5 research outputs found

    Religiooni osa poliitilise repressiooni jÀrgse traumaga toimetulekul

    Get PDF
    Tonu Lehtsaar, Heino Noor, The role of religion in coping with psychotrauma of political repressions.The article deals with the religious aspect of coping with posttraumatic stress caused by political repressions. A theoretical overview of posttraumatic stress is given. Political repressions as a type of traumatic factor are analyzed. Coping strategies and the role of religion in handling difficult life events are described. Sixty-four (31 female, 33 male) politically repressed people in Estonia were asked about the role of religion in their coping with stress. The results showed that 46% of the respondents considered religion very important, 23% rather important, 26% not very important and 6% absolutely unimportant in regard to their ability to cope. The responses given to the question of how religion had influenced their ability to cope fell into categories related to the image of God, emotional life, interpersonal relationships and problem solving. It appeared that for the relatively religious section of respondents, religion itself served as essential support for coping

    Mycobiota of Estonia

    Get PDF
    Seentel on looduses oluline osa - orgaanilise aine lagundajatena on nad asendamatud ökosĂŒsteemide aineringes. Niiviisi osalevad seened ökosĂŒsteemide sekundaarses produktsioonis, luues ĂŒhtlasi maakera loodusressursse. Inimese praktilises tegevuses on seentel tohutu tĂ€htsus nii negatiivses kui ka positiivses tĂ€henduses. Piisab, kui mĂ”elda söödavatele, sealhulgas viljeldavatele seentele, mitmesuguseid keemilisi aineid produtseerivatele liikidele, ravimseentele, mĂŒrkseentele, mĂŒkooside tekitajatele, fĂŒtopatogeensetele seentele, hallitusseentele jpt. SeepĂ€rast vÀÀrivad seened igakĂŒlgset tundmaĂ”ppimist ning oma igapĂ€evases tegevuses tuleb meil nendega tĂ”siselt arvestada. Eesti territoorium pakub seente leviku uurimise seisukohast laialdasemat huvi Euroopas tervikuna. TĂ€nu Eesti looduslikele (botaanilistele, geograafilistele, geoloogilistele) iseĂ€rasustele on meie ala omapĂ€raseks ristumiskohaks boreaalsete ja nemoraalsete, mĂ”ningal mÀÀral ka pontiliste seeneliikide areaalidele. SeetĂ”ttu on Eesti seenestik koosseisult mitmekesine ja liigirohke. Eesti seentest on kahe sajandi vĂ€ltel kirjutatud hulgaliselt nii teaduslikke kui populaarteaduslikke töid. Viimastel aastakĂŒmnetel on ilmunud rida raamatuid mitmesuguste seenerĂŒhmade kohta, sealhulgas ka ĂŒlevaated meie parimate söögiseente perekondadest. KĂ”iki Eesti suurseeni kĂ€sitlev raamat “Seened” (koostaja K. Kalamees) ilmus juba 1966. aastal. Eesti pisiseeni laiemale ĂŒldsusele tutvustavat kirjandust on seevastu napilt, ometi on nĂ€iteks seente poolt pĂ”hjustatud taimehaiguste tundmine nii pĂ”llumajandus- kui metsamajanduspraktikas vĂ€ga oluline. Eesti seente loend on meil kĂŒll ilmunud juba kahe raamatuna “Eesti seente koondnimestik” (JĂ€rva & E. Parmasto, 1980; JĂ€rva, I. Parmasto & Vaasma, 1998), kuid need mĂ”lemad kujutavad endast seeneliikide kommentaarideta nimestikku koos viidetega vastavale kirjandusele (kuni aastani 1990). KĂ€esolev raamat annab ĂŒlevaate umbes 4/5 Eestis kasvavatest seeneliikidest, pĂŒĂŒdes seejuures neid lĂŒhidalt iseloomustada sĂŒstemaatiliselt, ökoloogiliselt, levikuliselt, bioloogiliselt ning kasu vĂ”i kahju seisukohast inimesele. Lisaks sellele on raamatus iseloomustatud erinevaid seente kasvukohatĂŒĂŒpe Eestis, meie seente geograafiat, ökoloogiat, seenekaitset ning seente osa inimese elus. Paraku ei ole probleemide kĂ€sitlus raamatus siiski tĂ€ielik, kuna Eestis ei ole veel mitmeid seenerĂŒhmi nimetatud kĂŒsimustega seonduvalt lĂ€bi uuritud. Nii on nĂ€iteks toitumisrĂŒhmade, kasvukohtade ja levilatĂŒĂŒpidega seotud ĂŒldistav analĂŒĂŒs meil seni tehtud vaid lehikseente osas. KĂ€esolev raamat on teaduslik teatmeteos Eesti seentest. See ei ole ei mÀÀraja ega mĂŒkoloogia Ă”pik ning