Dendritic Cells: The Tools for Cancer Treatment

During cancer immune editing, the immune system shapes tumor fate in three phases through the activation of innate and adaptive immune mechanisms. After the elimination and equilibrium phase, the escape phase represents the final phase in which immunologically sculpted tumors begin to grow progressively. In this chapter, we will discuss which efforts are made to restore the balance in favor of the immune system making use of dendritic cells (DCs). The first approach is adoptive cell transfer, in which autologous DCs are generated and activated ex vivo. Secondly, we will discuss attempts in which pro-inflammatory or pro-migratory factors are delivered to attract and activate DCs in situ. Both strategies have the general goal to activate and mature DCs able to induce a robust tumor-specific T cell response. In addition, this chapter will discuss the clinical impact of DC-based therapies in cancer treatment focusing on the safety, feasibility, immunological responses, and clinical outcome

Immunomodulation of the Tumor Microenvironment: Turn Foe Into Friend

Immunotherapy, where the patient's own immune system is exploited to eliminate tumor cells, has become one of the most prominent new cancer treatment options in the last decade. The main hurdle for classical cancer vaccines is the need to identify tumor- and patient specific antigens to include in the vaccine. Therefore, in situ vaccination represents an alternative and promising approach. This type of immunotherapy involves the direct intratumoral administration of different immunomodulatory agents and uses the tumor itself as the source of antigen. The ultimate aim is to convert an immunodormant tumor microenvironment into an immunostimulatory one, enabling the immune system to eradicate all tumor lesions in the body. In this review we will give an overview of different strategies, which can be exploited for the immunomodulation of the tumor microenvironment and their emerging role in the treatment of cancer patients

A comprehensive quantification of global nitrous oxide sources and sinks

Nitrous oxide (N2O), like carbon dioxide, is a long-lived greenhouse gas that accumulates in the atmosphere. Over the past 150 years, increasing atmospheric N2O concentrations have contributed to stratospheric ozone depletion1 and climate change2, with the current rate of increase estimated at 2 per cent per decade. Existing national inventories do not provide a full picture of N2O emissions, owing to their omission of natural sources and limitations in methodology for attributing anthropogenic sources. Here we present a global N2O inventory that incorporates both natural and anthropogenic sources and accounts for the interaction between nitrogen additions and the biochemical processes that control N2O emissions. We use bottom-up (inventory, statistical extrapolation of flux measurements, process-based land and ocean modelling) and top-down (atmospheric inversion) approaches to provide a comprehensive quantification of global N2O sources and sinks resulting from 21 natural and human sectors between 1980 and 2016. Global N2O emissions were 17.0 (minimum–maximum estimates: 12.2–23.5) teragrams of nitrogen per year (bottom-up) and 16.9 (15.9–17.7) teragrams of nitrogen per year (top-down) between 2007 and 2016. Global human-induced emissions, which are dominated by nitrogen additions to croplands, increased by 30% over the past four decades to 7.3 (4.2–11.4) teragrams of nitrogen per year. This increase was mainly responsible for the growth in the atmospheric burden. Our findings point to growing N2O emissions in emerging economies—particularly Brazil, China and India. Analysis of process-based model estimates reveals an emerging N2O–climate feedback resulting from interactions between nitrogen additions and climate change. The recent growth in N2O emissions exceeds some of the highest projected emission scenarios3,4, underscoring the urgency to mitigate N2O emissions

Enhanced suppressive capacity of tumor-infiltrating myeloid-derived suppressor cells compared with their peripheral counterparts

