Molecular mechanism for the interaction between gibberellin and brassinosteroid signaling pathways in Arabidopsis

[EN] Plant development is modulated by the convergence of multiple environmental and endogenous signals, and the mechanisms that allow the integration of different signaling pathways is currently being unveiled. A paradigmatic case is the concurrence of brassinosteroid (BR) and gibberellin (GA) signaling in the control of cell expansion during photomorphogenesis, which is supported by physiological observations in several plants but for which no molecular mechanism has been proposed. In this work, we show that the integration of these two signaling pathways occurs through the physical interaction between the DELLA protein GAI, which is a major negative regulator of the GA pathway, and BRASSINAZOLE RESISTANT1 (BZR1), a transcription factor that broadly regulates gene expression in response to BRs. We provide biochemical evidence, both in vitro and in vivo, indicating that GAI inactivates the transcriptional regulatory activity of BZR1 upon their interaction by inhibiting the ability of BZR1 to bind to target promoters. The physiological relevance of this interaction was confirmed by the observation that the dominant gai-1 allele interferes with BR-regulated gene expression, whereas the bzr1-1D allele displays enhanced resistance to DELLA accumulation during hypocotyl elongation. Because DELLA proteins mediate the response to multiple environmental signals, our results provide an initial molecular framework for the integration with BRs of additional pathways that control plant development.We thank the Nottingham Arabidopsis Stock Centre, Tai-ping Sun, Zhi-Yong Wang, Yanhai Yin, Ana Cano-Delgado, Luis Lopez-Molina, and Francois Parcy for providing seeds or reagents; Laura Garcia-Carcel and Gaston Pizzio for help in the early stages of this work; and Salome Prat for fruitful discussions, sharing unpublished results, and careful reading of the manuscript. J.G.-B. holds a Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas Fellowship of the Joint Admissions Exercise Predoctoral Program. E. G. M. is recipient of a postdoctoral "Juan de la Cierva" contract from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation. A. L. was supported in part by a fellowship of the Fondo per gli Investimenti della Ricerca di Base Progetto Giovani of the Italian Ministry of Education, University, and Research. Work in the authors' laboratory was funded by Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation Grants BIO2007-60923, BIO2010-15071, and CSD2007-00057 and by Generalitat Valenciana Grants ACOMP/2010/190 and PROMETEO/2010/020. Rothamsted Research is funded by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) of the United Kingdom.Gallego Bartolomé, J.; Minguet, EG.; Grau Enguix, F.; Abbas, M.; Locascio, AAM.; Thomas, SG.; Alabadí Diego, D.... (2012). Molecular mechanism for the interaction between gibberellin and brassinosteroid signaling pathways in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 109(33):13446-13451. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1119992109S134461345110933Depuydt, S., & Hardtke, C. S. (2011). Hormone Signalling Crosstalk in Plant Growth Regulation. Current Biology, 21(9), R365-R373. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2011.03.013Alabadi, D., Blazquez, M. A., Carbonell, J., Ferrandiz, C., & Perez-Amador, M. A. (2009). Instructive roles for hormones in plant development. The International Journal of Developmental Biology, 53(8-9-10), 1597-1608. doi:10.1387/ijdb.072423daHartwell, L. H., Hopfield, J. J., Leibler, S., & Murray, A. W. (1999). From molecular to modular cell biology. Nature, 402(S6761), C47-C52. doi:10.1038/35011540Kuppusamy, K. T., Walcher, C. L., & Nemhauser, J. L. (2008). Cross-regulatory mechanisms in hormone signaling. Plant Molecular Biology, 69(4), 375-381. doi:10.1007/s11103-008-9389-2Jaillais, Y., & Chory, J. (2010). Unraveling the paradoxes of plant hormone signaling integration. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, 17(6), 642-645. doi:10.1038/nsmb0610-642Sun, T. (2011). The Molecular Mechanism and Evolution of the GA–GID1–DELLA Signaling Module in Plants. Current Biology, 21(9), R338-R345. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2011.02.036Hou, X., Lee, L. Y. C., Xia, K., Yan, Y., & Yu, H. (2010). DELLAs Modulate Jasmonate Signaling via Competitive Binding to JAZs. Developmental Cell, 19(6), 884-894. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2010.10.024Fonseca, S., Chico, J. M., & Solano, R. (2009). The jasmonate pathway: the ligand, the receptor and the core signalling module. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 12(5), 539-547. doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2009.07.013Frigerio, M., Alabadí, D., Pérez-Gómez, J., García-Cárcel, L., Phillips, A. L., Hedden, P., & Blázquez, M. A. (2006). Transcriptional Regulation of Gibberellin Metabolism Genes by Auxin Signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology, 142(2), 553-563. doi:10.1104/pp.106.084871Vert, G., Walcher, C. L., Chory, J., & Nemhauser, J. L. (2008). Integration of auxin and brassinosteroid pathways by Auxin Response Factor 2. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(28), 9829-9834. doi:10.1073/pnas.0803996105Nemhauser, J. L., Mockler, T. C., & Chory, J. (2004). Interdependency of Brassinosteroid and Auxin Signaling in Arabidopsis. PLoS Biology, 2(9), e258. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020258Clouse, S. D. (2011). Brassinosteroid Signal Transduction: From Receptor Kinase Activation to Transcriptional Networks Regulating Plant Development. The Plant Cell, 23(4), 1219-1230. doi:10.1105/tpc.111.084475Tanaka, K., Nakamura, Y., Asami, T., Yoshida, S., Matsuo, T., & Okamoto, S. (2003). Physiological Roles of Brassinosteroids in Early Growth of Arabidopsis: Brassinosteroids Have a Synergistic Relationship with Gibberellin as well as Auxin in Light-Grown Hypocotyl Elongation. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 22(3), 259-271. doi:10.1007/s00344-003-0119-3Alabadí, D., Gil, J., Blázquez, M. A., & García-Martínez, J. L. (2004). Gibberellins Repress Photomorphogenesis in Darkness. Plant Physiology, 134(3), 1050-1057. doi:10.1104/pp.103.035451Li, J., Nagpal, P., Vitart, V., McMorris, T. C., & Chory, J. (1996). A Role for Brassinosteroids in Light-Dependent Development of Arabidopsis. Science, 272(5260), 398-401. doi:10.1126/science.272.5260.398Szekeres, M., Németh, K., Koncz-Kálmán, Z., Mathur, J., Kauschmann, A., Altmann, T., … Koncz, C. (1996). Brassinosteroids Rescue the Deficiency of CYP90, a Cytochrome P450, Controlling Cell Elongation and De-etiolation in Arabidopsis. Cell, 85(2), 171-182. doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81094-6Chory, J., Nagpal, P., & Peto, C. A. (1991). Phenotypic and Genetic Analysis of det2, a New Mutant That Affects Light-Regulated Seedling Development in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell, 445-459. doi:10.1105/tpc.3.5.445Cheadle, C., Vawter, M. P., Freed, W. J., & Becker, K. G. (2003). Analysis of Microarray Data Using Z Score Transformation. The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, 5(2), 73-81. doi:10.1016/s1525-1578(10)60455-2Koornneef, M., & van der Veen, J. H. (1980). Induction and analysis of gibberellin sensitive mutants in Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) heynh. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 58(6), 257-263. doi:10.1007/bf00265176Davière, J.-M., de Lucas, M., & Prat, S. (2008). Transcriptional factor interaction: a central step in DELLA function. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development, 18(4), 295-303. doi:10.1016/j.gde.2008.05.004Leivar, P., Tepperman, J. M., Monte, E., Calderon, R. H., Liu, T. L., & Quail, P. H. (2009). Definition of Early Transcriptional Circuitry Involved in Light-Induced Reversal of PIF-Imposed Repression of Photomorphogenesis in Young Arabidopsis Seedlings. The Plant Cell, 21(11), 3535-3553. doi:10.1105/tpc.109.070672Shin, J., Kim, K., Kang, H., Zulfugarov, I. S., Bae, G., Lee, C.-H., … Choi, G. (2009). Phytochromes promote seedling light responses by inhibiting four negatively-acting phytochrome-interacting factors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(18), 7660-7665. doi:10.1073/pnas.0812219106Silverstone, A. L. (2001). Repressing a Repressor: Gibberellin-Induced Rapid Reduction of the RGA Protein in Arabidopsis. THE PLANT CELL ONLINE, 13(7), 1555-1566. doi:10.1105/tpc.13.7.1555Dill, A., Jung, H.-S., & Sun, T. -p. (2001). The DELLA motif is essential for gibberellin-induced degradation of RGA. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(24), 14162-14167. doi:10.1073/pnas.251534098Alabadí, D., Gallego-Bartolomé, J., Orlando, L., García-Cárcel, L., Rubio, V., Martínez, C., … Blázquez, M. A. (2007). Gibberellins modulate light signaling pathways to prevent Arabidopsis seedling de-etiolation in darkness. The Plant Journal, 53(2), 324-335. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2007.03346.xYin, Y., Wang, Z.-Y., Mora-Garcia, S., Li, J., Yoshida, S., Asami, T., & Chory, J. (2002). BES1 Accumulates in the Nucleus in Response to Brassinosteroids to Regulate Gene Expression and Promote Stem Elongation. Cell, 109(2), 181-191. doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00721-3He, J.-X., Gendron, J. M., Yang, Y., Li, J., & Wang, Z.-Y. (2002). The GSK3-like kinase BIN2 phosphorylates and destabilizes BZR1, a positive regulator of the brassinosteroid signaling pathway in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(15), 10185-10190. doi:10.1073/pnas.152342599Wang, Z.-Y., Nakano, T., Gendron, J., He, J., Chen, M., Vafeados, D., … Chory, J. (2002). Nuclear-Localized BZR1 Mediates Brassinosteroid-Induced Growth and Feedback Suppression of Brassinosteroid Biosynthesis. Developmental Cell, 2(4), 505-513. doi:10.1016/s1534-5807(02)00153-3Ryu, H., Kim, K., Cho, H., Park, J., Choe, S., & Hwang, I. (2007). Nucleocytoplasmic Shuttling of BZR1 Mediated by Phosphorylation Is Essential in Arabidopsis Brassinosteroid Signaling. The Plant Cell, 19(9), 2749-2762. doi:10.1105/tpc.107.053728Gampala, S. S., Kim, T.-W., He, J.-X., Tang, W., Deng, Z., Bai, M.-Y., … Wang, Z.-Y. (2007). An Essential Role for 14-3-3 Proteins in Brassinosteroid Signal Transduction in Arabidopsis. Developmental Cell, 13(2), 177-189. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2007.06.009De Lucas, M., Davière, J.-M., Rodríguez-Falcón, M., Pontin, M., Iglesias-Pedraz, J. M., Lorrain, S., … Prat, S. (2008). A molecular framework for light and gibberellin control of cell elongation. Nature, 451(7177), 480-484. doi:10.1038/nature06520Sun, T., & Gubler, F. (2004). MOLECULAR MECHANISM OF GIBBERELLIN SIGNALING IN PLANTS. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 55(1), 197-223. doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141753He, J.-X. (2005). BZR1 Is a Transcriptional Repressor with Dual Roles in Brassinosteroid Homeostasis and Growth Responses. Science, 307(5715), 1634-1638. doi:10.1126/science.1107580Sun, Y., Fan, X.-Y., Cao, D.-M., Tang, W., He, K., Zhu, J.-Y., … Wang, Z.-Y. (2010). Integration of Brassinosteroid Signal Transduction with the Transcription Network for Plant Growth Regulation in Arabidopsis. Developmental Cell, 19(5), 765-777. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2010.10.010Triezenberg, S. J., Kingsbury, R. C., & McKnight, S. L. (1988). Functional dissection of VP16, the trans-activator of herpes simplex virus immediate early gene expression. Genes & Development, 2(6), 718-729. doi:10.1101/gad.2.6.718Feng, S., Martinez, C., Gusmaroli, G., Wang, Y., Zhou, J., Wang, F., … Deng, X. W. (2008). Coordinated regulation of Arabidopsis thaliana development by light and gibberellins. Nature, 451(7177), 475-479. doi:10.1038/nature06448Gallego-Bartolomé, J., Arana, M. V., Vandenbussche, F., Žádníková, P., Minguet, E. G., Guardiola, V., … Blázquez, M. A. (2011). Hierarchy of hormone action controlling apical hook development in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal, 67(4), 622-634. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2011.04621.xGallego-Bartolomé, J., Alabadí, D., & Blázquez, M. A. (2011). DELLA-Induced Early Transcriptional Changes during Etiolated Development in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS ONE, 6(8), e23918. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0023918Steber, C. M., & McCourt, P. (2001). A Role for Brassinosteroids in Germination in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology, 125(2), 763-769. doi:10.1104/pp.125.2.763Yin, Y., Vafeados, D., Tao, Y., Yoshida, S., Asami, T., & Chory, J. (2005). A New Class of Transcription Factors Mediates Brassinosteroid-Regulated Gene Expression in Arabidopsis. Cell, 120(2), 249-259. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2004.11.044Müller, B., & Sheen, J. (2008). Cytokinin and auxin interaction in root stem-cell specification during early embryogenesis. Nature, 453(7198), 1094-1097. doi:10.1038/nature0694