seetĂ”ttu ei leia siin pĂ”hjalikku kĂ€sitlemist seente ehituse, bioloogia, paljunemise ja eluviisi probleemid. Neid kĂŒsimusi vaadeldakse ĂŒksikute seenerĂŒhmade juures vaid sedavĂ”rd, kuivĂ”rd nad osutuvad vajalikuks Eestist leitud seente iseloomustamisel. MĂŒkoloogiline oskussĂ”nastik hĂ”lbustab raamatu kasutamist. VĂ”imalikult tĂ€pselt on raamatus seeneliikide kĂ”rval viidatud ka nende peremeesorganismidele koos ladinakeelsete nimetustega. Eesti kodumaistele puu- ja pÔÔsaliikidele, levinumatele köögi- ja pĂ”lluviljadele, viljapuudele ja marjapÔÔsastele ning samuti kodu- ja metsloomadele on tekstis viidatud ainult eestikeelsete nimedega, vastavad ladinakeelsed nimed tuuakse eri nimestikuna raamatu lĂ”pus. Raamatu töömahukast ning aegavĂ”tvast kirjutamisest, koostamisest ja toimetamisest on osa vĂ”tnud palju kutselisi ja mitmeid harrastusmĂŒkolooge, samuti teistegi erialade esindajaid. Raamatu koostajana ja peatoimetajana avaldan siirast tĂ€nu kĂ”igile autoritele ja kaastoimetajatele, ingliskeelsete tekstide tĂ”lkijale M.Roosile ning keelelisele korrektorile M. Johansonile, CD versiooni tegijale ja kujundajale I. KĂŒbarsepale. Raamatu failide esialgse töötlejana vÀÀrib kahtlemata tĂ€nu OÜ Eesti Loodusfoto. Oma kĂ€sikirjaliste materjalide kasutamise vĂ”imaldamise ning samuti kaastöö eest mitmete erinevate lĂ”ikude sisulisel tĂ€iendamisel ja parandamisel pĂ€lvivad lisaks neile tĂ€nu A. Jakobson, K. JĂŒrgens, A. Kalamees, L. Kalamees, M. Laane, T. Randlane ja I. Saar. KĂ€sikirja teksti trĂŒkkimise ja vormistamise eest vÀÀrib siirast tĂ€nu M. Vaasma. Eriline tĂ€nu kuulub posthuumselt raamatu illustraatorile kunstnik Georg Ć tĆĄukinile, kelle sule ja pintsli alt on tulnud vĂ€rvitahvlid ning mustvalged joonised.An investigation into Estonian mycobiota, including taxonomy, ecology, distribution and data on its resources, is presented in this book. A contemporary interpretation of the distribution of Estonian fungi between the kingdoms of Eucaryota and their systematic arrangement based on the principles of Hawksworth et al.(1995), as well as the morphology, anatomy, ecology, phenology, distribution, the profit or damage from the human point of view are considered in detail at the level of different taxonomic units from phyla to species. Trophic groups and sites, and the peculiarities of the geographical distribution of fungi in Estonia are analysed. Edible mushrooms, their resources and cultivation in Estonia, the nutritive value and ways of preservation, mycetism, mycotoxicoses and mycoses in man and domestic animals, poisonous fungi and medical uses of fungi, plant diseases caused by fungi, and dyeing of textile fabrics with fungal pigments are treated in separate chapters. Particular attention is devoted to the principles of fungus protection and the species included in the Red Data Book of Estonia and to those under state protection. The priority in the fungus investigations in Estonia belongs to Fischer and Hupel (1777). That is particularly evident in the works of Fischer (1778, 1784, 1791), Grindel (1803), Friebe (1805), Weinmann (1836), Dietrich (1856, 1859), Bucholtz (1904, 1916), Lepik (1930, 1940), Witkowsky (1934), Leisner (1937, 1938). First more concrete data of scientific significance are found in Dietrich’s and Bucholtz’s works which contain studies on the fungi of the Baltic Region of that time. From the period of 1925–1943 very important are the mycological and phytopathological investigations of prof. E. Lepik. The research centres were situated in Tartu. On E. Lepik’s initiative a number of amateur mycologists like N. Witkowsky, T. Leisner, A. RĂŒhl and V. PĂ€rtelpoeg joined in the work. In Estonia, the investigation into the systematic, ecology, distribution, pathology and coenology of fungi became more active in the 1950s, when studies were started by E. Parmasto, V. Lasting, P. PĂ”ldmaa, K. Kalamees. In the 1960s and later A. Raitviir, L. JĂ€rva, A.