17 research outputs found
Interdisciplinary assessment of the potential for improving Integrated Pest Management practice in Scottish spring barley
Integrated Pest Management (IPM) has long been promoted as a means of reducing
reliance on pesticide inputs as compared to conventional farming systems. Reduced
pesticide application could be beneficial due to the links between intensive pesticide use and
negative impacts upon biodiversity and human health as well as the development of
pesticide resistance. Work assessing the potential of IPM in cereal production is currently
limited, however, and previous findings have generally covered the subject from the
perspective of either field trial data or social science studies of farmer behaviour. This thesis
attempts to help to address this knowledge gap by providing a more holistic assessment of
IPM in Scottish spring barley production (selected because of its dominance in Scotland’s
arable production systems), in relation to three of its most damaging fungal pathogens:
Rhynchosporium commune, Blumeria graminis f.sp. hordei, and Ramularia collo-cygni. Several
IPM techniques of potential relevance to the sector were identified, and the prospects of
three in particular – crop rotation, varietal disease resistance, and forecasting disease
pressure – were assessed in several ways.
Preliminary analysis of experimental field trial data collected from 2011 – 2014 across
Scotland found that the majority of spring barley trials in this period (65%) did not show a
statistically significant impact of fungicide treatment on yield, with the average yield
increase due to fungicide application being 0.62 t/ha. This initial analysis was expanded
upon using stepwise regressions of long-term (1996 – 2014) field trial data from the same
dataset. Here, the difference between treated and untreated yields could be explained by
disease resistance, average seasonal rainfall (whereby wetter seasons saw an increased
impact of fungicide use on yield), and high combined disease severity.
Stakeholder surveying provided information about current practice and attitudes
towards the selected IPM techniques amongst a group of 43 Scottish spring barley farmers
and 36 agronomists. Stakeholders were broadly open to taking up IPM measures on farm;
sowing of disease resistant varieties was most frequently selected as the best technique in
terms of both practicality and cost, though individual preference varied. However, a
disparity was seen between farmer perception of their uptake of IPM and actual, self-reported
uptake for both varietal disease resistance and rotation. Farmers and agronomists
also overestimated the impact of fungicide use as compared with the field trials results – the
majority of stakeholders believed fungicide treatment to increase yields by 1 - 2 t/ha, while
the majority of 2011 – 2014 field trials had a yield difference of under 1 t/ha. The reasons
behind these differences between perception and practice are not currently known.
Finally, an annual survey of commercial crops, gathered from 552 farms across
Scotland (from 2009 – 2015), highlighted two gaps where IPM practice could be improved
upon. Firstly, relatively few of the varieties listed in the commercial crops database were
highly resistant to the three diseases – 26.1% were highly resistant to Ramularia, 14.2% to
Rhynchosporium, and 58.1% to mildew. Secondly, 71% of the farms included in the
database had planted barley in at least two consecutive seasons, indicating that crop rotation
practices could be improved.
