45 research outputs found

    GPCRDB: information system for G protein-coupled receptors

    Get PDF
    The GPCRDB is a Molecular Class-Specific Information System (MCSIS) that collects, combines, validates and disseminates large amounts of heterogeneous data on G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). The GPCRDB contains experimental data on sequences, ligand-binding constants, mutations and oligomers, as well as many different types of computationally derived data such as multiple sequence alignments and homology models. The GPCRDB provides access to the data via a number of different access methods. It offers visualization and analysis tools, and a number of query systems. The data is updated automatically on a monthly basis. The GPCRDB can be found online at http://www.gpcr.org/7tm/

    GPCRDB: information system for G protein-coupled receptors

    Get PDF
    The GPCRDB is a Molecular Class-Specific Information System (MCSIS) that collects, combines, validates and disseminates large amounts of heterogeneous data on G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). The GPCRDB contains experimental data on sequences, ligand-binding constants, mutations and oligomers, as well as many different types of computationally derived data such as multiple sequence alignments and homology models. The GPCRDB provides access to the data via a number of different access methods. It offers visualization and analysis tools, and a number of query systems. The data is updated automatically on a monthly basis. The GPCRDB can be found online at http://www.gpcr.org/7tm/

    GLIDA: GPCR—ligand database for chemical genomics drug discovery—database and tools update

    Get PDF
    G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent one of the most important families of drug targets in pharmaceutical development. GLIDA is a public GPCR-related Chemical Genomics database that is primarily focused on the integration of information between GPCRs and their ligands. It provides interaction data between GPCRs and their ligands, along with chemical information on the ligands, as well as biological information regarding GPCRs. These data are connected with each other in a relational database, allowing users in the field of Chemical Genomics research to easily retrieve such information from either biological or chemical starting points. GLIDA includes a variety of similarity search functions for the GPCRs and for their ligands. Thus, GLIDA can provide correlation maps linking the searched homologous GPCRs (or ligands) with their ligands (or GPCRs). By analyzing the correlation patterns between GPCRs and ligands, we can gain more detailed knowledge about their conserved molecular recognition patterns and improve drug design efforts by focusing on inferred candidates for GPCR-specific drugs. This article provides a summary of the GLIDA database and user facilities, and describes recent improvements to database design, data contents, ligand classification programs, similarity search options and graphical interfaces. GLIDA is publicly available at http://pharminfo.pharm.kyoto-u.ac.jp/services/glida/. We hope that it will prove very useful for Chemical Genomics research and GPCR-related drug discovery

    Critical evaluation of the JDO API for the persistence and portability requirements of complex biological databases

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: Complex biological database systems have become key computational tools used daily by scientists and researchers. Many of these systems must be capable of executing on multiple different hardware and software configurations and are also often made available to users via the Internet. We have used the Java Data Object (JDO) persistence technology to develop the database layer of such a system known as the SigPath information management system. SigPath is an example of a complex biological database that needs to store various types of information connected by many relationships. RESULTS: Using this system as an example, we perform a critical evaluation of current JDO technology; discuss the suitability of the JDO standard to achieve portability, scalability and performance. We show that JDO supports portability of the SigPath system from a relational database backend to an object database backend and achieves acceptable scalability. To answer the performance question, we have created the SigPath JDO application benchmark that we distribute under the Gnu General Public License. This benchmark can be used as an example of using JDO technology to create a complex biological database and makes it possible for vendors and users of the technology to evaluate the performance of other JDO implementations for similar applications. CONCLUSIONS: The SigPath JDO benchmark and our discussion of JDO technology in the context of biological databases will be useful to bioinformaticians who design new complex biological databases and aim to create systems that can be ported easily to a variety of database backends

    MODBASE, a database of annotated comparative protein structure models and associated resources.

