82 research outputs found

    Measurement of the Ratios of Branching Fractions B(Bs -> Ds pi pi pi) / B(Bd -> Dd pi pi pi) and B(Bs -> Ds pi) / B(Bd -> Dd pi)

    Get PDF
    Using 355 pb^-1 of data collected by the CDF II detector in \ppbar collisions at sqrt{s} = 1.96 TeV at the Fermilab Tevatron, we study the fully reconstructed hadronic decays B -> D pi and B -> D pi pi pi. We present the first measurement of the ratio of branching fractions B(Bs -> Ds pi pi pi) / B(Bd -> Dd pi pi pi) = 1.05 pm 0.10 (stat) pm 0.22 (syst). We also update our measurement of B(Bs -> Ds pi) / B(Bd -> Dd pi) to 1.13 pm 0.08 (stat) pm 0.23 (syst) improving the statistical uncertainty by more than a factor of two. We find B(Bs -> Ds pi) = [3.8 pm 0.3 (stat) pm 1.3 (syst)] \times 10^{-3} and B(Bs -> Ds pi pi pi) = [8.4 pm 0.8 (stat) pm 3.2 (syst)] \times 10^{-3}.Comment: 7 pages, 2 figure

    Cross Section Measurements of High-pTp_T Dilepton Final-State Processes Using a Global Fitting Method

    Get PDF
    We present a new method for studying high-pTp_T dilepton events (e±ee^{\pm}e^{\mp}, μ±μ\mu^{\pm}\mu^{\mp}, e±μe^{\pm}\mu^{\mp}) and simultaneously extracting the production cross sections of ppˉttˉp\bar{p} \to t\bar{t}, ppˉW+Wp\bar{p} \to W^+W^-, and p\bar{p} \to \ztt at a center-of-mass energy of s=1.96\sqrt{s} = 1.96 TeV. We perform a likelihood fit to the dilepton data in a parameter space defined by the missing transverse energy and the number of jets in the event. Our results, which use 360pb1360 {\rm pb^{-1}} of data recorded with the CDF II detector at the Fermilab Tevatron Collider, are σ(ttˉ)=8.52.2+2.7\sigma(t\bar{t}) = 8.5_{-2.2}^{+2.7} pb, σ(W+W)=16.34.4+5.2\sigma(W^+W^-) = 16.3^{+5.2}_{-4.4} pb, and \sigma(\ztt) =291^{+50}_{-46} pb.Comment: 20 pages, 2 figures, to be submitted to PRD-R

    Search for New Physics in Lepton + Photon + X Events with L=305 pb-1 of ppbar Collisions at roots=1.96 TeV

    Get PDF
    We present results of a search for anomalous production of events containing a charged lepton (either electron or muon) and a photon, both with high transverse momentum, accompanied by additional signatures, X, including missing transverse energy (MET) and additional leptons and photons. We use the same kinematic selection criteria as in a previous CDF search, but with a substantially larger data set, 305 pb-1, a ppbar collision energy of 1.96 TeV, and the upgraded CDF II detector. We find 42 Lepton+Photon+MET events versus a standard model expectation of 37.3 +- 5.4 events. The level of excess observed in Run I, 16 events with an expectation of 7.6 +- 0.7 events (corresponding to a 2.7 sigma effect), is not supported by the new data. In the signature of Multi-Lepton+Photon+X we observe 31 events versus an expectation of 23.0 +- 2.7 events. In this sample we find no events with an extra photon or MET and so find no events like the one ee+gg+MET event observed in Run I.Comment: 7 pages, 3 figures, 1 table. Accepted to PR

    Measurement of the Lambda_b Lifetime in Lambda_b --> J/psi Lambda0 in p-pbar Collisions at sqrt(s)=1.96 TeV

    Get PDF
    We report a measurement of the Lambda_b lifetime in the exclusive decay Lambda_b --> J/psi Lambda0 in p-pbar collisions at sqrt(s) = 1.96 TeV using an integrated luminosity of 1.0 fb^{-1} of data collected by the CDF II detector at the Fermilab Tevatron. Using fully reconstructed decays, we measure tau(Lambda_b) = 1.593 ^{+0.083}_{-0.078} (stat.) +- 0.033 (syst.) ps. This is the single most precise measurement of tau(Lambda_b) and is 3.2 sigma higher than the current world average.Comment: 7 Pages, 2 Figures, 1 Table. Submitted to Phys. Rev. Let

    Limits on Anomalous Triple Gauge Couplings in ppbar Collisions at sqrt{s}=1.96 TeV