Although the main site of action for myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) is most likely the tumor microenvironment, so far the study of these cells has been largely restricted to spleen-derived MDSCs. In this study, we compared the suppressive capacity of splenic and tumor-derived MDSCs in different subcutaneous mouse tumor models. We investigated which suppressive mechanisms were involved. Finally, we investigated whether MDSCs and regulatory T cells (T-reg) cooperate in the suppression of T-cell responses. In all models, splenic granulocytic MDSCs (grMDSC) strongly suppress CD4(+) T-cell proliferation while the suppressive effect on CD8(+) T cells is less pronounced. Splenic monocytic MDSCs (moMDSC) have a lower suppressive capacity, compared to grMDSC, on both CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-cell proliferation. Both grMDSC and moMDSC isolated from the tumor have a much stronger suppressive activity compared to MDSCs isolated from the spleen of tumor-bearing mice, associated with a higher NO2- production by the tumor-derived moMDSC and arginase activity for both subsets. The expression of CD80 is also elevated on tumor-derived grMDSC compared with their peripheral counterparts. Direct contact with tumor cells is required for the upregulation of CD80 and CD80(+) MDSCs are more suppressive than CD80(-) MDSCs. Coculture of T-reg and MDSCs leads to a stronger suppression of CD8(+) T-cell proliferation compared to the suppression observed by T-reg or MDSCs alone. Thus, we showed that tumor-infiltrating MDSCs possess a stronger suppressive capacity than their peripheral counterparts and that various suppressive mechanisms account for this difference

Enhanced suppressive capacity of tumor‐infiltrating myeloid‐derived suppressor cells compared with their peripheral counterparts

Although the main site of action for myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) is most likely the tumor microenvironment, so far the study of these cells has been largely restricted to spleen-derived MDSCs. In this study, we compared the suppressive capacity of splenic and tumor-derived MDSCs in different subcutaneous mouse tumor models. We investigated which suppressive mechanisms were involved. Finally, we investigated whether MDSCs and regulatory T cells (T-reg) cooperate in the suppression of T-cell responses. In all models, splenic granulocytic MDSCs (grMDSC) strongly suppress CD4(+) T-cell proliferation while the suppressive effect on CD8(+) T cells is less pronounced. Splenic monocytic MDSCs (moMDSC) have a lower suppressive capacity, compared to grMDSC, on both CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-cell proliferation. Both grMDSC and moMDSC isolated from the tumor have a much stronger suppressive activity compared to MDSCs isolated from the spleen of tumor-bearing mice, associated with a higher NO2- production by the tumor-derived moMDSC and arginase activity for both subsets. The expression of CD80 is also elevated on tumor-derived grMDSC compared with their peripheral counterparts. Direct contact with tumor cells is required for the upregulation of CD80 and CD80(+) MDSCs are more suppressive than CD80(-) MDSCs. Coculture of T-reg and MDSCs leads to a stronger suppression of CD8(+) T-cell proliferation compared to the suppression observed by T-reg or MDSCs alone. Thus, we showed that tumor-infiltrating MDSCs possess a stronger suppressive capacity than their peripheral counterparts and that various suppressive mechanisms account for this difference

Investigations on bubble behaviour at a dip tube for enhanced densitometry and level measurements /

Diss. burgerlijk natuurkundig ingenieu

Combined VEGFR and CTLA-4 blockade increases the antigen-presenting function of intratumoral DCs and reduces the suppressive capacity of intratumoral MDSCs.

peer reviewedMelanoma brain metastases (MBM) occur in 10% to 50% of melanoma patients. They are often associated with a high morbidity and despite the improvements in the treatment of advanced melanoma, including immunotherapy, patients with MBM still have a poor prognosis. Antiangiogenic treatment was shown to reduce the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Therefore we investigated the effect of the combination of VEGFR- and CTLA-4 blockade on the immune cells within the tumor microenvironment. In this study we investigated the effect of the combination of axitinib, a TKI against VEGFR-1, -2 and -3, with therapeutic inhibition of CTLA-4 in subcutaneous and intracranial mouse melanoma models. The combination of axitinib with αCTLA-4 reduced tumor growth and increased survival in both intracranial and subcutaneous models. Investigation of the splenic immune cells showed an increased number of CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells after combination treatment. Moreover, combination treatment increased the number of intratumoral dendritic cells (DCs) and monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells (moMDSCs). When these immune cell populations were sorted from the subcutaneous and intracranial tumors of mice treated with axitinib+αCTLA-4, we observed an increased antigen-presenting function of DCs and a reduced suppressive capacity of moMDSCs on a per cell basis. Our results suggest that the combination of antiangiogenesis and checkpoint inhibition can lead to an enhanced antitumor effect leading to increased survival. We found that this effect is in part due to an enhanced antitumor immune response generated by an increased antigen-presenting function of intratumoral DCs in combination with a reduced suppressive capacity of intratumoral moMDSCs