-L. SĂ”mermaa, M. Hanso, H. Karis, J. Sarv, K. Kask, B. Kullman, I. Parmasto, M. Vaasma, T. Normet, H. LĂ”iveke, P. Soobik joined in the research. The amateur mycologists H. Kelder, G. Shtshukin, V. Liiv and S. Veldre also took up training for mycological investigations. At present the research centre of Estonian mycology is the Institute of Zoology and Botany (department of mycology) by the Estonian Agricultural University. A new generation of mycologists, among them U. KĂ”ljalg, K. PĂ”ldmaa have appeared. The traditional classical direction in Estonian mycological research is being replaced by a new one at the genetical and molecular level. Since 1777 almost 4000 species of fungi have been recorded in Estonia (cf. JĂ€rva, 1982; Parmasto, 1989). They have been treated in nearly 2000 books and articles (cf. JĂ€rva & E. Parmasto, 1980; JĂ€rva, I. Parmasto & Vaasma, 1998). Since 1950, 159 000 specimens of fungi have been collected for the fungus herbarium of the Institute of Zoology and Botany. The Estonian Mycological Society (until June 2000 the mycology section of the Estonian Naturalists' Society) has about 30 members. The composition of Estonian mycobiota is diverse, rich in species and resources, since Estonia lies in the temperate mixed forest zone of the northern hemisphere (Kalamees, 1995). In Estonia we find favourable growth conditions for both boreal coniferous forest fungus species and nemoral deciduous forest species. As the northern border of the distribution area of oak runs through South Finland, there are good growth conditions for practically all the fungus species connected with oak in Estonia. This is the reason why our mycobiota is considerably richer in comparison with that of the other northern countries. The development and character of Estonian mycobiota have been, to a great extent, influenced by the differences between the geological history of West ad East Estonia as well as the peculiarities of the soils, flora and climate in these regions. The differences in the base rock of North and South Estonia are equally important. West and North Estonia, including the islands of the Baltic Sea, considerably differ from South and East Estonia from the mycogeographical point of view as concerns, at least, mycorrhizal Agaricales. As regards the species composition of Agaricales, West and North Estonia are similar to Central and even to South Europe. The most important factors from the point of view of fungi in West and North Estonia are the abundance of broad-leaved tree species and calcareous soils on the Silurian and Ordovician limestone base rock. For these reasons Estonia seems to occupy an important position on the eastern and northern (north-eastern) borders of many nemoral fungus species spread in West Europe. Sometimes, however, the eastern (north-eastern) and northern borders of those species run in the close vicinity of the territory of Estonia, in Russia and South Finland, respectively. Owing to all the factors mentioned above the species composition of fungi in West and North Estonia is richer and more varied than that in East and South Estonia (which is also the case with the flora of higher plants). For instance, nearly 50 species of Estonian agarics grow only (or preferably) in West and North Estonia and on the islands (Kalamees & Lasting, 1973c). The mycobiota of Estonian forests is characterized by the domination of mycorrhizal fungi and litter saprobes (Kalamees, 1980a,c, 1982). There are few humus saprobes among forest fungi, their role is more important in forest type groups with a weak or missing litter horizon, such as alvar, dry boreo- nemoral, fresh boreo-nemoral, floodplain and paludified forests. The existence of wood saprobes and parasites, as well as leaf- and needle-debris saprobes is very characteristic of forest mycobiota. In the formation of the mycobiota of forest type groups the carbonate content of soils and their moisture regimes are of paramount importance. The mycobiota of Estonian meadows