Comparison of different model solutions to simulate membrane fouling in the ultrafiltration of a secondary effluent from a municipal wastewater treatment plant

The quality of the secondary treatment effluent (STE) from a municipal wastewater treatment plant (MWWTP) is not good enough for some applications such as agriculture. Membrane ultrafiltration (UF) has been proven to be a reliable tertiary treatment to achieve the needed water quality. The productivity of the UF processes depends on the membrane fouling. The aim of this work is to prepare a model wastewater that could mimic the fouling trend of a STE wastewater from a MWWTP. Several model wastewaters consisting of different proteins and carbohydrates were used in the UF experiments. UF was also performed with a STE. The membrane used in the UF tests was a UFCM5 from Norit X-flow® hydrophilic polyethersulfone/polyvinylpyrrolidone blend hollow-fiber UF membrane of 200 KDa molecular weight cut-off with a fiber diameter of 1.5 mm. Membrane configuration was inside-out. UF tests with model wastewater and STE wastewater were compared. The results showed that the best model wastewater, which represents the fouling trend of STE wastewater is the model wastewater whose composition is 15 mg/l of bovine serum albumin and 5.5 mg/l of dextran.The authors of this work wish to gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the Generalitat Valenciana through the program "Ayudas para la realizacion de proyectos I+D para grupos de investigacion emergentes GV/2013."Tora Grau, M.; Soler Cabezas, JL.; Vincent Vela, MC.; Mendoza Roca, JA.; Martínez Francisco, FJ. (2014). Comparison of different model solutions to simulate membrane fouling in the ultrafiltration of a secondary effluent from a municipal wastewater treatment plant. Desalination and Water Treatment. 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2014.939865S17Delgado, S., Dı́az, F., Vera, L., Dı́az, R., & Elmaleh, S. (2004). Modelling hollow-fibre ultrafiltration of biologically treated wastewater with and without gas sparging. Journal of Membrane Science, 228(1), 55-63. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2003.09.011Qin, J.-J., Oo, M. H., Lee, H., & Kolkman, R. (2004). Dead-end ultrafiltration for pretreatment of RO in reclamation of municipal wastewater effluent. Journal of Membrane Science, 243(1-2), 107-113. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2004.06.010Konieczny, K. (1998). Disinfection of surface and ground waters with polymeric ultrafiltration membranes. Desalination, 119(1-3), 251-258. doi:10.1016/s0011-9164(98)00166-0Madaeni, S. S., Fane, A. G., & Grohmann, G. S. (1995). Virus removal from water and wastewater using membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 102, 65-75. doi:10.1016/0376-7388(94)00252-tArnal Arnal, J. M., Sancho Fernández, M., Martín Verdú, G., & Lora García, J. (2001). Design of a membrane facility for water potabilization and its application to Third World countries. Desalination, 137(1-3), 63-69. doi:10.1016/s0011-9164(01)00205-3Arévalo, J., Garralón, G., Plaza, F., Moreno, B., Pérez, J., & Gómez, M. Á. (2009). Wastewater reuse after treatment by tertiary ultrafiltration and a membrane bioreactor (MBR): a comparative study. Desalination, 243(1-3), 32-41. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2008.04.013Katsoufidou, K., Yiantsios, S. G., & Karabelas, A. J. (2008). An experimental study of UF membrane fouling by humic acid and sodium alginate solutions: the effect of backwashing on flux recovery. Desalination, 220(1-3), 214-227. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2007.02.038Muthukumaran, S., Nguyen, D. A., & Baskaran, K. (2011). Performance evaluation of different ultrafiltration membranes for the reclamation and reuse of secondary effluent. Desalination, 279(1-3), 383-389. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2011.06.040Henderson, R. K., Subhi, N., Antony, A., Khan, S. J., Murphy, K. R., Leslie, G. L., … Le-Clech, P. (2011). Evaluation of effluent organic matter fouling in ultrafiltration treatment using advanced organic characterisation techniques. Journal of Membrane Science, 382(1-2), 50-59. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2011.07.041Fan, L., Nguyen, T., Roddick, F. A., & Harris, J. L. (2008). Low-pressure membrane filtration of secondary effluent in water reuse: Pre-treatment for fouling reduction. Journal of Membrane Science, 320(1-2), 135-142. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2008.03.058Xiao, D., Li, W., Chou, S., Wang, R., & Tang, C. Y. (2012). A modeling investigation on optimizing the design of forward osmosis hollow fiber modules. Journal of Membrane Science, 392-393, 76-87. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2011.12.006Kaya, Y., Barlas, H., & Arayici, S. (2011). Evaluation of fouling mechanisms in the nanofiltration of solutions with high anionic and nonionic surfactant contents using a resistance-in-series model. Journal of Membrane Science, 367(1-2), 45-54. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2010.10.037Yu, C.-H., Fang, L.-C., Lateef, S. K., Wu, C.-H., & Lin, C.-F. (2010). Enzymatic treatment for controlling irreversible membrane fouling in cross-flow humic acid-fed ultrafiltration. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 177(1-3), 1153-1158. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.01.022Gao, W., Liang, H., Ma, J., Han, M., Chen, Z., Han, Z., & Li, G. (2011). Membrane fouling control in ultrafiltration technology for drinking water production: A review. Desalination, 272(1-3), 1-8. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2011.01.051Amin Saad, M. (2004). Early discovery of RO membrane fouling and real-time monitoring of plant performance for optimizing cost of water. Desalination, 165, 183-191. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2004.06.021Jayalakshmi, A., Rajesh, S., & Mohan, D. (2012). Fouling propensity and separation efficiency of epoxidated polyethersulfone incorporated cellulose acetate ultrafiltration membrane in the retention of proteins. Applied Surface Science, 258(24), 9770-9781. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.06.028Qu, F., Liang, H., Wang, Z., Wang, H., Yu, H., & Li, G. (2012). Ultrafiltration membrane fouling by extracellular organic matters (EOM) of Microcystis aeruginosa in stationary phase: Influences of interfacial characteristics of foulants and fouling mechanisms. Water Research, 46(5), 1490-1500. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2011.11.051Wang, C., Li, Q., Tang, H., Yan, D., Zhou, W., Xing, J., & Wan, Y. (2012). Membrane fouling mechanism in ultrafiltration of succinic acid fermentation broth. Bioresource Technology, 116, 366-371. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2012.03.099Nataraj, S., Schomäcker, R., Kraume, M., Mishra, I. M., & Drews, A. (2008). Analyses of polysaccharide fouling mechanisms during crossflow membrane filtration. Journal of Membrane Science, 308(1-2), 152-161. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2007.09.060Zator, M., Ferrando, M., López, F., & Güell, C. (2007). Membrane fouling characterization by confocal microscopy during filtration of BSA/dextran mixtures. Journal of Membrane Science, 301(1-2), 57-66. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2007.05.038Xiao, K., Wang, X., Huang, X., Waite, T. D., & Wen, X. (2009). Analysis of polysaccharide, protein and humic acid retention by microfiltration membranes using Thomas’ dynamic adsorption model. Journal of Membrane Science, 342(1-2), 22-34. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2009.06.016Nigam, M. O., Bansal, B., & Chen, X. D. (2008). Fouling and cleaning of whey protein concentrate fouled ultrafiltration membranes. Desalination, 218(1-3), 313-322. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2007.02.027MOUROUZIDISMOUROUZIS, S., & KARABELAS, A. (2006). Whey protein fouling of microfiltration ceramic membranes—Pressure effects. Journal of Membrane Science, 282(1-2), 124-132. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2006.05.012Carić, M. Đ., Milanović, S. D., Krstić, D. M., & Tekić, M. N. (2000). Fouling of inorganic membranes by adsorption of whey proteins. Journal of Membrane Science, 165(1), 83-88. doi:10.1016/s0376-7388(99)00221-5Tasselli, F., Cassano, A., & Drioli, E. (2007). Ultrafiltration of kiwifruit juice using modified poly(ether ether ketone) hollow fibre membranes. Separation and Purification Technology, 57(1), 94-102. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2007.03.007Hao, Y., Moriya, A., Maruyama, T., Ohmukai, Y., & Matsuyama, H. (2011). Effect of metal ions on humic acid fouling of hollow fiber ultrafiltration membrane. Journal of Membrane Science, 376(1-2), 247-253. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2011.04.035Marcos, B., Moresoli, C., Skorepova, J., & Vaughan, B. (2009). CFD modeling of a transient hollow fiber ultrafiltration system for protein concentration. Journal of Membrane Science, 337(1-2), 136-144. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2009.03.036Chung, T.-S., Qin, J.-J., & Gu, J. (2000). Effect of shear rate within the spinneret on morphology, separation performance and mechanical properties of ultrafiltration polyethersulfone hollow fiber membranes. Chemical Engineering Science, 55(6), 1077-1091. doi:10.1016/s0009-2509(99)00371-1Nguyen, T.-A., Yoshikawa, S., Karasu, K., & Ookawara, S. (2012). A simple combination model for filtrate flux in cross-flow ultrafiltration of protein suspension. Journal of Membrane Science, 403-404, 84-93. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2012.02.026Domínguez Chabaliná, L., Rodríguez Pastor, M., & Rico, D. P. (2013). Characterization of soluble and bound EPS obtained from 2 submerged membrane bioreactors by 3D-EEM and HPSEC. Talanta, 115, 706-712. doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2013.05.062Viebke, C. (2000). Determination of molecular mass distribution of κ-carrageenan and xanthan using asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation. Food Hydrocolloids, 14(3), 265-270. doi:10.1016/s0268-005x(99)00066-1Kelly, S. T., & Zydney, A. L. (1995). Mechanisms for BSA fouling during microfiltration. Journal of Membrane Science, 107(1-2), 115-127. doi:10.1016/0376-7388(95)00108-oHwang, K.-J., & Sz, P.-Y. (2011). Membrane fouling mechanism and concentration effect in cross-flow microfiltration of BSA/dextran mixtures. Chemical Engineering Journal, 166(2), 669-677. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2010.11.04