The overarching finding of this project is that there is scope for IPM uptake to be
improved upon and fungicide use to be reduced while maintaining high levels of yield in
Scottish spring barley production. Incorporating experimental field data, stakeholder
surveying, and commercial practice data offered a unique view into the potential for IPM in
this sector, and provided insights which could not have been gained through the lens of a
single discipline
The importance of fisheries and aquaculture production for nutrition and food security
Aquatic food has a significant role to play in global nutrition and food security but is often ignored in that debate. Understanding its potential role is made difficult by the fact that aquatic food covers a large number of species which come from both capture fisheries and aquaculture and the marine and freshwater environments, including finfish, crustacea, molluscs, echinoderms, aquatic plants and other aquatic animals. Further complications arise from the fact that both supply and consumption vary significantly between countries. There are several criteria which need to be considered when discussing nutrition and food security. These include: how much food is produced, whether that production is sustainable, whether the production supports livelihoods, what the nutritional content of the food is and whether that food is safe. The authors conclude that there are many benefits to aquatic food under each of these criteria but there are also some hurdles which need to be overcome. Increased production to feed a growing global population relies on the growth of aquaculture. Limitations to such growth include the supply of raw ingredients for aquafeeds, losses due to disease outbreaks, being able to ensure high standards of food safety and overcoming environmental limitations to expansion. There are also problems with welfare conditions for people working in the supply chain which need to be addressed. Given the challenges to nutrition and food security which the world is currently facing, it is essential that aquatic food is brought into the debate and the significant benefits that aquatic foods provide are acknowledged and exploited
The impact of fungicide treatment and Integrated Pest Management on barley yields:Analysis of a long term field trials database
This paper assesses potential for Integrated Pest Management (IPM) techniques to reduce the need for fungicide use without negatively impacting yields. The impacts of three disease management practices of relevance to broad acre crops –disease resistance, forecasting disease pressure, and fungicide use – were analysed to determine impact on yield using a long-term field trials database of Scottish spring barley, with information from experiments across the country regarding yield, disease levels, and fungicide treatment. Due to changes in data collection practices, data from 1996 to 2010 were only available at trial level, while data from 2011 to 2014 were available at plot level. For this reason, data from 1996 to 2014 were analysed using regression models, while a subset of farmer relevant varieties was taken from the 2011–2014 data, and analysed using ANOVA, to provide additional information of particular relevance to current farm practice. While fungicide use reduced disease severity in 51.4%of a farmer-relevant subset of trials run 2011–2014, and yields were decreased by 0.62 t/ha on average, this was not statistically significant in 65% of trials. Fungicide use had only a minor impact on profit in these trials, with an average increase of 4.4% for malting and 4.7% for feed varieties, based on fungicide cost and yield difference; potential savings such as reduced machinery costs were not considered, as these may vary widely. Likewise, the1996–2014 database showed an average yield increase of 0.74 t/ha due to fungicide use, across a wide range of years, sites, varieties, and climatic conditions. A regression model was developed to assess key IPM and site factors which influenced the difference between treated and untreated yields across this 18-year period. Disease resistance, season rainfall, and combined disease severity of the three fungal diseases were found to be significant factors in the model. Sowing only highly resistant varieties and, as technology improves, forecasting disease pressure based on anticipated weather would help to reduce and optimise fungicide use
Perception vs practice:Farmer attitudes towards and uptake of IPM in Scottish spring barley
Integrated Pest Management (IPM) offers a suite of ways by which to reduce the need for pesticide use, thus minimising environmental damage and pathogen resistance build-up in crop production. Farmers and agronomists active in the Scottish spring barley sector were surveyed to determine the extent to which they currently use or are open to implementing three IPM measures – varietal disease resistance, crop rotation, and forecasting disease pressure – in order to control three important fungal diseases. Overall, the survey results demonstrate that farmers and agronomists are open to using the three IPM techniques. However, gaps between actual and perceived recent practice were large: despite over 60% of farmers stating that they sowed varieties highly resistant to Rhynchosporium or Ramularia, less than one third of reportedly sown varieties were highly resistant to these diseases. Similarly, over 80% of farmers indicated that they used crop rotations, yet 66% of farmers also reported sowing consecutive barley often/always. Further research is needed in order to understand why these gaps exist, and how they can be reduced in future in order to increase IPM uptake and optimise pesticide use
Recommended from our members
Impacts of Reducing UK Beef Consumption Using a Revised Sustainable Diets Framework
