Suicide Pact

Objective: To determine the time of diagnosis of typical orofacial clefts in different Brazilian regions and its influence on age at surgical correction. Method: This was a prospective, descriptive, cross-sectional study conducted in medical centers in the Southeast, South, and Northeast of Brazil. Trained speech therapists and geneticists interviewed the parents of affected children using a previously validated questionnaire. Epi-Info and SPSS were used for data analysis. Significance level was set at 5% (p ≤ 0.05). Results: The sample consisted of 215 interviews conducted in the following regions: 21.9% (47) in the Southeast, 51.1% (110) in the South, and 27% (58) in the Northeast. Monthly family income was higher in the Southeast (p ≤ 0.05). Cleft lip and palate were found in 61.4% (132) of cases, cleft palate in 20.9% (45), and cleft lip in 17.7% (38). Diagnosis occurred in the maternity ward in 75.3% (162) of cases, during the prenatal period in 14% (30), and after hospital discharge in 10.2% (22). The Southeast had a higher frequency of prenatal diagnosis (27.7%), possibly related to greater purchasing power in this region and greater availability of prenatal investigation. Of all cases diagnosed in the maternity ward, 74.4% occurred in the Northeast. However, no significant difference was found when comparing time of diagnosis, region, and age at first surgery. Conclusion: Considering that diagnosis is more common in the maternity ward, local health care teams should be trained in order to effectively improve the initial care of these patients. Although time of diagnosis did not affect age at surgery, it favors the planning of neonatal care and treatment of affected infants. Copyright © 2011 by Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria.873225230Wyszynski, D.F., (2002) Cleft Lip and Palate: From Origin to Treatment, , New York: Oxford University PressMoore, K.L., Persaud, T.V., The Pharyngeal (Branchial) Apparatus (1998) The Developing Human Clinically Oriented Embryology, pp. 215-256. , Moore KL, Persaud TV. 6th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: WB SaundersMossey, P.A., Little, J., Epidemiology of oral clefts: An international perspective (2002) Cleft Lip and Palate: from Origin to Treatment, pp. 127-158. , Wyszynski DF, editor. New York: Oxford University PressGlobal strategies to reduce the healthcare burden of craniofacial anomalies (2002) Report of WHO Meetings on International Collaborative Research on Craniofacial Anomalies, , Word Health Organization. Geneva: WHOStoll, C., Alembik, Y., Dott, B., Roth, M.P., Associated malformations in cases with oral clefts (2000) Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 37 (1), pp. 41-47Marazita, M.L., Mooney, M.P., Current concepts in the embryology and genetics of cleft lip and cleft palate (2004) Clin Plast Surg, 31, pp. 125-140Cohen Jr., M.M., Gorlin, R.J., Fraser, F.C., Craniofacial Disorders (1997) Emery and Rimoin's Principles and Practice of Medical Genetics, pp. 1121-1148. , Rimoin DL, Connor JM, Pyeritz RE, Korf BR, editors. New York: Churchill LivingstoneShprintzen, R.J., Siegel-Sadewitz, V.L., Amato, J., Goldberg, R.B., Anomalies associated with cleft lip, cleft palate, or both (1985) American Journal of Medical Genetics, 20 (4), pp. 585-595. , DOI 10.1002/ajmg.1320200404Offerdal, K., Jebens, N., Syvertsen, T., Blaas, H.G., Johansen, O.J., Eik-Nes, S.H., Prenatal ultrasound detection of facial clefts: A prospective study of 49,314 deliveries in a non-selected population in Norway (2008) Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 31, pp. 639-646Russell, K.A., Allen, V.M., MacDonald, M.E., Smith, K., Dodds, L., A population-based evaluation of antenatal diagnosis of orofacial clefts (2008) Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 45 (2), pp. 148-153. , DOI 10.1597/06-202.1Bunduki, V., Ruano, R., Sapienza, A.D., Hanaoka, B.Y., Zugaib, M., Diagnóstico