Study of the influence of operational conditions and hollow-fiber diameter on the ultrafiltration performance of a secondary treatment effluent

Secondary treatment effluents from municipal wastewater treatment plants (MWWTP) must achieve high water quality standards for their reuse in agriculture. To achieve these standards, ultrafiltration (UF) process, which is economically feasible, is carried out. However, UF has a drawback, membrane fouling, which causes operating difficulties and an increment of the operating cost. In order to minimize this phenomenon, it is important to determine the best operational conditions. Wastewater samples provided by MWWTP have a lot of variability in their composition due to factors such as temperature, efficiency of the secondary treatment, etc. Besides, the soluble microbial products of the secondary effluent are dependent on the type of the biological treatment implemented and its operating conditions. A model wastewater feed solution was prepared consisting of 15 mg/L of bovine serum albumin and 5.5 mg/L of dextran. In this research, UF tests were performed with the optimal simulated wastewater using two membranes UFCM5 Norit X-flow® hollow-fiber: one of them with a fiber diameter of 1.5 mm and the other one with a fiber diameter of 0.8 mm. The operational conditions, which influence membrane fouling, were varied in the range of 62 100 kPa for transmembrane pressure (TMP) and in the range of 0.8 1.2 m/s for cross-flow velocity (CFV). The best operational conditions were selected in terms of higher permeate flux. The highest permeate flux was obtained for the membrane of 0.8 mm and the lower energy consumption was achieved at a CFV of 1.2 m/s and a TMP of 62 kPa.Torà Grau, M.; Soler Cabezas, JL.; Vincent Vela, MC.; Mendoza Roca, JA.; Martínez Francisco, FJ. (2015). Study of the influence of operational conditions and hollow-fiber diameter on the ultrafiltration performance of a secondary treatment effluent. Desalination and Water Treatment. 1-7. doi:10.1080/19443994.2015.1118887S1

