Exome sequencing identifies germline variants in DIS3 in familial multiple myeloma

[Excerpt] Multiple myeloma (MM) is the third most common hematological malignancy, after Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma and Leukemia. MM is generally preceded by Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance (MGUS) [1], and epidemiological studies have identified older age, male gender, family history, and MGUS as risk factors for developing MM [2]. The somatic mutational landscape of sporadic MM has been increasingly investigated, aiming to identify recurrent genetic events involved in myelomagenesis. Whole exome and whole genome sequencing studies have shown that MM is a genetically heterogeneous disease that evolves through accumulation of both clonal and subclonal driver mutations [3] and identified recurrently somatically mutated genes, including KRAS, NRAS, FAM46C, TP53, DIS3, BRAF, TRAF3, CYLD, RB1 and PRDM1 [3,4,5]. Despite the fact that family-based studies have provided data consistent with an inherited genetic susceptibility to MM compatible with Mendelian transmission [6], the molecular basis of inherited MM predisposition is only partly understood. Genome-Wide Association (GWAS) studies have identified and validated 23 loci significantly associated with an increased risk of developing MM that explain ~16% of heritability [7] and only a subset of familial cases are thought to have a polygenic background [8]. Recent studies have identified rare germline variants predisposing to MM in KDM1A [9], ARID1A and USP45 [10], and the implementation of next-generation sequencing technology will allow the characterization of more such rare variants. [...]French National Cancer Institute (INCA) and the Fondation Française pour la Recherche contre le Myélome et les Gammapathies (FFMRG), the Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome (IFM), NCI R01 NCI CA167824 and a generous donation from Matthew Bell. This work was supported in part through the computational resources and staff expertise provided by Scientific Computing at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. Research reported in this paper was supported by the Office of Research Infrastructure of the National Institutes of Health under award number S10OD018522. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. The authors thank the Association des Malades du Myélome Multiple (AF3M) for their continued support and participation. Where authors are identified as personnel of the International Agency for Research on Cancer / World Health Organization, the authors alone are responsible for the views expressed in this article and they do not necessarily represent the decisions, policy or views of the International Agency for Research on Cancer / World Health Organizatio

Profil diagnostic et suivi de la maladie résiduelle par cytométrie en flux six couleurs dans les leucémies aigües myéloïdes

Malgré un taux de rémission complète de 70 à 80%, la moitié des patients porteurs de leucémies aigues myéloïdes vont présenter une rechute, du fait de la persistance de cellules leucémiques résistantes à la chimiothérapie d induction. La détection par cytométrie en flux d immunophénotypes aberrants (LAIP) sur les cellules blastiques, au diagnostic et au cours du suivi, permet de surveiller la maladie résiduelle. Nous avons mené une étude rétrospective sur 65 patients adultes atteints de LAM, étudiés en cytométrie en flux six couleurs. La première partie de ce travail a été d établir un profil de LAIP au diagnostic, en rapport avec la classification OMS et le groupe pronostic cytogénétique, mais aussi selon son impact sur la rechute et la survie globale. La seconde partie a porté sur l étude de la maladie résiduelle proprement dite, avec l analyse des LAIP résiduels en post induction, corrélés à la rechute et à la survie globale, et le profil des LAIP à la rechute. Nous avons retrouvé une corrélation entre le nombre de LAIP au diagnostic et la classification OMS, avec un nombre significativement moins important dans le sous groupe LAM avec MDS. Nous avons également dégagé 2 groupes significatifs de LAIP au diagnostic, impactant le pronostic (survie globale et/ou rechute) de manière péjorative ou favorable. En post induction, le nombre de LAIP résiduels est corrélé à la rechute de manière significative. 4 sous types de LAIP persistants en post induction semblent avoir un impact significatif sur la rechute, plus ou moins la survie globale. A la rechute, la moitié des LAIP exprimés n existait pas au diagnostic. Les LAIP exprimés du diagnostic à la rechute sont principalement ceux corrélés à un pronostic défavorable au diagnostic. Notre étude portant sur 65 cas de leucémies aigues myéloïdes (LAM) analysées en cytométrie en flux six couleurs a permis d établir une corrélation entre le nombre de LAIP au diagnostic et la classification OMS, avec un nombre significativement moins important dans le sous groupe LAM avec myélodysplasies. Nous avons également dégagé 2 groupes significatifs de LAIP au diagnostic, impactant le pronostic (survie globale et/ou rechute) de manière péjorative ou favorable. En post induction, le nombre de LAIP résiduels est corrélé à la rechute de manière significative. Quatre sous types de LAIP persistants en post induction semblent avoir un impact significatif sur la rechute, plus ou moins la survie globale. A la rechute, la moitié des LAIP exprimés n existait pas au diagnostic. Les LAIP persistants du diagnostic à la rechute sont principalement ceux corrélés à un pronostic défavorable au diagnostic. Ces résultats confirment l intérêt de la technique de cytométrie en flux pour le suivi des LAM et montrent pour la première fois la faisabilité d une étude en utilisant des marquages simultanés en six couleurs.ST ETIENNE-BU Médecine (422182102) / SudocSudocFranceF

