14 research outputs found

    The impact of operative approach on outcome of surgery for gastro-oesophageal tumours

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The choice of operation for tumours at or around the gastro-oesophageal junction remains controversial with little evidence to support one technique over another. This study examines the prevalence of margin involvement and nodal disease and their impact on outcome following three surgical approaches (Ivor Lewis, transhiatal and left thoraco-laparotomy) for these tumours.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A retrospective analysis was conducted of patients undergoing surgery for distal oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junction tumours by a single surgeon over ten years. Comparisons were undertaken in terms of tumour clearance, nodal yield, postoperative morbidity, mortality, and median survival. All patients were followed up until death or the end of the data collection (mean follow up 33.2 months).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>A total of 104 patients were operated on of which 102 underwent resection (98%). Median age was 64.1 yrs (range 32.1–79.4) with 77 males and 25 females. Procedures included 29 Ivor Lewis, 31 transhiatal and 42 left-thoraco-laparotomies. Postoperative mortality was 2.9% and median survival 23 months. Margin involvement was 24.1% (two distal, one proximal and 17 circumferential margins). Operative approach had no significant effect on nodal clearance, margin involvement, postoperative mortality or morbidity and survival. Lymph node positive disease had a significantly worse median survival of 15.8 months compared to 39.7 months for node negative (<it>p </it>= 0.007), irrespective of approach.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Surgical approach had no effect on postoperative mortality, circumferential tumour, nodal clearance or survival. This suggests that the choice of operative approach for tumours at the gastro-oesophageal junction may be based on the individual patient and tumour location rather than surgical dogma.</p

    Anaesthesia Choice for Creation of Arteriovenous Fistula (ACCess) study protocol : a randomised controlled trial comparing primary unassisted patency at 1 year of primary arteriovenous fistulae created under regional compared to local anaesthesia.

    Get PDF
    INTRODUCTION: Arteriovenous fistulae (AVF) are the 'gold standard' vascular access for haemodialysis. Universal usage is limited, however, by a high early failure rate. Several small, single-centre studies have demonstrated better early patency rates for AVF created under regional anaesthesia (RA) compared with local anaesthesia (LA). The mechanistic hypothesis is that the sympathetic blockade associated with RA causes vasodilatation and increased blood flow through the new AVF. Despite this, considerable variation in practice exists in the UK. A high-quality, adequately powered, multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) is required to definitively inform practice. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Anaesthesia Choice for Creation of Arteriovenous Fistula (ACCess) study is a multicentre, observer-blinded RCT comparing primary radiocephalic/brachiocephalic AVF created under regional versus LA. The primary outcome is primary unassisted AVF patency at 1 year. Access-specific (eg, stenosis/thrombosis), patient-specific (including health-related quality of life) and safety secondary outcomes will be evaluated. Health economic analysis will also be undertaken. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The ACCess study has been approved by the West of Scotland Research and ethics committee number 3 (20/WS/0178). Results will be published in open-access peer-reviewed journals within 12 months of completion of the trial. We will also present our findings at key national and international renal and anaesthetic meetings, and support dissemination of trial outcomes via renal patient groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN14153938. SPONSOR: NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde GN19RE456, Protocol V.1.3 (8 May 2021), REC/IRAS ID: 290482

    The development and validation of a scoring tool to predict the operative duration of elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy

    Get PDF
    Background: The ability to accurately predict operative duration has the potential to optimise theatre efficiency and utilisation, thus reducing costs and increasing staff and patient satisfaction. With laparoscopic cholecystectomy being one of the most commonly performed procedures worldwide, a tool to predict operative duration could be extremely beneficial to healthcare organisations. Methods: Data collected from the CholeS study on patients undergoing cholecystectomy in UK and Irish hospitals between 04/2014 and 05/2014 were used to study operative duration. A multivariable binary logistic regression model was produced in order to identify significant independent predictors of long (> 90 min) operations. The resulting model was converted to a risk score, which was subsequently validated on second cohort of patients using ROC curves. Results: After exclusions, data were available for 7227 patients in the derivation (CholeS) cohort. The median operative duration was 60 min (interquartile range 45–85), with 17.7% of operations lasting longer than 90 min. Ten factors were found to be significant independent predictors of operative durations > 90 min, including ASA, age, previous surgical admissions, BMI, gallbladder wall thickness and CBD diameter. A risk score was then produced from these factors, and applied to a cohort of 2405 patients from a tertiary centre for external validation. This returned an area under the ROC curve of 0.708 (SE = 0.013, p  90 min increasing more than eightfold from 5.1 to 41.8% in the extremes of the score. Conclusion: The scoring tool produced in this study was found to be significantly predictive of long operative durations on validation in an external cohort. As such, the tool may have the potential to enable organisations to better organise theatre lists and deliver greater efficiencies in care

    Are Brain Natriuretic Peptide Levels Related to Flow through Autologous Aterio-Venous Fistulae for Chronic Haemodialysis?

    Get PDF
    Formation of arterio-venous-fistulae (AVF) may exacerbate cardiac failure in the ever increasing, elderly population on haemodialysis. Brain Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) may prove a useful marker of cardiac failure in this population. We aimed to determine effect of creation of an AVF and flow in AVF on BNP levels. Ten patients undergoing primary formation of an upper limb autologous AVF (pre-dialysis), were recruited. Serum BNP (pg/ml) and flow in AVF (cm3/s) were documented pre-operatively, and then 2, 6 and 12 weeks post-operatively. The relationship between flow and BNP levels was assessed. Ten patients (6 male), mean age of 66yrs were recruited. Five patients had a radio-cephalic and 5 had a brachio-cephalic AVF formed. There was no correlation between BNP levels and flow within the AVF (r=0.34, p=0.28) at any time point. There was a general trend towards increased flow in the AVF over time, with only the change between flow at 2-weeks and 3-months postoperatively reaching significance, p=0.043. There was a general trend for BNP to fall over time in the postoperative period, with no significant change between the postoperative sampling time points. BNP levels do not correlate with flow across an AVF

    Lymph nodes 5a: Lymph node yield, 5b: Number of involved nodes by procedure

    No full text
    <p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "The impact of operative approach on outcome of surgery for gastro-oesophageal tumours"</p><p>http://www.wjso.com/content/5/1/95</p><p>World Journal of Surgical Oncology 2007;5():95-95.</p><p>Published online 20 Aug 2007</p><p>PMCID:PMC2000895.</p><p></p

    Kaplan Meier five year survival curves by circumferential resection margin involvement

    No full text
    <p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "The impact of operative approach on outcome of surgery for gastro-oesophageal tumours"</p><p>http://www.wjso.com/content/5/1/95</p><p>World Journal of Surgical Oncology 2007;5():95-95.</p><p>Published online 20 Aug 2007</p><p>PMCID:PMC2000895.</p><p></p
    corecore