pré-natal de fenda labial e palatina: Experiência de 40 casos (2001) RBGO, 23, pp. 561-566Grandjean, H., Larroque, D., Levi, S., The performance of routine ultrasonographic screening of pregnancies in the Eurofetus Study (1999) American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 181 (2), pp. 446-454. , DOI 10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70577-6Amstalden-Mendes, L.G., Magna, L.A., Gil-da-Silva-Lopes, V.L., Neonatal care of infants with cleft lip and/or palate: Feeding orientation and evolution of weight gain in a nonspecialized Brazilian hospital (2007) Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 44 (3), pp. 329-334. , DOI 10.1597/05-177Reid, J., A review of feeding interventions for infants with cleft palate (2004) Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 41 (3), pp. 268-278. , DOI 10.1597/02-148.1Shaw, W.C., Semb, G., Nelson, P., Brattström, V., Molsted, K., Prahl- Andersen, B., The Eurocleft Project 1996-2000: Overview (2001) J Cranio-maxillofacial Surgery, 29, pp. 131-140Chitty, L.S., Griffin, D.R., Anormalidades do lábio e do palato fetal: Diagnóstico ultra-sonográfico (2005) Tratamento de Fissura Labial e Fenda Palatina, pp. 107-116. , Watson AC, Sell DA, Grunwell P. São Paulo: Editora SantosHabel, A., O papel do pediatra (2005) Tratamento de Fissura Labial e Fenda Palatina, pp. 123-135. , Watson AC, Sell DA, Grunwell P. São Paulo: Editora SantosRibeiro-Roda, S., Gil-da-Silva-Lopes, V.L., Aspectos odontológicos das fendas labiopalatinas e orientações para cuidados básicos (2008) Rev Cienc Med, 17, pp. 95-103Monlleo, I.L., Gil-da-Silva-Lopes, V.L., Craniofacial anomalies: Description and evaluation of treatment under the Brazilian Unified Health System (2006) Cadernos de Saude Publica, 22 (5), pp. 913-922. , http://www.scielo.br/pdf/csp/v22n5/04.pdfLoffredo, L.C., Freitas, J.A., Grigolli, A.A., Prevalência das fissuras orais de 1975 a 1994 (2001) Rev Saude Publica, 35, pp. 571-575Nunes, L.M., Queluz, D.P., Pereira, A.C., Prevalência de fissuras labiopalatais no município de Campos dos Goytacazes-RJ, 1999-2004 (2007) Rev Bras Epidemiol, 10, pp. 109-116Cerqueira, M.N., Teixeira, S.C., Naressi, S.C., Ferrreira, A.P., Ocorrência de fissuras labiopalatais na cidade de São José dos Campos-SP (2005) Rev Bras Epidemiol, 8, pp. 161-166Di Ninno, C.Q., Santos, P.G., Bueno, M.G., Syrio, I.M., A influência da época do diagnóstico das fissuras labiopalatinas (2006) Rev Soc Bras Fonoaudiol, 11, pp. 75-81Jones, M.C., Prenatal diagnosis of cleft lip and palate: Detection rates, accuracy of ultrasonography, associated anomalies and strategies for counseling (2002) Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 39, pp. 169-173Johnson, N., Sandy, J.R., Prenatal diagnosis of cleft lip and palate (2003) Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 40 (2), pp. 186-189. , DOI 10.1597/1545-1569(2003)0402.0.CO;2Bradbury, E., Bannister, P., Aconselhamento pré-natal, perinatal e pós-natal (2005) Tratamento de Fissura Labial e Fenda Palatina, pp. 117-122. , Watson AC, Sell DA, Grunwell P. São Paulo: Editora SantosDi Ninno, C.Q., Gomes, R.O., Santos, P.G., Bueno, M.G., Galvão, D.A., Meira, A.L., O conhecimento de profissionais da área da saúde sobre fissura labiopalatina (2004) Rev Soc Bras Fonoaudiol, 9, pp. 93-101Schardosim, L.R., Nogueira, D.A., Bosco, V.L., Pereima, M.J., Bebês portadores de fissura labiopalatal: Satisfação dos pais com as orientações recebidas dos profissionais (2004) JBP Rev Ibero-am Odontopediatr Odontol Bebe, 7, pp. 568-573Amstalden-Mendes, L.G., Gil-da-Silva-Lopes, V.L., Fenda de lábio e ou palato: Recursos para alimentação antes da correção cirúrgica (2006) Rev Cienc Med, 15, pp. 437-448. , CampinasVieira, G.O., Martins, C.C., Vieira, T.O., De Oliveira, N.F., Silva, L.R., Factors predicting early discontinuation of exclusive breastfeeding in the first month of life (2010) J Pediatr, 86, pp. 441-444. , Rio

Measurement of the p-pbar -> Wgamma + X cross section at sqrt(s) = 1.96 TeV and WWgamma anomalous coupling limits

The WWgamma triple gauge boson coupling parameters are studied using p-pbar -> l nu gamma + X (l = e,mu) events at sqrt(s) = 1.96 TeV. The data were collected with the DO detector from an integrated luminosity of 162 pb^{-1} delivered by the Fermilab Tevatron Collider. The cross section times branching fraction for p-pbar -> W(gamma) + X -> l nu gamma + X with E_T^{gamma} > 8 GeV and Delta R_{l gamma} > 0.7 is 14.8 +/- 1.6 (stat) +/- 1.0 (syst) +/- 1.0 (lum) pb. The one-dimensional 95% confidence level limits on anomalous couplings are -0.88 < Delta kappa_{gamma} < 0.96 and -0.20 < lambda_{gamma} < 0.20.Comment: Submitted to Phys. Rev. D Rapid Communication

Measurement of the ttbar Production Cross Section in ppbar Collisions at sqrt{s} = 1.96 TeV using Kinematic Characteristics of Lepton + Jets Events

We present a measurement of the top quark pair ttbar production cross section in ppbar collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 1.96 TeV using 230 pb**{-1} of data collected by the DO detector at the Fermilab Tevatron Collider. We select events with one charged lepton (electron or muon), large missing transverse energy, and at least four jets, and extract the ttbar content of the sample based on the kinematic characteristics of the events. For a top quark mass of 175 GeV, we measure sigma(ttbar) = 6.7 {+1.4-1.3} (stat) {+1.6- 1.1} (syst) +/-0.4 (lumi) pb, in good agreement with the standard model prediction.Comment: submitted to Phys.Rev.Let

Measurement of the ttbar Production Cross Section in ppbar Collisions at sqrt(s)=1.96 TeV using Lepton + Jets Events with Lifetime b-tagging

We present a measurement of the top quark pair ($t\bar{t}$) production cross section ($\sigma_{t\bar{t}}$) in $p\bar{p}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}=1.96$ TeV using 230 pb$^{-1}$ of data collected by the D0 experiment at the Fermilab Tevatron Collider. We select events with one charged lepton (electron or muon), missing transverse energy, and jets in the final state. We employ lifetime-based b-jet identification techniques to further enhance the $t\bar{t}$ purity of the selected sample. For a top quark mass of 175 GeV, we measure $\sigma_{t\bar{t}}=8.6^{+1.6}_{-1.5}(stat.+syst.)\pm 0.6(lumi.)$ pb, in agreement with the standard model expectation.Comment: 7 pages, 2 figures, 3 tables Submitted to Phys.Rev.Let

Search for W' bosons decaying to an electron and a neutrino with the D0 detector

This Letter describes the search for a new heavy charged gauge boson W' decaying into an electron and a neutrino. The data were collected with the D0 detector at the Fermilab Tevatron proton-antiproton Collider at a center-of-mass energy of 1.96 TeV, and correspond to an integrated luminosity of about 1 inverse femtobarn. Lacking any significant excess in the data in comparison with known processes, an upper limit is set on the production cross section times branching fraction, and a W' boson with mass below 1.00 TeV can be excluded at the 95% C.L., assuming standard-model-like couplings to fermions. This result significantly improves upon previous limits, and is the most stringent to date.Comment: submitted to Phys. Rev. Let

Measurement of the ratios of the Z/G* + >= n jet production cross sections to the total inclusive Z/G* cross section in ppbar collisions at sqrt(s) = 1.96 TeV

We present a study of events with Z bosons and jets produced at the Fermilab Tevatron Collider in ppbar collisions at a center of mass energy of 1.96 TeV. The data sample consists of nearly 14,000 Z/G* -> e+e- candidates corresponding to the integrated luminosity of 0.4 fb-1 collected using the D0 detector. Ratios of the Z/G* + >= n jet cross sections to the total inclusive Z/G* cross section have been measured for n = 1 to 4 jet events. Our measurements are found to be in good agreement with a next-to-leading order QCD calculation and with a tree-level QCD prediction with parton shower simulation and hadronization.Comment: 7 pages, 2 figures, slightly modified, submitted to Phys. Lett.

Measurement of the Isolated Photon Cross Section in p-pbar Collisions at sqrt{s}=1.96 TeV

The cross section for the inclusive production of isolated photons has been measured in p anti-p collisions at sqrt{s}=1.96 TeV with the D0 detector at the Fermilab Tevatron Collider. The photons span transverse momenta 23 to 300 GeV and have pseudorapidity |eta|<0.9. The cross section is compared with the results from two next-to-leading order perturbative QCD calculations. The theoretical predictions agree with the measurement within uncertainties.Comment: 7 pages, 5 figures, submitted to Phys.Lett.