15 research outputs found

    No association of anti-osteoporosis drugs with COVID-19-related outcomes in women: a nationwide cohort study

    No full text
    This study was performed to evaluate whether the use of drugs in the treatment of osteoporosis in women is associated with COVID-19 outcomes. The results showed that the risk of hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, and mortality was not altered in individuals taking anti-osteoporosis drugs, suggesting no safety issues during a COVID-19 infection. Introduction Whether patients with COVID-19 receiving anti-osteoporosis drugs have lower risk of worse outcomes has not been reported yet. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of anti-osteoporosis drug use with COVID-19 outcomes in women. Methods Data obtained from a nationwide, multicenter, retrospective cohort of patients diagnosed with COVID-19 from March 11th to May 30th, 2020 was retrieved from the Turkish Ministry of Health Database. Women 50 years or older with confirmed COVID-19 who were receiving anti-osteoporosis drugs were compared with a 1:1 propensity score-matched COVID-19 positive women who were not receiving these drugs. The primary outcomes were hospitalization, ICU (intensive care unit) admission, and mortality. Results A total of 1997 women on anti-osteoporosis drugs and 1997 control patients were analyzed. In the treatment group, 1787 (89.5%) women were receiving bisphosphonates, 197 (9.9%) denosumab, and 17 (0.9%) teriparatide for the last 12 months. Hospitalization and mortality rates were similar between the treatment and control groups. ICU admission rate was lower in the treatment group (23.0% vs 27.0%, p = 0.013). However, multivariate analysis showed that anti-osteoporosis drug use was not an independent associate of any outcome. Hospitalization, ICU admission, and mortality rates were similar among bisphosphonate, denosumab, or teriparatide users. Conclusion Results of this nationwide study showed that preexisting use of anti-osteoporosis drugs in women did not alter the COVID-19-related risk of hospitalization, ICU admission, and mortality. These results do not suggest discontinuation of these drugs during a COVID-19 infection

    Психологические факторы развития у студентов опыта межкультурного взаимодействия

    No full text
    Objectives: To describe biochemical and clinical features, and therapeutic outcomes of acromegaly patients in Turkey.Methods: Retrospective multicenter epidemiological study of 547 patients followed in 10 centers of the Turkish Acromegaly registry.Results: A total of 547 acromegaly patients (55% female) with a median age of 41 was included in this study. Majority of patients had a macroadenoma (78%). Transsphenoidal surgery was performed as primary treatment in 92% of the patients (n = 503). Surgical remission rate was 39% (197/503) in all operated patients. Overall disease control was achieved in 70% of patients. Remission group were significantly older than non-remission group (p = .002). Patients with microadenomas had significantly higher remission rates than patients with macroadenomas (p < .001). Patients with microadenomas were significantly older at the time of diagnosis when compared to patients with macroadenomas (p < .001). Preoperative growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) levels were significantly lower in the remission group (p < .001). Initial IGF-1 and GH levels were significantly higher in macroadenomas compared to microadenomas (p < .001). Medical treatment was administered as a second-line treatment (97%) in almost all patients without remission. Radiotherapy was preferred in 21% of the patients mostly as a third line treatment.Conclusions: This is one of the largest real life studies evaluating the epidemiological characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients with acromegaly who were followed in different centers in Turkey. Transsphenoidal surgery in the treatment of acromegaly still remains the most valid method. Medical treatment options may improve long-term disease outcomes in patients who cannot be controlled with surgical treatment (up to 70%).C1 [Keskin, Caglar; Demir, Ozgur; Sahin, Mustafa; Emral, Rifat; Corapcioglu, Demet] Ankara Univ, Fac Med, Dept Endocrinol & Metab Dis, Ankara, Turkey.[Karci, Alper Cagri; Berker, Dilek] Ankara Numune Training & Res Hosp, Dept Endocrinol & Metab Dis, Ankara, Turkey.[Canturk, Zeynep] Kocaeli Univ, Fac Med, Dept Endocrinol & Metab Dis, Kocaeli, Turkey.[Yaylali, Guzin Fidan; Topsakal, Senay] Pamukkale Univ, Fac Med, Dept Endocrinol & Metab Dis, Denizli, Turkey.[Ersoy, Reyhan] Yildirim Beyazit Univ, Fac Med, Dept Endocrinol & Metab Dis, Ankara, Turkey.[Bayram, Fahri] Erciyes Univ, Fac Med, Dept Endocrinol & Metab Dis, Kayseri, Turkey.[Ertorer, Melek Eda; Bozkirli, Emre; Haydardedeoglu, Filiz] Baskent Univ, Adana Dr Turgut Noyan Training & Res Hosp, Dept Endocrinol & Metab Dis, Adana, Turkey.[Dilekci, Esra Nur Ademoglu] Abant Izzet Baysal Univ, Fac Med, Dept Endocrinol & Metab Dis, Bolu, Turkey.[Ay, Seyid Ahmet] GATA Haydarpasa Training Hosp, Dept Endocrinol & Metab Dis, Istanbul, Turkey.[Cansu, Guven Baris] Eskisehir Yunus Emre Hosp, Dept Endocrinol & Metab Dis, Eskisehir, Turkey

    Prevalence and predictors of gestational diabetes mellitus: a nationwide multicentre prospective study

    No full text
    Cetinkaya, Esra/0000-0003-2415-1236; Taskiran, Bengur/0000-0003-4842-450X; MELEKOGLU, RAUF/0000-0001-7113-6691; pekkolay, zafer/0000-0002-5323-2257; Ozer, Alev/0000-0002-0934-0226; kilinc, faruk/0000-0002-0198-2558; Aygun, Elif Ganime/0000-0003-3737-7250; KARAKILIC, ERSEN/0000-0003-3590-2656; Aydin, Hasan/0000-0003-4246-0681WOS: 000457530200011PubMed: 30402933Aim Prevalence rates of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) show considerable variation among different countries and regions of the world. The primary aim of this study was to determine the nationwide prevalence and predictors of GDM in Turkey. Methods We conducted prospective nationwide screening among pregnant women. Between August 2016 and November 2017, a total of 2643 pregnant women from 51 centres in 12 different regions were enrolled. A two-step screening method and Carpenter and Coustan criteria were used in the diagnosis of GDM. Clinical and biochemical data were obtained using electronic database software. Results The national prevalence of GDM was found to be 16.2% [95% confidence intervals (CI) 15.0% to 17.4%] without a significant difference between urban and rural regions. Women with GDM were older (mean age: 32 +/- 5 vs. 28 +/- 5 years, P < 0.001) and heavier (mean BMI: 27.2 +/- 5.1 vs. 24.7 +/- 4.7 kg/m(2), P < 0.001) than their counterparts without GDM. The prevalence of GDM tended to increase with age (< 25 years, 6.9%; 26-35 years, 15.6%; and 36-45 years, 32.7%; P < 0.001). Maternal age, maternal BMI, history of previous GDM and family history of diabetes mellitus were independent predictors of developing GDM (P < 0.05 for all). Low-risk women (age < 25 years, BMI < 25 kg/m(2), no family history of diabetes) comprised 10.7% of the total population and the prevalence of GDM in these women was 4.5% (95% CI 2.4% to 7.8%). Conclusion The results of this nationwide study indicate that GDM is very common, affecting one in seven pregnancies in Turkey. Implementation of international guidelines on screening and management of this public health problem is required
    corecore