STUDY OF EFFECTIVENESS OF SALT INHIBITORS

In this paper, the reasons for the formation of sparingly mineral salt deposits in steam boilers and inhibitors are considered as one of the options for combating this phenomenon

The Use of the Raabe Aspirator in Intraoperative neurophysiological Monitoring during Decompression and Stabilization Interventions for Degenerative Diseases and Injuries of the Lumbar Spine

Background. Raabe probe is a suction device with monopolar motor fibers mapping capabilities. A number of technical characteristics make it possible to use it for intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during posterior lumbar fusion surgery.The aim of this study was to analyze our experience of Raabe probe using for intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during posterior lumbar fusion surgery.Methods. Ninety-eight patients (55 women and 43 men) with degenerative changes and injuries of the lumbar spine were included into the study, mean age – 56.3 ± 12.8 years. Patients underwent the following operations: 85 cases (86.7 %) – spinal roots decompression with fusion by dorsal and ventral implants, 12 cases (12.2 %) – decompression with only dorsal fusion, 1 case (1.0 %) – dorsal fusion without decompression. In all cases intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring control by B. Calancie method with Raabe probe using was performed.Results. With a critical current threshold of 12 mA, the sensitivity of the method is 94 %, the specificity is 97 %. Comparing the thresholds of the M-response at the stage of screw stimulation, no statistically significant differences were found between the groups of true-positive and false-positive results, both for interested (p = 0.09) and intact (p = 0,16) screws. At the stage of the impactor stimulation, the threshold of the M-response in the true-positive group made11.39 ± 7.97 mA, and in the false-positive group – 24.16 ± 8.85 mA (p < 0.05).Conclusion. Raabe probe application for intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during posterior lumbar fusion surgery show the high sensitivity and specificity. The most reliable sign of pedicle wall breach is a threshold below than 12 mA at the stage of the impactor stimulation

ЛЕЧЕНИЕ БОЛЬНОГО РАКОМ СИГМОВИДНОЙ КИШКИ С СОЛИТАРНЫМ МЕТАСТАЗОМ В ЛЕГКОЕ С ИСПОЛЬЗОВАНИЕМ ЛАПАРОСКОПИЧЕСКОЙ И ТОРАКОСКОПИЧЕСКОЙ МЕТОДИК (КЛИНИЧЕСКОЕ НАБЛЮДЕНИЕ)

A clinical case of a sigmoid cancer patient with solitary lung metastasis is discussed in this article. Use of minimally invasive surgical technologies allowed to perform a simultaneous combined surgery on abdominal and thoracic cavities and improve rehabilitation time and time to systemic chemotherapy initiation. In presented clinical case patient was comorbid with stage III obesity, which was considered as a contraindication to laparoscopic surgery for a long time.В статье описан клинический случай лечения больного диссеминированным раком сигмовидной кишки с использованием мини-инвазивных технологий, позволивших произвести одномоментное комбинированное оперативное вмешательство на грудной и брюшной полости, что способствовало реабилитации пациента в кратчайшие сроки и своевременному началу системной химиотерапии. Особенностью данного случая является наличие у больного сопутствующего заболевания – ожирения III степени, долгое время считавшегося противопоказанием для выполнения лапароскопических операций

Effects of hospital facilities on patient outcomes after cancer surgery: an international, prospective, observational study

Background Early death after cancer surgery is higher in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) compared with in high-income countries, yet the impact of facility characteristics on early postoperative outcomes is unknown. The aim of this study was to examine the association between hospital infrastructure, resource availability, and processes on early outcomes after cancer surgery worldwide.Methods A multimethods analysis was performed as part of the GlobalSurg 3 study-a multicentre, international, prospective cohort study of patients who had surgery for breast, colorectal, or gastric cancer. The primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and 30-day major complication rates. Potentially beneficial hospital facilities were identified by variable selection to select those associated with 30-day mortality. Adjusted outcomes were determined using generalised estimating equations to account for patient characteristics and country-income group, with population stratification by hospital.Findings Between April 1, 2018, and April 23, 2019, facility-level data were collected for 9685 patients across 238 hospitals in 66 countries (91 hospitals in 20 high-income countries; 57 hospitals in 19 upper-middle-income countries; and 90 hospitals in 27 low-income to lower-middle-income countries). The availability of five hospital facilities was inversely associated with mortality: ultrasound, CT scanner, critical care unit, opioid analgesia, and oncologist. After adjustment for case-mix and country income group, hospitals with three or fewer of these facilities (62 hospitals, 1294 patients) had higher mortality compared with those with four or five (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 3.85 [95% CI 2.58-5.75]; p<0.0001), with excess mortality predominantly explained by a limited capacity to rescue following the development of major complications (63.0% vs 82.7%; OR 0.35 [0.23-0.53]; p<0.0001). Across LMICs, improvements in hospital facilities would prevent one to three deaths for every 100 patients undergoing surgery for cancer.Interpretation Hospitals with higher levels of infrastructure and resources have better outcomes after cancer surgery, independent of country income. Without urgent strengthening of hospital infrastructure and resources, the reductions in cancer-associated mortality associated with improved access will not be realised

Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries

Background Healthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres. Methods This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was co-prioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low–middle-income countries. Results In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified, which had low uptake in practice according to 3042 professionals globally. In phase 2, a shortlist of 15 intervention domains was generated. In phase 3, interventions were deemed acceptable for more than 90 per cent of patients except for reducing general anaesthesia (84 per cent) and re-sterilization of ‘single-use’ consumables (86 per cent). In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for high-income countries were: introducing recycling; reducing use of anaesthetic gases; and appropriate clinical waste processing. In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for low–middle-income countries were: introducing reusable surgical devices; reducing use of consumables; and reducing the use of general anaesthesia. Conclusion This is a step toward environmentally sustainable operating environments with actionable interventions applicable to both high– and low–middle–income countries

Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries

Abstract Background Healthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres. Methods This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was co-prioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low–middle-income countries. Results In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified, which had low uptake in practice according to 3042 professionals globally. In phase 2, a shortlist of 15 intervention domains was generated. In phase 3, interventions were deemed acceptable for more than 90 per cent of patients except for reducing general anaesthesia (84 per cent) and re-sterilization of ‘single-use’ consumables (86 per cent). In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for high-income countries were: introducing recycling; reducing use of anaesthetic gases; and appropriate clinical waste processing. In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for low–middle-income countries were: introducing reusable surgical devices; reducing use of consumables; and reducing the use of general anaesthesia. Conclusion This is a step toward environmentally sustainable operating environments with actionable interventions applicable to both high– and low–middle–income countries

TREATMENT USING LAPAROSCOPIC AND THORACOSCOPIC PROCEDURES IN A PATIENT WITH SIGMOID CANCER AND SOLITARY PULMONARY METASTASIS: A CLINICAL CASE

A clinical case of a sigmoid cancer patient with solitary lung metastasis is discussed in this article. Use of minimally invasive surgical technologies allowed to perform a simultaneous combined surgery on abdominal and thoracic cavities and improve rehabilitation time and time to systemic chemotherapy initiation. In presented clinical case patient was comorbid with stage III obesity, which was considered as a contraindication to laparoscopic surgery for a long time