Ultrafiltration fouling trend simulation of a municipal wastewater treatment plant effluent with model wastewater

Secondary treatment effluents from Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants require tertiary treatments to be reused in agriculture. Among tertiary treatment technologies, ultrafiltration has been proven to be a reliable reclamation process. Nevertheless this technique has an important disadvantage: membrane fouling. This phenomenon causes decline in permeate flux with time and increases the operational costs. Due to the fact that secondary effluents from Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants contain a large amount of different compounds and that there is certain variability in their composition, the use of a simplified model wastewater consisting of only few compounds may help to simulate better the ultrafiltration fouling trend. The main secondary treatment effluent components responsible for fouling membrane during ultrafiltration tests are extracellular polymeric substances. These substances are mainly composed of proteins and polysaccharides, thus they are commonly used to prepare model wastewaters. This work consisted in two parts. Firstly, a model wastewater was selected among different model solutions mimicking secondary treatment effluent. Secondly, ultrafiltration behaviour of the selected model solution was compared with the behaviour of the secondary effluent in the ultrafiltration tests at different cross-flow velocities and transmembrane pressures. The membrane used in the ultrafiltration tests was UFCM5 Norit X-flow® hollow-fiber. To prepare model wastewaters, three parameters (proteins and carbohydrates concentrations and chemical oxygen demand) were considered. The model wastewater that represented the best the fouling trend of the secondary treatment effluent had a composition of 15 mg/l of bovine serum albumin and 5.5 mg/l of dextranThe authors wish to gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Generalitat Valenciana through the project "Ayudas para la realizacion de proyectos I+D para grupos de investigacion emergentes GV/2013."Tora Grau, M.; Soler Cabezas, JL.; Vincent Vela, MC.; Mendoza Roca, JA.; Martínez Francisco, FJ. (2015). Ultrafiltration fouling trend simulation of a municipal wastewater treatment plant effluent with model wastewater. Desalination and Water Treatment. 1-9. doi:10.1080/19443994.2014.999714S19Qin, J.-J., Oo, M. H., Lee, H., & Kolkman, R. (2004). Dead-end ultrafiltration for pretreatment of RO in reclamation of municipal wastewater effluent. Journal of Membrane Science, 243(1-2), 107-113. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2004.06.010Arévalo, J., Garralón, G., Plaza, F., Moreno, B., Pérez, J., & Gómez, M. Á. (2009). Wastewater reuse after treatment by tertiary ultrafiltration and a membrane bioreactor (MBR): a comparative study. Desalination, 243(1-3), 32-41. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2008.04.013Katsoufidou, K., Yiantsios, S. G., & Karabelas, A. J. (2008). An experimental study of UF membrane fouling by humic acid and sodium alginate solutions: the effect of backwashing on flux recovery. Desalination, 220(1-3), 214-227. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2007.02.038Muthukumaran, S., Nguyen, D. A., & Baskaran, K. (2011). Performance evaluation of different ultrafiltration membranes for the reclamation and reuse of secondary effluent. Desalination, 279(1-3), 383-389. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2011.06.040Henderson, R. K., Subhi, N., Antony, A., Khan, S. J., Murphy, K. R., Leslie, G. L., … Le-Clech, P. (2011). Evaluation of effluent organic matter fouling in ultrafiltration treatment using advanced organic characterisation techniques. Journal of Membrane Science, 382(1-2), 50-59. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2011.07.041Muthukumaran, S., Jegatheesan, J. V., & Baskaran, K. (2013). Comparison of fouling mechanisms in low-pressure membrane (MF/UF) filtration of secondary effluent. Desalination and Water Treatment, 52(4-6), 650-662. doi:10.1080/19443994.2013.826324Yu, C.-H., Fang, L.-C., Lateef, S. K., Wu, C.-H., & Lin, C.-F. (2010). Enzymatic treatment for controlling irreversible membrane fouling in cross-flow humic acid-fed ultrafiltration. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 177(1-3), 1153-1158. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.01.022Gao, W., Liang, H., Ma, J., Han, M., Chen, Z., Han, Z., & Li, G. (2011). Membrane fouling control in ultrafiltration technology for drinking water production: A review. Desalination, 272(1-3), 1-8. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2011.01.051Kaya, Y., Barlas, H., & Arayici, S. (2011). Evaluation of fouling mechanisms in the nanofiltration of solutions with high anionic and nonionic surfactant contents using a resistance-in-series model. Journal of Membrane Science, 367(1-2), 45-54. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2010.10.037Delgado, S., Dı́az, F., Vera, L., Dı́az, R., & Elmaleh, S. (2004). Modelling hollow-fibre ultrafiltration of biologically treated wastewater with and without gas sparging. Journal of Membrane Science, 228(1), 55-63. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2003.09.011Fan, L., Nguyen, T., Roddick, F. A., & Harris, J. L. (2008). Low-pressure membrane filtration of secondary effluent in water reuse: Pre-treatment for fouling reduction. Journal of Membrane Science, 320(1-2), 135-142. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2008.03.058Xiao, D., Li, W., Chou, S., Wang, R., & Tang, C. Y. (2012). A modeling investigation on optimizing the design of forward osmosis hollow fiber modules. Journal of Membrane Science, 392-393, 76-87. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2011.12.006Zator, M., Ferrando, M., López, F., & Güell, C. (2007). Membrane fouling characterization by confocal microscopy during filtration of BSA/dextran mixtures. Journal of Membrane Science, 301(1-2), 57-66. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2007.05.038Nataraj, S., Schomäcker, R., Kraume, M., Mishra, I. M., & Drews, A. (2008). Analyses of polysaccharide fouling mechanisms during crossflow membrane filtration. Journal of Membrane Science, 308(1-2), 152-161. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2007.09.060Nguyen, S. T., & Roddick, F. A. (2011). Chemical cleaning of ultrafiltration membrane fouled by an activated sludge effluent. Desalination and Water Treatment, 34(1-3), 94-99. doi:10.5004/dwt.2011.2790Xiao, K., Wang, X., Huang, X., Waite, T. D., & Wen, X. (2009). Analysis of polysaccharide, protein and humic acid retention by microfiltration membranes using Thomas’ dynamic adsorption model. Journal of Membrane Science, 342(1-2), 22-34. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2009.06.016Hwang, K.-J., & Chiang, Y.-C. (2014). Comparisons of membrane fouling and separation efficiency in protein/polysaccharide cross-flow microfiltration using membranes with different morphologies. Separation and Purification Technology, 125, 74-82. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2014.01.041Yamamura, H., Okimoto, K., Kimura, K., & Watanabe, Y. (2014). Hydrophilic fraction of natural organic matter causing irreversible fouling of microfiltration and ultrafiltration membranes. Water Research, 54, 123-136. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2014.01.024Nigam, M. O., Bansal, B., & Chen, X. D. (2008). Fouling and cleaning of whey protein concentrate fouled ultrafiltration membranes. Desalination, 218(1-3), 313-322. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2007.02.027MOUROUZIDISMOUROUZIS, S., & KARABELAS, A. (2006). Whey protein fouling of microfiltration ceramic membranes—Pressure effects. Journal of Membrane Science, 282(1-2), 124-132. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2006.05.012Carić, M. Đ., Milanović, S. D., Krstić, D. M., & Tekić, M. N. (2000). Fouling of inorganic membranes by adsorption of whey proteins. Journal of Membrane Science, 165(1), 83-88. doi:10.1016/s0376-7388(99)00221-5Tasselli, F., Cassano, A., & Drioli, E. (2007). Ultrafiltration of kiwifruit juice using modified poly(ether ether ketone) hollow fibre membranes. Separation and Purification Technology, 57(1), 94-102. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2007.03.007Vincent-Vela, M.-C., Álvarez-Blanco, S., Lora-García, J., & Bergantiños-Rodríguez, E. (2009). Estimation of the gel layer concentration in ultrafiltration: Comparison of different methods. Desalination and Water Treatment, 3(1-3), 157-161. doi:10.5004/dwt.2009.454Valiño, V., San Román, M. F., Ibáñez, R., Benito, J. M., Escudero, I., & Ortiz, I. (2014). Accurate determination of key surface properties that determine the efficient separation of bovine milk BSA and LF proteins. Separation and Purification Technology, 135, 145-157. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2014.07.051Luck, P. J., Vardhanabhuti, B., Yong, Y. H., Laundon, T., Barbano, D. M., & Foegeding, E. A. (2013). Comparison of functional properties of 34% and 80% whey protein and milk serum protein concentrates. Journal of Dairy Science, 96(9), 5522-5531. doi:10.3168/jds.2013-6617Marcos, B., Moresoli, C., Skorepova, J., & Vaughan, B. (2009). CFD modeling of a transient hollow fiber ultrafiltration system for protein concentration. Journal of Membrane Science, 337(1-2), 136-144. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2009.03.036Chung, T.-S., Qin, J.-J., & Gu, J. (2000). Effect of shear rate within the spinneret on morphology, separation performance and mechanical properties of ultrafiltration polyethersulfone hollow fiber membranes. Chemical Engineering Science, 55(6), 1077-1091. doi:10.1016/s0009-2509(99)00371-1Salahi, A., Mohammadi, T., Rahmat Pour, A., & Rekabdar, F. (2009). Oily wastewater treatment using ultrafiltration. Desalination and Water Treatment, 6(1-3), 289-298. doi:10.5004/dwt.2009.480Janssen, A. N., van Agtmaal, J., van den Broek, W. B. P., de Koning, J., Menkveld, H. W. H., Schrotter, J.-C., … van der Graaf, J. H. J. M. (2008). Monitoring of SUR to control and enhance the performance of dead-end ultrafiltration installations treating wwtp effluent. Desalination, 231(1-3), 99-107. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2007.10.024Torà-Grau, M., Soler-Cabezas, J. L., Vincent-Vela, M. C., Mendoza-Roca, J. A., & Martínez-Francisco, F. J. (2014). Comparison of different model solutions to simulate membrane fouling in the ultrafiltration of a secondary effluent from a municipal wastewater treatment plant. Desalination and Water Treatment, 1-7. doi:10.1080/19443994.2014.93986

Ultrafiltration of municipal wastewater: study on fouling models and fouling mechanisms

Ultrafiltration (UF) with hollow fiber membranes is a proven membrane technique that can achieve high water quality standards as a tertiary treatment in municipal wastewater treatment plants. However, UF has a major drawback, membrane fouling, which causes losses of productivity and increases operation costs. Thus, the aim of this work is to model membrane fouling in the UF of a secondary treatment effluent. The tests were carried out with a model wastewater solution that consisted of bovine serum albumin and dextran. Three different transmembrane pressures and three different crossflow velocities were tested. Several fouling models available in the literature, and new models proposed, were fitted to permeate flux decline experimental data. The models studied by other authors and considered in this study were: Hermia s models (complete, intermediate, standard pore blocking and gel layer) and Belfort s model. The new models proposed in this work were: modified Belfort s model, quadratic exponential model, logarithmic inversed model, double exponential model and tangent inversed model. The fitting accuracy of the models was determined in terms of the R-squared and standard deviation. The results showed that the model that had the higher fitting accuracy was the logarithmic inversed model. Among the Hermia s models, the model that had the higher fitting accuracy was the intermediate pore blocking model. Therefore, the predominant fouling mechanism was determined and it was the intermediate pore blocking modelThe authors wish to gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Generalitat Valenciana through the project "Ayudas para la realizacion de proyectos I+D para grupos de investigacion emergentes GV/2013".Soler Cabezas, JL.; Tora Grau, M.; Vincent Vela, MC.; Mendoza Roca, JA.; Martínez Francisco, FJ. (2014). Ultrafiltration of municipal wastewater: study on fouling models and fouling mechanisms. Desalination and Water Treatment. 1-11. doi:10.1080/19443994.2014.969320S111Gadani, V., Irwin, R., & Mandra, V. (1996). Ultrafiltration as a tertiary treatment: Joint research program on membranes. Desalination, 106(1-3), 47-53. doi:10.1016/s0011-9164(96)00091-4Illueca-Muñoz, J., Mendoza-Roca, J. A., Iborra-Clar, A., Bes-Piá, A., Fajardo-Montañana, V., Martínez-Francisco, F. J., & Bernácer-Bonora, I. (2008). Study of different alternatives of tertiary treatments for wastewater reclamation to optimize the water quality for irrigation reuse. Desalination, 222(1-3), 222-229. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2007.01.157Muthukumaran, S., Jegatheesan, J. V., & Baskaran, K. (2013). Comparison of fouling mechanisms in low-pressure membrane (MF/UF) filtration of secondary effluent. Desalination and Water Treatment, 52(4-6), 650-662. doi:10.1080/19443994.2013.826324Delgado, S., Dı́az, F., Vera, L., Dı́az, R., & Elmaleh, S. (2004). Modelling hollow-fibre ultrafiltration of biologically treated wastewater with and without gas sparging. Journal of Membrane Science, 228(1), 55-63. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2003.09.011Qin, J.-J., Oo, M. H., Lee, H., & Kolkman, R. (2004). Dead-end ultrafiltration for pretreatment of RO in reclamation of municipal wastewater effluent. Journal of Membrane Science, 243(1-2), 107-113. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2004.06.010Konieczny, K. (1998). Disinfection of surface and ground waters with polymeric ultrafiltration membranes. Desalination, 119(1-3), 251-258. doi:10.1016/s0011-9164(98)00166-0Madaeni, S. S., Fane, A. G., & Grohmann, G. S. (1995). Virus removal from water and wastewater using membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 102, 65-75. doi:10.1016/0376-7388(94)00252-tArnal Arnal, J. M., Sancho Fernández, M., Martín Verdú, G., & Lora García, J. (2001). Design of a membrane facility for water potabilization and its application to Third World countries. Desalination, 137(1-3), 63-69. doi:10.1016/s0011-9164(01)00205-3Arévalo, J., Garralón, G., Plaza, F., Moreno, B., Pérez, J., & Gómez, M. Á. (2009). Wastewater reuse after treatment by tertiary ultrafiltration and a membrane bioreactor (MBR): a comparative study. Desalination, 243(1-3), 32-41. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2008.04.013Katsoufidou, K., Yiantsios, S. G., & Karabelas, A. J. (2008). An experimental study of UF membrane fouling by humic acid and sodium alginate solutions: the effect of backwashing on flux recovery. Desalination, 220(1-3), 214-227. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2007.02.038Muthukumaran, S., Nguyen, D. A., & Baskaran, K. (2011). Performance evaluation of different ultrafiltration membranes for the reclamation and reuse of secondary effluent. Desalination, 279(1-3), 383-389. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2011.06.040Henderson, R. K., Subhi, N., Antony, A., Khan, S. J., Murphy, K. R., Leslie, G. L., … Le-Clech, P. (2011). Evaluation of effluent organic matter fouling in ultrafiltration treatment using advanced organic characterisation techniques. Journal of Membrane Science, 382(1-2), 50-59. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2011.07.041Xiao, D., Li, W., Chou, S., Wang, R., & Tang, C. Y. (2012). A modeling investigation on optimizing the design of forward osmosis hollow fiber modules. Journal of Membrane Science, 392-393, 76-87. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2011.12.006Kaya, Y., Barlas, H., & Arayici, S. (2011). Evaluation of fouling mechanisms in the nanofiltration of solutions with high anionic and nonionic surfactant contents using a resistance-in-series model. Journal of Membrane Science, 367(1-2), 45-54. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2010.10.037Amin Saad, M. (2004). Early discovery of RO membrane fouling and real-time monitoring of plant performance for optimizing cost of water. Desalination, 165, 183-191. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2004.06.021Yu, C.-H., Fang, L.-C., Lateef, S. K., Wu, C.-H., & Lin, C.-F. (2010). Enzymatic treatment for controlling irreversible membrane fouling in cross-flow humic acid-fed ultrafiltration. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 177(1-3), 1153-1158. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.01.022Gao, W., Liang, H., Ma, J., Han, M., Chen, Z., Han, Z., & Li, G. (2011). Membrane fouling control in ultrafiltration technology for drinking water production: A review. Desalination, 272(1-3), 1-8. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2011.01.051Jayalakshmi, A., Rajesh, S., & Mohan, D. (2012). Fouling propensity and separation efficiency of epoxidated polyethersulfone incorporated cellulose acetate ultrafiltration membrane in the retention of proteins. Applied Surface Science, 258(24), 9770-9781. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.06.028Qu, F., Liang, H., Wang, Z., Wang, H., Yu, H., & Li, G. (2012). Ultrafiltration membrane fouling by extracellular organic matters (EOM) of Microcystis aeruginosa in stationary phase: Influences of interfacial characteristics of foulants and fouling mechanisms. Water Research, 46(5), 1490-1500. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2011.11.051Wang, C., Li, Q., Tang, H., Yan, D., Zhou, W., Xing, J., & Wan, Y. (2012). Membrane fouling mechanism in ultrafiltration of succinic acid fermentation broth. Bioresource Technology, 116, 366-371. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2012.03.099Zator, M., Ferrando, M., López, F., & Güell, C. (2007). Membrane fouling characterization by confocal microscopy during filtration of BSA/dextran mixtures. Journal of Membrane Science, 301(1-2), 57-66. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2007.05.038Sheng, G.-P., Yu, H.-Q., & Li, X.-Y. (2010). Extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) of microbial aggregates in biological wastewater treatment systems: A review. Biotechnology Advances, 28(6), 882-894. doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.08.001Nguyen, S. T., & Roddick, F. A. (2011). Chemical cleaning of ultrafiltration membrane fouled by an activated sludge effluent. Desalination and Water Treatment, 34(1-3), 94-99. doi:10.5004/dwt.2011.2790Xiao, K., Wang, X., Huang, X., Waite, T. D., & Wen, X. (2009). Analysis of polysaccharide, protein and humic acid retention by microfiltration membranes using Thomas’ dynamic adsorption model. Journal of Membrane Science, 342(1-2), 22-34. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2009.06.016Suh, C., Lee, S., & Cho, J. (2013). Investigation of the effects of membrane fouling control strategies with the integrated membrane bioreactor model. Journal of Membrane Science, 429, 268-281. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2012.11.042Duclos-Orsello, C., Li, W., & Ho, C.-C. (2006). A three mechanism model to describe fouling of microfiltration membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 280(1-2), 856-866. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2006.03.005Davis, R. H. (1992). Modeling of Fouling of Crossflow Microfiltration Membranes. Separation and Purification Methods, 21(2), 75-126. doi:10.1080/03602549208021420Bhattacharjee, S., & Bhattacharya, P. K. (1992). Flux decline behaviour with low molecular weight solutes during ultrafiltration in an unstirred batch cell. Journal of Membrane Science, 72(2), 149-161. doi:10.1016/0376-7388(92)80195-pMallubhotla, H., & Belfort, G. (1996). Semiempirical Modeling of Cross-Flow Microfiltration with Periodic Reverse Filtration. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 35(9), 2920-2928. doi:10.1021/ie950719tSalahi, A., Abbasi, M., & Mohammadi, T. (2010). Permeate flux decline during UF of oily wastewater: Experimental and modeling. Desalination, 251(1-3), 153-160. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2009.08.006Field, R. W., Wu, D., Howell, J. A., & Gupta, B. B. (1995). Critical flux concept for microfiltration fouling. Journal of Membrane Science, 100(3), 259-272. doi:10.1016/0376-7388(94)00265-zVincent Vela, M. C., Álvarez Blanco, S., Lora García, J., & Bergantiños Rodríguez, E. (2009). Analysis of membrane pore blocking models adapted to crossflow ultrafiltration in the ultrafiltration of PEG. Chemical Engineering Journal, 149(1-3), 232-241. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2008.10.027Hasan, A., Peluso, C. R., Hull, T. S., Fieschko, J., & Chatterjee, S. G. (2013). A surface-renewal model of cross-flow microfiltration. Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 30(1), 167-186. doi:10.1590/s0104-66322013000100019ANG, W., & ELIMELECH, M. (2007). Protein (BSA) fouling of reverse osmosis membranes: Implications for wastewater reclamation. Journal of Membrane Science, 296(1-2), 83-92. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2007.03.018Muthukumaran, S., & Baskaran, K. (2013). Comparison of the performance of ceramic microfiltration and ultrafiltration membranes in the reclamation and reuse of secondary wastewater. Desalination and Water Treatment, 52(4-6), 670-677. doi:10.1080/19443994.2013.826333Tasselli, F., Cassano, A., & Drioli, E. (2007). Ultrafiltration of kiwifruit juice using modified poly(ether ether ketone) hollow fibre membranes. Separation and Purification Technology, 57(1), 94-102. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2007.03.007Chung, T.-S., Qin, J.-J., & Gu, J. (2000). Effect of shear rate within the spinneret on morphology, separation performance and mechanical properties of ultrafiltration polyethersulfone hollow fiber membranes. Chemical Engineering Science, 55(6), 1077-1091. doi:10.1016/s0009-2509(99)00371-1Swaminathan, T., Chaudhuri, M., & Sirkar, K. K. (1979). Anomalous flux behavior in initial time stirred protein ultrafiltration through partially permeable membranes. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 24(6), 1581-1585. doi:10.1002/app.1979.070240620Ahmad, A. L., & Hairul, N. A. H. (2009). Protein–membrane interactions in forced-flow electrophoresis of protein solutions: Effect of initial pH and initial ionic strength. Separation and Purification Technology, 66(2), 273-278. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2008.12.027Gu, Z. (2007). Across-sample Incomparability of R2s and Additional Evidence on Value Relevance Changes Over Time. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 34(7-8), 1073-1098. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5957.2007.02044.xVincent, T., Parodi, A., & Guibal, E. (2008). Pt recovery using Cyphos IL-101 immobilized in biopolymer capsules. Separation and Purification Technology, 62(2), 470-479. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2008.02.025Daufin, G., Merin, U., Labbé, J. P., Quémerais, A., & Kerhervé, F. L. (1991). Cleaning of inorganic membranes after whey and milk ultrafiltration. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 38(1), 82-89. doi:10.1002/bit.260380111Daufin, G., Merin, U., Kerherve, F.-L., Labbe, J.-P., Quemerais, A., & Bousser, C. (1992). Efficiency of cleaning agents for an inorganic membrane after milk ultrafiltration. Journal of Dairy Research, 59(1), 29-38. doi:10.1017/s0022029900030211Morão, A., Nunes, J. C., Sousa, F., Amorim, M. T. P. de, Escobar, I. C., & Queiroz, J. A. (2009). Development of a model for membrane filtration of long and flexible macromolecules: Application to predict dextran and linear DNA rejections in ultrafiltration. Journal of Membrane Science, 336(1-2), 61-70. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2009.03.007Ouammou, M., Tijani, N., Calvo, J. I., Velasco, C., Martín, A., Martínez, F., … Hernández, A. (2007). Flux decay in protein microfiltration through charged membranes as a function of pH. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 298(3), 267-273. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2006.11.006Mohammadi, T., Kazemimoghadam, M., & Saadabadi, M. (2003). Modeling of membrane fouling and flux decline in reverse osmosis during separation of oil in water emulsions. Desalination, 157(1-3), 369-375. doi:10.1016/s0011-9164(03)00419-3Ng, C. Y., Mohammad, A. W., Ng, L. Y., & Jahim, J. M. (2014). Membrane fouling mechanisms during ultrafiltration of skimmed coconut milk. Journal of Food Engineering, 142, 190-200. doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2014.06.005Mah, S.-K., Chuah, C.-K., Cathie Lee, W. P., & Chai, S.-P. (2012). Ultrafiltration of palm oil–oleic acid–glycerin solutions: Fouling mechanism identification, fouling mechanism analysis and membrane characterizations. Separation and Purification Technology, 98, 419-431. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2012.07.020Said, M., Ahmad, A., Mohammad, A. W., Nor, M. T. M., & Sheikh Abdullah, S. R. (2015). Blocking mechanism of PES membrane during ultrafiltration of POME. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 21, 182-188. doi:10.1016/j.jiec.2014.02.023Amin, I. N. H. M., Mohammad, A. W., Markom, M., Peng, L. C., & Hilal, N. (2010). Analysis of deposition mechanism during ultrafiltration of glycerin-rich solutions. Desalination, 261(3), 313-320. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2010.04.01

