Roof Segmentation Towards Digital Twin Generation in LoD2+Using Deep Learning

There is an increasing need for digital twins of cities and their base maps, 3D city models. Creating and updating these twins is not an easy task, so automating and streamlining the process is a field of active research. A significant part of the urban geometry is residential buildings and their roofs. Modeling of roofs for urban buildings can be divided into three main areas - building detection, roof recognition and building reconstruction. The building and roofs are segmented with the help of machine learning and image processing. Afterwards the extracted information is used to generate parametric models for the roofs using methods from computational geometry. The goal is to create correct virtual models of roofs belonging to many different types of buildings. In this study, a supervised deep learning approach is proposed for the segmentation of roof edges from a single orthophoto. The predicted features include the linear elements of roofs. The experiments show that, despite the small amount of training data, even in the presence of noise, the proposed method performs well on semantic segmentation of roofs with different shapes and complexities. The quality of the extracted roof elements for the test area is about 56% and 71% for mean intersection over union (IOU) and Dice metric scores, respectively. Copyright (C) 2022 The Authors

Why Are Outcomes Different for Registry Patients Enrolled Prospectively and Retrospectively? Insights from the Global Anticoagulant Registry in the FIELD-Atrial Fibrillation (GARFIELD-AF).

Background: Retrospective and prospective observational studies are designed to reflect real-world evidence on clinical practice, but can yield conflicting results. The GARFIELD-AF Registry includes both methods of enrolment and allows analysis of differences in patient characteristics and outcomes that may result. Methods and Results: Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and ≥1 risk factor for stroke at diagnosis of AF were recruited either retrospectively (n = 5069) or prospectively (n = 5501) from 19 countries and then followed prospectively. The retrospectively enrolled cohort comprised patients with established AF (for a least 6, and up to 24 months before enrolment), who were identified retrospectively (and baseline and partial follow-up data were collected from the emedical records) and then followed prospectively between 0-18 months (such that the total time of follow-up was 24 months; data collection Dec-2009 and Oct-2010). In the prospectively enrolled cohort, patients with newly diagnosed AF (≤6 weeks after diagnosis) were recruited between Mar-2010 and Oct-2011 and were followed for 24 months after enrolment. Differences between the cohorts were observed in clinical characteristics, including type of AF, stroke prevention strategies, and event rates. More patients in the retrospectively identified cohort received vitamin K antagonists (62.1% vs. 53.2%) and fewer received non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (1.8% vs . 4.2%). All-cause mortality rates per 100 person-years during the prospective follow-up (starting the first study visit up to 1 year) were significantly lower in the retrospective than prospectively identified cohort (3.04 [95% CI 2.51 to 3.67] vs . 4.05 [95% CI 3.53 to 4.63]; p = 0.016). Conclusions: Interpretations of data from registries that aim to evaluate the characteristics and outcomes of patients with AF must take account of differences in registry design and the impact of recall bias and survivorship bias that is incurred with retrospective enrolment. Clinical Trial Registration: - URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier for GARFIELD-AF (NCT01090362)

Improved risk stratification of patients with atrial fibrillation: an integrated GARFIELD-AF tool for the prediction of mortality, stroke and bleed in patients with and without anticoagulation.