Human herpesvirus 6 infection after autologous stem cell transplantation: A multicenter prospective study in adult patients

International audienc

Randomized Trial Comparing Double Versus Triple Bortezomib-Based Regimen in Patients With Multiple Myeloma and Acute Kidney Injury Due to Cast Nephropathy

International audiencePURPOSE We report a multicenter controlled trial comparing renal recovery and tolerance profile of doublet versus triplet bortezomib-based regimens in patients with initial myeloma cast nephropathy (CN) and acute kidney injury (AKI) without need for dialysis. METHODS After symptomatic measures and high-dose dexamethasone, patients were randomly assigned to receive bortezomib plus dexamethasone (BD), or BD plus cyclophosphamide (C-BD). In patients with < 50% reduction of serum free light chains (sFLCs) after 3 cycles, chemotherapy was reinforced with either cyclophosphamide (BD group) or thalidomide (C-BD group). RESULTS Ninety-two patients were enrolled in each group. At random assignment, characteristics of the 2 groups were similar, including median age (68 years) and serum creatinine level (305.5 and 273.5 µmol/L in BD and C-BD group, respectively). At 3 months, renal response rate (primary end point) was not different (41 v 47 responders in the BD and C-BD groups, respectively; relative risk [RR], 0.87; P = .46). Very good partial response (free light chain reduction ≥ 90%) or more was achieved in 36 and 47 patients, respectively (RR, 0.76; P = .10). After 1 cycle of chemotherapy, 69 in the BD group and 67 patients in the C-BD group had achieved sFLC level ≤ 500 mg/L. Serious adverse events were recorded in 30 and 40 patients, respectively. At 12 months, 19 patients had died (9 in the BD group v 10 in the C-BD group), including 10 (6 in the BD group and 4 in the C-BD group) from myeloma progression and 3 (0 in the BD group and 3 in the C-BD group) from infection. Within median follow-up of 27 months, 43 and 42 patients switched to new therapy, respectively. Overall, 50 patients (24 in the BD group and 26 in the C-BD group) had died. CONCLUSION This randomized study did not show any benefit of C-BD compared with BD on renal recovery of patients with initial CN not requiring dialysis. Adding cyclophosphamide did not sufficiently improve the efficacy-toxicity balance. Patients with myeloma with AKI are fragile, and indication for doublet or triplet regimen should be adapted to frailty

Extending autologous transplantation as first line therapy in multiple myeloma patients with severe renal impairment: a retrospective study by the SFGM-TC

IF 4.497International audienceRenal impairment is a common complication of multiple myeloma (MM), accounting for 20–30% of MM patients at diagnosis and 40–50% of patients during the course of their disease. This feature is associated with poor prognosis and shorter survival as compared to patients with normal renal function (NRF). Therefore, therapeutic management is challenging as autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is often not considered as a valuable strategy, mainly due to concerns of toxicity. In this retrospective and multicenter study, we included 55 MM patients with dialysis-dependent or independent renal failure who underwent high-dose melphalan-based ASCT in order to assess the efficacy outcomes and toxicities of this strategy. Response to ASCT was at least VGPR (very good PR) in 58% of patients and 96% of patients who also received bortezomib-based induction were at least in PR after ASCT. Median OS was 76 months and median PFS was 55 months, similarly to MM patients with NRF. In multivariate analysis, dose of melphalan (140 mg/m2) was correlated with better PFS (18 months, P = 0.005). Toxicities included febrile neutropenia (75%) and severe mucositis (34%). Overall, this work confirmed that ASCT conditioned by 140 mg/m2 melphalan is a beneficial procedure for MM patients with renal failure