The impact of beef consumption on sustainability is a complex and evolving area, as sustainability covers many areas from human nutrient adequacy to ecosystem stability. Three sustainability assessment frameworks have been created to help policy makers unpack the complexities of sustainable food systems and healthy sustainable dietary change. However, none of these frameworks have yet to be applied to a case study or individual policy issue. This paper uses a hybrid version of the sustainability assessment frameworks to investigate the impact of reducing beef consumption (with a concurrent increase in consumption of plant-based foods, with a focus on legumes) on sustainability at a UK level. The aim of this paper is to understand the applicability of these overarching frameworks at the scale of an individual policy. Such an assessment is important, as this application of previously high-level frameworks to individual policies makes it possible to summarise, at a glance, the various co-benefits and trade-offs associated with a given policy, which may be of particular value in terms of stakeholder decision-making. We find that many of the proposed metrics found within the sustainability assessment frameworks are difficult to implement at an individual issue level; however, overall they show that a reduction in beef consumption and an increase in consumption of general plant-based foods, with a focus around legumes production, would be expected to be strongly beneficial in five of the eight overarching measures which were assessed
An interdisciplinary method for assessing IPM potential:Case study in Scottish spring barley
A method is proposed which considers Integrated Pest Management (IPM) through several lenses, in order to obtain a more holistic view of the potential for IPM, and is described using a case study of Scottish spring barley. Long-term experimental field trial databases are used to determine which management methods are best suited to the system at hand. Stakeholder engagement provides insight into which of these methods are most likely to be taken up by farmers. Finally, a database of commercial practice allows an estimate of the potential for improving management patterns, based on current levels of IPM uptake across a wider sample of Scottish farmers. Together, these diverse sources of information give a more complete view of a complex system than any individual source could and allow the identification of IPM methods which are robust, practical, and not already in widespread use in this system. Bringing together these sources of information may be of particular value for policy and other decision makers, who need information about strategies which are both practical and likely to have a large positive impact. In the case of Scottish spring barley, there is good potential to reduce the need for fungicide use through the increased use of highly resistant barley varieties
Seafood in Food Security: A Call for Bridging the Terrestrial-Aquatic Divide
The contribution of seafood to global food security is being increasingly highlighted in policy. However, the extent to which such claims are supported in the current food security literature is unclear. This review assesses the extent to which seafood is represented in the recent food security literature, both individually and from a food systems perspective, in combination with terrestrially-based production systems. The results demonstrate that seafood remains under-researched compared to the role of terrestrial animal and plant production in food security. Furthermore, seafood and terrestrial production remain siloed, with very few papers addressing the combined contribution or relations between terrestrial and aquatic systems. We conclude that far more attention is needed to the specific and relative role of seafood in global food security and call for the integration of seafood in a wider interdisciplinary approach to global food system research.Additional co-authors: Neil L. Andrew, Gulshan Ara, Gill Banner-Stevens, Ben Belton, Malcolm Beveridge, Jessica R. Bogard, Simon R. Bush, Peter Edwards, Joao G. Ferreira, Angus Garrett, Iain Gatward, Faruk U. Islam, Marian Kjellevold, Froukje Kruijssen, Abullah-Al Mamun, Birgitte Krogh-Poulsen, Belinda Richardson, Nanna Roos, Elin Röös, Tori Spence-McConnell, Sharon K. Suri, Shauntala H. Thilsted, Kim D. Thompson, Michael F. Tlusty, Max F. Troell, Raffaele Vignola, Wenbo Zhan
Seafood in Food Security: a call for bridging the terrestrial-aquatic divide
The contribution of seafood to global food security is being increasingly highlighted in policy. However, the extent to which such claims are supported in the current food security literature is unclear. This review assesses the extent to which seafood is represented in the recent food security literature, both individually and from a food systems perspective, in combination with terrestrially-based production systems. The results demonstrate that seafood remains under-researched compared to the role of terrestrial animal and plant production in food security. Furthermore, seafood and terrestrial production remain siloed, with very few papers addressing the combined contribution or relations between terrestrial and aquatic systems. We conclude that far more attention is needed to the specific and relative role of seafood in global food security and call for the integration of seafood in a wider interdisciplinary approach to global food system research
Seafood in Food Security: A Call for Bridging the Terrestrial-Aquatic Divide
The contribution of seafood to global food security is being increasingly highlighted in policy. However, the extent to which such claims are supported in the current food security literature is unclear. This review assesses the extent to which seafood is represented in the recent food security literature, both individually and from a food systems perspective, in combination with terrestrially-based production systems. The results demonstrate that seafood remains under-researched compared to the role of terrestrial animal and plant production in food security. Furthermore, seafood and terrestrial production remain siloed, with very few papers addressing the combined contribution or relations between terrestrial and aquatic systems. We conclude that far more attention is needed to the specific and relative role of seafood in global food security and call for the integration of seafood in a wider interdisciplinary approach to global food system research
What are the barriers preventing people eating sustainably in the UK?
Systematic Literature Revie