    Get PDF
    We present a search for anomalous triple gauge couplings (ATGC) in WW and WZ boson production. The boson pairs are produced in ppbar collisions at sqrt{s}=1.96 TeV, and the data sample corresponds to 350 pb-1 of integrated luminosity collected with the CDF II detector at the Fermilab Tevatron. In this search one W decays to leptons, and the other boson (W or Z) decays hadronically. Combining with a previously published CDF measurement of Wgamma boson production yields ATGC limits of -0.18 < lambda < 0.17 and -0.46 < Delta kappa < 0.39 at the 95% confidence level, using a cut-off scale Lambda=1.5 TeV.Comment: 7 pages, 3 figures. Submitted to Phys. Rev.

    Measurement of the Top Quark Mass with the Dynamical Likelihood Method using Lepton plus Jets Events with b-tags in ppbar Collisions at s**(1/2) = 1.96 TeV

    Get PDF
    This report describes a measurement of the top quark mass, M_{top}, with the dynamical likelihood method (DLM) using the CDF II detector at the Fermilab Tevatron. The Tevatron produces top/anti-top pairs in protons and anti-protons collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 1.96 TeV. The data sample used in this analysis was accumulated from March 2002 through August 2004, which corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 318 pb^{-1}. We use the top/anti-top candidates in the ``lepton+jets'' decay channel, requiring at least one jet identified as a b quark by finding a displaced secondary vertex. The DLM defines a likelihood for each event based on the differential cross section as a function of M_{top} per unit phase space volume of the final partons, multiplied by the transfer functions from jet to parton energies. The method takes into account all possible jet combinations in an event, and the likelihood is multiplied event by event to derive the top quark mass by the maximum likelihood method. Using 63 top quark candidates observed in the data, with 9.2 events expected from background, we measure the top quark mass to be 173.2 +2.6/-2.4 (stat.) +/- 3.2 (syst.) GeV/c^2, or 173.2 +4.1/-4.0 GeV/c^2.Comment: 66 pages, 26 figures, 4 table