Axitinib increases the infiltration of immune cells and reduces the suppressive capacity of monocytic MDSCs in an intracranial mouse melanoma model

Melanoma patients are at a high risk of developing brain metastases, which are strongly vascularized and therefore have a significant risk of spontaneous bleeding. VEGF not only plays a role in neo-angiogenesis but also in the antitumor immune response. VEGFR-targeted therapy might not only have an impact on the tumor vascularization but also on tumor-infiltrating immune cells. In this study, we investigated the effect of axitinib, a small molecule TKI of VEGFR-1, -2, and -3, on tumor growth and on the composition of tumor-infiltrating immune cells in subcutaneous and intracranial mouse melanoma models. In vivo treatment with axitinib induced a strong inhibition of tumor growth and significantly improved survival in both tumor models. Characterization of the immune cells within the spleen and tumor of tumor-bearing mice respectively showed a significant increase in the number of CD3(+)CD8(+) T cells and CD11b(+) cells of axitinib-treated mice. More specifically, we observed a significant increase of intratumoral monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells (moMDSCs; CD11b(+)Ly6C(high)Ly6G(-)). Interestingly, in vitro proliferation assays showed that moMDSCs isolated from spleen or tumor of axitinib-treated mice had a reduced suppressive capacity on a per cell basis as compared to those isolated from vehicle-treated mice. Moreover, MDSCs from axitinib-treated animals displayed the capacity to stimulate allogeneic T cells. Thus, treatment with axitinib induces differentiation of moMDSC toward an antigen-presenting phenotype. Based on these observations, we conclude that the impact of axitinib on tumor growth and survival is most likely not restricted to direct anti-angiogenic effects but also involves important effects on tumor immunity

Preclinical evaluation of TriMix and antigen mRNA-based anti-tumor therapy

The use of tumor-associated antigen (TAA) mRNA for therapeutic purposes is under active investigation. To be effective, mRNA vaccines need to deliver activation stimuli in addition to TAAs to dendritic cells (DC). In this study, we evaluated whether intranodal delivery of TAA mRNA together with TriMix, a mix of mRNA encoding CD40 ligand, constitutive active Toll-like receptor 4 and CD70, results in the in situ modification and maturation of DCs, hence, priming of TAA-specific T cells. We showed selective uptake and translation of mRNA in vivo by lymph node resident CD11c(+) cells. This process was hampered by codelivery of classical maturation stimuli but not by TriMix mRNA. Importantly, TriMix mRNA induced a T-cell-attracting and stimulatory environment, including recruitment of antigen-specific CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells and CTLs against various TAAs. In several mouse tumor models, mRNA vaccination was as efficient in CTL induction and therapy response as vaccination with mRNA-electroporated DCs. Together, our findings suggest that intranodal administration of TAA mRNA together with mRNA encoding immunomodulating molecules is a promising vaccination strategy

Intratumoral delivery of TriMix mRNA results in T-cell activation by cross-presenting dendritic cells.

Modulating the activity of tumor-infiltrating dendritic cells (TiDCs) provides opportunities for novel cancer interventions. In this study, we report on the uptake of mRNA by CD8α+ cross-presenting TiDCs upon its intratumoral (IT) delivery. We exploited this property to deliver mRNA encoding the co-stimulatory molecule CD70, the activation stimuli CD40 ligand, and constitutively active Toll-like receptor 4, referred to as TriMix mRNA. We show that TiDCs are reprogrammed to mature antigen-presenting cells that migrate to tumor-draining lymph nodes (TDLNs). TriMix stimulated antitumor T-cell responses to spontaneously engulfed cancer antigens, including a neoepitope. We showed in various mouse cancer models that IT delivery of TriMix mRNA results in systemic therapeutic antitumor immunity. Finally, we showed that the induction of antitumor responses critically depends on TiDCs, whereas it only partially depends on TDLNs. As such we provide a platform and a mechanistic rationale for the clinical testing of IT administration of TriMix mRNA.SCOPUS: ar.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe