Early high-titer plasma therapy to prevent severe Covid-19 in older adults

BACKGROUND: Therapies to interrupt the progression of early coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) remain elusive. Among them, convalescent plasma administered to hospitalized patients has been unsuccessful, perhaps because antibodies should be administered earlier in the course of illness. METHODS We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of convalescent plasma with high IgG titers against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in older adult patients within 72 hours after the onset of mild Covid-19 symptoms. The primary end point was severe respiratory disease, defined as a respiratory rate of 30 breaths per minute or more, an oxygen saturation of less than 93% while the patient was breathing ambient air, or both. The trial was stopped early at 76% of its projected sample size because cases of Covid-19 in the trial region decreased considerably and steady enrollment of trial patients became virtually impossible. RESULTS A total of 160 patients underwent randomization. In the intention-to-treat population, severe respiratory disease developed in 13 of 80 patients (16%) who received convalescent plasma and 25 of 80 patients (31%) who received placebo (relative risk, 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.29 to 0.94; P = 0.03), with a relative risk reduction of 48%. A modified intention-to-treat analysis that excluded 6 patients who had a primary end-point event before infusion of convalescent plasma or placebo showed a larger effect size (relative risk, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.81). No solicited adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS Early administration of high-titer convalescent plasma against SARS-CoV-2 to mildly ill infected older adults reduced the progression of Covid-19. (Funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Fundación INFANT Pandemic Fund; Dirección de Sangre y Medicina Transfusional del Ministerio de Salud number, PAEPCC19, Plataforma de Registro Informatizado de Investigaciones en Salud number, 1421, and ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04479163.).Fil: Libster, Romina Paula. Fundación para la Investigación en Infectología Infantil; ArgentinaFil: Pérez Marc, Gonzalo. Hospital Militar Central, Buenos Aires; ArgentinaFil: Wappner, Diego. Fundación para la Investigación en Infectología Infantil; ArgentinaFil: Coviello, Silvina Andrea. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Fundación para la Investigación en Infectología Infantil; ArgentinaFil: Bianchi, Alejandra. Fundación para la Investigación en Infectología Infantil; ArgentinaFil: Braem, Virginia. Fundación para la Investigación en Infectología Infantil; ArgentinaFil: Esteban, Ignacio. Fundación para la Investigación en Infectología Infantil; ArgentinaFil: Caballero, Mauricio Tomás. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Wood, Cristian. Fundación para la Investigación en Infectología Infantil; ArgentinaFil: Berrueta, Mabel. Hospital Militar Central; ArgentinaFil: Rondan, Aníbal. Fundación para la Investigación en Infectología Infantil; ArgentinaFil: Lescano, Gabriela Mariel. Hospital Dr. Carlos Bocalandro; ArgentinaFil: Cruz, Pablo. Fundación para la Investigación en Infectología Infantil; ArgentinaFil: Ritou, Yvonne. Fundación para la Investigación en Infectología Infantil; ArgentinaFil: Fernández Viña, Valeria Silvina. Hospital Simplemente Evita; ArgentinaFil: Álvarez Paggi, Damián Jorge. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Fundación para la Investigación en Infectología Infantil; ArgentinaFil: Esperante, Sebastian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Bioquímicas de Buenos Aires. Fundación Instituto Leloir. Instituto de Investigaciones Bioquímicas de Buenos Aires; ArgentinaFil: Ferreti, Adrián. Hospital Dr. Carlos Bocalandro; ArgentinaFil: Ofman, Gaston. University of Oklahoma; Estados UnidosFil: Ciganda, Álvaro. Gobierno de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Hospital Interzonal Especializado de Agudos y Cronicos San Juan de Dios.; ArgentinaFil: Rodriguez, Rocío. Hospital Simplemente Evita; ArgentinaFil: Lantos, Jorge. Fundación para la Investigación en Infectología Infantil; ArgentinaFil: Valentini, Ricardo. No especifíca;Fil: Itcovici, Nicolás. Fundación para la Investigación en Infectología Infantil; ArgentinaFil: Hintze, Alejandra. No especifíca;Fil: Oyarvide, M. Laura. Fundación para la Investigación en Infectología Infantil; ArgentinaFil: Etchegaray, Candela. Fundación para la Investigación en Infectología Infantil; ArgentinaFil: Neira, Alejandra. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; ArgentinaFil: Name, Ivonne. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; ArgentinaFil: Alfonso, Julieta. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Swiss Medical Group; ArgentinaFil: López Castelo, Rocío. Centro de Educación Médica e Investigaciones Clínicas "Norberto Quirno"; ArgentinaFil: Caruso, Gisela. Hospital Militar Central; ArgentinaFil: Rapelius, Sofía. Hospital Militar Central; ArgentinaFil: Alvez, Fernando. Hospital Militar Central; ArgentinaFil: Etchenique, Federico. Hospital Militar Central; ArgentinaFil: Dimase, Federico. Hospital Militar Central; ArgentinaFil: Alvarez, Darío. Hospital Militar Central; ArgentinaFil: Aranda, Sofía S.. Hospital Militar Central; ArgentinaFil: Sánchez Yanotti, Clara Inés. Hospital Militar Central; ArgentinaFil: De Luca, Julián. Hospital Militar Central; ArgentinaFil: Jares Baglivo, Sofía. Hospital Militar Central; ArgentinaFil: Laudanno, Sofía. Fundación Hematológica Sarmiento; ArgentinaFil: Nowogrodzki, Florencia. Swiss Medical Group; ArgentinaFil: Larrea, Ramiro. Hospital Municipal San Isidro; ArgentinaFil: Silveyra, María. Hospital Militar Central; ArgentinaFil: Leberzstein, Gabriel. No especifíca;Fil: Debonis, Alejandra. Fundación para la Investigación en Infectología Infantil; ArgentinaFil: Molinos, Juan. Fundación para la Investigación en Infectología Infantil; ArgentinaFil: González, Miguel. Fundación para la Investigación en Infectología Infantil; ArgentinaFil: Perez, Eduardo. Fundación para la Investigación en Infectología Infantil; ArgentinaFil: Kreplak, Nicolás. Fundación para la Investigación en Infectología Infantil; ArgentinaFil: Pastor Argüello, Susana. Fundación para la Investigación en Infectología Infantil; ArgentinaFil: Gibbons, Luz. Hospital Municipal de San Isidro; ArgentinaFil: Althabe, Fernando. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; ArgentinaFil: Bergel, Eduardo. Sanatorio Sagrado Corazón; ArgentinaFil: Polack, Fernando Pedro. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Ministerio de Salud; Argentin