Combination of adsorption and biological treatment in a SBR for colour elimination in municipal wastewater with discharges of textile effluents

ischarge of textile wastewaters (WW) to municipal wastewater treatment plants (MWWTPs) entails the presence of colour in the final effluent. It causes a negative impact on the environment and, additionally, hinders an efficient disinfection by UV lamps. In this work, a combined process consisting of the addition of powdered activated carbon (PAC) to a sequencing batch reactor was studied. The main objective was to reduce WW colour in order to obtain transmittance values in the final effluent above 60%, measured at a wavelength of 254 nm, with the aim of ensuring disinfection with UV lamps. Experiments were performed with both simulated wastewater (SWW) including the azo dye Reactive Black 5 and WW from a MWWTP receiving discharges from textile mills. Biosorption increased the transmittance of the effluent around 25% for SWW and 24% for WW, in comparison with the values measured in the influent. The PAC concentrations for the achievement of a value of 60% in the transmittance of the treated water were 250 and 400 mg/L for the simulated effluent and for the WW, respectively. PAC had to be periodically added in order to cover its loss in the waste sludge.Authors thank Depuracion de Aguas del Mediterraneo S.A. for its support in the work.Ferrer-Polonio, E.; Iborra Clar, A.; Mendoza Roca, JA.; Iborra Clar, MI. (2014). Combination of adsorption and biological treatment in a SBR for colour elimination in municipal wastewater with discharges of textile effluents. Desalination and Water Treatment. 55(7):1915-1912. doi:10.1080/19443994.2014.929979S1915191255

Use of the osmotic membrane bioreactor for the management of tannery wastewater using absorption liquid waste as draw solution

[EN] The performance of an osmotic membrane bioreactor (OMBR) for treating tannery wastewater at laboratory scale has been evaluated in this study. The forward osmosis (FO) membrane tested was CTA-NW from HTI. As draw solution, actual waste water from an absorption column for ammonia separation, which consists mainly of ammonium sulphate was used. The study was focused on the salt reverse flux during the OMBR operation, membrane water flux, biomass characteristics and membrane fouling. Regarding membrane water flux change with the time, the measured values diminished from 3.44 to 0.72 LMH due to the membrane fouling and the salt accumulation in the biological reactor. The stable mixed liquor conductivity value at the end of the experiment was 29.8 mS·cm¿1. The chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal efficiencies were maintained near 80% until the first 50 days of operation, considering the soluble COD in the reactor instead of the COD in the membrane permeate for the performance calculation. Thence, COD removal efficiencies decreased progressively due to the accumulation of non degradable COD coming from the tannery wastewater. Concerning to the membrane fouling, FESEM/EDX analysis corroborated that organic fouling was predominant on the membrane active layer.This study was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness through the project RTC-2015-3582-5-AR.Lujan Facundo, MJ.; Mendoza Roca, JA.; Soler Cabezas, JL.; Bes-Piá, M.; Vincent Vela, MC.; Pastor Alcañiz, L. (2019). Use of the osmotic membrane bioreactor for the management of tannery wastewater using absorption liquid waste as draw solution. Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 131:292-299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2019.09.024S29229913

