Stroke survivors’ priorities for research related to life after stroke

Background - Stroke has transitioned from an untreatable, unpreventable disease to a highly treatable and preventable disease over recent decades, and the number of stroke survivors is expected to increase. The number is also foreseen to grow larger as a result of an aging population. With an escalating number of stroke survivors, research on how to improve life after stroke is needed. Aims - The primary aim was to determine which area of research related to life after stroke that stroke patients and their informal carers prioritized as being relevant and valuable. Methods - A cross-sectional study of all patients who had completed the 12 months of follow-up in the EFFECTS trial. In the questionnaire the stroke patients and their informal carers were asked to prioritize areas of research they considered important and valuable with respect to their life after stroke. Results - Of the 731 patients who were still alive after the 12 months-follow-up, 589 responded. The most prioritized areas of research were Balance and walking difficulties (290 (49%) responders) and Post-stroke fatigue (173 (29%) responders). Women answered the undefined alternative “other” more often than men (43 women (11%) versus 11 men (6%), p = .04). Younger patients prioritized Post-stroke fatigue to a higher extent (88 (45%) versus (22%), p Balance and walking difficulties (214 (54%) versus 76 (40%), p = .002) and Speech difficulties (38 (10%) versus 9 (5%), p = .045). Conclusions - Life after stroke is perceived differentely with aging. Future research should address strategies to face challenges such as imbalance and walking difficulties and post-stroke-fatigue

Individual patient data meta-analysis of the effects of fluoxetine on functional outcomes after acute stroke

Background We collaboratively designed three large trials of fluoxetine for stroke recovery to facilitate an individual patient data meta-analysis (IPDM). MethodsWe performed fixed effects meta-analyses on the combined data set, for the primary outcome (modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 6 months) and secondary outcomes common to the individual trials. As a sensitivity analysis, summary statistics from each trial were created and combined. FindingsWe recruited 5907 people (mean age 69∙5 years (SD 12∙3), 2256 (38%) females, 2-15 days post-stroke) from Australia, New Zealand, UK, Sweden and Vietnam; and randomized them to fluoxetine 20mg daily or matching placebo for 6 months. 5833 (98∙75%) were available at 6 months. The adjusted ordinal comparison of mRS was similar in the two groups (common OR 0∙96, 95% CI 0∙87 to 1∙05, p=0∙37). There were no statistically significant interactions between the minimization variables (baseline probability of being alive and independent at 6 months, time to treatment, motor deficit or aphasia) and pre-specified subgroups (including age, pathological type, inability to assess mood, proxy or patient consent, baseline depression, country). Fluoxetine increased seizure risk (2∙64% vs 1∙8%, p=0∙03), falls with injury (6∙26% vs 4∙51%, p=0∙03), fractures (3∙15% vs 1∙39%, p&lt;0∙0001) and hyponatraemia (1∙22% vs 0∙61%, p=0∙01) but reduced new depression (10∙05% vs 13∙42%, p&lt;0∙0001). At 12 months, there was no difference in adjusted mRS (n=5760; COR 0∙98, 95% CI 0∙89 to 1∙07). Sensitivity analyses gave the same results.Interpretation Fluoxetine 20mg daily for six months did not improve functional recovery. It increased seizures, falls with injury, bone fractures but reduced depression frequency at 6 months. Trial Funding Stroke Association, National Institute of Health Research, Australian Government National Health and Medical Research Council, Swedish Research Council, Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation, Swedish Brain Foundation, Swedish Society of Medicine, King Gustav V and Queen Victoria's Foundation of Freemasons and STROKE-Riksförbundet <br/

990-53 Effects on Cardiovascular End Points and Psychological Variables of Metoprolol and Verapamil in Patients with Stable Angina Pectoris — The Angina Prognosis Study in Stockholm (APSIS)