OBJECTIVES: To provide an accurate, web-based tool for stratifying patients with atrial fibrillation to facilitate decisions on the potential benefits/risks of anticoagulation, based on mortality, stroke and bleeding risks. DESIGN: The new tool was developed, using stepwise regression, for all and then applied to lower risk patients. C-statistics were compared with CHA2DS2-VASc using 30-fold cross-validation to control for overfitting. External validation was undertaken in an independent dataset, Outcome Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (ORBIT-AF). PARTICIPANTS: Data from 39 898 patients enrolled in the prospective GARFIELD-AF registry provided the basis for deriving and validating an integrated risk tool to predict stroke risk, mortality and bleeding risk. RESULTS: The discriminatory value of the GARFIELD-AF risk model was superior to CHA2DS2-VASc for patients with or without anticoagulation. C-statistics (95% CI) for all-cause mortality, ischaemic stroke/systemic embolism and haemorrhagic stroke/major bleeding (treated patients) were: 0.77 (0.76 to 0.78), 0.69 (0.67 to 0.71) and 0.66 (0.62 to 0.69), respectively, for the GARFIELD-AF risk models, and 0.66 (0.64-0.67), 0.64 (0.61-0.66) and 0.64 (0.61-0.68), respectively, for CHA2DS2-VASc (or HAS-BLED for bleeding). In very low to low risk patients (CHA2DS2-VASc 0 or 1 (men) and 1 or 2 (women)), the CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED (for bleeding) scores offered weak discriminatory value for mortality, stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding. C-statistics for the GARFIELD-AF risk tool were 0.69 (0.64 to 0.75), 0.65 (0.56 to 0.73) and 0.60 (0.47 to 0.73) for each end point, respectively, versus 0.50 (0.45 to 0.55), 0.59 (0.50 to 0.67) and 0.55 (0.53 to 0.56) for CHA2DS2-VASc (or HAS-BLED for bleeding). Upon validation in the ORBIT-AF population, C-statistics showed that the GARFIELD-AF risk tool was effective for predicting 1-year all-cause mortality using the full and simplified model for all-cause mortality: C-statistics 0.75 (0.73 to 0.77) and 0.75 (0.73 to 0.77), respectively, and for predicting for any stroke or systemic embolism over 1 year, C-statistics 0.68 (0.62 to 0.74). CONCLUSIONS: Performance of the GARFIELD-AF risk tool was superior to CHA2DS2-VASc in predicting stroke and mortality and superior to HAS-BLED for bleeding, overall and in lower risk patients. The GARFIELD-AF tool has the potential for incorporation in routine electronic systems, and for the first time, permits simultaneous evaluation of ischaemic stroke, mortality and bleeding risks. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier for GARFIELD-AF (NCT01090362) and for ORBIT-AF (NCT01165710)

Two-year outcomes of patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation: results from GARFIELD-AF.

AIMS: The relationship between outcomes and time after diagnosis for patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is poorly defined, especially beyond the first year. METHODS AND RESULTS: GARFIELD-AF is an ongoing, global observational study of adults with newly diagnosed NVAF. Two-year outcomes of 17 162 patients prospectively enrolled in GARFIELD-AF were analysed in light of baseline characteristics, risk profiles for stroke/systemic embolism (SE), and antithrombotic therapy. The mean (standard deviation) age was 69.8 (11.4) years, 43.8% were women, and the mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 3.3 (1.6); 60.8% of patients were prescribed anticoagulant therapy with/without antiplatelet (AP) therapy, 27.4% AP monotherapy, and 11.8% no antithrombotic therapy. At 2-year follow-up, all-cause mortality, stroke/SE, and major bleeding had occurred at a rate (95% confidence interval) of 3.83 (3.62; 4.05), 1.25 (1.13; 1.38), and 0.70 (0.62; 0.81) per 100 person-years, respectively. Rates for all three major events were highest during the first 4 months. Congestive heart failure, acute coronary syndromes, sudden/unwitnessed death, malignancy, respiratory failure, and infection/sepsis accounted for 65% of all known causes of death and strokes for <10%. Anticoagulant treatment was associated with a 35% lower risk of death. CONCLUSION: The most frequent of the three major outcome measures was death, whose most common causes are not known to be significantly influenced by anticoagulation. This suggests that a more comprehensive approach to the management of NVAF may be needed to improve outcome. This could include, in addition to anticoagulation, interventions targeting modifiable, cause-specific risk factors for death. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01090362

Risk profiles and one-year outcomes of patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation in India: Insights from the GARFIELD-AF Registry.

