Analysis of Small Muscle Movement Effects on EEG Signals

In this thesis, the artefactual effects of the small muscle movements were investigated. Upper frequency bands (30 Hz) of the EEG signal were extracted in order to investigate the artefactual effects of the small muscle movements. When the contamination level is high, the detection of the small muscle artifact can be made with the 92.2% accuracy. If these artifacts are really small such as a single finger movement, the detection accuracy decreases to 64%. But, the detection accuracy increases to 72% after removing the eye blink artifacts. The results of the classification support our hypothesis about the artefactual effects of the small muscle movements

Validating and improving the correction of ocular artifacts in electro-encephalography

For modern applications of electro-encephalography, including brain computer interfaces and single-trial Event Related Potential detection, it is becoming increasingly important that artifacts are accurately removed from a recorded electro-encephalogram (EEG) without affecting the part of the EEG that reflects cerebral activity. Ocular artifacts are caused by movement of the eyes and the eyelids. They occur frequently in the raw EEG and are often the most prominent artifacts in EEG recordings. Their accurate removal is therefore an important procedure in nearly all electro-encephalographic research. As a result of this, a considerable number of ocular artifact correction methods have been introduced over the past decades. A selection of these methods, which contains some of the most frequently used correction methods, is given in Section 1.5. When two different correction methods are applied to the same raw EEG, this usually results in two different corrected EEGs. A measure for the accuracy of correction should indicate how well each of these corrected EEGs recovers the part of the raw EEG that truly reflects cerebral activity. The fact that this accuracy cannot be determined directly from a raw EEG is intrinsic to the need for artifact removal. If, based on a raw EEG, it would be possible to derive an exact reference on what the corrected EEG should be, then there would not be any need for adequate artifact correction methods. Estimating the accuracy of correction methods is mostly done either by using models to simulate EEGs and artifacts, or by manipulating the experimental data in such a way that the effects of artifacts to the raw EEG can be isolated. In this thesis, modeling of EEG and artifact is used to validate correction methods based on simulated data. A new correction method is introduced which, unlike all existing methods, uses a camera to monitor eye(lid) movements as a basis for ocular artifact correction. The simulated data is used to estimate the accuracy of this new correction method and to compare it against the estimated accuracy of existing correction methods. The results of this comparison suggest that the new method significantly increases correction accuracy compared to the other methods. Next, an experiment is performed, based on which the accuracy of correction can be estimated on raw EEGs. Results on this experimental data comply very well with the results on the simulated data. It is therefore concluded that using a camera during EEG recordings provides valuable extra information that can be used in the process of ocular artifact correction. In Chapter 2, a model is introduced that assists in estimating the accuracy of eye movement artifacts for simulated EEG recordings. This model simulates EEG and eye movement artifacts simultaneously. For this, the model uses a realistic representation of the head, multiple dipoles to model cerebral and ocular electrical activity, and the boundary element method to calculate changes in electrical potential at different positions on the scalp. With the model, it is possible to simulate different data sets as if they are recorded using different electrode configurations. Signal to noise ratios are used to assess the accuracy of these six correction methods for various electrode configurations before and after applying six different correction methods. Results show that out of the six methods, second order blind identification, SOBI, and multiple linear regression, MLR, correct most accurately overall as they achieve the highest rise in signal to noise ratio. The occurrence of ocular artifacts is linked to changes in eyeball orientation. In Chapter 2 an eye tracker is used to record pupil position, which is closely linked to eyeball orientation. The pupil position information is used in the model to simulate eye movements. Recognizing the potential benefit of using an eye tracker not only for simulations, but also for correction, Chapter 3 introduces an eye movement artifact correction method that exploits the pupil position information that is provided by an eye tracker. Other correction methods use the electrooculogram (EOG) and/or the EEG to estimate ocular artifacts. Because both the EEG and the EOG recordings are susceptive to cerebral activity as well as to ocular activity, these other methods are at risk of overcorrecting the raw EEG. Pupil position information provides a reference that is linked to the ocular artifact in the EEG but that cannot be affected by cerebral activity, and as a result the new correction method avoids having to solve traditionally problematic issues like forward/backward propagation and evaluating the accuracy of component extraction. By using both simulated and experimental data, it is determined how pupil position influences the raw EEG and it is found that this relation is linear or quadratic. A Kalman filter is used for tuning of the parameters that specify the relation. On simulated data, the new method performs very well, resulting in an SNR after correction of over 10 dB for various patterns of eye movements. When compared to the three methods that performed best in the evaluation of Chapter 2, only the SOBI method which performed best in that evaluation shows similar results for some of the eye movement patterns. However, a serious limitation of the correction method is its inability to correct blink artifacts. In order to increase the variety of applications for which the new method can be used, the new correction should be improved in a way that enables it to correct the raw EEG for blinking artifacts. Chapter 4 deals with implementing such improvements based on the idea that a more advanced eye-tracker should be able to detect both the pupil position and the eyelid position. The improved eye tracker-based ocular artifact correction method is named EYE. Driven by some practical limitations regarding the eye tracking device currently available to us, an alternative way to estimate eyelid position is suggested, based on an EOG recorded above one eye. The EYE method can be used with both the eye tracker information or with the EOG substitute. On simulated data, accuracy of the EYE method is estimated using the EOGbased eyelid reference. This accuracy is again compared against the six other correction methods. Two different SNR-based measures of accuracy are proposed. One of these quantifies the correction of the entire simulated data set and the other focuses on those segments containing simulated blinking artifacts. After applying EYE, an average SNR of at least 9 dB for both these measures is achieved. This implies that the power of the corrected signal is at least eight times the power of the remaining noise. The simulated data sets contain a wide range of eye movements and blink frequencies. For almost all of these data sets, 16 out of 20, the correction results for EYE are better than for any of the other evaluated correction method. On experimental data, the EYE method appears to adequately correct for ocular artifacts as well. As the detection of eyelid position from the EOG is in principle inferior to the detection of eyelid position with the use of an eye tracker, these results should also be considered as an indicator of even higher accuracies that could be obtained with a more advanced eye tracker. Considering the simplicity of the MLR method, this method also performs remarkably well, which may explain why EOG-based regression is still often used for correction. In Chapter 5, the simulation model of Chapter 2 is put aside and, alternatively, experimentally recorded data is manipulated in a way that correction inaccuracies can be highlighted. Correction accuracies of eight correction methods, including EYE, are estimated based on data that are recorded during stop-signal tasks. In the analysis of these tasks it is essential that ocular artifacts are adequately removed because the task-related ERPs, are located mostly at frontal electrode positions and are low-amplitude. These data are corrected and subsequently evaluated. For the eight methods, the overall ranking of estimated accuracy in Figure 5.3, corresponds very well with the correction accuracy of these methods on simulated data as was found in Chapter 4. In a single-trial correction comparison, results suggest that the EYE corrected EEG, is not susceptible to overcorrection, whereas the other corrected EEGs are

