PresenceClick, mejorando los procesos de enseñanza-aprendizaje mediante el modelado de interacciones presenciales

298 p.Este trabajo de tesis propone la modelización de interacciones presenciales entre profesores y alumnos para generar conocimiento nuevo que ayude a enriquecer el proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje mediante mecanismos de concienciación y reflexión. El resultado principal es la herramienta PresenceClick, un sistema distribuido en una plataforma web y una aplicación móvil, que permite un registro ágil de las interacciones presenciales y proporciona información a docentes y estudiantes sobre ellas mediante visualizaciones. Además de la asistencia de los alumnos de manera automática, PresenceClick facilita el registro de las emociones de los alumnos a través de una serie de eventos emocionales durante el curso, de preguntas-respuestas en el aula, del estado de realización de los ejercicios y de las dudas de los alumnos a resolver en tutorías. Por un lado, el alumno puede visualizar su progreso en clase en comparación al grupo con el fin de provocar un proceso de reflexión que incida en una mejora continua. Por otro lado, el profesor obtiene información sobre el progreso de sus alumnos de manera individual y grupal con el fin de promover intervenciones tempranas para adaptar la instrucción y mejorar la tasa de éxito. Además, con este fin, también se han creado modelos de predicción que predicen el éxito/fracaso de los estudiantes a partir de los datos recogidos. Se ha realizado un proceso de evaluación e implantación de la herramienta en entornos reales de aprendizaje con resultados satisfactorios

PresenceClick, mejorando los procesos de enseñanza-aprendizaje mediante el modelado de interacciones presenciales

298 p.Este trabajo de tesis propone la modelización de interacciones presenciales entre profesores y alumnos para generar conocimiento nuevo que ayude a enriquecer el proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje mediante mecanismos de concienciación y reflexión. El resultado principal es la herramienta PresenceClick, un sistema distribuido en una plataforma web y una aplicación móvil, que permite un registro ágil de las interacciones presenciales y proporciona información a docentes y estudiantes sobre ellas mediante visualizaciones. Además de la asistencia de los alumnos de manera automática, PresenceClick facilita el registro de las emociones de los alumnos a través de una serie de eventos emocionales durante el curso, de preguntas-respuestas en el aula, del estado de realización de los ejercicios y de las dudas de los alumnos a resolver en tutorías. Por un lado, el alumno puede visualizar su progreso en clase en comparación al grupo con el fin de provocar un proceso de reflexión que incida en una mejora continua. Por otro lado, el profesor obtiene información sobre el progreso de sus alumnos de manera individual y grupal con el fin de promover intervenciones tempranas para adaptar la instrucción y mejorar la tasa de éxito. Además, con este fin, también se han creado modelos de predicción que predicen el éxito/fracaso de los estudiantes a partir de los datos recogidos. Se ha realizado un proceso de evaluación e implantación de la herramienta en entornos reales de aprendizaje con resultados satisfactorios

¿Qué queda de mí?

Este libro es una reclamación a quienes hemos sido, somos o seremos docentes. A quienes no hemos respetado a las personas que se han puesto junto a nosotros y nosotras, confiando su bien más preciado: la libertad. Estas páginas denuncian cada vez que convertimos una visión en la visión, una emoción en la emoción, un saber en el saber, un comportamiento en el comportamiento. Es un grito contra la imposición, la normalización, la neutralización y la universalización de una perspectiva particular. Una pugna contra cada proceso que no se ha conectado con las vidas de los aprendices. Un texto colaborativo realizado por alumnado de Educación y Cambio Social en el Grado en Educación Infantil de la Universidad de Málaga y coordinado por Ignacio Calderón Almendros

Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries

Abstract Background Healthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres. Methods This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was co-prioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low–middle-income countries. Results In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified, which had low uptake in practice according to 3042 professionals globally. In phase 2, a shortlist of 15 intervention domains was generated. In phase 3, interventions were deemed acceptable for more than 90 per cent of patients except for reducing general anaesthesia (84 per cent) and re-sterilization of ‘single-use’ consumables (86 per cent). In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for high-income countries were: introducing recycling; reducing use of anaesthetic gases; and appropriate clinical waste processing. In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for low–middle-income countries were: introducing reusable surgical devices; reducing use of consumables; and reducing the use of general anaesthesia. Conclusion This is a step toward environmentally sustainable operating environments with actionable interventions applicable to both high– and low–middle–income countries

Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries

Background Healthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres. Methods This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was co-prioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low–middle-income countries. Results In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified, which had low uptake in practice according to 3042 professionals globally. In phase 2, a shortlist of 15 intervention domains was generated. In phase 3, interventions were deemed acceptable for more than 90 per cent of patients except for reducing general anaesthesia (84 per cent) and re-sterilization of ‘single-use’ consumables (86 per cent). In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for high-income countries were: introducing recycling; reducing use of anaesthetic gases; and appropriate clinical waste processing. In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for low–middle-income countries were: introducing reusable surgical devices; reducing use of consumables; and reducing the use of general anaesthesia. Conclusion This is a step toward environmentally sustainable operating environments with actionable interventions applicable to both high– and low–middle–income countries

GaLan (Entornos de Aprendizaje Adaptativos, Lenguajes y Sistemas Informáticos), UPV/EHU

This issue introduces the GaLan research group - Adaptive Learning Environments (Languages and Computer Systems department), of the University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU. Its main research lines are centered on architectures, interactions and interfaces for learning systems, cognitive diagnosis, authoring tools and, orthogonally, on agile methodologies for interactive applications development.Este documento presenta el grupo de investigación GaLan � Entornos de Aprendizaje Adaptativos (Dpto. de Lenguajes y Sistemas Informáticos), de la Universidad del País Vasco (UPV/EHU). Sus líneas principales de investigación se centran en las arquitecturas, interacciones e interfaces de los sistemas de aprendizaje, el diagnóstico cognitivo, las herramientas de autor y, de modo transversal, en las metodologías ágiles para desarrollo de aplicaciones interactivas

Evaluation of a quality improvement intervention to reduce anastomotic leak following right colectomy (EAGLE): pragmatic, batched stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized trial in 64 countries

Background Anastomotic leak affects 8 per cent of patients after right colectomy with a 10-fold increased risk of postoperative death. The EAGLE study aimed to develop and test whether an international, standardized quality improvement intervention could reduce anastomotic leaks. Methods The internationally intended protocol, iteratively co-developed by a multistage Delphi process, comprised an online educational module introducing risk stratification, an intraoperative checklist, and harmonized surgical techniques. Clusters (hospital teams) were randomized to one of three arms with varied sequences of intervention/data collection by a derived stepped-wedge batch design (at least 18 hospital teams per batch). Patients were blinded to the study allocation. Low- and middle-income country enrolment was encouraged. The primary outcome (assessed by intention to treat) was anastomotic leak rate, and subgroup analyses by module completion (at least 80 per cent of surgeons, high engagement; less than 50 per cent, low engagement) were preplanned. Results A total 355 hospital teams registered, with 332 from 64 countries (39.2 per cent low and middle income) included in the final analysis. The online modules were completed by half of the surgeons (2143 of 4411). The primary analysis included 3039 of the 3268 patients recruited (206 patients had no anastomosis and 23 were lost to follow-up), with anastomotic leaks arising before and after the intervention in 10.1 and 9.6 per cent respectively (adjusted OR 0.87, 95 per cent c.i. 0.59 to 1.30; P = 0.498). The proportion of surgeons completing the educational modules was an influence: the leak rate decreased from 12.2 per cent (61 of 500) before intervention to 5.1 per cent (24 of 473) after intervention in high-engagement centres (adjusted OR 0.36, 0.20 to 0.64; P < 0.001), but this was not observed in low-engagement hospitals (8.3 per cent (59 of 714) and 13.8 per cent (61 of 443) respectively; adjusted OR 2.09, 1.31 to 3.31). Conclusion Completion of globally available digital training by engaged teams can alter anastomotic leak rates. Registration number: NCT04270721 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov)

Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries

Background: Healthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres. Methods: This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was coprioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low-middle-income countries. Results: In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified, which had low uptake in practice according to 3042 professionals globally. In phase 2, a shortlist of 15 intervention domains was generated. In phase 3, interventions were deemed acceptable for more than 90 per cent of patients except for reducing general anaesthesia (84 per cent) and re-sterilization of 'single-use' consumables (86 per cent). In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for high-income countries were: introducing recycling; reducing use of anaesthetic gases; and appropriate clinical waste processing. In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for low-middle-income countries were: introducing reusable surgical devices; reducing use of consumables; and reducing the use of general anaesthesia. Conclusion: This is a step toward environmentally sustainable operating environments with actionable interventions applicable to both high- and low-middle-income countries