Treatment with tocilizumab or corticosteroids for COVID-19 patients with hyperinflammatory state: a multicentre cohort study (SAM-COVID-19)

Objectives: The objective of this study was to estimate the association between tocilizumab or corticosteroids and the risk of intubation or death in patients with coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) with a hyperinflammatory state according to clinical and laboratory parameters. Methods: A cohort study was performed in 60 Spanish hospitals including 778 patients with COVID-19 and clinical and laboratory data indicative of a hyperinflammatory state. Treatment was mainly with tocilizumab, an intermediate-high dose of corticosteroids (IHDC), a pulse dose of corticosteroids (PDC), combination therapy, or no treatment. Primary outcome was intubation or death; follow-up was 21 days. Propensity score-adjusted estimations using Cox regression (logistic regression if needed) were calculated. Propensity scores were used as confounders, matching variables and for the inverse probability of treatment weights (IPTWs). Results: In all, 88, 117, 78 and 151 patients treated with tocilizumab, IHDC, PDC, and combination therapy, respectively, were compared with 344 untreated patients. The primary endpoint occurred in 10 (11.4%), 27 (23.1%), 12 (15.4%), 40 (25.6%) and 69 (21.1%), respectively. The IPTW-based hazard ratios (odds ratio for combination therapy) for the primary endpoint were 0.32 (95%CI 0.22-0.47; p < 0.001) for tocilizumab, 0.82 (0.71-1.30; p 0.82) for IHDC, 0.61 (0.43-0.86; p 0.006) for PDC, and 1.17 (0.86-1.58; p 0.30) for combination therapy. Other applications of the propensity score provided similar results, but were not significant for PDC. Tocilizumab was also associated with lower hazard of death alone in IPTW analysis (0.07; 0.02-0.17; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Tocilizumab might be useful in COVID-19 patients with a hyperinflammatory state and should be prioritized for randomized trials in this situatio

Geoeconomic variations in epidemiology, ventilation management, and outcomes in invasively ventilated intensive care unit patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome: a pooled analysis of four observational studies

Background: Geoeconomic variations in epidemiology, the practice of ventilation, and outcome in invasively ventilated intensive care unit (ICU) patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remain unexplored. In this analysis we aim to address these gaps using individual patient data of four large observational studies. Methods: In this pooled analysis we harmonised individual patient data from the ERICC, LUNG SAFE, PRoVENT, and PRoVENT-iMiC prospective observational studies, which were conducted from June, 2011, to December, 2018, in 534 ICUs in 54 countries. We used the 2016 World Bank classification to define two geoeconomic regions: middle-income countries (MICs) and high-income countries (HICs). ARDS was defined according to the Berlin criteria. Descriptive statistics were used to compare patients in MICs versus HICs. The primary outcome was the use of low tidal volume ventilation (LTVV) for the first 3 days of mechanical ventilation. Secondary outcomes were key ventilation parameters (tidal volume size, positive end-expiratory pressure, fraction of inspired oxygen, peak pressure, plateau pressure, driving pressure, and respiratory rate), patient characteristics, the risk for and actual development of acute respiratory distress syndrome after the first day of ventilation, duration of ventilation, ICU length of stay, and ICU mortality. Findings: Of the 7608 patients included in the original studies, this analysis included 3852 patients without ARDS, of whom 2345 were from MICs and 1507 were from HICs. Patients in MICs were younger, shorter and with a slightly lower body-mass index, more often had diabetes and active cancer, but less often chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and heart failure than patients from HICs. Sequential organ failure assessment scores were similar in MICs and HICs. Use of LTVV in MICs and HICs was comparable (42·4% vs 44·2%; absolute difference -1·69 [-9·58 to 6·11] p=0·67; data available in 3174 [82%] of 3852 patients). The median applied positive end expiratory pressure was lower in MICs than in HICs (5 [IQR 5-8] vs 6 [5-8] cm H2O; p=0·0011). ICU mortality was higher in MICs than in HICs (30·5% vs 19·9%; p=0·0004; adjusted effect 16·41% [95% CI 9·52-23·52]; p&lt;0·0001) and was inversely associated with gross domestic product (adjusted odds ratio for a US$10 000 increase per capita 0·80 [95% CI 0·75-0·86]; p&lt;0·0001). Interpretation: Despite similar disease severity and ventilation management, ICU mortality in patients without ARDS is higher in MICs than in HICs, with a strong association with country-level economic status