An electroencephalographic investigation of the impact of eye movements in a change detection task

openIn studies involving Event-Related Potentials (ERPs), ocular artifacts such as blinks and saccades can compromise the quality of the recorded neural signals. To address this issue, researchers often manually reject epochs (that is a specific time-window extracted from the continuous EEG signal) containing these artifacts. However, this procedure consistently reduces the number of epochs that can be used for extracting ERPs. An alternative solution is to use Independent Component Analysis (ICA), which can preserve more epochs for analysis by removing only the artifact from the EEG recording. However, the reliability of ICA in neurocognitive studies of lateralized ERP components, such as the Sustained Posterior Contralateral Negativity (SPCN) related to visual working memory load, remains unclear, particularly in contexts where subjects are more likely to make saccades during the task. Furthermore, by using ICA, we are assuming that ocular movements do not interact with the neural signal, which has yet to be confirmed. For this reason, in the present experiment, all the participants were asked to perform a change detection task under two conditions: a ‘free gaze/saccade’ condition, where they were allowed to move their eyes to look at the lateralized stimuli, and a ‘fixation’ condition, where they were required to maintain the gaze on the center of the monitor. The subjects were also split into two groups, each performing the same experiment but with different stimulus presentation times (100 ms and 500 ms) to investigate whether saccades could differently affect the ERP in these conditions. The SPCN components were then extracted using both the Independent Component Analysis (ICA) correction and epoch-rejection methods. The results revealed that ICA correction is a robust and reliable method for experimental paradigms with a short presentation time of the stimuli (100 ms). By removing only the saccades, the features of the SPCN are preserved, suggesting that with this method we can retain a higher number of epochs for the ERP extraction with the certainty that saccades do not alter the neural signal.In studies involving Event-Related Potentials (ERPs), ocular artifacts such as blinks and saccades can compromise the quality of the recorded neural signals. To address this issue, researchers often manually reject epochs (that is a specific time-window extracted from the continuous EEG signal) containing these artifacts. However, this procedure consistently reduces the number of epochs that can be used for extracting ERPs. An alternative solution is to use Independent Component Analysis (ICA), which can preserve more epochs for analysis by removing only the artifact from the EEG recording. However, the reliability of ICA in neurocognitive studies of lateralized ERP components, such as the Sustained Posterior Contralateral Negativity (SPCN) related to visual working memory load, remains unclear, particularly in contexts where subjects are more likely to make saccades during the task. Furthermore, by using ICA, we are assuming that ocular movements do not interact with the neural signal, which has yet to be confirmed. For this reason, in the present experiment, all the participants were asked to perform a change detection task under two conditions: a ‘free gaze/saccade’ condition, where they were allowed to move their eyes to look at the lateralized stimuli, and a ‘fixation’ condition, where they were required to maintain the gaze on the center of the monitor. The subjects were also split into two groups, each performing the same experiment but with different stimulus presentation times (100 ms and 500 ms) to investigate whether saccades could differently affect the ERP in these conditions. The SPCN components were then extracted using both the Independent Component Analysis (ICA) correction and epoch-rejection methods. The results revealed that ICA correction is a robust and reliable method for experimental paradigms with a short presentation time of the stimuli (100 ms). By removing only the saccades, the features of the SPCN are preserved, suggesting that with this method we can retain a higher number of epochs for the ERP extraction with the certainty that saccades do not alter the neural signal

