Hospital Costs Related to Early Extubation after Infant Cardiac Surgery

Background The Pediatric Heart Network Collaborative Learning Study (PHN CLS) increased early extubation rates after infant Tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) and coarctation (CoA) repair across participating sites by implementing a clinical practice guideline (CPG). The impact of the CPG on hospital costs has not been studied. Methods PHN CLS clinical data were linked to cost data from Children’s Hospital Association by matching on indirect identifiers. Hospital costs were evaluated across active and control sites in the pre- and post-CPG periods using generalized linear mixed effects models. A difference-in-difference approach was used to assess whether changes in cost observed in active sites were beyond secular trends in control sites. Results Data were successfully linked on 410/428 (96%) of eligible patients from 4 active and 4 control sites. Mean adjusted cost/case for TOF repair was significantly reduced in the post-CPG period at active sites ($42,833 vs.$56,304, p<0.01) and unchanged at control sites ($47,007 vs.$46,476, p=0.91), with an overall cost reduction of 27% in active vs. control sites (p=0.03). Specific categories of cost reduced in the TOF cohort included clinical (-66%, p<0.01), pharmacy (-46%, p=0.04), lab (-44%, p<0.01), and imaging (-32%, p<0.01). There was no change in costs for CoA repair at active or control sites. Conclusions The early extubation CPG was associated with a reduction in hospital costs for infants undergoing repair of TOF, but not CoA repair. This CPG represents an opportunity to both optimize clinical outcome and reduce costs for certain infant cardiac surgeries

Effect of a pediatric early warning system on all-cause mortality in Hospitalized pediatric patients: The epoch randomized clinical trial

IMPORTANCE: There is limited evidence that the use of severity of illness scores in pediatric patients can facilitate timely admission to the intensive care unit or improve patient outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of the Bedside Paediatric Early Warning System (BedsidePEWS) on all-cause hospital mortality and late admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), cardiac arrest, and ICU resource use. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A multicenter cluster randomized trial of 21 hospitals located in 7 countries (Belgium, Canada, England, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, and the Netherlands) that provided inpatient pediatric care for infants (gestational age ≥37 weeks) to teenagers (aged ≤18 years). Participating hospitals had continuous physician staffing and subspecialized pediatric services. Patient enrollment began on February 28, 2011, and ended on June 21, 2015. Follow-up ended on July 19, 2015. INTERVENTIONS: The BedsidePEWS intervention (10 hospitals) was compared with usual care (no severity of illness score; 11 hospitals). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was all-cause hospital mortality. The secondary outcome was a significant clinical deterioration event, which was defined as a composite outcome reflecting late ICU admission. Regression analyses accounted for hospital-level clustering and baseline rates. RESULTS: Among 144539 patient discharges at 21 randomized hospitals, there were 559 443 patient-days and 144539 patients (100%) completed the trial. All-cause hospital mortality was 1.93 per 1000 patient discharges at hospitals with BedsidePEWS and 1.56 per 1000 patient discharges at hospitals with usual care (adjusted between-group rate difference, 0.01 [95% CI, -0.80 to 0.81 per 1000 patient discharges]; adjusted odds ratio, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.61 to 1.69]; P =.96). Significant clinical deterioration events occurred during 0.50 per 1000 patient-days at hospitals with BedsidePEWS vs 0.84 per 1000 patient-days at hospitals with usual care (adjusted between-group rate difference, -0.34 [95% CI, -0.73 to 0.05 per 1000 patient-days]; adjusted rate ratio, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.61 to 0.97]; P =.03). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Implementation of the Bedside Paediatric Early Warning System compared with usual care did not significantly decrease all-cause mortality among hospitalized pediatric patients. These findings do not support the use of this system to reduce mortality

Prospective Assessment of Coronary Artery Flows Before and After Cardiopulmonary Bypass in Children With a Spectrum of Congenital Heart Disease

