Optimising French fisheries surveys for marine strategy framework directive integrated ecosystem monitoring

International audienceThe French initial assessment of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) highlighted the lack of reliable data concerning offshore areas. During the planning of the monitoring programmes, the scientists therefore proposed to partially cover this gap by using existing fisheries research vessel surveys deployed for the purposes of the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP). This paper describes ways of improving the effectiveness of these surveys and making them better suited to delivering the information needed for the MSFD. The process took two years and became operational at the beginning of the year 2016. Testing phases from October 2013 to August 2015 had to be organized to fit within the ongoing fisheries tasks without significantly increasing the workload in terms of both time and human resources. Six fisheries research surveys henceforth collect new data, with or without additional sampling techniques. Specific examples are given with litter and hydrological data which will be used to assess the environmental status of French marine waters. The paper also identifies certain limitations regarding this approach. This French experiment enabled more efficient and effective use of current data collection efforts, while optimising vessel time and implementing an ecosystem approach in collecting data for fisheries management

Trace elements, dioxins and PCBs in different fish species and marine regions: Importance of the taxon and regional features

International audienceChemical contaminant concentrations in wild organisms are used to assess environmental status under the Eu-ropean Marine Strategy Framework Directive. However, this approach is challenged by the complex intra- andinter-species variability, and the different regional features. In this study, concentrations in trace elements (As,Cd, Hg and Pb), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), polychlorodibenzo-para-dioxines (PCDDs) and poly-chlorodibenzofuranes (PCDFs) were monitored in 8 fish species sampled on the continental shelf of three Frenchregions: the Eastern English Channel (EEC) and Bay of Biscay (BoB) in the Northeast Atlantic Ocean, and the Gulfof Lions (GoL) in Western Mediterranean Sea. Our objectives were to identify species or regions more likely to becontaminated and to assess how to take this variability into account in environmental assessment. While con-centrations were higher in benthic and demersal piscivores, PCB and PCDD/F concentrations (lipid-weight) weresimilar in most teleost species. For Cd, Hg and Pb, the trophic group accumulating the highest concentrationsdepended on the contaminant and region. Concentrations in Hg, PCBs and PCDD/Fs were higher in the EEC and/or GoL than in BoB. Cadmium and Pb concentrations were highest in the BoB. Lipid content accounted for 35%–84% of organic contaminant variability. Lipid normalisation was employed to enhance robustness in the iden-tification of spatial patterns. Contaminant patterns in chondrichthyans clearly differed from that in teleosts. Inaddition, trophic levels accounted for ≤1% and ≤33% of the contaminant variability in teleost fishes in the EECand BoB, respectively. Therefore, developing taxa-specific thresholds might be a more practical way forward forenvironmental assessment than normalisation to trophic level

Fish contamination and trophodynamics in three French subregions

International audienc

Les costumes régionaux

Progressivement rejetés de la culture des élites, au XXe siècle, pour n'être plus que des objets de divertissement folklorique, les costumes régionaux de l'ère contemporaine sont pourtant d'extraordinaires documents qui autorisent une entrée dans les cultures provinciales des deux derniers siècles, faisant apparaître ce que l'archive écrite, bien souvent, ignore. S'ils sont, dans la conscience collective, de bons marqueurs des espaces régionaux, leur dimension historique a été effacée, jusqu'à créer des images intemporelles prêtes à servir les tenants d'un « ordre éternel des champs ». Or ils n'ont cessé d'évoluer dans le temps, empruntant aux circuits économiques, épousant les attentes culturelles de ceux qui les portaient, marquant les distinctions sociales, puisque, la plupart du temps, ils étaient trop coûteux pour vêtir les plus humbles. Le défi relevé par les chercheurs qui ont contribué à cet ouvrage est de restituer aux costumes régionaux leur valeur de document historique. Cela suppose de les comparer à d'autres pratiques vestimentaires, de France ou d'ailleurs, de comprendre que les multiples récupérations dont ils ont fait l'objet doivent être identifiées, ou que les tris effectués parmi eux, n'ayant visé depuis longtemps qu'à la conservation des plus spectaculaires, ont déformé notre vision de leur passé. Nous devons aujourd'hui nous pencher sur les sources et produire aussi une histoire des regards portés sur les costumes régionaux, à la fois inséparable et distincte de celle qui concerne les costumes eux-mêmes. Fruit d'un travail pluridisciplinaire et international, l'ouvrage prend appui sur les développements les plus récents de la recherche menée au CNRS, dans les musées ou les universités. Ils conduisent à la formulation de questionnements nouveaux autour des costumes régionaux qui sont, pleinement, des objets d'histoire

