IRE1α–XBP1 controls T cell function in ovarian cancer by regulating mitochondrial activity

Tumours evade immune control by creating hostile microenvironments that perturb T cell metabolism and effector function 1?4 . However, it remains unclear how intra-tumoral T cells integrate and interpret metabolic stress signals. Here we report that ovarian cancer?an aggressive malignancy that is refractory to standard treatments and current immunotherapies 5?8 ?induces endoplasmic reticulum stress and activates the IRE1α?XBP1 arm of the unfolded protein response 9,10 in T cells to control their mitochondrial respiration and anti-tumour function. In T cells isolated from specimens collected from patients with ovarian cancer, upregulation of XBP1 was associated with decreased infiltration of T cells into tumours and with reduced IFNG mRNA expression. Malignant ascites fluid obtained from patients with ovarian cancer inhibited glucose uptake and caused N-linked protein glycosylation defects in T cells, which triggered IRE1α?XBP1 activation that suppressed mitochondrial activity and IFNγ production. Mechanistically, induction of XBP1 regulated the abundance of glutamine carriers and thus limited the influx of glutamine that is necessary to sustain mitochondrial respiration in T cells under glucose-deprived conditions. Restoring N-linked protein glycosylation, abrogating IRE1α?XBP1 activation or enforcing expression of glutamine transporters enhanced mitochondrial respiration in human T cells exposed to ovarian cancer ascites. XBP1-deficient T cells in the metastatic ovarian cancer milieu exhibited global transcriptional reprogramming and improved effector capacity. Accordingly, mice that bear ovarian cancer and lack XBP1 selectively in T cells demonstrate superior anti-tumour immunity, delayed malignant progression and increased overall survival. Controlling endoplasmic reticulum stress or targeting IRE1α?XBP1 signalling may help to restore the metabolic fitness and anti-tumour capacity of T cells in cancer hosts.Fil: Song, Minkyung. Weill Cornell Medicine; Estados UnidosFil: Sandoval, Tito A.. Weill Cornell Medicine; Estados UnidosFil: Chae, Chang-Suk. Weill Cornell Medicine; Estados UnidosFil: Chopra, Sahil. Weill Cornell Medicine; Estados UnidosFil: Tan, Chen. Weill Cornell Medicine; Estados UnidosFil: Rutkowski, Melanie R.. University of Virginia; Estados UnidosFil: Raundhal, Mahesh. Dana Farber Cancer Institute; Estados Unidos. Harvard Medical School; Estados UnidosFil: Chaurio, Ricardo A.. H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute; Estados UnidosFil: Payne, Kyle K.. H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute; Estados UnidosFil: Konrad, Csaba. Weill Cornell Medicine; Estados UnidosFil: Bettigole, Sarah E.. Quentis Therapeutics Inc.; Estados UnidosFil: Shin, Hee Rae. Quentis Therapeutics Inc.; Estados UnidosFil: Crowley, Michael J. P.. Weill Cornell Graduate School of Medical Sciences; Estados UnidosFil: Cerliani, Juan Pablo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Fundación de Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental; ArgentinaFil: Kossenkov, Andrew V.. The Wistar Institute; Estados UnidosFil: Motorykin, Ievgen. Weill Cornell Medicine,; Estados UnidosFil: Zhang, Sheng. Weill Cornell Medicine,; Estados UnidosFil: Manfredi, Giovanni. Weill Cornell Medicine,; Estados UnidosFil: Zamarin, Dmitriy. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Estados UnidosFil: Holcomb, Kevin. Weill Cornell Medicine,; Estados UnidosFil: Rodriguez, Paulo C.. H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute; Estados UnidosFil: Rabinovich, Gabriel Adrián. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Fundación de Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental. Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Química Biológica; ArgentinaFil: Conejo Garcia, Jose R.. H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute; Estados UnidosFil: Glimcher, Laurie H.. Dana Farber Cancer Institute; Estados Unidos. Harvard Medical School; Estados UnidosFil: Cubillos-Ruiz, Juan R.. Weill Graduate School Of Medical Sciences; Estados Unidos. Weill Graduate School Of Medical Sciences; Estados Unido

Phosphatidylserine targeting for diagnosis and treatment of human diseases

Cells are able to execute apoptosis by activating series of specific biochemical reactions. One of the most prominent characteristics of cell death is the externalization of phosphatidylserine (PS), which in healthy cells resides predominantly in the inner leaflet of the plasma membrane. These features have made PS-externalization a well-explored phenomenon to image cell death for diagnostic purposes. In addition, it was demonstrated that under certain conditions viable cells express PS at their surface such as endothelial cells of tumor blood vessels, stressed tumor cells and hypoxic cardiomyocytes. Hence, PS has become a potential target for therapeutic strategies aiming at Targeted Drug Delivery. In this review we highlight the biomarker PS and various PS-binding compounds that have been employed to target PS for diagnostic purposes. We emphasize the 35 kD human protein annexin A5, that has been developed as a Molecular Imaging agent to measure cell death in vitro, and non-invasively in vivo in animal models and in patients with cardiovascular diseases and cancer. Recently focus has shifted from diagnostic towards therapeutic applications employing annexin A5 in strategies to deliver drugs to cells that express PS at their surface