BACKGROUND: The Global Anticoagulant Registry in the FIELD-Atrial Fibrillation (GARFIELD-AF) is an ongoing prospective noninterventional registry, which is providing important information on the baseline characteristics, treatment patterns, and 1-year outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). This report describes data from Indian patients recruited in this registry. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 52,014 patients with newly diagnosed AF were enrolled globally; of these, 1388 patients were recruited from 26 sites within India (2012-2016). In India, the mean age was 65.8 years at diagnosis of NVAF. Hypertension was the most prevalent risk factor for AF, present in 68.5% of patients from India and in 76.3% of patients globally (P < 0.001). Diabetes and coronary artery disease (CAD) were prevalent in 36.2% and 28.1% of patients as compared with global prevalence of 22.2% and 21.6%, respectively (P < 0.001 for both). Antiplatelet therapy was the most common antithrombotic treatment in India. With increasing stroke risk, however, patients were more likely to receive oral anticoagulant therapy [mainly vitamin K antagonist (VKA)], but average international normalized ratio (INR) was lower among Indian patients [median INR value 1.6 (interquartile range {IQR}: 1.3-2.3) versus 2.3 (IQR 1.8-2.8) (P < 0.001)]. Compared with other countries, patients from India had markedly higher rates of all-cause mortality [7.68 per 100 person-years (95% confidence interval 6.32-9.35) vs 4.34 (4.16-4.53), P < 0.0001], while rates of stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding were lower after 1 year of follow-up. CONCLUSION: Compared to previously published registries from India, the GARFIELD-AF registry describes clinical profiles and outcomes in Indian patients with AF of a different etiology. The registry data show that compared to the rest of the world, Indian AF patients are younger in age and have more diabetes and CAD. Patients with a higher stroke risk are more likely to receive anticoagulation therapy with VKA but are underdosed compared with the global average in the GARFIELD-AF. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION-URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01090362

Using the Octree Immersed Boundary Method for urban wind CFD simulations

This paper describes the initial steps in a larger effort to perform verification and validation (V&V) of wind simulations in an urban environment. The presented work uses data from wind tunnel experiments on a simplified urban area to assess the performance of the steady-state RANS octree immersed boundary flow solver IBOFlow®. Verification and validation activities are indispensable in computational modelling, because they address the issue about the trustworthiness of models directly. This is particularly so in the modelling of complex systems such as urban environments. The results of the early V&V work are presented, together with a discussion on different aspects of the experimental and modelling settings. A key contribution of this work, which is planned as a first in a series of V&V publications, is the identification of concrete future actions to address the issues of trust in urban wind model predictions

Using the Octree Immersed Boundary Method for urban wind CFD simulations

This paper describes the initial steps in a larger effort to perform verification and validation (V&V) of wind simulations in an urban environment. The presented work uses data from wind tunnel experiments on a simplified urban area to assess the performance of the steady-state RANS octree immersed boundary flow solver IBOFlow®. Verification and validation activities are indispensable in computational modelling, because they address the issue about the trustworthiness of models directly. This is particularly so in the modelling of complex systems such as urban environments. The results of the early V&V work are presented, together with a discussion on different aspects of the experimental and modelling settings. A key contribution of this work, which is planned as a first in a series of V&V publications, is the identification of concrete future actions to address the issues of trust in urban wind model predictions

Clinical characteristics and prognostic significance of extramedullary involvement in childhood acute myeloid leukemia

Background. Extramedullary infiltration (EI) is relatively common in children with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (up to 20-25 %). However, its clinical and prognostic significance remains poorly understood.Objective: to describe clinical features and to define prognostic significance of EI in children with AML.Materials and methods. The subjects of retrospective observational study were 228 children with de novo AML. The median age was 6.6 years. All of them were treated according to the protocol AML-MM-2006 from April 2007 to June 2018.All patients with EI were divided into three cohorts according to the localization of the lesions: 1) central nervous system (CNS) involvement (CNS group), 2) other localizations apart from CNS (myelosarcomas (MS) group), 3) combined lesions (CNS + MS group).Results. EI was diagnosed in 84 patients (36.84 %) with de novo AML. Among them 47 (55.95 %) had CNS involvement, 20 (23.81 %) had MS, 15 (17.86 %) had both CNS involvement and MS. 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was slightly higher in patients with CNS involvement than in children without EI - 80 ± 12 % vs 71 ± 9 %, p = 0.26, however OS in patients with MS was significantly lower - 45 ± 16 % vs 71 ± 9 %, p &lt;0.001. In addition, OS in high-risk patients according to the protocol AML-MM-2006 who underwent allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) without EI and with MS (± CNS involvement) was similar to OS in main groups - 81 ± 11 % and 42 ± 26 % respectively, p = 0.004. 5-year event-free survival in patients with MS was also lower than in children without EI - 38 ± 16 % vs 51 ± 8 %, p = 0.011.Conclusion. Patients with MS had worse 5-year OS and EFS than children without EI according to our study. Moreover allogenic HSCT conducted in first clinical remission did not improve the survival rate. Neuroleukemia as the only EI was not an unfavorable prognostic factor in our cohort of AML patients and was more often associated with inv(16)