Assessment of Translocator Protein Density, as Marker of Neuroinflammation, in Major Depressive Disorder: A Pilot, Multicenter, Comparative, Controlled, Brain PET Study (INFLADEP Study)

Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a serious public health problem with high lifetime prevalence (4.4–20%) in the general population. The monoamine hypothesis is the most widespread etiological theory of MDD. Also, recent scientific data has emphasized the importance of immuno-inflammatory pathways in the pathophysiology of MDD. The lack of data on the magnitude of brain neuroinflammation in MDD is the main limitation of this inflammatory hypothesis. Our team has previously demonstrated the relevance of [18F] DPA-714 as a neuroinflammation biomarker in humans. We formulated the following hypotheses for the current study: (i) Neuroinflammation in MDD can be measured by [18F] DPA-714; (ii) its levels are associated with clinical severity; (iii) it is accompanied by anatomical and functional alterations within the frontal-subcortical circuits; (iv) it is a marker of treatment resistance.Methods: Depressed patients will be recruited throughout 4 centers (Bordeaux, Montpellier, Tours, and Toulouse) of the French network from 13 expert centers for resistant depression. The patient population will be divided into 3 groups: (i) experimental group—patients with current MDD (n = 20), (ii) remitted depressed group—patients in remission but still being treated (n = 20); and, (iii) control group without any history of MDD (n = 20). The primary objective will be to compare PET data (i.e., distribution pattern of neuroinflammation) between the currently depressed group and the control group. Secondary objectives will be to: (i) compare neuroinflammation across groups (currently depressed group vs. remitted depressed group vs. control group); (ii) correlate neuroinflammation with clinical severity across groups; (iii) correlate neuroinflammation with MRI parameters for structural and functional integrity across groups; (iv) correlate neuroinflammation and peripheral markers of inflammation across groups.Discussion: This study will assess the effects of antidepressants on neuroinflammation as well as its role in the treatment response. It will contribute to clarify the putative relationships between neuroinflammation quantified by brain neuroimaging techniques and peripheral markers of inflammation. Lastly, it is expected to open innovative and promising therapeutic perspectives based on anti-inflammatory strategies for the management of treatment-resistant forms of MDD commonly seen in clinical practice.Clinical trial registration (reference: NCT03314155): https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03314155?term=neuroinflammation&cond=depression&cntry=FR&rank=

Spécificités des tentatives de suicide périmenstruelles

MONTPELLIER-BU Médecine UPM (341722108) / SudocMONTPELLIER-BU Médecine (341722104) / SudocSudocFranceF

Resistant depression : potentiation strategies

International audienceLithium is among the most classically recommended add-on therapeutic ă strategy for the management of depressive patients showing unsuccessful ă response to standard antidepressant medications. ă The effectiveness of the add-on strategy with lithium requires achieving ă plasma levels above 0.5 mEq/L. ă Mood-stabilizing antiepileptic drugs such as carbamazepine, valproate ă derivatives or lamotrigine have not demonstrated conclusive therapeutic ă effects for the management of depressive patients showing unsuccessful ă response to standard antidepressant medications. ă Thyroid hormones are considered among the currently recommended add-on ă therapeutic strategy for the management of depressive patients showing ă unsuccessful response to standard antidepressant medications. ă The effectiveness of the add-on strategy with thyroid hormones requires ă achieving plasma concentration of TSH close to the lower limits at the ă normal range (0.4 mUI/L) or even below it. Second-generation ă antipsychotics such as aripiprazole or quetiapine have consistently ă demonstrated significant therapeutic effects for the management of ă depressive patients showing unsuccessful response to standard ă antidepressant medications. ă Second-generation antipsychotics however require the careful monitoring ă of both cardiovascular and metabolic adverse effects

Dépression résistante : les autres stratégies thérapeutiques

International audienc

Quelle définition pour la dépression résistante ?

International audienc

Dépression résistante : les stratégies de changement et d’association de médicaments antidépresseurs

International audienc

Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome and Associated Factors in a Cohort of Individuals With Treatment-Resistant Depression

International audienceBACKGROUND:The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) and its components in a cohort of French patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) and to determine correlations with sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment-related factors.METHODS:From 2012 to 2018, 205 patients who met DSM-IV criteria for major depressive episode with moderate-to-severe symptoms (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale score ≥ 20), and at least Stage II resistance according to Thase and Rush criteria were enrolled in the FondaMental Advanced Centers of Expertise in Resistant Depression (FACE-DR) cohort. Data on sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, lifestyle information, and treatment and comorbidities were collected, and a blood sample was drawn. MetS was defined according to the criteria of the International Diabetes Federation.RESULTS:Overall, 38% of individuals with TRD met criteria for MetS. The frequency of MetS was significantly higher in men than in women only for patients aged 40 years or older (46.3% vs 35.2%, P = .0427). Moreover, whereas the management for diabetes was good, less than one-third of the patients with high blood pressure or dyslipidemia were treated for these conditions. Multivariate analysis showed that individuals with abnormal plasma c-reactive protein levels had a 3-fold increased risk (95% CI, 1.5-5.2) of having MetS, independent of other potential confounders.CONCLUSION:The prevalence of MetS is higher in patients with TRD than in those with other psychiatric disorders and characterized by a considerable undertreatment of some components of MetS in this population. Diagnosis and treatment of the components of MetS should be systematically performed to prevent the occurrence of cardiovascular diseases in patients with TRD. These findings highlight the need for integrated care, with more interaction and coordination between psychiatrists and primary care providers

