Auditory-motor adaptation is reduced in adults who stutter but not in children who stutter

Previous studies have shown that adults who stutter produce smaller corrective motor responses to compensate for unexpected auditory perturbations in comparison to adults who do not stutter, suggesting that stuttering may be associated with deficits in integration of auditory feedback for online speech monitoring. In this study, we examined whether stuttering is also associated with deficiencies in integrating and using discrepancies between expect ed and received auditory feedback to adaptively update motor programs for accurate speech production. Using a sensorimotor adaptation paradigm, we measured adaptive speech responses to auditory formant frequency perturbations in adults and children who stutter and their matched nonstuttering controls. We found that the magnitude of the speech adaptive response for children who stutter did not differ from that of fluent children. However, the adaptation magnitude of adults who stutter in response to formant perturbation was significantly smaller than the adaptation magnitude of adults who do not stutter. Together these results indicate that stuttering is associated with deficits in integrating discrepancies between predicted and received auditory feedback to calibrate the speech production system in adults but not children. This auditory-motor integration deficit thus appears to be a compensatory effect that develops over years of stuttering

Feedforward and feedback control in apraxia of speech: effects of noise masking on vowel production

PURPOSE: This study was designed to test two hypotheses about apraxia of speech (AOS) derived from the Directions Into Velocities of Articulators (DIVA) model (Guenther et al., 2006): the feedforward system deficit hypothesis and the feedback system deficit hypothesis. METHOD: The authors used noise masking to minimize auditory feedback during speech. Six speakers with AOS and aphasia, 4 with aphasia without AOS, and 2 groups of speakers without impairment (younger and older adults) participated. Acoustic measures of vowel contrast, variability, and duration were analyzed. RESULTS: Younger, but not older, speakers without impairment showed significantly reduced vowel contrast with noise masking. Relative to older controls, the AOS group showed longer vowel durations overall (regardless of masking condition) and a greater reduction in vowel contrast under masking conditions. There were no significant differences in variability. Three of the 6 speakers with AOS demonstrated the group pattern. Speakers with aphasia without AOS did not differ from controls in contrast, duration, or variability. CONCLUSION: The greater reduction in vowel contrast with masking noise for the AOS group is consistent with the feedforward system deficit hypothesis but not with the feedback system deficit hypothesis; however, effects were small and not present in all individual speakers with AOS. Theoretical implications and alternative interpretations of these findings are discussed.R01 DC002852 - NIDCD NIH HHS; R01 DC007683 - NIDCD NIH HH

Auditoryâ motor adaptation is reduced in adults who stutter but not in children who stutter

Previous studies have shown that adults who stutter produce smaller corrective motor responses to compensate for unexpected auditory perturbations in comparison to adults who do not stutter, suggesting that stuttering may be associated with deficits in integration of auditory feedback for online speech monitoring. In this study, we examined whether stuttering is also associated with deficiencies in integrating and using discrepancies between expected and received auditory feedback to adaptively update motor programs for accurate speech production. Using a sensorimotor adaptation paradigm, we measured adaptive speech responses to auditory formant frequency perturbations in adults and children who stutter and their matched nonstuttering controls. We found that the magnitude of the speech adaptive response for children who stutter did not differ from that of fluent children. However, the adaptation magnitude of adults who stutter in response to auditory perturbation was significantly smaller than the adaptation magnitude of adults who do not stutter. Together these results indicate that stuttering is associated with deficits in integrating discrepancies between predicted and received auditory feedback to calibrate the speech production system in adults but not children. This auditoryâ motor integration deficit thus appears to be a compensatory effect that develops over years of stuttering.We examined auditoryâ motor adaptation in children and adults who stutter. The magnitude of the speech adaptive response for children who stutter did not differ from that of fluent children. However, the magnitude of adaptation of adults who stutter was significantly smaller than that of adults who do not stutter.Peer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142979/1/desc12521.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142979/2/desc12521_am.pd

Neural Modeling and Imaging of the Cortical Interactions Underlying Syllable Production

This paper describes a neural model of speech acquisition and production that accounts for a wide range of acoustic, kinematic, and neuroimaging data concerning the control of speech movements. The model is a neural network whose components correspond to regions of the cerebral cortex and cerebellum, including premotor, motor, auditory, and somatosensory cortical areas. Computer simulations of the model verify its ability to account for compensation to lip and jaw perturbations during speech. Specific anatomical locations of the model's components are estimated, and these estimates are used to simulate fMRI experiments of simple syllable production with and without jaw perturbations.National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01 DC02852, RO1 DC01925

LaDIVA: A neurocomputational model providing laryngeal motor control for speech acquisition and production

