Exile Vol. LII No. 2

Title Page 2 Epigraph by Ezra Pound 3 Table of Contents 4 Editor\u27s Note 6 Contributors\u27 Notes 45 Editorial Board 46 ART Wallace Monument by Casey Flax 9 Blind Man by Abbe Wright 18 Untitled by Adrienne Hunter 20 Sentinel by Eric Ahnmark 28 Untitled by Abbe Wright 32 Under Charles by Medha Jaishankar 43 FICTION The Great Lego Wall by Dawson West 12-16 Gods by Nick Wright 21-24 Some Days Hit like Mack Trucks by Sarah Broderick 33-42 POETRY The Liberation from Jack Kerouac by Katie Berta 7-8 Fragmented Grief by Jen Humbert 10 Rauschenberg Painting Iris Clért by Jeremy Heartberg 11 Outgrowing by Sarah Rogers 17 Garden of Eden by Jen Humbert 19 She whispered to the moon by Dave Murrin-von Ebers 25 A Joke by Jeremy Heartberg 26 Retrospective by Casey Flax 27 Ketchup Fetish by Dawson West 29 Winter Raspberries by Jennifer Luebbers 30-31 Knot by Sarah Rogers 44 Editor\u27s Note The process by which Exile comes into being each semester is by no means a quick or simple one, and was further confounded in this instance by having me at its core. I do not necessarily mean to discredit myself ad nauseam as some editors would, but they will all tell you that transitional periods are the toughest on a publication. The collaborative effort of Jeremy Heartberg and Jennifer Humbert over the past several semesters, not to mention the competent and eager editorial staff they have recruited, has seen to it that the transition made in these past few months has not been bulky or awkward, but rather quite seamless. It is appropriate then, that the two of them are both prominently featured in the edition of Exile on which you presently fix your gaze. In recent years, you have benefited from Jeremy\u27s and Jen\u27s dedication to Exile as a whole; this year, enjoy their dedication to the flexibility and nuance of language, to the manipulation of form, to poetry. Jeremy, Jen, Sarah, and Emily, thank you, you will be missed. / April 2006 -6 Front Cover Art by Chris Davis: Reflections / Back Cover Art by Eric Ahnmark: Trucks Only -46 All submissions are reviewed on an anonymous basis, and all editorial decisions are shared equally among the members of the editorial board. -4

Auditory Integration Interventions for Children with Autism and Developmental Disabilities: An Evidence-Based Practice Project

After extensive review of select auditory integration interventions including Auditory Integration Therapy (AIT), The Listening Program (TLP), and Therapeutic Listening (TL), we can conclude that many of these interventions have not been examined for use with children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Although some the research we found showed slight improvements in our investigated outcomes, many of them did not analyze the primary long-term outcomes of interest for occupational therapy including performance, participation, and engagement. Specialized training is required for therapists to facilitate AIT, TLP, and TL with their clients. Courses are costly ranging from $365-$2400, which further detracts the practicality of these interventions. All three of our auditory interventions were either not reviewed by the expert review groups or were investigated but not recommended. Additionally, some insurance companies and the United States Federal Drug Administration do not approve of some of the interventions and equipment required due to safety concerns and lack of evidence (UnitedHealthcare, 2016). Our preliminary recommendations are that these interventions are a Level 5. A Level 5 means that the treatment is designated as an untested/experimental treatment and/or is potentially harmful (WI Department of Health Services, 2014). Additionally, the results may not be a direct outcome of AIT, TLP, and TL due to a variety of limitations and gaps in research. Because of these gaps and limitations we can conclude that the existing research is of poor quality. Given the chosen study design in a majority of these articles, we cannot make definite conclusions that these interventions caused the differences in the outcomes. Also, due to case study designs and small sample sizes, the results cannot be generalized to the larger population. Conflicting recommendations exist for further on these auditory integration interventions. Therefore, individuals interested in conducting research should be aware of these cautions