Background: Normative data for the effect of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) on coronary artery Doppler velocities by transesophageal echocardiography in paediatric patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) are lacking. The objective of the study was to prospectively examine the effects of CPB on coronary artery flow patterns by transesophageal echocardiography before and after CPB in children with CHD. Methods: All cases undergoing CHD surgery at the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, were eligible. The excluded cases included Norwood operation, heart transplantation, or weight <2.5 kg. Coronary Dopplers and coronary flow reserve (CFR) for the right coronary artery (RCA) and left anterior descending (LAD) were obtained. Multivariable analyses using linear regression models were performed, adjusted for age and cross-clamp time. Results: From May 2017 to June 2018, 69 children (median age at surgery: 0.7 years, interquartile range [IQR]: 0.4-3.7 years; median weight: 7.4 kg, IQR: 5.8-13.3 kg) were included. They were grouped into shunt lesions (N = 26), obstructive lesions (N = 26), transposition of the great arteries (N = 5), and single ventricle (N = 12). N = 39 (57%) were primary repairs, and 56 (81%) had 1 CPB run. For RCA and LAD peak velocities, there was an increase from pre- to post-CPB in RCA peak 39 cm/s (IQR: 30-54 cm/s) to 65 cm/s (IQR: 47-81 cm/s), P < 0.001, mean CFR 1.52 (IQR: 1.25-1.81), and LAD peak 49 cm/s (IQR: 39-60 cm/s) to 70 cm/s (IQR: 52-90 cm/s), P < 0.001, mean CFR 1.48 (IQR: 1.14-1.77). Conclusions: Coronary flow velocities increase from pre- to post-CPB in congenital heart lesions. CFR is consistent across all lesions but is relatively low compared with the adult population. Résumé: Contexte: On ne dispose pas de données normatives sur les effets de la dérivation cardiopulmonaire (DCP) sur le débit coronarien mesuré au moyen d’une échocardiographie transœsophagienne Doppler chez des enfants présentant une cardiopathie congénitale. L’objectif de l’étude était d’examiner de manière prospective les effets de la DCP sur le débit coronarien avant et après l’intervention chez des enfants présentant une cardiopathie congénitale. Méthodologie: Tous les enfants ayant subi une intervention chirurgicale pour une cardiopathie congénitale à l’Hospital for Sick Children de Toronto étaient admissibles à l’étude, à l’exception de ceux ayant subi une intervention de Norwood ou une transplantation cardiaque, de même que les enfants pesant moins de 2,5 kg. Les résultats du test Doppler et la réserve coronarienne pour l’artère coronaire droite (ACD) et la branche antérieure de l’artère coronaire gauche (ACG) ont été obtenus. Des analyses multivariées ont été réalisées au moyen de modèles de régression linéaire, avec correction en fonction de l’âge et du temps de clampage total. Résultats: Entre mai 2017 et juin 2018, 69 enfants (âge médian au moment de la chirurgie : 0,7 an, intervalle interquartile (IIQ) : 0,4-3,7 ans; poids médian : 7,4 kg, IIQ : 5,8-13,3 kg) ont été inclus dans l’étude. Les sujets ont été répartis en quatre groupes : shunts (n = 26), lésions obstructives (n = 26), permutation des gros vaisseaux (n = 5) et ventricule unique (n = 12). Chez 39 sujets (57 %), il s’agissait d’une réparation primitive, et 56 enfants (81 %) avaient déjà subi une DCP. Les vitesses maximales dans l’ACD et dans la branche antérieure de l’ACG ont augmenté après la DCP, passant de 39 cm/s (IIQ : 30-54 cm/s) à 65 cm/s (IIQ : 47-81 cm/s), p < 0,001; réserve coronarienne moyenne : 1,52 (IIQ : 1,25-1,81) pour l’ACD, et de 49 cm/s (IIQ : 39-60 cm/s) à 70 cm/s (IIQ : 52-90 cm/s), p < 0,001; réserve coronarienne moyenne : 1,48 (IIQ : 1,14-1,77) pour la branche antérieure de l’ACG. Conclusions: Le débit coronarien augmente après une DCP dans les cas de lésions cardiaques congénitales. La réserve coronarienne est constante dans tous les types de lésions, mais elle est relativement faible comparativement à celle de la population adulte