Many voice disorders are the result of intricate neural and/or biomechanical impairments that are poorly understood. The limited knowledge of their etiological and pathophysiological mechanisms hampers effective clinical management. Behavioral studies have been used concurrently with computational models to better understand typical and pathological laryngeal motor control. Thus far, however, a unified computational framework that quantitatively integrates physiologically relevant models of phonation with the neural control of speech has not been developed. Here, we introduce LaDIVA, a novel neurocomputational model with physiologically based laryngeal motor control. We combined the DIVA model (an established neural network model of speech motor control) with the extended body-cover model (a physics-based vocal fold model). The resulting integrated model, LaDIVA, was validated by comparing its model simulations with behavioral responses to perturbations of auditory vocal fundamental frequency (fo) feedback in adults with typical speech. LaDIVA demonstrated capability to simulate different modes of laryngeal motor control, ranging from short-term (i.e., reflexive) and long-term (i.e., adaptive) auditory feedback paradigms, to generating prosodic contours in speech. Simulations showed that LaDIVA’s laryngeal motor control displays properties of motor equivalence, i.e., LaDIVA could robustly generate compensatory responses to reflexive vocal fo perturbations with varying initial laryngeal muscle activation levels leading to the same output. The model can also generate prosodic contours for studying laryngeal motor control in running speech. LaDIVA can expand the understanding of the physiology of human phonation to enable, for the first time, the investigation of causal effects of neural motor control in the fine structure of the vocal signal.Fil: Weerathunge, Hasini R.. Boston University; Estados UnidosFil: Alzamendi, Gabriel Alejandro. Universidad Nacional de Entre Ríos. Instituto de Investigación y Desarrollo en Bioingeniería y Bioinformática - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Investigación y Desarrollo en Bioingeniería y Bioinformática; ArgentinaFil: Cler, Gabriel J.. University of Washington; Estados UnidosFil: Guenther, Frank H.. Boston University; Estados UnidosFil: Stepp, Cara E.. Boston University; Estados UnidosFil: Zañartu, Matías. Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María; Chil

Speech Production as State Feedback Control

Spoken language exists because of a remarkable neural process. Inside a speaker's brain, an intended message gives rise to neural signals activating the muscles of the vocal tract. The process is remarkable because these muscles are activated in just the right way that the vocal tract produces sounds a listener understands as the intended message. What is the best approach to understanding the neural substrate of this crucial motor control process? One of the key recent modeling developments in neuroscience has been the use of state feedback control (SFC) theory to explain the role of the CNS in motor control. SFC postulates that the CNS controls motor output by (1) estimating the current dynamic state of the thing (e.g., arm) being controlled, and (2) generating controls based on this estimated state. SFC has successfully predicted a great range of non-speech motor phenomena, but as yet has not received attention in the speech motor control community. Here, we review some of the key characteristics of speech motor control and what they say about the role of the CNS in the process. We then discuss prior efforts to model the role of CNS in speech motor control, and argue that these models have inherent limitations – limitations that are overcome by an SFC model of speech motor control which we describe. We conclude by discussing a plausible neural substrate of our model

The role of linguistic contrasts in the auditory feedback control of Speech

Thesis (Ph. D. in Speech and Hearing Bioscience and Technology)--Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, 2010.Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.Includes bibliographical references (p. 165-180).Speakers use auditory feedback to monitor their own speech, ensuring that the intended output matches the observed output. By altering the acoustic feedback signal before it reaches the speaker's ear, we can induce auditory errors: differences between what is expected and what is heard. This dissertation investigates the neural mechanisms responsible for the detection and consequent correction of these auditory errors. Linguistic influences on feedback control were assessed in two experiments employing auditory perturbation. In a behavioral experiment, subjects spoke four-word sentences while the fundamental frequency (FO) of the stressed word was perturbed either upwards or downwards, causing the word to sound more or less stressed. Subjects adapted by altering both the FO and the intensity contrast between stressed and unstressed words, even though intensity remained unperturbed. An integrated model of prosodic control is proposed in which FO and intensity are modulated together to achieve a stress target. In a second experiment, functional magnetic resonance imaging was used to measure neural responses to speech with and without auditory perturbation. Subjects were found to compensate more for formant shifts that resulted in a phonetic category change than for formant shifts that did not, despite the identical magnitudes of the shifts. Furthermore, the extent of neural activation in superior temporal and inferior frontal regions was greater for cross-category than for within-category shifts, evidence that a stronger cortical error signal accompanies a linguistically-relevant acoustic change. Taken together, these results demonstrate that auditory feedback control is sensitive to linguistic contrasts learned through auditory experience.by Caroline A. Niziolek.Ph.D.in Speech and Hearing Bioscience and Technolog

Online control of articulation based on auditory feedback in normal Speech and stuttering : behavioral and modeling studies

