40 research outputs found

    Virtual hybrid simulation of beams with web openings in fire

    Get PDF
    Purpose: Perforated composite beams are an increasingly popular choice in the construction of buildings because they can provide a structurally and materially efficient design solution while also facilitating the passage of services. The purpose of this paper is to examine the behaviour of restrained perforated beams, which act compositely with a profiled slab and are exposed to fire. The effect of surrounding structure on the composite perforated beam is incorporated in this study using a virtual hybrid simulation framework. The developed framework could also be used to analyse other structural components in fire. Design/methodology/approach: A finite element model is developed using OpenSees and OpenFresco using a virtual hybrid simulation technique, and the accuracy of the model is validated using available fire test data. The validated model is used to investigate some of the most salient parameters such as the degree of axial and rotational restraint, arrangement of the openings and different types of fire on the overall fire behaviour of composite perforated beams. Findings: It is shown that both axial and rotational restraint have a considerable effect on time-displacement behaviour and the fire performance of the composite perforated beam. It is observed that the rate of heating and the consequent development of elevated temperature in the section have a significant effect on the fire behaviour of composite perforated beams. Originality/value: The paper will improve the knowledge of readers about modelling the whole system behaviour in structural fire engineering and the presented approach could also be used for analysing different types of structural components in fire conditions

    Elevated temperature material properties of stainless steel reinforcing bar

    Get PDF
    Corrosion of carbon steel reinforcing bar can lead to deterioration of concrete structures, especially in regions where road salt is heavily used or in areas close to sea water. Although stainless steel reinforcing bar costs more than carbon steel, its selective use for high risk elements is cost-effective when the whole life costs of the structure are taken into account. Considerations for specifying stainless steel reinforcing bars and a review of applications are presented herein. Attention is then given to the elevated temperature properties of stainless steel reinforcing bars, which are needed for structural fire design, but have been unexplored to date. A programme of isothermal and anisothermal tensile tests on four types of stainless steel reinforcing bar is described: 1.4307 (304L), 1.4311 (304LN), 1.4162 (LDX 2101®) and 1.4362 (2304). Bars of diameter 12 mm and 16 mm were studied, plain round and ribbed. Reduction factors were calculated for the key strength, stiffness and ductility properties and compared to equivalent factors for stainless steel plate and strip, as well as those for carbon steel reinforcement. The test results demonstrate that the reduction factors for 0.2% proof strength, strength at 2% strain and ultimate strength derived for stainless steel plate and strip can also be applied to stainless steel reinforcing bar. Revised reduction factors for ultimate strain and fracture strain at elevated temperatures have been proposed. The ability of two-stage Ramberg-Osgood expressions to capture accurately the stress-strain response of stainless steel reinforcement at both room temperature and elevated temperatures is also demonstrated

    Life cycle impact comparison of different concrete floor slabs considering uncertainty and sensitivity analysis

    Get PDF
    The traditional construction industry is characterized as a labor-intensive, wasteful, and inefficient sector. Currently, prefabrication has become a common practice in residential development and has reduced energy consumption and waste generation compared to traditional on-site practices. This study investigates the differences in life cycle environmental impacts among three different floor systems (precast slab, composite slab (semi-precast slab) and cast-in-situ slab) based on two functional units (delivering the same carrying capacity and maintaining consistent floor depth) using both LCA midpoint and endpoint methods using the software tool SimaPro. This study sets a calculation boundary for the construction process: raw material production, slab production, transportation, construction activities on-site, demolition and recycling of buildings at the end-of-life stage. Moreover, uncertainty and sensitivity analysis are carried out to help decision-makers identify major environmental impact factors and develop eco-friendly plans to facilitate housing industrialization. The results indicate that (1) the environmental impact of precast slab outperforms those of cast-in-situ and composite floors regardless of different design functional units and evaluation methods. (2) While under different functional units, the environmental performance of composite and cast-in-situ floors varies considerably. (3) From the perspective of life cycle stages, the transportation sector and its supply chain make up a significant portion of the final environmental impact and are responsible for 45.2%, 50.1% and 53.6% of the total impact for the precast, composite and cast-in-situ slabs, respectively. Slab production of precast slab (it is raw material production of cast-in-situ and composite slabs) is the second largest contributor to the environmental impact
    corecore