107 research outputs found

    Understanding the agglomerate crystallisation of hexamine through X-ray microscopy and crystallographic modelling

    Get PDF
    © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/The detailed molecular-scale mechanism of the growth of organic crystals underpins a diversity of phenomena, such as the isolation and purification of high-quality materials for the pharmaceutical and fine chemical sectors. Recent advances in X-ray Microscopy (XRM) and complementary diffraction contrast tomography (DCT) have enabled the detailed characterisation of the micro-structure of hexamine agglomerates. Detailed XRM analysis of the growth history and micro-structure of such agglomerates reveals a highly orientated epitaxial inter-relationship between their constituent micro-crystallites. This is found to be consistent with a secondary nucleation growth mechanism associated with re-growth at the 3-fold corner sites within the crystals’ dominant {1 1 0} dodecahedral morphology. The agglomeration appears to heal upon further growth as the aligned agglomerated micro-crystals connect and fuse together but, in doing so, pockets of inter-crystallite mother liquor become trapped forming a symmetric pattern of solvent inclusions. The mechanistic origin of this phenomenon is rationalised with respect to historical data together with an analysis of the solid-state chemistry of the compound through the development of a ‘snow flake’ model. The latter draws upon hexamine's propensity for edge growth instabilities with increasing crystal size as well as its tendency for unstable growth at the facet corners along the 〈1 1 1〉 directions, a situation compounded by the lack of growth-promoting dislocations at the centers of the {1 1 0} habit surfaces. The agglomerative mechanism presented here could apply to other high symmetry crystal systems, particularly those whose crystal structures involve centred Bravais lattices and where the dominant inter-molecular interactions are angled towards the facet edges.Peer reviewe

    Carbon clusters near the crossover to fullerene stability

    Get PDF
    The thermodynamic stability of structural isomers of C24\mathrm{C}_{24}, C26\mathrm{C}_{26}, C28\mathrm{C}_{28} and C32\mathrm{C}_{32}, including fullerenes, is studied using density functional and quantum Monte Carlo methods. The energetic ordering of the different isomers depends sensitively on the treatment of electron correlation. Fixed-node diffusion quantum Monte Carlo calculations predict that a C24\mathrm{C}_{24} isomer is the smallest stable graphitic fragment and that the smallest stable fullerenes are the C26\mathrm{C}_{26} and C28\mathrm{C}_{28} clusters with C2v\mathrm{C}_{2v} and Td\mathrm{T}_{d} symmetry, respectively. These results support proposals that a C28\mathrm{C}_{28} solid could be synthesized by cluster deposition.Comment: 4 pages, includes 4 figures. For additional graphics, online paper and related information see http://www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/~prck

    Genome-Wide Joint Meta-Analysis of SNP and SNP-by-Smoking Interaction Identifies Novel Loci for Pulmonary Function

    Get PDF

    The Physical Processes of CME/ICME Evolution

    Get PDF
    As observed in Thomson-scattered white light, coronal mass ejections (CMEs) are manifest as large-scale expulsions of plasma magnetically driven from the corona in the most energetic eruptions from the Sun. It remains a tantalizing mystery as to how these erupting magnetic fields evolve to form the complex structures we observe in the solar wind at Earth. Here, we strive to provide a fresh perspective on the post-eruption and interplanetary evolution of CMEs, focusing on the physical processes that define the many complex interactions of the ejected plasma with its surroundings as it departs the corona and propagates through the heliosphere. We summarize the ways CMEs and their interplanetary CMEs (ICMEs) are rotated, reconfigured, deformed, deflected, decelerated and disguised during their journey through the solar wind. This study then leads to consideration of how structures originating in coronal eruptions can be connected to their far removed interplanetary counterparts. Given that ICMEs are the drivers of most geomagnetic storms (and the sole driver of extreme storms), this work provides a guide to the processes that must be considered in making space weather forecasts from remote observations of the corona.Peer reviewe

    Calibration of the LIGO gravitational wave detectors in the fifth science run

    Get PDF
    The Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory (LIGO) is a network of three detectors built to detect local perturbations in the space–time metric from astrophysical sources. These detectors, two in Hanford, WA and one in Livingston, LA, are power-recycled Fabry-Perot Michelson interferometers. In their fifth science run (S5), between November 2005 and October 2007, these detectors accumulated one year of triple coincident data while operating at their designed sensitivity. In this paper, we describe the calibration of the instruments in the S5 data set, including measurement techniques and uncertainty estimation.United States. National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationCarnegie TrustLeverhulme TrustDavid & Lucile Packard FoundationResearch CorporationAlfred P. Sloan Foundatio

    The Physical Processes of CME/ICME Evolution

    Get PDF

    Sex Determination of Turkey Poults

    No full text

    Bicameralism and majoritarian equilibrium

    No full text
    Recent papers have established that bicameralism can support a non-empty core in majority voting games in two dimensional policy spaces. We generalise this result to the n-dimensional case, and provide a discussion of multi-cameralism. Bicameralism generates a core of potentially stable equilibria by institutionalising opposition between mutually oriented median voters, this provides a clear link with the standard median voter model and with more traditional analyses of bicameralism.An earlier version of this paper (Brennan and Hamlin, 1990), written in ignorance of the work of Hammond and Miller (1987, 1990), benefited from comments at the Public Choice Society meetings, Tucson; the European Public Choice Society meetings, Meersburg; the Center for Study of Public Choice, and the Universities of Chicago and Oxford. Hamlin is grateful for the support of visiting fellowships at ANU and All Souls College, Oxford
    corecore