Phenotypic Divergence among West European Populations of Reed Bunting Emberiza schoeniclus: The Effects of Migratory and Foraging Behaviours

[EN] Divergent selection and local adaptation are responsible for many phenotypic differences between populations, potentially leading to speciation through the evolution of reproductive barriers. Here we evaluated the morphometric divergence among west European populations of Reed Bunting in order to determine the extent of local adaptation relative to two important selection pressures often associated with speciation in birds: migration and diet. We show that, as expected by theory, migratory E. s. schoeniclus had longer and more pointed wings and a slightly smaller body mass than the resident subspecies, with the exception of E. s. lusitanica, which despite having rounder wings was the smallest of all subspecies. Tail length, however, did not vary according to the expectation (shorter tails in migrants) probably because it is strongly correlated with wing length and might take longer to evolve. E. s. witherbyi, which feed on insects hiding inside reed stems during the winter, had a very thick, stubby bill. In contrast, northern populations, which feed on seeds, had thinner bills. Despite being much smaller, the southern E. s. lusitanica had a significantly thicker, longer bill than migratory E. s. schoeniclus, whereas birds from the UK population had significantly shorter, thinner bills. Geometric morphometric analyses revealed that the southern subspecies have a more convex culmen than E. s. schoeniclus, and E. s. lusitanica differs from the nominate subspecies in bill shape to a greater extent than in linear bill measurements, especially in males. Birds with a more convex culmen are thought to exert a greater strength at the bill tip, which is in agreement with their feeding technique. Overall, the three subspecies occurring in Western Europe differ in a variety of traits following the patterns predicted from their migratory and foraging behaviours, strongly suggesting that these birds have became locally adapted through natural selection.Some fieldwork in Portugal was supported financially by ICETA, University of Porto. LG and JMN were supported financially by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology through grants SFRH/BD/64645/2009 and SFRH/BPD/40667/2007, respectively. JSM and EJB were funded by the projects CGL2005-02041/BOS and CGL2010-21933-C02-02 granted by Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion (Spain). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Neto, JM.; Gordinho, L.; Belda, EJ.; Marín Villora, M.; Monrós González, JS.; Fearon, P.; Crates, R. (2013). Phenotypic Divergence among West European Populations of Reed Bunting Emberiza schoeniclus: The Effects of Migratory and Foraging Behaviours. PLoS ONE. 8(5):1-11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063248S11185Van Doorn, G. S., Edelaar, P., & Weissing, F. J. (2009). On the Origin of Species by Natural and Sexual Selection. Science, 326(5960), 1704-1707. doi:10.1126/science.1181661Winker, K. (2010). Chapter 1: Subspecies Represent Geographically Partitioned Variation, A Gold Mine of Evolutionary Biology, and a Challenge for Conservation. Ornithological Monographs, 67(1), 6-23. doi:10.1525/om.2010.67.1.6Servedio, M. R., Doorn, G. S. V., Kopp, M., Frame, A. M., & Nosil, P. (2011). Magic traits in speciation: ‘magic’ but not rare? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 26(8), 389-397. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2011.04.005Via, S. (2009). Natural selection in action during speciation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(Supplement_1), 9939-9946. doi:10.1073/pnas.0901397106Shaw, K. L., & Mullen, S. P. (2011). Genes versus phenotypes in the study of speciation. Genetica, 139(5), 649-661. doi:10.1007/s10709-011-9562-4Bearhop, S. (2005). Assortative Mating as a Mechanism for Rapid Evolution of a Migratory Divide. Science, 310(5747), 502-504. doi:10.1126/science.1115661Pérez-Tris, J., Ramírez, Á., & Tellería, J. L. (2003). Are Iberian ChiffchaffsPhylloscopus (collybita) brehmiilong-distance migrants? An analysis of flight-related morphology. Bird Study, 50(2), 146-152. doi:10.1080/00063650309461306Irwin DE, Irwin JH (2005) Siberian migratory divides. The role of seasonal migration in speciation. In: Greenberg R, Marra PP, editors. Birds of Two Worlds. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland. 27–40.BENSCH, S., GRAHN, M., MÜLLER, N., GAY, L., & ÅKESSON, S. (2009). Genetic, morphological, and feather isotope variation of migratory willow warblers show gradual divergence in a ring. Molecular Ecology, 18(14), 3087-3096. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2009.04210.xRohwer, S., & Irwin, D. E. (2011). Molt, Orientation, and Avian Speciation. The Auk, 128(2), 419-425. doi:10.1525/auk.2011.10176Grant, P. R. (2002). Unpredictable Evolution in a 30-Year Study of Darwin’s Finches. Science, 296(5568), 707-711. doi:10.1126/science.1070315Ryan, P. G., Bloomer, P., Moloney, C. L., Grant, T. J., & Delport, W. (2007). Ecological Speciation in South Atlantic Island Finches. Science, 315(5817), 1420-1423. doi:10.1126/science.1138829Benkman, C. W. (2003). DIVERGENT SELECTION DRIVES THE ADAPTIVE RADIATION OF CROSSBILLS. Evolution, 57(5), 1176-1181. doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00326.xFunk, D. J., Nosil, P., & Etges, W. J. (2006). Ecological divergence exhibits consistently positive associations with reproductive isolation across disparate taxa. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(9), 3209-3213. doi:10.1073/pnas.0508653103Cramp S, Perrins CM (1994) Handbook of the birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa. The birds of the Western Palaearctic. Volume 9: Buntings and new world warblers. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 522 p.Byers C, Curson J, Olson U (1995) Sparrows and Buntings: A Guide to the Sparrows and Buntings of North America and the World. Houghton Mifflin, New York.MATESSI, G., GRIGGIO, M., & PILASTRO, A. (2002). The geographical distribution of populations of the large-billed subspecies of reed bunting matches that of its main winter food. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 75(1), 21-26. doi:10.1046/j.1095-8312.2002.00003.xOrłowski, G., & Czarnecka, J. (2007). Winter diet of reed bunting Emberiza schoeniclus in fallow and stubble fields. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 118(1-4), 244-248. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2006.05.026Clements JF, Schulenberg TS, Iliff MJ, Sullivan BL, Wood CL, et al.. (2011) The Clements checklist of birds of the world: Version 6.6. Available: https://www.birds.cornell.edu/clementschecklist/download/del Hoyo J, Elliot A, Christie DA (ed) (2011) Handbook of the birds of the world. Vol. 16. Lynx edicions, Barcelona. 894 p.Steinbacher, F. (1930). Bemerkungen zur Systematik der Rohrammern,Emberiza schoeniclus (L.). Journal für Ornithologie, 78(4), 471-487. doi:10.1007/bf01953149Atienza JC (2006) El escribano palustre em España. I Censo nacional (2005). SEO/BirdLife, Madrid. 72 p.Copete, J. L., Mariné, R., Bigas, D., & Martínez-Vilalta, A. (1999). Differences in wing shape between sedentary and migratory Reed BuntingsEmberiza schoeniclus. Bird Study, 46(1), 100-103. doi:10.1080/00063659909461119GRAPPUTO, A., PILASTRO, A., & MARIN, G. (1998). Genetic variation and bill size dimorphism in a passerine bird, the reed bunting Emberiza schoeniclus. Molecular Ecology, 7(9), 1173-1182. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00441.xZink, R. M., Pavlova, A., Drovetski, S., & Rohwer, S. (2008). Mitochondrial phylogeographies of five widespread Eurasian bird species. Journal of Ornithology, 149(3), 399-413. doi:10.1007/s10336-008-0276-zKvist, L., Ponnikas, S., Belda, E. J., Encabo, I., Martínez, E., Onrubia, A., … Monrós, J. S. (2011). Endangered subspecies of the Reed Bunting (Emberiza schoeniclus witherbyi and E. s. lusitanica) in Iberian Peninsula have different genetic structures. Journal of Ornithology, 152(3), 681-693. doi:10.1007/s10336-011-0646-9Matessi, G., Dabelsteen, T., & Pilastro, A. (2000). Responses to playback of different subspecies songs in the Reed Bunting Emberiza schoeniclus. Journal of Avian Biology, 31(1), 96-101. doi:10.1034/j.1600-048x.2000.310113.xPodos, J. (2001). Correlated evolution of morphology and vocal signal structure in Darwin’s finches. Nature, 409(6817), 185-188. doi:10.1038/35051570Hedenström, A. (2007). Adaptations to migration in birds: behavioural strategies, morphology and scaling effects. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363(1490), 287-299. doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2140MILÁ, B., WAYNE, R. K., & SMITH, T. B. (2008). ECOMORPHOLOGY OF MIGRATORY AND SEDENTARY POPULATIONS OF THE YELLOW-RUMPED WARBLER (DENDROICA CORONATA). The Condor, 110(2), 335-344. doi:10.1525/cond.2008.8396Keller, L. F., Grant, P. R., Grant, B. R., & Petren, K. (2001). Heritability of morphological traits in Darwin’s Finches: misidentified paternity and maternal effects. Heredity, 87(3), 325-336. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2540.2001.00900.xTarka, M., Åkesson, M., Beraldi, D., Hernández-Sánchez, J., Hasselquist, D., Bensch, S., & Hansson, B. (2010). A strong quantitative trait locus for wing length on chromosome 2 in a wild population of great reed warblers. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 277(1692), 2361-2369. doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.0033Svensson L (1992) Identification guide to European passerines, 4th edition. Lars Svensson, Stockholm.De La Puente, J., & Seoane, J. (2001). The use of primary abrasion for ageing reed buntingsemberiza schoeniclus. Ringing & Migration, 20(3), 221-223. doi:10.1080/03078698.2001.9674249Jenni, L., & Winkler, R. (1989). The feather-length of small passerines: a measurement for wing-length in live birds and museum skins. Bird Study, 36(1), 1-15. doi:10.1080/00063658909476996Gosler, A. G., Greenwood, J. J. D., Baker, J. K., & Davidson, N. C. (1998). The field determination of body size and condition in passerines: a report to the British Ringing Committee. Bird Study, 45(1), 92-103. doi:10.1080/00063659809461082James Rohlf, F., & Marcus, L. F. (1993). A revolution morphometrics. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 8(4), 129-132. doi:10.1016/0169-5347(93)90024-jMarcus LF, Corti M, Loy A, Naylor GJP, Slice DE (eds) (1996) Advances in Morphometrics. NATO ASI Series A: Life Sciences. Plenum Press, New York.Klingenberg CP (1996) Multivariate allometry. In: Marcus LF, Corti M, Loy A, Naylor G, Slice DE, editors. Advances in Morphometrics, Plenum Press, New York. 23–49.Zelditch M, Swiderski D, Sheets H, Fink W (2004) Geometric Morphometrics for Biologists: A Primer. Elsevier Academic Press, London.FOSTER, D. J., PODOS, J., & HENDRY, A. P. (2007). A geometric morphometric appraisal of beak shape in Darwin’s finches. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 21(1), 263-275. doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01449.xNavarro, J., Kaliontzopoulou, A., & González-Solís, J. (2009). Sexual dimorphism in bill morphology and feeding ecology in Cory’s shearwater (Calonectris diomedea). Zoology, 112(2), 128-138. doi:10.1016/j.zool.2008.05.001Berns, C. M., & Adams, D. C. (2010). Bill Shape and Sexual Shape Dimorphism between two Species of Temperate Hummingbirds: Black-Chinned Hummingbird (Archilochusalexandri) and Ruby-Throated Hummingbird (A. colubris). The Auk, 127(3), 626-635. doi:10.1525/auk.2010.09213Rohlf FJ (2010) Morphometrics at SUNY Stony Brook. Available: http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/morphRohlf FJ (2010) tps Utility program. Version 1.46. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook.Kaliontzopoulou, A., Carretero, M. A., & Llorente, G. A. (2007). Multivariate and geometric morphometrics in the analysis of sexual dimorphism variation inPodarcis lizards. Journal of Morphology, 268(2), 152-165. doi:10.1002/jmor.10494Rohlf FJ (2010) tpsDig. Version 2.16. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook.Rohlf FJ (2003) tpsSmall, version 1.20. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook.Rohlf, F. J., & Slice, D. (1990). Extensions of the Procrustes Method for the Optimal Superimposition of Landmarks. Systematic Zoology, 39(1), 40. doi:10.2307/2992207Rohlf, F. J. (1999). Shape Statistics: Procrustes Superimpositions and Tangent Spaces. Journal of Classification, 16(2), 197-223. doi:10.1007/s003579900054Rohlf FJ (2010) tpsRelw, relative warps analysis, version 1.49. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook.LLEONART, J., SALAT, J., & TORRES, G. J. (2000). Removing Allometric Effects of Body Size in Morphological Analysis. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 205(1), 85-93. doi:10.1006/jtbi.2000.2043IBM Corp. (2011) IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.BALDWIN, M. W., WINKLER, H., ORGAN, C. L., & HELM, B. (2010). Wing pointedness associated with migratory distance in common-garden and comparative studies of stonechats (Saxicola torquata). Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 23(5), 1050-1063. doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.01975.xFörschler, M. I., & Bairlein, F. (2011). Morphological Shifts of the External Flight Apparatus across the Range of a Passerine (Northern Wheatear) with Diverging Migratory Behaviour. PLoS ONE, 6(4), e18732. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0018732Wernham CV, Toms MP, Marchant JH, Clark JA, Siriwardena GM, et al.. (eds) (2002) The Migration Atlas: movements of the birds of Britain and Ireland. T. & A.D. Poyser, London.Tarka M (2012) Evolutionary dynamics of migration and breeding in wild birds: genetic architecture, sexual conflicts and evolutionary constrains. PhD dissertation, Lund, University, Sweden. 264 p.Greenberg, R., & Olsen, B. (2010). Bill size and dimorphism in tidal-marsh sparrows: island-like processes in a continental habitat. Ecology, 91(8), 2428-2436. doi:10.1890/09-1136.1Cooper, I. A., Gilman, R. T., & Boughman, J. W. (2011). SEXUAL DIMORPHISM AND SPECIATION ON TWO ECOLOGICAL COINS: PATTERNS FROM NATURE AND THEORETICAL PREDICTIONS. Evolution, 65(9), 2553-2571. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01332.xGreenberg, R., Cadena, V., Danner, R. M., & Tattersall, G. (2012). Heat Loss May Explain Bill Size Differences between Birds Occupying Different Habitats. PLoS ONE, 7(7), e40933. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0040933Greenberg, R., Danner, R., Olsen, B., & Luther, D. (2012). High summer temperature explains bill size variation in salt marsh sparrows. Ecography, 35(2), 146-152. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.2011.07002.xGreenberg, R., & Danner, R. M. (2012). THE INFLUENCE OF THE CALIFORNIA MARINE LAYER ON BILL SIZE IN A GENERALIST SONGBIRD. Evolution, 66(12), 3825-3835. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01726.xBallentine, B., & Greenberg, R. (2010). Common Garden Experiment Reveals Genetic Control of Phenotypic Divergence between Swamp Sparrow Subspecies That Lack Divergence in Neutral Genotypes. PLoS ONE, 5(4), e10229. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.001022