Long-term benzodiazepine prescription in treatment-resistant depression: A national FACE-TRD prospective study

Background: Benzodiazepine long-term use (BLTU) is a public health challenge. We lack data on the consequences of LBTU on the trajectory of treatment-resistant depression (TRD).Objective: To determine the prevalence of BLTU in a nationwide non-selected population of patients with TRD, to determine the rate of patients succeeding at withdrawing benzodiazepines at one year and to determine if persistent BLTU is associated with poorer mental health outcomes.Method: The FACE-TRD cohort is a national cohort of TRD patients recruited in 13 resistant depression expert centers between 2014 and 2021 and followed-up at one year. A standardized one-day long comprehensive battery was carried out, including trained-clinician and patient-reported outcomes, and patients were reevaluated at one year.Results: At baseline, 45.2% of the patients were classified in the BLTU group. In multivariate analysis, compared to patients without BLTU, patients with BLTU were more frequently classified in the "low physical activity" group (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.885, p = 0.036), and had higher primary healthcare consumption (B = 0.158, p = 0.031) independently of age, sex and antipsychotic consumption. We found no significant difference for personality traits, suicidal ideation, impulsivity, childhood trauma exposure, earlier age at first major depressive episode, anxiety and sleep disorders (all p > 0.05). Despite recommendations for withdrawal, <5% of BLTU patients withdraw benzodiazepines during the one-year follow-up. Persistent BLTU at one-year was associated with higher depression severity (B = 0.189, p = 0.029), higher clinical global severity (B = 0.210, p = 0.016), higher state-anxiety (B = 0.266, p = 0.003), impaired sleep quality (B = 0.249, p = 0.008), increased peripheral inflammation (B = 0.241, p = 0.027), lower functioning level (B = -0.240, p = 0.006), decreased processing speed (B = -0.195, p = 0.020) and verbal episodic memory (B = -0.178, p = 0.048), higher absenteeism and productivity loss (B = 0.595, p = 0.016) and lower subjective global health status (B = -0.198, p = 0.028).Conclusion: Benzodiazepines are over-prescribed in TRD (in almost a half of the patients). Despite recommendations for withdrawal and psychiatric follow-up, <5% of patients successfully stopped taking benzodiazepines at one-year. Maintaining BLTU may contribute to the worsening of clinical and cognitive symptoms and of daily functioning in TRD patients. Progressive and planed withdrawal of benzodiazepines seems therefore strongly recommended in TRD patients with BLTU. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological alternatives should be promoted when possible

Significant Need for a French Network of Expert Centers Enabling a Better Characterization and Management of Treatment-Resistant Depression (Fondation FondaMental)

BackgroundMajor depression is characterized by (i) a high lifetime prevalence of 16–17% in the general population; (ii) a high frequency of treatment resistance in around 20–30% of cases; (iii) a recurrent or chronic course; (iv) a negative impact on the general functioning and quality of life; and (v) a high level of comorbidity with various psychiatric and non-psychiatric disorders, high occurrence of completed suicide, significant burden along with the personal, societal, and economic costs. In this context, there is an important need for the development of a network of expert centers for treatment-resistant depression (TRD), as performed under the leadership of the Fondation FondaMental.MethodsThe principal mission of this national network is to establish a genuine prevention, screening, and diagnosis policy for TRD to offer a systematic, comprehensive, longitudinal, and multidimensional evaluation of cases. A shared electronic medical file is used referring to a common exhaustive and standardized set of assessment tools exploring psychiatric, non-psychiatric, metabolic, biological, and cognitive dimensions of TRD. This is paralleled by a medico-economic evaluation to examine the global economic burden of the disease and related health-care resource utilization. In addition, an integrated biobank has been built by the collection of serum and DNA samples for the measurement of several biomarkers that could further be associated with the treatment resistance in the recruited depressed patients. A French observational long-term follow-up cohort study is currently in progress enabling the extensive assessment of resistant depressed patients. In those unresponsive cases, each expert center proposes relevant therapeutic options that are classically aligned to the international guidelines referring to recognized scientific societies.DiscussionThis approach is expected to improve the overall clinical assessments and to provide evidence-based information to those clinicians most closely involved in the management of TRD thereby facilitating treatment decisions and choice in everyday clinical practice. This could contribute to significantly improve the poor prognosis, the relapsing course, daily functioning and heavy burden of TRD. Moreover, the newly created French network of expert centers for TRD will be particularly helpful for a better characterization of sociodemographic, clinical, neuropsychological, and biological markers of treatment resistance required for the further development of personalized therapeutic strategies in TRD