Comparing the Efficacy of Tolterodine and Gabapentin Versus Placebo in Catheter Related Bladder Discomfort after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of tolterodine and gabapentin vs placebo in catheter related bladder discomfort (CRBD) following percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Materials and Methods: This study was a double-blind parallel group randomized clinical trial. Patients who were candidates of PCNL were enrolled. Patients were randomized to treatment groups of tolterodine 2 mg orally (PO) (group T, n = 50), gabapentin 600 mg PO (group G, n = 50), and placebo (group P, n = 70) 1 hour before operation using balanced block randomization. The primary endpoint of interest was visual analog pain scale in 1, 3, 12, and 24 hours after the operation. Secondary endpoints included rescue analgesic use (opioid and nonopioid). Results: The frequency of severe CRBD in 1,12, and 24 hours after the operation was 4, 4, and 6 in group T vs 4, 0, and 2 in group G vs 47, 14, and 6 in the P group (p < 0.001). The number of paracetamol injections for CRBD in the T and G groups was significantly lower than the placebo group (1.8 ± 0.8 vs 1.8 ± 0.7 vs 3.6 ± 0.7, p < 0.001). Likewise the number of pethidine injections in the T and G groups was significantly lower than the placebo group (0.42 ± 0.54 vs 0.68 ± 0.62 vs 2.4 ± 0.64, p < 0.001). In patients with history of Double-J insertion, the severity of CRBD was lower in all treatment groups. Conclusions: Preoperative administration of oral tolterodine or gabapentin reduces postoperative CRBD and the need for rescue analgesics as much as 24 hours after surgery. Patients with history of Double-J insertion experience less CRBD. © Copyright 2018, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc

Comparing the Efficacy of Tolterodine and Gabapentin Versus Placebo in Catheter Related Bladder Discomfort after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of tolterodine and gabapentin vs placebo in catheter related bladder discomfort (CRBD) following percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Materials and Methods: This study was a double-blind parallel group randomized clinical trial. Patients who were candidates of PCNL were enrolled. Patients were randomized to treatment groups of tolterodine 2 mg orally (PO) (group T, n = 50), gabapentin 600 mg PO (group G, n = 50), and placebo (group P, n = 70) 1 hour before operation using balanced block randomization. The primary endpoint of interest was visual analog pain scale in 1, 3, 12, and 24 hours after the operation. Secondary endpoints included rescue analgesic use (opioid and nonopioid). Results: The frequency of severe CRBD in 1,12, and 24 hours after the operation was 4, 4, and 6 in group T vs 4, 0, and 2 in group G vs 47, 14, and 6 in the P group (p < 0.001). The number of paracetamol injections for CRBD in the T and G groups was significantly lower than the placebo group (1.8 ± 0.8 vs 1.8 ± 0.7 vs 3.6 ± 0.7, p < 0.001). Likewise the number of pethidine injections in the T and G groups was significantly lower than the placebo group (0.42 ± 0.54 vs 0.68 ± 0.62 vs 2.4 ± 0.64, p < 0.001). In patients with history of Double-J insertion, the severity of CRBD was lower in all treatment groups. Conclusions: Preoperative administration of oral tolterodine or gabapentin reduces postoperative CRBD and the need for rescue analgesics as much as 24 hours after surgery. Patients with history of Double-J insertion experience less CRBD. © Copyright 2018, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc

Design and usability analysis of gesture-based control for common desktop tasks

We have designed and implemented a vision-based system capable of interacting with user's natural arm and finger gestures. Using depth-based vision has reduced the effect of ambient disturbances such as noise and lighting condition. Various arm and finger gestures are designed and a system capable of detection and classification of gestures is developed and implemented. Finally the gesture recognition routine is linked to a simplified desktop for usability and human factor studies. Several factors such as precision, efficiency, ease-of-use, pleasure, fatigue, naturalness, and overall satisfaction are investigated in detail. Through different simple and complex tasks, it is concluded that finger-based inputs are superior to arm-based ones in the long run. Furthermore, it is shown that arm gestures cause more fatigue and appear less natural than finger gestures. However, factors such as time, overall satisfaction, and easiness were not affected by selecting one over the other

Usability study of static/dynamic gestures and haptic input as interfaces to 3D games

In this paper, the quality of the interaction of users with a 3D game using different modalities is studied. Three different interaction methods with a 3D virtual environment are considered: a haptic 3D mouse, natural static gestures (postures), and natural dynamic (kinetics) gestures. Through a comprehensive user experiment we compared the pre-defined natural gestures to each other and also to a haptic interface which is designed for the same game. The experiments analyze precision (error), efficiency (time), ease-of-use, pleasantness, fatigue, naturalness, mobility, and overall satisfaction as evaluation criteria. We also used user-selected ranks of importance as weight values for evaluation criteria to measure the overall satisfaction. Finally, our user experiment presents a learning curve for each of the three input methods which along with the other findings can be a good source for further research in the field of natural multimodal Human-Computer Interaction