29 research outputs found

    LSST: from Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products

    Get PDF
    (Abridged) We describe here the most ambitious survey currently planned in the optical, the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST). A vast array of science will be enabled by a single wide-deep-fast sky survey, and LSST will have unique survey capability in the faint time domain. The LSST design is driven by four main science themes: probing dark energy and dark matter, taking an inventory of the Solar System, exploring the transient optical sky, and mapping the Milky Way. LSST will be a wide-field ground-based system sited at Cerro Pach\'{o}n in northern Chile. The telescope will have an 8.4 m (6.5 m effective) primary mirror, a 9.6 deg2^2 field of view, and a 3.2 Gigapixel camera. The standard observing sequence will consist of pairs of 15-second exposures in a given field, with two such visits in each pointing in a given night. With these repeats, the LSST system is capable of imaging about 10,000 square degrees of sky in a single filter in three nights. The typical 5σ\sigma point-source depth in a single visit in rr will be ∌24.5\sim 24.5 (AB). The project is in the construction phase and will begin regular survey operations by 2022. The survey area will be contained within 30,000 deg2^2 with ÎŽ<+34.5∘\delta<+34.5^\circ, and will be imaged multiple times in six bands, ugrizyugrizy, covering the wavelength range 320--1050 nm. About 90\% of the observing time will be devoted to a deep-wide-fast survey mode which will uniformly observe a 18,000 deg2^2 region about 800 times (summed over all six bands) during the anticipated 10 years of operations, and yield a coadded map to r∌27.5r\sim27.5. The remaining 10\% of the observing time will be allocated to projects such as a Very Deep and Fast time domain survey. The goal is to make LSST data products, including a relational database of about 32 trillion observations of 40 billion objects, available to the public and scientists around the world.Comment: 57 pages, 32 color figures, version with high-resolution figures available from https://www.lsst.org/overvie

    Discovery and Genomic Characterization of Noroviruses from a Gastroenteritis Outbreak in Domestic Cats in the US

    Get PDF
    Norovirus (NoV) RNA was detected in the stools of 6 out 14 (42.8%) 8–12-week-old cats with enteritis from a feline shelter, in New York State. Upon sequence analysis of the complete capsid, the six NoVs were found to be identical, suggesting the spread of a unique NoV strain in the shelter. The full-length genomic sequence (7839 nt) of one feline NoV, CU081210E/2010/US, was determined. In the capsid protein VP1 region, the virus displayed the highest amino acid identity to animal genogroup IV genotype 2 (GIV.2) NoVs: lion/Pistoia-387/06/IT (97.9%) and dog/Bari-170/07/IT (90.4%). These findings document the discovery of a novel feline calicivirus, different from vesiviruses, and extend the spectrum of NoV host range. Epidemiological studies using feline NoV-specific diagnostic tools and experimental infection of cats are required to understand whether NoVs have a pathogenic role in this species

    Integrative analysis of multimodal mass spectrometry data in MZmine 3

    Get PDF
    3 Pág.We thank Christopher Jensen and Gauthier Boaglio for their contributions to the MZmine codebase. We thank Jianbo Zhang and Zachary Russ for their donations to MZmine development. The MZmine 3 logo was designed by the Bioinformatics & Research Computing group at the Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research. T.P. is supported by Czech Science Foundation (GA CR) grant 21-11563M and by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Marie SkƂodowska-Curie grant agreement 891397. Support for P.C.D. was from US NIH U19 AG063744, P50HD106463, 1U24DK133658 and BBSRC-NSF award 2152526. T.S. acknowledges funding by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (441958208). M. Wang acknowledges the US Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute ( https://ror.org/04xm1d337 , a DOE Office of Science User Facility) and is supported by the Office of Science of the US Department of Energy operated under subcontract No. 7601660. E.R. and H.H. thank Wen Jiang (HILICON AB) for providing the iHILIC Fusion(+) column for HILIC measurements. M.F., K.D. and S.B. are supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (BO 1910/20). L.-F.N. is supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (project 189921). D.P. was supported through the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) through the CMFI Cluster of Excellence (EXC-2124 — 390838134 project-ID 1-03.006_0) and the Collaborative Research Center CellMap (TRR 261 - 398967434). J.-K.W. acknowledges the US National Science Foundation (MCB-1818132), the US Department of Agriculture, and the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative. MZmine developers have received support from the European COST Action CA19105 — Pan-European Network in Lipidomics and EpiLipidomics (EpiLipidNET). We acknowledge the support of the Google Summer of Code (GSoC) program, which has funded the development of several MZmine modules through student projects. We thank Adam Tenderholt for introducing MZmine to the GSoC program.Peer reviewe

    Virology under the microscope—a call for rational discourse

    Get PDF
    Viruses have brought humanity many challenges: respiratory infection, cancer, neurological impairment and immunosuppression to name a few. Virology research over the last 60+ years has responded to reduce this disease burden with vaccines and antivirals. Despite this long history, the COVID-19 pandemic has brought unprecedented attention to the field of virology. Some of this attention is focused on concern about the safe conduct of research with human pathogens. A small but vocal group of individuals has seized upon these concerns – conflating legitimate questions about safely conducting virus-related research with uncertainties over the origins of SARS-CoV-2. The result has fueled public confusion and, in many instances, ill-informed condemnation of virology. With this article, we seek to promote a return to rational discourse. We explain the use of gain-of-function approaches in science, discuss the possible origins of SARS-CoV-2 and outline current regulatory structures that provide oversight for virological research in the United States. By offering our expertise, we – a broad group of working virologists – seek to aid policy makers in navigating these controversial issues. Balanced, evidence-based discourse is essential to addressing public concern while maintaining and expanding much-needed research in virology

    Therapy-Related Explants After Spinal Cord Stimulation: Results of an International Retrospective Chart Review Study

    No full text
    Objectives: Clinical trials of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) have largely focused on conversion from trial to permanent SCS and the first years after implant. This study evaluates the association of type of SCS and patient characteristics with longer-term therapy-related explants. Materials and Methods: Implanting centers in three European countries conducted a retrospective chart review of SCS systems implanted from 2010 to 2013. Ethics approval or waiver was obtained, and informed consent was not required. The chart review recorded implants, follow-up visits, and date and reasons for any explants through mid-2016. Results are presented using Cox regression to determine factors associated with explant for inadequate pain relief. Results: Four implanting centers in three countries evaluated 955 implants, with 8720 visits over 2259 years of follow-up. Median age was 53 years; 558 (58%) were female. Explant rate was 7.9% per year. Over half (94 of 180) of explants were for inadequate pain relief, including 32/462 (6.9%) of implants with conventional nonrechargeable SCS, 37/329 (11.2%) with conventional rechargeable and 22/155 (14.2%) with high-frequency (10 kHz) rechargeable SCS. A higher explant rate was found in univariate regression for conventional rechargeable (HR 1.98, p=0.005) and high-frequency stimulation (HR 1.79, p=0.035) than nonrechargeable SCS. After covariate adjustment, the elevated explant rate persisted for conventional rechargeable SCS (HR 1.95, p=0.011), but was not significant for high-frequency stimulation (HR 1.71, p=0.069). Conclusions: This international, real-world study found higher explant rates for conventional rechargeable and high-frequency SCS than nonrechargeable systems. The increased rate for conventional rechargeable stimulation persisted after covariate adjustmen
    corecore