consists of humus saprobes, and lots of mycorrhizal fungi in parkland meadows and litter saprobes in denser stand groups (Kalamees, 1979c, 1980a, 1982). In parkland meadows quite frequent are also wood saprobes. The composition of the mycobiota of meadows is, to quite a great extent, influenced by human activities, mainly by grazing cattle and mowing. Pastures are, for instance, always rich in coprotrophs. The determining factor in the fungus composition of dry and fresh meadows is the carbonate content of the soils. The poverty of mycobiota in paludified meadows mainly accounts for excessive moisture. The mycobiota of Estonian mires basically consists of hygrophilous humus and moss saprobes (Kalamees, 1982). As concerns forested mires a few mycorrhizal fungi are also found. The main factor determining the character of mire mycobiota is the continuous excess moisture. The calcareousness of the soils does not exert significant effect on the mycobiota of mires. The mycobiota of Estonian boreal heath grasslands is very poor in species due to the extremely infavourable growth conditions (Kalamees, 1980a). The raw-humus nature of the forest litter horizon and high acidity do not create necessary conditions for the development of litter saprobes. The mycobiota of coastal dunes is poor in species but very peculiar in its species composition: psammophilous humus saprobes and xerophilous mycorrhizal fungi of willows and pines grow there. Sandy inland plains, which represent secondarily outcropping unfixed sands, are dry and therefore offer favourable growth conditions for only a few fungus species. Vegetation of outcrops in Estonia as well as halophilous coastal areas, off-shore bars, nitrophilous areas at the nesting places of birds, etc. are also very poor in fungus species (Kalamees, 1980a). A number of water fungi grow in Estonia. They are found on plant remnants deposited on the bottom of water-bodies, on stalks of live plants and on other organic substrate in water. They mainly belong to Hyphomycetes (A. Kalamees, 1989). Macrofungi cannot grow in water, but favourable conditions for the development of many Helotiales are created in reed-beds and other groups of water plants as a result of the accumulation of decaying plant remnants after the flood has sunk. The mycobiota of ruderal and cultivated vegetation is highly varied and peculiar (Kalamees, 1981). The basic factor determining its composition is the humus content in the soil. Mainly humus saprobes grow on these sites, but coprotrophs are also often found. Lots of mycorrhizal fungi grow in parks. Estonian mycobiota is rich in edible fungi being represented by almost 400 species. The general resources of Estonian fungi reach to 36.5 thousand tons (Kalamees & Vaasma, 1980). Among forest types with stands ready for felling the following types can be undoubtedly considered the most productive: Vaccinium uliginosum pine type with 229 kg per hectare, Cladonia pine type with approximately 215 kg per hectare and Calluna pine type with approximately 239 kg per hectare (Kalamees & Vaasma, 1980; Kalamees & Silver, 1988, 1993). According to the latest data it is the young Cladonia type (25 years old) that with 569 kg per hectare exceeds manyfold the fungus yields of any other Estonian forest site. The most productive forests, as concerns the fungus yield, lie in North, South-East and South-West Estonia, and on the island of Saaremaa. As concerns fungus species, the following can be considered to be the most productive: Lactarius rufus with 495 kg per hectare, Suillus bovinus with 165 kg per hectare, Suillus variegatus with 129 kg per hectare and Russula decolorans with 94 kg per hectare (Kalamees & Silver, 1988). Among the 200 species of poisonous macrofungi have been recorded in Estonia, there are three deadly poisonous ones: Amanita virosa, A. phalloides and Inocybe erubescens. Mycetism has been rare in Estonia. Amanita virosa was the reason of four poisonings