    Get PDF
    MODBASE (http://salilab.org/modbase) is a database of annotated comparative protein structure models. The models are calculated by MODPIPE, an automated modeling pipeline that relies primarily on MODELLER for fold assignment, sequence-structure alignment, model building and model assessment (http:/salilab.org/modeller). MODBASE currently contains 5,152,695 reliable models for domains in 1,593,209 unique protein sequences; only models based on statistically significant alignments and/or models assessed to have the correct fold are included. MODBASE also allows users to calculate comparative models on demand, through an interface to the MODWEB modeling server (http://salilab.org/modweb). Other resources integrated with MODBASE include databases of multiple protein structure alignments (DBAli), structurally defined ligand binding sites (LIGBASE), predicted ligand binding sites (AnnoLyze), structurally defined binary domain interfaces (PIBASE) and annotated single nucleotide polymorphisms and somatic mutations found in human proteins (LS-SNP, LS-Mut). MODBASE models are also available through the Protein Model Portal (http://www.proteinmodelportal.org/)

    PROFESS: a PROtein Function, Evolution, Structure and Sequence database

    Get PDF
    The proliferation of biological databases and the easy access enabled by the Internet is having a beneficial impact on biological sciences and transforming the way research is conducted. There are ∼1100 molecular biology databases dispersed throughout the Internet. To assist in the functional, structural and evolutionary analysis of the abundant number of novel proteins continually identified from whole-genome sequencing, we introduce the PROFESS (PROtein Function, Evolution, Structure and Sequence) database. Our database is designed to be versatile and expandable and will not confine analysis to a pre-existing set of data relationships. A fundamental component of this approach is the development of an intuitive query system that incorporates a variety of similarity functions capable of generating data relationships not conceived during the creation of the database. The utility of PROFESS is demonstrated by the analysis of the structural drift of homologous proteins and the identification of potential pancreatic cancer therapeutic targets based on the observation of protein–protein interaction networks

    Advances in Computational Techniques to Study GPCR-Ligand Recognition

    Get PDF
    G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are among the most intensely investigated drug targets. The recent revolutions in protein engineering and molecular modeling algorithms have overturned the research paradigm in the GPCR field. While the numerous ligand-bound X-ray structures determined have provided invaluable insights into GPCR structure and function, the development of algorithms exploiting graphics processing units (GPUs) has made the simulation of GPCRs in explicit lipid-water environments feasible within reasonable computation times. In this review we present a survey of the recent advances in structure-based drug design approaches with a particular emphasis on the elucidation of the ligand recognition process in class A GPCRs by means of membrane molecular dynamics (MD) simulations

    G-protein coupled receptors activation mechanism: from ligand binding to the transmission of the signal inside the cell

    Get PDF
    G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest family of pharmaceutical drug targets in the human genome and are modulated by a large variety of en- dogenous and synthetic ligands. GPCRs activation usually depends on agonist binding (except for receptors with basal activity), which stabilizes receptor con- formations and allow the requirement and activation of intracellular transducers. GPCRs are unique receptors and very well studied, since they play an important role in a great number of diseases. They interact with different type of ligands (such as light, peptides, proteins) and different partners in the intracellular part (such as G-proteins or β-arrestins). Based on homology and function GPCRs are divided in five classes: Class A or Rhodopsin, Class B1 or Secretin, Class B2 or Adhesion, Class C or Glutamate, Class F or Frizzled. What is still missing in the state of the art of these receptor, and in particular in Class A, is a global study on different binding cavities with divergent properties, with the aim to discover common binding characteristics, preserved during years of evolution. Gaining more knowledge on common features for ligand recognition shared among all the recep- tors may become crucial to deeply understand the mechanism used to transmit the signal into the cell. In the first step of this thesis we have used all the solved Class A receptors structures to analyze and find, if exist, a common way to transmit the signal inside the cell. We identified and validated ten positions shared between all the binding cavities and always involved in the interaction with ligands. We demonstrated that residues in these positions are conserved and have co-evolved together. In a second step, we used these positions to understand how ligands could be positioned in the binding cavities of three study cases: Muscarinic receptors, Kisspeptin receptors and the GPR3 receptor. We did not have any experimental information a priori. We used homology modeling and docking techniques for the first two cases, adding molecular dynamics simulations in the third case. All the predictions and suggestions from the computational point of view, turned out to be very successful. In particular for the GPR3 receptor we were able to identify and validate by alanine-scanning mutagenesis the role of three functionally relevant residues. The latter were correlated with the constitutive and agonist-stimulated adenylate cyclase activity of GPR3 receptor. Taken together, these results suggest an important role of computational structural biology and pave the way of strong collaborations between computational and experimental researches
    corecore