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology, February 2012."February, 2012." Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.Includes bibliographical references (p. 185-209).Articulation of multisyllabic speech requires a high degree of accuracy in controlling the spatial (positional) and the temporal parameters of articulatory movements. In stuttering, a disorder of speech fluency, failures to meet these control requirements occur frequently, leading to dysfluencies such as sound repetitions and prolongations. Currently, little is known about the sensorimotor mechanisms underlying the control of multisyllabic articulation and how they break down in stuttering. This dissertation is focused on the interaction between multisyllabic articulation and auditory feedback (AF), the perception of one's own speech sounds during speech production, which has been shown previously to play important roles in quasi-static articulations as well as in the mechanisms of stuttering. To investigate this topic empirically, we developed a digital signal processing platform for introducing flexible online perturbations of time-varying formants in speakers' AF during speech production. This platform was in a series of perturbation experiments, in which we aimed separately at elucidating the role of AF in controlling the spatial and temporal parameters of multisyllabic articulation. Under these perturbations of AF, normal subjects showed small but significant and specific online adjustments in the spatial and temporal parameters of articulation, which provided first evidence for a role of AF in the online fine-tuning of articulatory trajectories. To model and explain these findings, we designed and tested sqDIVA, a computational model for the sensory feedback-based control of speech movement timing. Test results indicated that this new model accurately accounted for the spatiotemporal compensation patterns observed in the perturbation experiments. In addition, we investigated empirically how the AF-based online speech motor control differed between people who stutter (PWS) and normal speakers. The PWS group showed compensatory responses significantly smaller in magnitude and slower in onset compared to the control subjects' responses. This under-compensation to AF perturbation was observed for both quasi-static vowels and multisyllabic speech, and for both the spatial and temporal control of articulation. This abnormal sensorimotor performance supports the hypothesis that stuttering involves deficits in the rapid internal transformations between the auditory and motor domains, with important implications for the neural basis of this disorder.by Shanqing Cai.Ph.D

The Role of Sensory Feedback in Developmental Stuttering: A Review

Developmental stuttering is a neurodevelopmental disorder that severely affects speech fluency. Multiple lines of evidence point to a role of sensory feedback in the disorder; this has led to a number of theories proposing different disruptions to the use of sensory feedback during speech motor control in people who stutter. The purpose of this review was to bring together evidence from studies using altered auditory feedback paradigms with people who stutter, in order to evaluate the predictions of these different theories. This review highlights converging evidence for particular patterns of differences in the responses of people who stutter to feedback perturbations. The implications for hypotheses on the nature of the disruption to sensorimotor control of speech in the disorder are discussed, with reference to neurocomputational models of speech control (predominantly, the DIVA model; Guenther et al., 2006; Tourville et al., 2008). While some consistent patterns are emerging from this evidence, it is clear that more work in this area is needed with developmental samples in particular, in order to tease apart differences related to symptom onset from those related to compensatory strategies that develop with experience of stuttering

The roles of auditory and somatosensory feedback in vocal motor control

Perturbing sensory feedback during speech is an often-used approach to characterizing feedback control mechanisms in speech and voice production. Auditory and somatosensory feedback are both engaged to correct perceived voice errors, but to date the role of somatosensory feedback control in voice remains unclear. Previous studies of somatosensory contributions to vocal control have involved mechanically displacing the larynx while observing compensatory responses in fundamental frequency (fo). These responses likely reflect a combination of auditory and somatosensory control processes, as sensory information was available in both domains. To isolate the individual contribution of each feedback controller, a laryngeal perturbation experiment was conducted with and without auditory feedback masking. Responses to the laryngeal perturbation experiment were compared to responses in an auditory perturbation experiment and in relation to a measure of auditory acuity. In the laryngeal perturbation experiment with auditory masking, the results indicated that participants compensated for the perturbation, suggesting that even when auditory feedback is unavailable, somatosensory feedback plays a role in correcting for errors. When auditory masking was removed, the level of compensation increased, supporting the idea that both sensory modalities are involved in correcting for errors when available. In the auditory perturbation experiment, participants compensated for the perturbation (a 100-cent downward shift in fo), but the amount of compensation was less than in the laryngeal perturbation experiment. This reduced compensation may be explained by the auditory and somatosensory feedback controllers working against each other. No relationship was found between participants’ compensations to the laryngeal and auditory perturbations, suggesting a lack of sensory preference across participants. Further, no relationships were found between auditory acuity and the level of compensation to the auditory perturbation, or auditory acuity and the contribution of auditory feedback to compensations in the laryngeal perturbation experiment. While models of speech motor control suggest that those with better sensory acuity should show greater compensation, our findings do not support this theory. This dissertation helps to elucidate the roles of auditory and somatosensory feedback in vocal motor control and lays the groundwork for future studies of vocal motor control mechanisms in populations with voice disorders