    Multipurpose silicon photonics signal processor core

    Full text link
    [EN] Integrated photonics changes the scaling laws of information and communication systems offering architectural choices that combine photonics with electronics to optimize performance, power, footprint, and cost. Application-specific photonic integrated circuits, where particular circuits/chips are designed to optimally perform particular functionalities, require a considerable number of design and fabrication iterations leading to long development times. A different approach inspired by electronic Field Programmable Gate Arrays is the programmable photonic processor, where a common hardware implemented by a two-dimensional photonic waveguide mesh realizes different functionalities through programming. Here, we report the demonstration of such reconfigurable waveguide mesh in silicon. We demonstrate over 20 different functionalities with a simple seven hexagonal cell structure, which can be applied to different fields including communications, chemical and biomedical sensing, signal processing, multiprocessor networks, and quantum information systems. Our work is an important step toward this paradigm.J.C. acknowledges funding from the ERC Advanced Grant ERC-ADG-2016-741415 UMWP-Chip, I.G. acknowledges the funding through the Spanish MINECO Ramon y Cajal program. D.P. acknowledges financial support from the UPV through the FPI predoctoral funding scheme. D.J.T. acknowledges funding from the Royal Society for his University Research Fellowship.Pérez-López, D.; Gasulla Mestre, I.; Crudgington, L.; Thomson, DJ.; Khokhar, AZ.; Li, K.; Cao, W.... (2017). Multipurpose silicon photonics signal processor core. Nature Communications. 8(1925):1-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00714-1S1981925Doerr, C. R. & Okamoto, K. Advances in silica planar lightwave circuits. J. Lightw. Technol. 24, 4763–4789 (2006).Coldren, L. A. et al. High performance InP-based photonic ICs—A tutorial. J. Lightw. Technol 29, 554–570 (2011).Soref, R. The past, present, and future of silicon photonics. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 12, 1678–1687 (2006).Bogaerts, W. Design challenges in silicon photonics. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 20, 8202008 (2014).Bogaerts, W. et al. Nanophotonic waveguides in silicon-on-insulator fabricated with CMOS technology. J. Lightw. Technol. 23, 401–412 (2005).Smit, M. K. et al. An introduction to InP-based generic integration technology. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 29, 083001 (2014).Leinse, A. et al. TriPleX waveguide platform: low-loss technology over a wide wavelength range. Proc. SPIE 8767, 87670E (2013).Kish, F. et al. From visible light-emitting diodes to large-scale III–V photonic integrated circuits. Proc. IEEE 101, 2255–2270 (2013).Heck, M. J. R. et al. Hybrid silicon photonic integrated circuit technology. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 19, 6100117 (2013).Sacher, W. et al. Multilayer silicon nitride-on-silicon integrated photonic platforms and devices. J. Lightw. Technol. 33, 901–910 (2015).Asghari, M. Silicon photonics: A low cost integration platform for datacom and telecom applications. In OFC/NFOEC 2008 – 2008 Conference on Optical Fiber Communication/National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference 1–10 (San Diego, USA, 2008).Melati, D. et al. Integrated all-optical MIMO demultiplexer for mode- and wavelength-division-multiplexed transmission. Opt. Lett. 42, 342–345 (2017).Waterhouse, R. & Novak, D. Realizing 5G: microwave photonics for 5G mobile wireless systems. IEEE Microw. Mag. 16, 84–92 (2015).Marpaung, D. et al. Integrated microwave photonics. Laser Photon. Rev. 7, 506–538 (2013).Iezekiel, S., Burla, M., Klamkin, J., Marpaung, D. & Capmany, J. RF engineering meets optoelectronics: Progress in integrated microwave photonics. IEEE Microw. Mag. 16, 28–45 (2015).Technology focus on microwave photonics. Nat. Photon. 5, 723 (2011).Ghelfi, P. et al. A fully photonics-based coherent radar system. Nature 507, 341–345 (2014).Heideman, R. G. TriPleX™-based integrated optical ring resonators for lab-ona-chip-and environmental detection. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 18, 1583–1596 (2012).Estevez, M. C., Alvarez, M. & Lechuga, L. Integrated optical devices for lab-on-a-chip biosensing applications. Laser Photon. Rev. 6, 463–487 (2012).Almeida, V. R., Barrios, C. A., Panepucci, R. & Lipson, M. All-optical control of light on a silicon chip. Nature 431, 1081–1084 (2004).Norberg, E. J., Guzzon, R. S., Parker, J. S., Johansson, L. A. & Coldren, L. A. Programmable photonic microwave filters monolithically integrated in InP/InGaAsP. J. Lightw. Technol. 29, 1611–1619 (2011).Wang, J. et al. Reconfigurable radio-frequency arbitrary waveforms synthesized in a silicon photonic chip. Nat. Commun. 6, 5957 (2015).Hill, M. T. et al. A fast low power optical memory based on coupled micro-ring lasers. Nature 432, 206–209 (2004).Slavík, R. et al. Photonic temporal integrator for all-optical computing. Opt. Express 16, 18202–18214 (2008).Sun, C. et al. A monolithically-integrated chip-to-chip optical link in bulk CMOS. IEEE J. Solid-State Circ. 50, 828–844 (2015).Sun, C. et al. Single-chip microprocessor that communicates directly using light. Nature 528, 534–538 (2015).Assefa, S. et al. in Optical Fibre Communication Conference OMM6, https://www.osapublishing.org/abstract.cfm?uri=OFC-2011-OMM6 (Optical Society of America, 2011).Peruzzo, A. et al. Multimode quantum interference of photons in multiport integrated devices. Nat. Commun. 2, 224 (2011).Bonneau, D. et al. Quantum interference and manipulation of entanglement in silicon wire waveguide quantum circuits. N. J. Phys. 14, 045003 (2012).Metcalf, B. J. et al. Multiphoton quantum interference in a multiport integrated photonic device. Nat. Commun. 4, 1356 (2013).Muñoz, P. et al. in 16th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks (ICTON), 1–4 (Graz, 2014).Ribeiro, A. et al. Demonstration of a 4×4-port universal linear circuit. Optica 3, 1348–1357 (2016).Liu, W. et al. A fully reconfigurable photonic integrated signal processor. Nat. Photon 10, 190–195 (2016).Graydon, O. Birth of the programmable optical chip. Nat. Photon 10, 1 (2016).Pérez, D., Gasulla, I. & Capmany, J. Software-defined reconfigurable microwave photonics processor. Opt. Express 23, 14640–14654 (2015).Miller, D. A. B. Self-configuring universal linear optical component. Photon. Res. 1, 1–15 (2013).Miller, D. A. B. Self-aligning universal beam coupler. Opt. Express 21, 6360–6370 (2013).Clements, W. R. et al. Optimal design for universal multiport interferometers. Optica 3, 1460–1465 (2016).Zhuang, L., Roeloffzen, C. G. H., Hoekman, M., Boller, K.-J. & Lowery, A. J. Programmable photonic signal processor chip for radiofrequency applications. Optica 2, 854–859 (2015).Capmany, J., Gasulla, I. & Pérez, D. Microwave photonics: The programmable processor. Nat. Photon. 10, 6–8 (2016).Pérez, D., Gasulla., Capmany, J. & Soref, R. A. Reconfigurable lattice mesh designs for programmable photonic processors. Opt. Express 24, 12093–12106 (2016).Madsen, C. K. & Zhao, J. H. Optical Filter Design and Analysis: A Signal Processing Approach. 1st edn. (Wiley, 1999).Jinguji, K. Synthesis of coherent two-port lattice-form optical delay-line circuit. J. Lightw. Technol. 13, 73–82 (1995).Jinguji, K. Synthesis of coherent two-port Optical delay-line circuit with ring waveguides. J. Lightw. Technol. 14, 1882–1898 (1996).Madsen, C. K. General IIR optical filter design for WDM applications using all-pass filters. J. Lightw. Technol. 18, 860–868 (2000).Burla, M. et al. On-chip CMOS compatible reconfigurable optical delay line with separate carrier tuning for microwave photonic signal processing. Opt. Express 19, 21475–21484 (2011).Yariv, A. et al. Coupled resonator optical waveguides: a proposal and analysis. Opt. Lett. 24, 711–713 (1999).Hebner, J. E. et al. Distributed and localized feedback in microresonator sequences for linear and nonlinear optics. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B. 21, 1665–1673 (2004).Fandiño, J. S. et al. A monolithic integrated photonic microwave filter. Nat. Photon. 11, 124–129 (2017).Miller, D. A. B. All linear optical devices are mode converters. Opt. Express 20, 23985–23993 (2012).Reck, M. et al. Experimental realization of any discrete unitary operator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 58–61 (1994).Carolan, J. et al. Universal linear optics. Science 349, 711 (2015).Nielsen, M. A. & Chuang, I. L. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. 1st edn. (Cambridge University Press, 2001).Miller, D. A. B. Perfect optics with imperfect components. Optica 2, 747–750 (2015).Grillanda, S. et al. Non-invasive monitoring and control in silicon photonics using CMOS integrated electronics. Optica 1, 129–136 (2014)