causing death during the period of 1935–1998 (see Lepik, 1935a; Witkovsky, 1935). Some quite serious poisonings were caused by Inocybe erubescens, Gyromitra esculenta, Cortinarius sp. (subg. Phlegmacium, sect. Xanthophylli), Paxillus involutus and Phaeolepiota aurea in recent years. Relatively many cases of mycotoxicoses in cattle recorded in Estonia during the last half a century were caused by spoilt feed. Dermatomycoses and candidiasis quite wide-spread mycoses are in people and domestic animals and aspergillose and trichohytosis in domestic animals and poultry. In Estonia there are about 150 species of macrofungi belonging to medical fungi, 3/4 of them for their antibiotic qualities. In fact, only 2 species have been used for this purpose. Claviceps purpurea is the only pharmacological fungus medicine used. In folk medicine Inonotus obliquus is used in the cure of cancer. There are about half a thousand fungus species in Estonia which pigments could be used for dyeing textile fabrics. However, as a matter of fact, they have never been used for this purpose. The basic principle of the fungus protection in Estonia consists in the protection of fungus habitats (Kalamees, 1988). As a result, we can protect successfully both the fungus resources and separate species requiring protection. The Red Data Book of Estonia contains 91 fungus species, the list of fungi under protection contains 30 species (Kalamees & Vaaasma, 1998).KĂ€sikirja valmimist rahastas Eesti Teadusfond ja Eesti Haridusministeerium

    Evaluation of a quality improvement intervention to reduce anastomotic leak following right colectomy (EAGLE): pragmatic, batched stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized trial in 64 countries

    Get PDF
    Background Anastomotic leak affects 8 per cent of patients after right colectomy with a 10-fold increased risk of postoperative death. The EAGLE study aimed to develop and test whether an international, standardized quality improvement intervention could reduce anastomotic leaks. Methods The internationally intended protocol, iteratively co-developed by a multistage Delphi process, comprised an online educational module introducing risk stratification, an intraoperative checklist, and harmonized surgical techniques. Clusters (hospital teams) were randomized to one of three arms with varied sequences of intervention/data collection by a derived stepped-wedge batch design (at least 18 hospital teams per batch). Patients were blinded to the study allocation. Low- and middle-income country enrolment was encouraged. The primary outcome (assessed by intention to treat) was anastomotic leak rate, and subgroup analyses by module completion (at least 80 per cent of surgeons, high engagement; less than 50 per cent, low engagement) were preplanned. Results A total 355 hospital teams registered, with 332 from 64 countries (39.2 per cent low and middle income) included in the final analysis. The online modules were completed by half of the surgeons (2143 of 4411). The primary analysis included 3039 of the 3268 patients recruited (206 patients had no anastomosis and 23 were lost to follow-up), with anastomotic leaks arising before and after the intervention in 10.1 and 9.6 per cent respectively (adjusted OR 0.87, 95 per cent c.i. 0.59 to 1.30; P = 0.498). The proportion of surgeons completing the educational modules was an influence: the leak rate decreased from 12.2 per cent (61 of 500) before intervention to 5.1 per cent (24 of 473) after intervention in high-engagement centres (adjusted OR 0.36, 0.20 to 0.64; P < 0.001), but this was not observed in low-engagement hospitals (8.3 per cent (59 of 714) and 13.8 per cent (61 of 443) respectively; adjusted OR 2.09, 1.31 to 3.31). Conclusion Completion of globally available digital training by engaged teams can alter anastomotic leak rates. Registration number: NCT04270721 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov)
    corecore