The effect of treatment with metoprolol or verapamil was investigated in 809 patients with stable angina pectoris. End points for the study were: death, nonfatal cardiovascular events and three psychological variables reflecting aspects of quality of life. Nonfatal cardiovascular events included acute myocardial infarction, incapacitating or unstable angina, cerebrovascular and peripheral vascular events. The psychological variables were aggregate measures of psychosomatic symptoms and sleep disturbances and an evaluation of life satisfaction on a visual analogue scale. The mean age of the patients was 59±7 years and 30% were women. The patients were followed for a total of 2887 patient years, with a median follow-up time of 3.6 years. Total cardiovascular mortality in the metoprolol versus verapamit group were 5.4% versus 6.2% and 4.7% versus 4.7% respectively. Nonfatal cardiovascular events occurred in 26.4 and 24.1%, respectively. Psychosomatic symptoms and sleep disturbances were significantly improved in both treatment groups. The magnitude of change was small and not significantly different. Life satisfaction did not change on either drug. Withdrawals due to side effects occurred in 11.1 and 14.6%, respectively.ConclusionThis large scale long term study shows that both drugs were well tolerated and had the same effect on mortality, cardiovascular end points and measures of quality of life

Update on the EFFECTS study of fluoxetine for stroke recovery: a randomised controlled trial in Sweden

Studies have suggested that fluoxetine might improve neurological recovery after stroke, but the results remain inconclusive. The EFFECTS (Efficacy oF Fluoxetine – a randomisEd Controlled Trial in Stroke) reached its recruitment target of 1500 patients in June 2019. The purpose of this article is to present all amendments to the protocol and describe how we formed the EFFECTS trial collaboration in Sweden. Methods In this investigator-led, multicentre, parallel-group, randomised, placebo-controlled trial, we enrolled non-depressed stroke patients aged 18 years or older between 2 and 15 days after stroke onset. The patients had a clinical diagnosis of stroke (ischaemic or intracerebral haemorrhage) with persisting focal neurological deficits. Patients were randomised to fluoxetine 20 mg or matching placebo capsules once daily for 6 months. Results Seven amendments were made and included clarification of drug interaction between fluoxetine and metoprolol and the use of metoprolol for severe heart failure as an exclusion criterion, inclusion of data from central Swedish registries and the Swedish Stroke Register, changes in informed consent from patients, and clarification of design of some sub-studies. EFFECTS recruited 1500 patients at 35 centres in Sweden between 20 October 2014 and 28 June 2019. We plan to unblind the data in January 2020 and report the primary outcome in May 2020. Conclusion EFFECTS will provide data on the safety and efficacy of 6 months of treatment with fluoxetine after stroke in a Swedish health system setting. The data from EFFECTS will also contribute to an individual patient data meta-analysis

Effects of Fluoxetine on Outcomes at 12 Months After Acute Stroke:Results From EFFECTS, a Randomized Controlled Trial

Background and Purpose: The EFFECTS (Efficacy of Fluoxetine—a Randomised Controlled Trial in Stroke) recently reported that 20 mg fluoxetine once daily for 6 months after acute stroke did not improve functional outcome but reduced depression and increased fractures and hyponatremia at 6 months. The purpose of this predefined secondary analysis was to identify if any effects of fluoxetine were maintained or delayed over 12 months. Methods: EFFECTS was an investigator-led, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel group trial in Sweden that enrolled adult patients with stroke. Patients were randomized to 20 mg oral fluoxetine or matching placebo for 6 months and followed for another 6 months. The primary outcome was functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale), at 6 months. Predefined secondary outcomes for these analyses included the modified Rankin Scale, health status, quality of life, fatigue, mood, and depression at 12 months. Results: One thousand five hundred patients were recruited from 35 centers in Sweden between 2014 and 2019; 750 were allocated fluoxetine and 750 placebo. At 12 months, modified Rankin Scale data were available in 715 (95%) patients allocated fluoxetine and 712 (95%) placebo. The distribution of modified Rankin Scale categories was similar in the 2 groups (adjusted common odds ratio, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.76–1.10]). Patients allocated fluoxetine scored worse on memory with a median value of 89 (interquartile range, 75–100) versus 93 (interquartile range, 82–100); P =0.0021 and communication 93 (interquartile range, 82–100) versus 96 (interquartile range, 86–100); P =0.024 domains of the Stroke Impact Scale compared with placebo. There were no other differences in secondary outcomes. Conclusions: Fluoxetine after acute stroke had no effect on functional outcome at 12 months. Patients allocated fluoxetine scored worse on memory and communication on the Stroke Impact Scale compared with placebo, but this is likely to be due to chance. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02683213