First Assessment of the Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Global Marine Recreational Fisheries

This work is the result of an international research effort to determine the main impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on marine recreational fishing. Changes were assessed on (1) access to fishing, derived from lockdowns and other mobility restrictions; (2) ecosystems, because of alterations in fishing intensity and human presence; (3) the blue economy, derived from alterations in the investments and expenses of the fishers; and (4) society, in relation to variations in fishers’ health and well-being. For this, a consultation with experts from 16 countries was carried out, as well as an international online survey aimed at recreational fishers, that included specific questions designed to capture fishers’ heterogeneity in relation to behavior, skills and know-how, and vital involvement. Fishers’ participation in the online survey (5,998 recreational fishers in 15 countries) was promoted through a marketing campaign. The sensitivity of the fishers’ clustering procedure, based on the captured heterogeneity, was evaluated by SIMPER analysis and by generalized linear models. Results from the expert consultation highlighted a worldwide reduction in marine recreational fishing activity. Lower human-driven pressures are expected to generate some benefits for marine ecosystems. However, experts also identified high negative impacts on the blue economy, as well as on fisher health and well-being because of the loss of recreational fishing opportunities. Most (98%) of the fishers who participated in the online survey were identified as advanced, showing a much higher degree of commitment to recreational fishing than basic fishers (2%). Advanced fishers were, in general, more pessimistic about the impacts of COVID-19, reporting higher reductions in physical activity and fish consumption, as well as poorer quality of night rest, foul mood, and raised more concerns about their health status. Controlled and safe access to marine recreational fisheries during pandemics would provide benefits to the health and well-being of people and reduce negative socioeconomic impacts, especially for vulnerable social groups

First Assessment of the Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Global Marine Recreational Fisheries

This work is the result of an international research effort to determine the main impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on marine recreational fishing. Changes were assessed on (1) access to fishing, derived from lockdowns and other mobility restrictions; (2) ecosystems, because of alterations in fishing intensity and human presence; (3) the blue economy, derived from alterations in the investments and expenses of the fishers; and (4) society, in relation to variations in fishers? health and well-being. For this, a consultation with experts from 16 countries was carried out, as well as an international online survey aimed at recreational fishers, that included specific questions designed to capture fishers? heterogeneity in relation to behavior, skills and know-how, and vital involvement. Fishers? participation in the online survey (5,998 recreational fishers in 15 countries) was promoted through a marketing campaign. The sensitivity of the fishers? clustering procedure, based on the captured heterogeneity, was evaluated by SIMPER analysis and by generalized linear models. Results from the expert consultation highlighted a worldwide reduction in marine recreational fishing activity. Lower human-driven pressures are expected to generate some benefits for marine ecosystems. However, experts also identified high negative impacts on the blue economy, as well as on fisher health and well-being because of the loss of recreational fishing opportunities. Most (98%) of the fishers who participated in the online survey were identified as advanced, showing a much higher degree of commitment to recreational fishing than basic fishers (2%). Advanced fishers were, in general, more pessimistic about the impacts of COVID-19, reporting higher reductions in physical activity and fish consumption, as well as poorer quality of night rest, foul mood, and raised more concerns about their health status. Controlled and safe access to marine recreational fisheries during pandemics would provide benefits to the health and well-being of people and reduce negative socioeconomic impacts, especially for vulnerable social groups.Fil: Pita, Pablo. Universidad de Santiago de Compostela; EspañaFil: Ainsworth, Gillian B.. Universidad de Santiago de Compostela; EspañaFil: Alba, Bernardino. Alianza de Pesca Española Recreativa Responsable; EspañaFil: Anderson, Antônio B.. Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo; BrasilFil: Antelo, Manel. Universidad de Santiago de Compostela; EspañaFil: Alós, Josep. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas. Instituto Mediterráneo de Estudios Avanzados; EspañaFil: Artetxe, Iñaki. No especifíca;Fil: Baudrier, Jérôme. Institut Français de Recherche Pour l’Exploitation de la Mer; FranciaFil: Castro, José J.. Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria; EspañaFil: Chicharro, Belén. No especifíca;Fil: Erzini, Karim. Universidad de Algarve; PortugalFil: Ferter, Keno. No especifíca;Fil: Freitas, Mafalda. No especifíca;Fil: García-de-la-Fuente, Laura. Universidad de Oviedo; EspañaFil: García Charton, José A.. Universidad de Murcia; EspañaFil: Giménez Casalduero, María. Universidad de Murcia; EspañaFil: Grau, Antoni M.. No especifíca;Fil: Diogo, Hugo. Universidade Dos Açores; Portugal. Direção de Serviços de Recursos; PortugalFil: Gordoa, Ana. No especifíca;Fil: Henriques, Filipe. Universidad de Algarve; Portugal. Universidad de Coimbra; PortugalFil: Hyder, Kieran. University of East Anglia; Reino UnidoFil: Jiménez Alvarado, David. Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria; EspañaFil: Karachle, Paraskevi K.. No especifíca;Fil: Lloret, Josep. Universidad de Girona; EspañaFil: Laporta, Martin. No especifíca;Fil: Lejk, Adam M.. No especifíca;Fil: Dedeu, Arnau L.. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas. Instituto de Ciencias del Mar; EspañaFil: Sosa, Martín Pablo. No especifíca;Fil: Martínez, Lllibori. No especifíca;Fil: Mira, Antoni M.. No especifíca;Fil: Morales Nin, Beatriz. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas. Instituto Mediterráneo de Estudios Avanzados; EspañaFil: Mugerza, Estanis. No especifíca;Fil: Olesen, Hans J.. Technical University of Denmark; DinamarcaFil: Papadopoulos, Anastasios. No especifíca;Fil: Pontes, João. Universidad de Algarve; PortugalFil: Pascual Fernández, José J.. Universidad de La Laguna; EspañaFil: Purroy, Ariadna. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas. Instituto de Ciencias del Mar; EspañaFil: Ramires, Milena. Santa Cecília University; BrasilFil: Rangel, Mafalda. Universidad de Algarve; PortugalFil: Reis Filho, José Amorim. Universidade Federal do Pará; BrasilFil: Sánchez Lizaso, Jose L.. Universidad de Alicante; EspañaFil: Sandoval, Virginia. Universidad de Murcia; EspañaFil: Sbragaglia, Valerio. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas. Instituto de Ciencias del Mar; EspañaFil: Silva, Luis. No especifíca;Fil: Skov, Christian. Technical University of Denmark; DinamarcaFil: Sola, Iván Daniel. Universidad de Alicante; España. Universidad de Playa Ancha; ChileFil: Strehlow, Harry V.. No especifíca;Fil: Torres, María A.. No especifíca;Fil: Ustups, Didzis. No especifíca;Fil: van der Hammen, Tessa. No especifíca;Fil: Veiga, Pedro. Universidad de Algarve; PortugalFil: Venerus, Leonardo Ariel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico. Centro para el Estudio de Sistemas Marinos; ArgentinaFil: Verleye, Thomas. No especifíca;Fil: Villasante, Sebastián. Universidad de Santiago de Compostela; EspañaFil: Weltersbach, Marc Simon. No especifíca;Fil: Zarauz, Lucía. No especifíca

