41 research outputs found
Exclusive Look at the Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology’s new Social Science Section
The Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology (POST) is Parliament’s in-house source of independent, balanced and accessible analysis of public policy issues related to science and technology. In partnership with the ESRC and with the support of UCL, POST is establishing a dedicated Social Science Section to provide parliamentarians with more access to social science research evidence. Ahead of its launch this week, we’ve asked for reflections from Adam Afriyie MP (Chair of POST), Jason Blackstock (UCL), Paul Boyle (ESRC) and Chris Tyler (POST) on the making of the Social Science Section and how it will seek to improve the impact of social science in policy-making
Recommended from our members
Designing Procedural Mechanisms for the Governance of Solar Radiation Management Field Experiments: Workshop Report
The unexpected ocean fertilization experiment off the west coast of Canada in 2012 highlights the reality that non-governmental actors can already initiate small- to medium-scale environmental experiments and solar radiation management (SRM) field experiments with no government funding or approval. Without careful consideration and development of a governance framework for these types of experimentation, governments could be caught out having to respond ad hoc to situations driven by non-governmental actors.
This two-day workshop considered and evaluated governance mechanisms that may be useful for managing proposed SRM field experiments. Two specific procedural mechanisms were under consideration: environmental impact assessments and research registries. To ensure discussions were as realistic as possible, participants used a set of recently published SRM field experiment proposals as hypothetical examples when considering and evaluating both mechanisms. The workshop operated under the Chatham House Rule, and no attempts were made to forge consensus positions or to generate policy recommendations. Rather, this workshop was exploratory in nature, with discussions ranging widely along with personal opinions on some topics
‘Opening up’ geoengineering appraisal: Multi-Criteria Mapping of options for tackling climate change
Direct Air Capture of CO2 with Chemicals: A Technology Assessment for the APS Panel on Public Affairs
Recommended from our members
Understanding the Iranian Nuclear Equation.
Since mid-2005, the Iranian regime has embarked on a course
of aggressive and public brinksmanship regarding its domestic
nuclear program. This article explores this new Iranian behavior
by first elucidating the range of strategic variables comprising
the Iranian nuclear equation and then evaluating how recent
evolutions in the international and domestic environments have
altered the influence of the equation’s different variables. The
analysis demonstrates that Iran’s recent brinksmanship gambit
was driven largely by the regime’s desire to use the nuclear issue
to garner domestic public support, and was enabled by the growing perceived inability of the international community to enact
effective coercive measures against Iran. The article culminates
with a recommendation that U.S. and EU policymakers seriously evaluate the hitherto dismissed alternative of accepting
nuclear fuel cycle facilities on Iranian soil under the control of a
multinational or international consortium. Emphasis is placed
on the importance of considering such alternatives before Iran
achieves nuclear technological independence