Evaluation of cleaning efficiency of ultrafiltration membranes fouled by BSA using FTIR–ATR as a tool

The goal of this paper was to study the cleaning of two polyethersulfone (PES) membranes of different molecular weight and fouled with BSA solution. Ultrafiltration (UF) membranes were tested in a flat sheet module. Fouling experiments were carried out at a transmembrane pressure of 2 bar and cross flow velocity of 2 m/s during 2 h. Cleaning experiments were performed at 1 bar and 2.2 m/s. To compare the efficiency of different cleaning solutions (NaOH and P3-Ultrasil 115), quantification of residual pro-teins on the membrane was carried out by FTIR ATR. To have a better understanding of the cleaning pro-cess, characteristics of the feed solution and of the membranes were considered and contact angle of the membranes before and after the cleaning was measured. Membrane resistances were also calculated at the different stages. Results from resistances showed that reversible fouling prevail over irreversible fouling for both membranes. P3-Ultrasil 115 was a better cleaning agent than NaOH solution since cleaning efficiencies (CE) of 100% for both membranes were achieved for P3-Ultrasil 115 solution. Residual pro-teins on the membrane after the cleaning were measured both by FTIR ATR and Pierce-BCA method. Results showed that 100% of permeability recovery did not imply the complete BSA removal from the membrane. However, these measurements corroborated that P3-Ultrasil 115 had removed a higher amount of proteins than NaOH solution.This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (CTM 2010-20.186).Luján Facundo, MJ.; Mendoza Roca, JA.; Cuartas Uribe, BE.; Alvarez Blanco, S. (2015). Evaluation of cleaning efficiency of ultrafiltration membranes fouled by BSA using FTIR–ATR as a tool. Journal of Food Engineering. 163:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2015.04.015S1816

Comparison of two strategies for the start-up of a biological reactor for the treatment of hypersaline effluents from a table olive packaging industry

Biological treatment of hypersaline effluents with high organic matter concentrations is difficult to carry out and it can require a long start-up phase. This is the case of the treatment of fermentation brines from the table olive packaging (FTOP) industries. These effluents are characterized by conductivity values around 90 mS/cm, COD around 15,000 mg/L and total phenols concentration around 1000 mg/L. In this work, FTOP has been treated in two sequencing batch reactors (SBRs) operated in parallel. In each SBR a different start-up strategy has been carried out. In the SBR-2, biomass was previously acclimated to high salinity using simulated wastewater without phenolic compounds, meanwhile in the SBR-1, FTOP was added from the beginning of the start-up. Results indicated more operational problems in the SBR-2 consisting in a higher deflocculation that drove to high turbidity values in the effluent. Besides, at the end of the start-up, the SBR-1 reached higher COD removal efficiencies than SBR-2 (88% and 73%, respectively). In both reactors, an increase in gamma-Proteobacteria in the microbial population was observed for increasing conductivities. In addition, phenols were completely removed in both reactors at the end of the start-up, what implied very low toxicity values in the effluent.The authors of this work thank the financial support of CDTI (Centre for Industrial Technological Development) depending on the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation.Ferrer-Polonio, E.; Mendoza Roca, JA.; Iborra Clar, A.; Alonso Molina, JL.; Pastor Alcañiz, L. (2015). Comparison of two strategies for the start-up of a biological reactor for the treatment of hypersaline effluents from a table olive packaging industry. Chemical Engineering Journal. 273:595-602. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2015.03.062S59560227

Brine recovery from hypersaline wastewaters from table olive processing by combination of biological treatment and membrane technologies

[EN] The fermentation brines from table olive processing (FTOP) are hypersaline effluents (conductivities higher than 75 mS·cm-1) with high organic matter concentrations (COD around 10 g·L-1), which also include phenolic compounds (between 700 and 1500 mg TY·L-1). In this work, an integrated process for the FTOP reuse as brine in the table olive processing has been evaluated. This integrated process consisted of a biological treatment followed by a membrane system, which included ultrafiltration (UF) plus nanofiltration (NF). The biological treatment was carried out by 6 L laboratory sequencing batch reactor (SBR). UF and NF were performed in laboratory plants for flat membranes of 0.0125 and 0.0072 m2, respectively. Each stream generated during the FTOP treatment (SBR effluent, and UF and NF permeates) were evaluated. The SBR eliminated around 80% of COD and 71% of total phenols concentration. In the final NF permeate the COD concentration was lower than 125 mg·L-1; while the turbidity, colour and phenolic compounds, were completely removed.The authors of this work thank the financial support of CDTI (Centre for Development Technological Industrial) depending on the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation.Ferrer-Polonio, E.; Carbonell Alcaina, C.; Mendoza Roca, JA.; Iborra Clar, A.; Alvarez Blanco, S.; Bes-Piá, M.; Pastor Alcañiz, L. (2017). Brine recovery from hypersaline wastewaters from table olive processing by combination of biological treatment and membrane technologies. Journal of Cleaner Production. 142:1377-1386. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.169S1377138614