Oncogenic Properties of Apoptotic Tumor Cells in Aggressive B Cell Lymphoma

BACKGROUND: Cells undergoing apoptosis are known to modulate their tissue microenvironments. By acting on phagocytes, notably macrophages, apoptotic cells inhibit immunological and inflammatory responses and promote trophic signaling pathways. Paradoxically, because of their potential to cause death of tumor cells and thereby militate against malignant disease progression, both apoptosis and tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are often associated with poor prognosis in cancer. We hypothesized that, in progression of malignant disease, constitutive loss of a fraction of the tumor cell population through apoptosis could yield tumor-promoting effects. RESULTS: Here, we demonstrate that apoptotic tumor cells promote coordinated tumor growth, angiogenesis, and accumulation of TAMs in aggressive B cell lymphomas. Through unbiased "in situ transcriptomics" analysis-gene expression profiling of laser-captured TAMs to establish their activation signature in situ-we show that these cells are activated to signal via multiple tumor-promoting reparatory, trophic, angiogenic, tissue remodeling, and anti-inflammatory pathways. Our results also suggest that apoptotic lymphoma cells help drive this signature. Furthermore, we demonstrate that, upon induction of apoptosis, lymphoma cells not only activate expression of the tumor-promoting matrix metalloproteinases MMP2 and MMP12 in macrophages but also express and process these MMPs directly. Finally, using a model of malignant melanoma, we show that the oncogenic potential of apoptotic tumor cells extends beyond lymphoma. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to its profound tumor-suppressive role, apoptosis can potentiate cancer progression. These results have important implications for understanding the fundamental biology of cell death, its roles in malignant disease, and the broader consequences of apoptosis-inducing anti-cancer therapy

Resolvins suppress tumor growth and enhance cancer therapy

National Cancer Institute grants RO1 01CA170549-02 (to D. Panigrahy and C.N. Serhan), ROCA148633-01A4 (to D. Panigrahy), and GM095467 (to C.N. Serhan); the Stop and Shop Pediatric Brain Tumor Fund (to M.W. Kieran); the CJ Buckley Pediatric Brain Tumor Fund (to M.W. Kieran); Alex Lemonade Stand (to M.W. Kieran); Molly’s Magic Wand for Pediatric Brain Tumors (to M.W. Kieran); the Markoff Foundation Art-In-Giving Foundation (to M.W. Kieran); the Kamen Foundation (to M.W. Kieran); Jared Branfman Sunflowers for Life (to M.W.K.); and The Wellcome Trust program 086867/Z/08 (to M. Perretti)

Harnessing γδ T Cells against Human Gynecologic Cancers

Immuno-oncology has traditionally focused on conventional MHC-restricted αβ T cells. Yet, unconventional γδ T cells, which kill tumor cells in an MHC-unrestricted manner, display characteristics of effector activity and stemness without exhaustion and are nearly universally observed in human gynecologic malignancies, correlating with improved outcomes. These cells do not have a clear counterpart in mice but are also found in the healthy female reproductive tract. Interventions that modulate their in vivo activity, or cellular therapies utilizing γδ T cells as an allogeneic, “off-the-shelf” platform (e.g., for chimeric antigen receptor expression) hold significant potential against challenging tumors like ovarian cancer, which has been stubbornly resistant to the immune checkpoint inhibitors that change the landscape of other human tumors. Here, we discuss recent discoveries on the specific populations of γδ T cells that infiltrate human gynecologic cancers, their anti-tumor activity, and the prospect of redirecting their effector function against tumor cells to develop a new generation of immunotherapies that extends beyond the traditional αβ T cell-centric view of the field

Molecular and translational classifications of DAMPs in immunogenic cell death

The immunogenicity of malignant cells has recently been acknowledged as a critical determinant of efficacy in cancer therapy. Thus, besides developing direct immunostimulatory regimens, including dendritic cell-based vaccines, checkpoint-blocking therapies, and adoptive T-cell transfer, researchers have started to focus on the overall immunobiology of neoplastic cells. It is now clear that cancer cells can succumb to some anticancer therapies by undergoing a peculiar form of cell death that is characterized by an increased immunogenic potential, owing to the emission of the so-called “damage-associated molecular patterns” (DAMPs). The emission of DAMPs and other immunostimulatory factors by cells succumbing to immunogenic cell death (ICD) favors the establishment of a productive interface with the immune system. This results in the elicitation of tumor-targeting immune responses associated with the elimination of residual, treatment-resistant cancer cells, as well as with the establishment of immunological memory. Although ICD has been characterized with increased precision since its discovery, several questions remain to be addressed. Here, we summarize and tabulate the main molecular, immunological, preclinical, and clinical aspects of ICD, in an attempt to capture the essence of this phenomenon, and identify future challenges for this rapidly expanding field of investigation