Bortezomib and high-dose melphalan conditioning regimen in frontline multiple myeloma: an IFM randomized phase 3 study.

peer reviewedHigh-dose melphalan (HDM) and transplantation are recommended for eligible patients with multiple myeloma. No other conditioning regimen has proven to be more effective and/or safer. We previously reported in a phase 2 study that bortezomib can safely and effectively be combined with HDM (Bor-HDM), with a 32% complete response (CR) rate after transplantation. These data supported a randomized phase 3 trial. Randomization was stratified according to risk and response to induction: 300 patients were enrolled, and 154 were allocated to the experimental arm (ie, arm A) with bortezomib (1 mg/m2 intravenously [IV]) on days -6, -3, +1, and +4 and melphalan (200 mg/m2 IV) on day -2. The control arm (ie, arm B) consisted of HDM alone (200 mg/m2 IV). There were no differences in stringent CR + CR rates at day 60 posttransplant (primary end point): 22.1% in arm A vs 20.5% in arm B (P = .844). There were also no differences in undetectable minimum residual disease rates: 41.3% vs 39.4% (P = .864). Median progression-free survival was 34.0 months for arm A vs 29.6 months for arm B (adjusted HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.61-1.13; P = .244). The estimated 3-year overall survival was 89.5% in both arms (hazard ratio, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.62-2.64; P = .374). Sixty-nine serious adverse events occurred in 18.7% of Bor-HDM-treated patients (vs 13.1% in HDM-treated patients). The proportion of grade 3/4 AEs was similar within the 2 groups (72.0% vs 73.1%), mainly (as expected) blood and gastrointestinal disorders; 4% of patients reported grade 3/4 or painful peripheral neuropathy in arm A (vs 1.5% in arm B). In this randomized phase 3 study, a conditioning regimen with Bor-HDM did not improve efficacy end points or outcomes compared with HDM alone. The original trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02197221

Bortezomib and high-dose melphalan conditioning regimen in frontline multiple myeloma: an IFM randomized phase 3 study.

High-dose melphalan (HDM) and transplantation are recommended for eligible patients with multiple myeloma. No other conditioning regimen has proven to be more effective and/or safer. We previously reported in a phase 2 study that bortezomib can safely and effectively be combined with HDM (Bor-HDM), with a 32% complete response (CR) rate after transplantation. These data supported a randomized phase 3 trial. Randomization was stratified according to risk and response to induction: 300 patients were enrolled, and 154 were allocated to the experimental arm (ie, arm A) with bortezomib (1 mg/m2 intravenously [IV]) on days -6, -3, +1, and +4 and melphalan (200 mg/m2 IV) on day -2. The control arm (ie, arm B) consisted of HDM alone (200 mg/m2 IV). There were no differences in stringent CR + CR rates at day 60 posttransplant (primary end point): 22.1% in arm A vs 20.5% in arm B (P = .844). There were also no differences in undetectable minimum residual disease rates: 41.3% vs 39.4% (P = .864). Median progression-free survival was 34.0 months for arm A vs 29.6 months for arm B (adjusted HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.61-1.13; P = .244). The estimated 3-year overall survival was 89.5% in both arms (hazard ratio, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.62-2.64; P = .374). Sixty-nine serious adverse events occurred in 18.7% of Bor-HDM-treated patients (vs 13.1% in HDM-treated patients). The proportion of grade 3/4 AEs was similar within the 2 groups (72.0% vs 73.1%), mainly (as expected) blood and gastrointestinal disorders; 4% of patients reported grade 3/4 or painful peripheral neuropathy in arm A (vs 1.5% in arm B). In this randomized phase 3 study, a conditioning regimen with Bor-HDM did not improve efficacy end points or outcomes compared with HDM alone. The original trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02197221