Eye blink characterization from frontal EEG electrodes using source separation and pattern recognition algorithms

Due to its major safety applications, including safe driving, mental fatigue estimation is a rapidly growing research topic in the engineering field. Most current mental fatigue monitoring systems analyze brain activity through electroencephalography (EEG). Yet eye blink analysis can also be added to help characterize fatigue states. It usually requires the use of additional devices, such as EOG electrodes, uncomfortable to wear, or more expensive eye trackers. However, in this article, a method is proposed to evaluate eye blink parameters using frontal EEG electrodes only. EEG signals, which are generally corrupted by ocular artifacts, are decomposed into sources by means of a source separation algorithm. Sources are then automatically classified into ocular or non-ocular sources using temporal, spatial and frequency features. The selected ocular source is back propagated in the signal space and used to localize blinks by means of an adaptive threshold, and then to characterize detected blinks. The method, validated on 11 different subjects, does not require any prior tuning when applied to a new subject, which makes it subject-independent. The vertical EOG signal was recorded during an experiment lasting 90 min in which the participants’ mental fatigue increased. The blinks extracted from this signal were compared to those extracted using frontal EEG electrodes. Very good performances were obtained with a true detection rate of 89% and a false alarm rate of 3%. The correlation between the blink parameters extracted from both recording modalities was 0.81 in average

A real-time noise cancelling EEG electrode employing Deep Learning

Two major problems of head worn electroencephalogram (EEG) are muscle and eye-blink artefacts, in particular in non-clinical environments while performing everyday tasks. Current artefact removal techniques such as principle component analysis (PCA) or independent component analysis (ICA) take signals from a high number of electrodes and separate the noise from the signal by processing them offline in a computationally expensive and slow way. In contrast, we present a smart compound electrode which is able to learn in real-time to remove artefacts. The smart 3D printed electrode consists of a central electrode and a ring electrode where poly-lactate acid (PLA) was used for the the base and Ag/AgCl for the conductive parts allowing standard manufacturing processes. A new deep learning algorithm then learns continuously to remove both eye-blink and muscle artefacts which combines the real-time capabilities of adaptive filters with the power of deep neural networks. The electrode setup together with the deep learning algorithm increases the signal to noise ratio of the EEG in average by 20 dB. Our approach offers a simple 3D printed design in combination with a real-time algorithm which can be integrated into the electrode itself. This electrode has the potential to provide high quality EEG in non-clinical and consumer applications, such as sleep monitoring and brain-computer interface (BCI).Comment: 12 pages, 4 figures, code available under http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.413110

Automatic artifacts removal from epileptic EEG using a hybrid algorithm

Electroencephalogram (EEG) examination plays a very important role in the diagnosis of disorders related to epilepsy in clinic. However, epileptic EEG is often contaminated with lots of artifacts such as electrocardiogram (ECG), electromyogram (EMG) and electrooculogram (EOG). These artifacts confuse EEG interpretation, while rejecting EEG segments containing artifacts probably results in a substantial data loss and it is very time-consuming. The purpose of this study is to develop a novel algorithm for removing artifacts from epileptic EEG automatically. The collected multi-channel EEG data are decomposed into statistically independent components with Independent Component Analysis (ICA). Then temporal and spectral features of each independent component, including Hurst exponent, skewness, kurtosis, largest Lyapunov exponent and frequency-band energy extracted with wavelet packet decomposition, are calculated to quantify the characteristics of different artifact components. These features are imported into trained support vector machine to determine whether the independent components represent EEG activity or artifactual signals. Finally artifact-free EEGs are obtained by reconstructing the signal with artifact-free components. The method is evaluated with EEG recordings acquired from 15 epilepsy patients. Compared with previous work, the proposed method can remove artifacts such as baseline drift, ECG, EMG, EOG, and power frequency interference automatically and efficiently, while retaining important features for epilepsy diagnosis such as interictal spikes and ictal segments

A new eliminating EOG artifacts technique using combined decomposition methods with CCA and H.P.F. techniques

Normally, the collected EEG signals from the human scalp cortex by using the non-invasive EEG collection methods were contaminated with artifacts, like an eye electrical activity, leading to increases in the challenges in analyzing the electroencephalogram for obtaining useful clinical information. In this paper, we do a comparison of using two decomposing methods (DWT and EMD) with CCA technique or High Pass Filter, for the elimination of eye artifacts from EEG. The eye artifacts (EOG) signals were extracted from the un-cleaned or raw EEG signals by DWT and EMD with CCA approach or H.P.F. The root means square error ratio of the uncontaminated EEG signal to the contaminated EEG signal with eye artifacts were the performance indicators for both elimination methods, which indicate that the combined CCA method outperforms the combined H.P.F method in the elimination of eye blinking contamination artifact from the EEG signal