    Structure and Behavior of Human α-Thrombin upon Ligand Recognition: Thermodynamic and Molecular Dynamics Studies

    Get PDF
    Thrombin is a serine proteinase that plays a fundamental role in coagulation. In this study, we address the effects of ligand site recognition by alpha-thrombin on conformation and energetics in solution. Active site occupation induces large changes in secondary structure content in thrombin as shown by circular dichroism. Thrombin-D-Phe-Pro-Arg-chloromethyl ketone (PPACK) exhibits enhanced equilibrium and kinetic stability compared to free thrombin, whose difference is rooted in the unfolding step. Small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) measurements in solution reveal an overall similarity in the molecular envelope of thrombin and thrombin-PPACK, which differs from the crystal structure of thrombin. Molecular dynamics simulations performed with thrombin lead to different conformations than the one observed in the crystal structure. These data shed light on the diversity of thrombin conformers not previously observed in crystal structures with distinguished catalytic and conformational behaviors, which might have direct implications on novel strategies to design direct thrombin inhibitors

    Measurement of the Inclusive Jet Cross Section using the k_T algorithm in pp-bar Collisions at sqrt(s) = 1.96 TeV with the CDF II Detector

    Get PDF
    We report on measurements of the inclusive jet production cross section as a function of the jet transverse momentum in pp-bar collisions at sqrt{s} = 1.96 TeV}, using the k_T algorithm and a data sample corresponding to 1.0 fb^-1 collected with the Collider Detector at Fermilab in Run II. The measurements are carried out in five different jet rapidity regions with |yjet| < 2.1 and transverse momentum in the range 54 < \ptjet < 700 GeV/c. Next-to-leading order perturbative QCD predictions are in good agreement with the measured cross sections.Comment: Submitted to Phys. Rev.

    Measurement of the B+ production cross section in pp(-) collisions at root s=1960 GeV

    Get PDF
    We present a new measurement of the B+ meson differential cross section d sigma/dp(T) at root s=1960 GeV. The data correspond to an integrated luminosity of 739 pb(-1) collected with the upgraded CDF detector (CDF II) at the Fermilab Tevatron collider. B+ candidates are reconstructed through the decay B+-\u3e J/psi K+, with J/psi -\u3emu(+)mu(-). The integrated cross section for producing B+ mesons with p(T)\u3e= 6 GeV/c and vertical bar y vertical bar \u3c= 1 is measured to be 2.78 +/- 0.24 mu b
    corecore