Individual patient data meta-analysis of the effects of fluoxetine on functional outcomes after acute stroke

Background Three large randomised controlled trials of fluoxetine for stroke recovery have been performed. We perfomed an individual patient data meta-analysis (IPDM) on the combined data. Methods Fixed effects meta-analyses was performed on the combined data set, for the primary outcome (modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 6 months), and secondary outcomes common to the individual trials. As a sensitivity analysis, summary statistics from each trial were created and combined. Findings The three trials recruited a combined total of 5907 people (mean age 69∙5 years (SD 12∙3), 2256 (38%) females, 2-15 days post-stroke) from Australia, New Zealand, UK, Sweden and Vietnam; and randomized them to fluoxetine 20mg daily or matching placebo for 6 months. Data on 5833 (98∙75%) were available at 6 months. The adjusted ordinal comparison of mRS was similar in the two groups (common OR 0∙96, 95% CI 0∙87 to 1∙05, p=0∙37). There were no statistically significant interactions between the minimization variables (baseline probability of being alive and independent at 6 months, time to treatment, motor deficit or aphasia) and pre-specified subgroups (including age, pathological type, inability to assess mood, proxy or patient consent, baseline depression, country). Fluoxetine increased seizure risk (2∙64% vs 1∙8%, p=0∙03), falls with injury (6∙26% vs 4∙51%, p=0∙03), fractures (3∙15% vs 1∙39%, p<0∙0001) and hyponatraemia (1∙22% vs 0∙61%, p=0∙01) but reduced new depression (10∙05% vs 13∙42%, p<0∙0001). At 12 months, there was no difference in adjusted mRS (n=5760; COR 0∙98, 95% CI 0∙89 to 1∙07). Sensitivity analyses gave the same results. Interpretation Fluoxetine 20mg daily for six months did not improve functional recovery. It increased seizures, falls with injury, and bone fractures but reduced depression frequency at 6 months

Estimated Time for Occurrence of Smoking-Related Consequences among Pregnant and Non-Pregnant Women

Objectives: To study time estimates by women smokers for when smoking-related consequences will occur given continuing or quitting smoking. The relationship of these estimates to pregnancy and intent to quit smoking was also investigated. Methods: Over a two-week period, eighty women, selected to constitute four subgroups formed by pregnant vs. non-pregnant and trying vs. not trying to quit smoking, rated times at which they would expect smoking-related consequences to occur given continuing or quitting smoking. Results: Somatic health consequences were estimated to occur later than consequences related to mood and social relations. All consequences were estimated to occur later given quitting smoking. Pregnancy had an effect on the estimated time that consequences would occur, with pregnant women estimating earlier occurrence of consequences related to mood and social relations than non-pregnant women did. Conclusion: Health messages should stress consequences for somatic health in quitting smoking, since outcomes later in time might have too low a value to exert a positive effect on decisions to quit smoking