Petiole hyponasty: an ethylene-driven, adaptive response to changes in the environment

Hyponastic (upwardly bending) growth by leaves is a response of numerous plant species to adverse environmental conditions. This review summarises current knowledge on hyponasty with a particular focus on the role of ethylene in regulating this phenomenon and its possible adaptive significance

Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)1.

In 2008, we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, this topic has received increasing attention, and many scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Thus, it is important to formulate on a regular basis updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Despite numerous reviews, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to evaluate autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. Here, we present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a dogmatic set of rules, because the appropriateness of any assay largely depends on the question being asked and the system being used. Moreover, no individual assay is perfect for every situation, calling for the use of multiple techniques to properly monitor autophagy in each experimental setting. Finally, several core components of the autophagy machinery have been implicated in distinct autophagic processes (canonical and noncanonical autophagy), implying that genetic approaches to block autophagy should rely on targeting two or more autophagy-related genes that ideally participate in distinct steps of the pathway. Along similar lines, because multiple proteins involved in autophagy also regulate other cellular pathways including apoptosis, not all of them can be used as a specific marker for bona fide autophagic responses. Here, we critically discuss current methods of assessing autophagy and the information they can, or cannot, provide. Our ultimate goal is to encourage intellectual and technical innovation in the field

Lactoferrin as Immune-Enhancement Strategy for SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Alzheimer’s Disease Patients

Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) (COVID-19) causes severe acute respiratory syndrome. Severe illness of COVID-19 largely occurs in older people and recent evidence indicates that demented patients have higher risk for COVID-19. Additionally, COVID-19 further enhances the vulnerability of older adults with cognitive damage. A balance between the immune and inflammatory response is necessary to control the infection. Thus, antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory drugs are hopeful therapeutic agents for the treatment of COVID-19. Accumulating evidence suggests that lactoferrin (Lf) is active against SARS-CoV-2, likely due to its potent antiviral and anti-inflammatory actions that ultimately improves immune system responses. Remarkably, salivary Lf levels are significantly reduced in different Alzheimer’s disease (AD) stages, which may reflect AD-related immunological disturbances, leading to reduced defense mechanisms against viral pathogens and an increase of the COVID-19 susceptibility. Overall, there is an urgent necessity to protect AD patients against COVID-19, decreasing the risk of viral infections. In this context, we propose bovine Lf (bLf) as a promising preventive therapeutic tool to minimize COVID-19 risk in patients with dementia or AD

Molecular Mechanism of Action of Plant DRM De Novo DNA Methyltransferases

DNA methylation is a conserved epigenetic gene-regulation mechanism. DOMAINS REARRANGED METHYLTRANSFERASE (DRM) is a key de novo methyltransferase in plants, but how DRM acts mechanistically is poorly understood. Here, we report the crystal structure of the methyltransferase domain of tobacco DRM (NtDRM) and reveal a molecular basis for its rearranged structure. NtDRM forms a functional homodimer critical for catalytic activity. We also show that Arabidopsis DRM2 exists in complex with the small interfering RNA (siRNA) effector ARGONAUTE4 (AGO4) and preferentially methylates one DNA strand, likely the strand acting as the template for RNA polymerase V-mediated noncoding RNA transcripts. This strand-biased DNA methylation is also positively correlated with strand-biased siRNA accumulation. These data suggest a model in which DRM2 is guided to target loci by AGO4-siRNA and involves base-pairing of associated siRNAs with nascent RNA transcripts

Mechanism of DNA Methylation-Directed Histone Methylation by KRYPTONITE

In Arabidopsis, CHG DNA methylation is controlled by the H3K9 methylation mark through a self-reinforcing loop between DNA methyltransferase CHROMOMETHYLASE3 (CMT3) and H3K9 histone methyltransferase KRYPTONITE/SUVH4 (KYP). We report on the structure of KYP in complex with methylated DNA, substrate H3 peptide, and cofactor SAH, thereby defining the spatial positioning of the SRA domain relative to the SET domain. The methylated DNA is bound by the SRA domain with the 5mC flipped out of the DNA, while the H3(1-15) peptide substrate binds between the SET and post-SET domains, with the ε-ammonium of K9 positioned adjacent to bound SAH. These structural insights, complemented by functional data on key mutants of residues lining the 5mC and H3K9-binding pockets within KYP, establish how methylated DNA recruits KYP to the histone substrate. Together, the structures of KYP and previously reported CMT3 complexes provide insights into molecular mechanisms linking DNA and histone methylation

Fruit Development: new directions for an old pathway

A recent study investigating the molecular mechanisms of seed pod shattering has shown that the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) proteins INDEHISCENT and ALCATRAZ appear to regulate fruit patterning through gibberellic acid (GA)-DELLA signalling, revealing a central role for bHLH family members in GA response specificity