AVONET: morphological, ecological and geographical data for all birds

Functional traits offer a rich quantitative framework for developing and testing theories in evolutionary biology, ecology and ecosystem science. However, the potential of functional traits to drive theoretical advances and refine models of global change can only be fully realised when species‐level information is complete. Here we present the AVONET dataset containing comprehensive functional trait data for all birds, including six ecological variables, 11 continuous morphological traits, and information on range size and location. Raw morphological measurements are presented from 90,020 individuals of 11,009 extant bird species sampled from 181 countries. These data are also summarised as species averages in three taxonomic formats, allowing integration with a global phylogeny, geographical range maps, IUCN Red List data and the eBird citizen science database. The AVONET dataset provides the most detailed picture of continuous trait variation for any major radiation of organisms, offering a global template for testing hypotheses and exploring the evolutionary origins, structure and functioning of biodiversity

Data from: Causes and consequences of individual variation in the extent of post-juvenile moult in the blue tit Cyanistes caeruleus (Passeriformes: Paridae)

Moult, comprising the growth or replacement of feathers in birds, is an energetically demanding process. As a result, in many species, the extent of the post-juvenile moult can vary substantially. However, the reasons underlying this variation remain poorly understood, and the potential life-history consequences of variation in moult extent are even less clear. In the present study, we aimed to use individual-specific data to identify factors affecting the extent of the post-juvenile moult in a population of over 2500 blue tits Cyanistes caeruleus Linnaeus 1758, and to assess the consequences of individual variation in moult extent on reproduction in the first year of life. There was a substantial sex difference in post-juvenile moult extent, with males moulting more extensively than females. Putative immigrant birds had moulted on average less than those born locally. However, there was little evidence of carry-over effects of the natal environment on moult extent because we found no relationship between moult extent and fledging date or nestling mass. Evidence that moult extent, and hence feather brightness, affected subsequent reproductive success was limited. Moult extent had no effect on recruitment in males, although female recruits had moulted significantly less than nonbreeders. Because it was not influenced by features of the natal environment, moult extent may not be an honest signal of individual quality in C. caeruleus. As a result, the potential consequences of variation in moult extent for fitness are likely to be small

Causes and consequences of individual variation in the extent of post-juvenile moult in the blue tit Cyanistes caeruleus (Passeriformes: Paridae)

Moult, comprising the growth or replacement of feathers in birds, is an energetically demanding process. As a result, in many species, the extent of the post-juvenile moult can vary substantially. However, the reasons underlying this variation remain poorly understood, and the potential life-history consequences of variation in moult extent are even less clear. In the present study, we aimed to use individual-specific data to identify factors affecting the extent of the post-juvenile moult in a population of over 2500 blue tits Cyanistes caeruleus Linnaeus 1758, and to assess the consequences of individual variation in moult extent on reproduction in the first year of life. There was a substantial sex difference in post-juvenile moult extent, with males moulting more extensively than females. Putative immigrant birds had moulted on average less than those born locally. However, there was little evidence of carry-over effects of the natal environment on moult extent because we found no relationship between moult extent and fledging date or nestling mass. Evidence that moult extent, and hence feather brightness, affected subsequent reproductive success was limited. Moult extent had no effect on recruitment in males, although female recruits had moulted significantly less than nonbreeders. Because it was not influenced by features of the natal environment, moult extent may not be an honest signal of individual quality in C. caeruleus. As a result, the potential consequences of variation in moult extent for fitness are likely to be small. © 2015 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2015, 116, 341–351

Individual variation in winter supplementary food consumption and its consequences for reproduction in wild birds

The provision of wild birds with supplementary food has increased substantially over recent decades. While it is assumed that provisioning birds is beneficial, supplementary feeding can have detrimental ‘carry‐over’ effects on reproductive traits. Due to difficulties in monitoring individual feeding behaviour, assessing how individuals within a population vary in their exploitation of supplementary food resources has been limited. Quantifying individual consumption of supplementary food is necessary to understand the operation of carry‐over effects at the individual level. We used Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) technology and automated feeders to estimate individual consumption of supplementary winter food in a large wild population of great tits Parus major and blue tits Cyanistes caeruleus. Using these data, we identified demographic factors that explained individual variation in levels of supplementary food consumption. We also tested for carry‐over effects of supplementary food consumption on recruitment, reproductive success and a measure of survival. Individual variation in consumption of supplementary food was explained by differences between species, ages, sexes and years. Individuals were consistent across time in their usage of supplementary resources. We found no strong evidence that the extent of supplementary food consumption directly influenced subsequent fitness parameters. Such effects may instead result from supplementary food influencing population demographics by enhancing the survival and subsequent breeding of less competitive individuals, which reduce average breeding parameters and increase density‐dependent competition. Carry‐over effects of supplementary feeding are not universal and may depend upon the temporal availability of the food provided. Our study demonstrates how RFID systems can be used to examine individual‐level behaviour with minimal effects on fitness

Individual variation in winter supplementary food consumption and its consequences for reproduction in wild birds

The provision of wild birds with supplementary food has increased substantially over recent decades. While it is assumed that provisioning birds is beneficial, supplementary feeding can have detrimental ‘carry‐over’ effects on reproductive traits. Due to difficulties in monitoring individual feeding behaviour, assessing how individuals within a population vary in their exploitation of supplementary food resources has been limited. Quantifying individual consumption of supplementary food is necessary to understand the operation of carry‐over effects at the individual level. We used Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) technology and automated feeders to estimate individual consumption of supplementary winter food in a large wild population of great tits Parus major and blue tits Cyanistes caeruleus. Using these data, we identified demographic factors that explained individual variation in levels of supplementary food consumption. We also tested for carry‐over effects of supplementary food consumption on recruitment, reproductive success and a measure of survival. Individual variation in consumption of supplementary food was explained by differences between species, ages, sexes and years. Individuals were consistent across time in their usage of supplementary resources. We found no strong evidence that the extent of supplementary food consumption directly influenced subsequent fitness parameters. Such effects may instead result from supplementary food influencing population demographics by enhancing the survival and subsequent breeding of less competitive individuals, which reduce average breeding parameters and increase density‐dependent competition. Carry‐over effects of supplementary feeding are not universal and may depend upon the temporal availability of the food provided. Our study demonstrates how RFID systems can be used to examine individual‐level behaviour with minimal effects on fitness

Moult files for Dryad

12 separate files in a zip folder: BREEDERF/M = comparing breeders v non-breeders for each sex. Clutchegg = analyses of clutch size and egg mass. DISP = dispersal distance analysis. FIVEF/M comparing age of partner in first year birds. hatched_in_wytham= natal effects data file. RES-IMM = comparison of residents v immigrants. SEX_DIFFERENCES = comparison of moult extent by sex. YRMALES/FEMALES = analysis of young ringed by moult extent for both sexes. All headings self-explanatory. PC1_F is our synthetic measure of moult extent

The role of social and ecological processes in structuring animal populations : A case study from automated tracking of wild birds

Both social and ecological factors influence population process and structure, with resultant consequences for phenotypic selection on individuals. Understanding the scale and relative contribution of these two factors is thus a central aim in evolutionary ecology. In this study, we develop a framework using null models to identify the social and spatial patterns that contribute to phenotypic structure in a wild population of songbirds. We used automated technologies to track 1053 individuals that formed 73 737 groups from which we inferred a social network. Our framework identified that both social and spatial drivers contributed to assortment in the network. In particular, groups had a more even sex ratio than expectedand exhibited a consistent age structure that suggested local association preferences, such as preferential attachment or avoidance. By contrast, recent immigrants were spatially partitioned from locally born individuals, suggesting differential dispersal strategies by phenotype. Our results highlight how different scales of social decision-making, ranging from post-natal dispersal settlement to fission–fusion dynamics, can interact to drive phenotypic structure in animal populations.</p

Data from: The role of social and ecological processes in structuring animal populations: a case study from automated tracking of wild birds

Both social and ecological factors influence population process and structure, with resultant consequences for phenotypic selection on individuals. Understanding the scale and relative contribution of these two factors is thus a central aim in evolutionary ecology. In this study, we develop a framework using null models to identify the social and spatial patterns that contribute to phenotypic structure in a wild population of songbirds. We used automated technologies to track 1053 individuals that formed 73 737 groups from which we inferred a social network. Our framework identified that both social and spatial drivers contributed to assortment in the network. In particular, groups had a more even sex ratio than expected and exhibited a consistent age structure that suggested local association preferences, such as preferential attachment or avoidance. By contrast, recent immigrants were spatially partitioned from locally born individuals, suggesting differential dispersal strategies by phenotype. Our results highlight how different scales of social decision-making, ranging from post-natal dispersal settlement to fission–fusion dynamics, can interact to drive phenotypic structure in animal populations