Primeira avaliação dos impactos da pandemia COVID-19 sobre pesca recreativa marinha global

In late 2019, an outbreak caused by a novel coronavirus started in China (Graham and Baric, 2020; Hu et al., 2020; Maxmen, 2021). A global pandemic was declared in March 2020, as COVID-19, the disease caused by the coronavirus (World Health Organization, 2020b), escalated outside China (World Health Organization, 2020a). In mid-2021, when vaccination campaigns began to show positive effects on the control of the disease in several countries (Kaur and Gupta, 2020), the COVID-19 pandemic caused millions of deaths and hundreds of millions of infections (Dong et al., 2020). To fight the pandemic, governments reacted with measures designed to contain the spread of the virus, especially through measures aimed to reduce social interactions, including lockdowns (Wilder-Smith and Freedman, 2020), travel restrictions (Chinazzi et al., 2020), and limiting people’s access to non-essential activities (Storr et al., 2021). Humanity suffered a notable impact as a result of the pandemic, including losses of jobs and an abrupt disruption in global demand of goods and services (Barua, 2020; McKibbin and Fernando, 2020; Nicola et al., 2020). The pandemic further degraded the quality of life of the most vulnerable people, particularly those with mental health problems (Brooks et al., 2020), victims of domestic violence (Usher et al., 2020), children (Singh et al., 2020), or indigenous populations (Lane, 2020). As a result, an increase in economic inequality and worldwide poverty is expected, especially in developing countries (World Bank, 2020), and a peak in the suicide rate (Kawohl and Nordt, 2020). On the other hand, global reduction of human activities has had some positive effects on the global environment, especially for air and water quality (Rutz et al., 2020), and noise reduction (Zambrano-Monserrate et al., 2020). Marine ecosystems for example experienced less impacts derived from commercial fishing due to disruptions in large markets such as the United States (White et al., 2021a) or the European Union (Prellezo and Carvahlo, 2020; Coll et al., 2021).info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio