Characterization and intercomparison of aerosol absorption photometers: Result of two intercomparison workshops

Absorption photometers for real time application have been available since the 1980s, but the use of filter-based instruments to derive information on aerosol properties (absorption coefficient and black carbon, BC) is still a matter of debate. Several workshops have been conducted to investigate the performance of individual instruments over the intervening years. Two workshops with large sets of aerosol absorption photometers were conducted in 2005 and 2007. The data from these instruments were corrected using existing methods before further analysis. The inter-comparison shows a large variation between the responses to absorbing aerosol particles for different types of instruments. The unit to unit variability between instruments can be up to 30% for Particle Soot Absorption Photometers (PSAPs) and Aethalometers. Multi Angle Absorption Photometers (MAAPs) showed a variability of less than 5%. Reasons for the high variability were identified to be variations in sample flow and spot size. It was observed that different flow rates influence system performance with respect to response to absorption and instrumental noise. Measurements with non absorbing particles showed that the current corrections of a cross sensitivity to particle scattering are not sufficient. Remaining cross sensitivities were found to be a function of the total particle load on the filter. The large variation between the response to absorbing aerosol particles for different types of instruments indicates that current correction functions for absorption photometers are not adequate

Characterization of particle sources and comparison of different particle metrics in an urban detached housing area, Finland

Particulate matter (PM) is emitted from various anthropogenic sources in urban areas affecting the local air quality. The aim of this study was to characterize the sources influencing air quality in detached house area in the Helsinki metropolitan area in Finland, and secondly, to explore the additional value of new particle physical properties to assess the impact of residential combustion on air quality. Measurements were conducted in an urban detached housing area between January and April 2019. Measured particle physical properties were particle number (PN), particle mass (PM1) and lung deposited surface area (LDSA) concentrations and number size distributions. In addition, particle chemical composition was measured using a soot particle aerosol mass spectrometer (SP-AMS; organic compounds, inorganic ions) and an aethalometer (black carbon (BC)). Concentrations of selected monosaccharide anhydrides and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons were analysed from the PM10 filter samples. The sources and characteristics of organic aerosol was investigated by applying positive matrix factorization to the mass spectra measured with the SP-AMS. Based on the variations in the measured particle physical parameters, chemical species and meteorology, the measurement period was divided into three sub periods dominated by urban background, wood burning and long-range transport (LRT) aerosols. Highest pollutant concentrations were measured during the wood burning and LRT periods. Wood burning increased the concentrations of all measured species, but the differences were most significant to levoglucosan, benzo(a)pyrene, BC and PM1 that had 12, 10, 6.4 and 3.6 times larger mean concentrations during the wood burning period compared to the urban background period, respectively. LRT affected significantly levoglucosan, PM1 and BC concentrations, since LRT pollutants partly originated from open biomass fires in Eastern Europe. The impact of local wood burning and LRT was quite small to particle number concentrations, whereas LDSA concentrations and size distributions were affected by traffic, wood combustion emissions and LRT. BC concentration correlated with the LDSA concentration during all periods suggesting a common origin. Particle number concentration was a good indicator of local combustion, especially traffic emissions, while the PM1 mass concentration together with secondary particle material was a good measure for the LRT pollutants. Benzo(a)pyrene was found to be a good indicator of local wood burning, but it was not detected in LRT biomass combustion particles.publishedVersionPeer reviewe

Residential wood combustion in two domestic devices: relationship of different parameters throughout the combustion cycle

Logs of three common Southern and mid-European woods (Quercus pyrenaica, Populus nigra and Fagus sylvatica) were burned in two different combustion appliances, a fireplace and a stove. The flue gas composition was monitored continuously in the exhaust ducts of both burning appliances for total hydrocarbons (THC) and carbon oxides (CO2 and CO). Particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter below 2.5 mm (PM2.5) was sampled in a dilution tunnel under isokinetic conditions and chemically characterised for water soluble-inorganic ions, organic and elemental carbon and levoglucosan, mannosan, and galactosan. The evolution of the emission factors of these components throughout the combustion cycle was studied. The fireplace was the combustion appliance with the highest CO, CO2, THC and PM2.5 emission factors. The carbonaceous matter represented 72e84% of the particulate mass emitted, regardless of species burned and combustion devices. OC/EC ratios were higher for the fireplace than for the stove, and showed a significant potential relation with Kþ/levoglucosan. The dominant water soluble inorganic ions in smoke particles were Kþ, PO3 4 , SO2 4 , and Naþ. Anhydrosugar emissions were strongly enhanced in the start-up phase, when lower temperatures are registered, and decreased progressively until the glowing combustion phase. However, Kþ emission seems to be higher in flaming-dominated combustion at higher temperature. Statistical analyses, including the KruskaleWallis test, principal component analysis and Pearson correlation between emission factors, were carried out. A significant correlation between NH4 þ and levoglucosan was found for both appliances

