14 research outputs found
Zoonoses research in Somalia: A scoping review using a One Health approach
Zoonoses are likely to cause a substantial burden on both human and animal health systems in Somalia, given the close proximity between the pastoralist majority and their livestock. However, decades of instability leading to weak disease surveillance have meant that data on the burden of zoonoses is lacking. The aim of this scoping review was to assess and synthesize the available literature on the presence and burden of zoonoses in Somalia.
We used keywords to search Web of Science for relevant publications. Studies were included if they contained relevant data on a zoonosis and were undertaken in Somalia or were undertaken in another country where exposure could reasonably be assumed to have occurred in Somalia (e.g., migrants/refugees, returning soldiers, exported animals). Studies were not included if they focused on Somali ethnic communities permanently living elsewhere or if zoonotic aspects were not considered. We extracted data on disease(s) reported, geographic focus, data reported (human, animal, environment), study design and author affiliation.
A total of 22 zoonotic infections were documented in 76 publications. The most frequently studied diseases were Rift Valley Fever (nâŻ=âŻ15, 17%), brucellosis (nâŻ=âŻ13, 14%) and hepatitis E (nâŻ=âŻ10, 11%). Around 30% of papers reported data from relevant populations outside Somalia. Only 18 papers undertook laboratory analysis within Somalia. Most papers reported data on humans (45%) and animals (36%) with limited research on the environmental domain. Descriptive studies (47%) dominated and most were led by non-Somali researchers (89% in first authors and 95% of last authors).
This study highlights the need for well-designed zoonoses research in Somalia supported by capacity building of local researchers and investments in diagnostic laboratories
A cross-section observational study on the seroprevalence of antibodies to COVID-19 in patients receiving opiate agonist treatment.
INTRODUCTION: The HSE National Drug Treatment Centre is an inner city drug treatment centre in Dublin which provides opiate agonist treatment (OAT) to approximately 565 patients, many of whom have complex care needs.
OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to determine seropositivity to the COVID-19 virus in patients attending NDTC, and to establish if patients tested had any clinical symptoms of this disease since March 2020.
METHOD: All patients attending for OAT were invited to participate and 103/565 patients agreed. The patients were tested for the presence of serum antibodies to COVID-19 in a single sample collected over a 4-month period (July-October 2020). A questionnaire was administered at the same time as sample taking.
RESULTS: Results showed that the majority of patient samples (100; 97%) tested were negative for the presence of antibodies to COVID-19. There were only two confirmed positive results (1.9%) and one equivocal result (1%). None of the approximately 565 attendees at the HSE NDTC presented with serious illness indicative of COVID-19 throughout the three waves of the pandemic, nor were any deaths due to COVID-19 reported.
CONCLUSION: These findings indicate (a) possible low level of exposure to COVID-19 among this patient cohort or (b) that those patients who have been exposed have not developed or maintained detectable antibody levels, nor developed symptoms of the disease. Public health measures could explain the low level of COVID-19 in this cohort. The findings are also consistent with the possibility of a protective effect of OAT medications on development of the disease
Therapeutic potential of long-acting opioids and opioid antagonists for SARS CoV-2 infection.
Does opioid substitution treatment have a protective effect on the clinical manifestations of COVID-19? ? Comment on Br J Anaesth
LogMyScan: a pilot evaluation study of a mobile phone based ultrasound logbook application
Interhemispheric Inhibition Is Reduced in Response to Acute Muscle Pain:A Cross-Sectional Study Using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Bilateral deficits in sensorimotor function have been observed in unilateral musculoskeletal pain conditions. Evidence suggests a reduction in interhemispheric inhibition (IHI) from the âaffectedâ (contralateral to the side of pain) to the âunaffectedâ primary motor cortex (M1) could contribute. However, the effect of short-lasting acute muscle pain on IHI, and whether any changes are related to early sensorimotor changes in the unaffected limb, is unknown. Using a cross-sectional study design, IHI was investigated in 20 healthy individuals before, immediately after, and 30 minutes after the induction of acute muscle pain in the right first dorsal interosseous muscle via a bolus injection of hypertonic saline. Transcranial magnetic stimulation was used to assess corticomotor excitability and short and long latency IHI. Pain intensity and quality were recorded using an 11-point numerical rating scale and the McGill Pain Questionnaire. Pressure pain thresholds were assessed in the affected and unaffected first dorsal interosseous and both tibialis anterior muscles. Participants reported an average pain intensity of 4.8 points (standard deviation = 1.3 points). Compared with baseline, corticomotor excitability was decreased at all time points in the affected but not the unaffected M1. IHI was decreased at all time points from the affected to the unaffected M1. Pressure pain thresholds were decreased over both first dorsal interosseous muscles at 30 minutes of follow-up. These findings suggest a decrease in IHI from the affected to the unaffected M1 that occurs rapidly after the onset of acute pain and could contribute to the development of bilateral symptoms. Perspective: The affected M1 (contralateral to the side of pain) releases inhibition over the unaffected M1 within minutes after the onset of acute muscle pain. This finding could have relevance for the development of bilateral sensorimotor symptoms in unilateral pain conditions