Health-status outcomes with invasive or conservative care in coronary disease

BACKGROUND In the ISCHEMIA trial, an invasive strategy with angiographic assessment and revascularization did not reduce clinical events among patients with stable ischemic heart disease and moderate or severe ischemia. A secondary objective of the trial was to assess angina-related health status among these patients. METHODS We assessed angina-related symptoms, function, and quality of life with the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) at randomization, at months 1.5, 3, and 6, and every 6 months thereafter in participants who had been randomly assigned to an invasive treatment strategy (2295 participants) or a conservative strategy (2322). Mixed-effects cumulative probability models within a Bayesian framework were used to estimate differences between the treatment groups. The primary outcome of this health-status analysis was the SAQ summary score (scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health status). All analyses were performed in the overall population and according to baseline angina frequency. RESULTS At baseline, 35% of patients reported having no angina in the previous month. SAQ summary scores increased in both treatment groups, with increases at 3, 12, and 36 months that were 4.1 points (95% credible interval, 3.2 to 5.0), 4.2 points (95% credible interval, 3.3 to 5.1), and 2.9 points (95% credible interval, 2.2 to 3.7) higher with the invasive strategy than with the conservative strategy. Differences were larger among participants who had more frequent angina at baseline (8.5 vs. 0.1 points at 3 months and 5.3 vs. 1.2 points at 36 months among participants with daily or weekly angina as compared with no angina). CONCLUSIONS In the overall trial population with moderate or severe ischemia, which included 35% of participants without angina at baseline, patients randomly assigned to the invasive strategy had greater improvement in angina-related health status than those assigned to the conservative strategy. The modest mean differences favoring the invasive strategy in the overall group reflected minimal differences among asymptomatic patients and larger differences among patients who had had angina at baseline

Initial invasive or conservative strategy for stable coronary disease

BACKGROUND Among patients with stable coronary disease and moderate or severe ischemia, whether clinical outcomes are better in those who receive an invasive intervention plus medical therapy than in those who receive medical therapy alone is uncertain. METHODS We randomly assigned 5179 patients with moderate or severe ischemia to an initial invasive strategy (angiography and revascularization when feasible) and medical therapy or to an initial conservative strategy of medical therapy alone and angiography if medical therapy failed. The primary outcome was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, or hospitalization for unstable angina, heart failure, or resuscitated cardiac arrest. A key secondary outcome was death from cardiovascular causes or myocardial infarction. RESULTS Over a median of 3.2 years, 318 primary outcome events occurred in the invasive-strategy group and 352 occurred in the conservative-strategy group. At 6 months, the cumulative event rate was 5.3% in the invasive-strategy group and 3.4% in the conservative-strategy group (difference, 1.9 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8 to 3.0); at 5 years, the cumulative event rate was 16.4% and 18.2%, respectively (difference, 121.8 percentage points; 95% CI, 124.7 to 1.0). Results were similar with respect to the key secondary outcome. The incidence of the primary outcome was sensitive to the definition of myocardial infarction; a secondary analysis yielded more procedural myocardial infarctions of uncertain clinical importance. There were 145 deaths in the invasive-strategy group and 144 deaths in the conservative-strategy group (hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.32). CONCLUSIONS Among patients with stable coronary disease and moderate or severe ischemia, we did not find evidence that an initial invasive strategy, as compared with an initial conservative strategy, reduced the risk of ischemic cardiovascular events or death from any cause over a median of 3.2 years. The trial findings were sensitive to the definition of myocardial infarction that was used