Particulate matter characteristics, dynamics, and sources in an underground mine

<p>Particulate matter (PM) from mining operations, engines, and ore processing may have adverse effects on health and well-being of workers and population living nearby. In this study, the characteristics of PM in an underground chrome mine were investigated in Kemi, Northern Finland. The concentrations and chemical composition of PM in size ranges from 2.5 nm to 10 µm were explored in order to identify sources, formation mechanisms, and post-emission processes of particles in the mine air. This was done by using several online instruments with high time-resolution and offline particulate sampling followed by elemental and ionic analyses. A majority of sub-micrometer particles (<1 µm in diameter, PM₁) originated from diesel engine emissions that were responsible for a rather stable composition of PM₁ in the mine air. Another sub-micrometer particle type originated from the combustion products of explosives (<i>e.g.</i>, nitrate and ammonium). On average, PM₁ in the mine was composed of 62%, 30%, and 8% of organic matter, black carbon, and major inorganic species, respectively. Regarding the analyzed elements (<i>e.g.</i>, Al, Si, Fe, Ca), many of them peaked at >1 µm indicating mineral dust origin. The average particle number concentration in the mine was (2.3 ± 1.4)*10⁴ #/cm³. The maximum of particle number size distribution was between 30 and 200 nm for most of the time but there was frequently a distinct mode <30 nm. The potential origin of nano-size particles remained as challenge for future studies.</p> <p>Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published with license by Taylor & Francis</p

Characterization and intercomparison of aerosol absorption photometers: result of two intercomparison workshops

Absorption photometers for real time application have been available since the 1980s, but the use of filterbased instruments to derive information on aerosol properties (absorption coefficient and black carbon, BC) is still a matter of debate. Several workshops have been conducted to investigate the performance of individual instruments over the intervening years. Two workshops with large sets of aerosol absorption photometers were conducted in 2005 and 2007. The data from these instruments were corrected using existing methods before further analysis. The intercomparison shows a large variation between the responses to absorbing aerosol particles for different types of instruments. The unit to unit variability between instruments can be up to 30% for Particle Soot Absorption Photometers (PSAPs) and Aethalometers. Multi Angle Absorption Photometers (MAAPs) showed a variability of less than 5%. Reasons for the high variability were identified to be variations in sample flow and spot size. It was observed that different flow rates influence system performance with respect to response to absorption and instrumental noise. Measurements with non absorbing particles showed that the current corrections of a cross sensitivity to particle scattering are not sufficient. Remaining cross sensitivities were found to be a function of the total particle load on the filter. The large variation between the response to absorbing aerosol particles for different types of instruments indicates that current correction functions for absorption photometers are not adequate.

Characterization and intercomparison of aerosol absorption photometers: Result of two intercomparison workshops

Absorption photometers for real time application have been available since the 1980s, but the use of filter-based instruments to derive information on aerosol properties (absorption coefficient and black carbon, BC) is still a matter of debate. Several workshops have been conducted to investigate the performance of individual instruments over the intervening years. Two workshops with large sets of aerosol absorption photometers were conducted in 2005 and 2007. The data from these instruments were corrected using existing methods before further analysis. The inter-comparison shows a large variation between the responses to absorbing aerosol particles for different types of instruments. The unit to unit variability between instruments can be up to 30% for Particle Soot Absorption Photometers (PSAPs) and Aethalometers. Multi Angle Absorption Photometers (MAAPs) showed a variability of less than 5%. Reasons for the high variability were identified to be variations in sample flow and spot size. It was observed that different flow rates influence system performance with respect to response to absorption and instrumental noise. Measurements with non absorbing particles showed that the current corrections of a cross sensitivity to particle scattering are not sufficient. Remaining cross sensitivities were found to be a function of the total particle load on the filter. The large variation between the response to absorbing aerosol particles for different types of instruments indicates that current correction functions for absorption photometers are not adequate. © Author(s) 2011

Laboratory and field evaluation of the Aerosol Dynamics Inc. concentrator (ADIc) for aerosol mass spectrometry

An air-to-air ultrafine particle concentrator (Aerosol Dynamics Inc. concentrator; ADIc) has been designed to enhance online chemical characterization of ambient aerosols using aerosol mass spectrometry. The ADIc employs a three-stage, moderated water-based condensation growth tube coupled to an aerodynamic focusing nozzle to concentrate fine particles into a portion of the flow. The system can be configured to sample between 1.0 and 1.7 L min−1, with an output concentrated flow between 0.08 and 0.12 L min−1, resulting in a theoretical concentration factor (sample flow / output flow) ranging from 8 to 21. Laboratory tests with monodisperse particles show that the ADIc is effective for particles as small as 10 nm. Laboratory experiments conducted with the Aerosol Mass Spectrometer (AMS) showed no shift in the particle size with the ADIc, as measured by the AMS particle time-of-flight operation. The ADIc-AMS system was operated unattended over a 1-month period near Boston, Massachusetts. Comparison to a parallel AMS without the concentrator showed concentration factors of 9.7±0.15 and 9.1±0.1 for sulfate and nitrate, respectively, when operated with a theoretical concentration factor of 10.5±0.3. The concentration factor of organics was lower, possibly due to the presence of large particles from nearby road-paving operations and a difference in aerodynamic lens cutoff between the two AMS instruments. Another field deployment was carried out in Helsinki, Finland. Two ∼10 d measurement periods showed good correlation for the concentrations of organics, sulfate, nitrate and ammonium measured with an Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor (ACSM) with the ADIc and a parallel AMS without the concentrator. Additional experiments with an AMS alternating between the ADIc and a bypass line demonstrated that the concentrator did not significantly change the size distribution or the chemistry of the ambient aerosol particles