Safety and efficacy of fluoxetine on functional recovery after acute stroke (EFFECTS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Background Studies have suggested that fluoxetine could improve neurological recovery after stroke. The Efficacy oF Fluoxetine—a randomisEd Controlled Trial in Stroke (EFFECTS) trial aimed to assess whether administration of oral fluoxetine for 6 months after acute stroke improves functional outcome. Methods EFFECTS was an investigator-led, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel group trial that enrolled patients aged 18 years or older between 2 and 15 days after stroke onset in 35 stroke and rehabilitation centres in Sweden. Eligible patients had a clinical diagnosis of ischaemic or intracerebral haemorrhage, brain imaging that was consistent with intracerebral haemorrhage or ischaemic stroke, and had at least one persisting focal neurological deficit. A web-based randomisation system that incorporated a minimisation algorithm was used to randomly assign (1:1) participants to receive oral fluoxetine 20 mg once daily or matching placebo capsules for 6 months. Patients, care providers, investigators, and outcomes assessors were masked to the allocation. The primary outcome was functional status, measured with the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 6 months, analysed in all patients with available mRS data at the 6-month follow-up; we did an ordinal analysis adjusted for the minimisation variables used in the randomisation. This trial is registered with EudraCT, 2011-006130-16; ISRCTN, 13020412; and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02683213. Findings Between Oct 20, 2014, and June 28, 2019, 1500 patients were enrolled, of whom 750 were randomly assigned to fluoxetine and 750 were randomly assigned to placebo. At 6 months, mRS data were available for 737 (98%) patients in the fluoxetine group and 742 (99%) patients in the placebo group. There was no effect of fluoxetine on the primary outcome—distribution across mRS score categories—compared with placebo (adjusted common odds ratio 0·94 [95% CI 0·78 to 1·13]; p=0·42). The proportion of patients with a new diagnosis of depression was lower with fluoxetine than with placebo (54 [7%] patients vs 81 [11%] patients; difference −3·60% [–6·49 to −0·71]; p=0·015), but fluoxetine was associated with more bone fractures (28 [4%] vs 11 [2%]; difference 2·27% [0·66 to 3·87]; p=0·0058) and hyponatraemia (11 [1%] vs one [<1%]; difference 1·33% [0·43 to 2·23]; p=0·0038) at 6 months. Interpretation Functional outcome after acute stroke did not improve with oral fluoxetine 20 mg once daily for 6 months. Fluoxetine reduced the occurrence of depression but increased the risk of bone fractures and hyponatraemia. Our results do not support the use of fluoxetine after acute stroke

Factors driving public support for road congestion reduction policies: Congestion charging, free public transport and more roads in Stockholm, Helsinki and Lyon

Based on an across-the-board survey conducted among residents of Stockholm, Helsinki and Lyon, we explore the opinions on three policy measures to combat road congestion: congestion charging, free public transport and building more roads. The support for the two latter policies is substantially higher than the support for congestion charging, which is only supported by a majority in Stockholm. Self-interest is important for the formation of the opinion to all three policies. However, fundamental values and general political views, indicated by four attitudinal factors, are even more important in forming opinions towards the three transport policies. Of all attitudinal factors, the one indicating environmental concern most influences the support for all policies. Equity concerns, however, increase the support for free public transport and opposition to taxation increases the support for building more roads. Our results further suggest that the opinions towards free public transport and building more roads can be mapped along the left–right political axis, where Environment and Equity are to the left and Pricing and Taxation are to the right. However, the opinion towards congestion charging cuts right through the political spectrum. The impact of the fundamental values and self-interest variables are similar for Stockholm and Helsinki, indicating that even if experience increases the overall support for charging, it does not change the relative strength of different political arguments to any major extent

HLA class I and II expression in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma in relation to tumor HPV status and clinical outcome.

HPV-DNA positive (HPVDNA+) oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) has better clinical outcome than HPV-DNA negative (HPVDNA-) OSCC. Current treatment may be unnecessarily extensive for most HPV+ OSCC, but before de-escalation, additional markers are needed together with HPV status to better predict treatment response. Here the influence of HLA class I/HLA class II expression was explored. Pre-treatment biopsies, from 439/484 OSCC patients diagnosed 2000-2009 and treated curatively, were analyzed for HLA I and II expression, p16(INK4a) and HPV DNA. Absent/weak as compared to high HLA class I intensity correlated to a very favorable disease-free survival (DFS), disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) in HPVDNA+ OSCC, both in univariate and multivariate analysis, while HLA class II had no impact. Notably, HPVDNA+ OSCC with absent/weak HLA class I responded equally well when treated with induction-chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) or radiotherapy (RT) alone. In patients with HPVDNA- OSCC, high HLA class I/class II expression correlated in general to a better clinical outcome. p16(INK4a) overexpression correlated to a better clinical outcome in HPVDNA+ OSCC. Absence of HLA class I intensity in HPVDNA+ OSCC suggests a very high survival independent of treatment and could possibly be used clinically to select patients for randomized trials de-escalating therapy