Catalan model of care forpeople with frailty, complex chronic (CCP) and advanced chronic (ACP) conditions

Atenció hospitalària; Malalts crònics; Atenció individualitzadaAtención hospitalaria; Enfermos crónicos; Atención individualizadaHospital care; Chronically ill; Individualized attentionDocument que vol promoure un model d'atenció més individualitzat per a les persones amb cronicitat complexa i/o avançada.Documento que desea promover un modelo de atención más individualizado para las personas con cronicidad compleja y/o avanzada.Document that promotes a more individualized care model for people with complex and/or advanced chronicity

Evidence supporting the best clinical management of patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy: a systematic guideline review and expert consensus

This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Wiley via the DOI in this record.The complexity and heterogeneity of patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy renders traditional disease-oriented guidelines often inadequate and complicates clinical decision making. To address this challenge, guidelines have been developed on multimorbidity or polypharmacy. To systematically analyse their recommendations, we conducted a systematic guideline review using the Ariadne principles for managing multimorbidity as analytical framework. The information synthesis included a multistep consensus process involving 18 multidisciplinary experts from seven countries. We included eight guidelines (four each on multimorbidity and polypharmacy) and extracted about 250 recommendations. The guideline addressed (i) the identification of the target population (risk factors); (ii) the assessment of interacting conditions and treatments: medical history, clinical and psychosocial assessment including physiological status and frailty, reviews of medication and encounters with healthcare providers highlighting informational continuity; (iii) the need to incorporate patient preferences and goal setting: eliciting preferences and expectations, the process of shared decision making in relation to treatment options and the level of involvement of patients and carers; (iv) individualized management: guiding principles on optimization of treatment benefits over possible harms, treatment communication and the information content of medication/care plans; (v) monitoring and follow-up: strategies in care planning, self-management and medication-related aspects, communication with patients including safety instructions and adherence, coordination of care regarding referral and discharge management, medication appropriateness and safety concerns. The spectrum of clinical and self-management issues varied from guiding principles to specific recommendations and tools providing actionable support. The limited availability of reliable risk prediction models, feasible interventions of proven effectiveness and decision aids, and limited consensus on appropriate outcomes of care highlight major research deficits. An integrated approach to both multimorbidity and polypharmacy should be considered in future guidelines.Journal of Internal MedicineKarolinska Institutet Strategic Research Area in Epidemiology (SfoEpi

What does it take to make integrated care work? A ‘cookbook’ for large-scale deployment of coordinated care and telehealth

The Advancing Care Coordination & Telehealth Deployment (ACT) Programme is the first to explore the organisational and structural processes needed to successfully implement care coordination and telehealth (CC&TH) services on a large scale. A number of insights and conclusions were identified by the ACT programme. These will prove useful and valuable in supporting the large-scale deployment of CC&TH. Targeted at populations of chronic patients and elderly people, these insights and conclusions are a useful benchmark for implementing and exchanging best practices across the EU. Examples are: Perceptions between managers, frontline staff and patients do not always match; Organisational structure does influence the views and experiences of patients: a dedicated contact person is considered both important and helpful; Successful patient adherence happens when staff are engaged; There is a willingness by patients to participate in healthcare programmes; Patients overestimate their level of knowledge and adherence behaviour; The responsibility for adherence must be shared between patients and health care providers; Awareness of the adherence concept is an important factor for adherence promotion; The ability to track the use of resources is a useful feature of a stratification strategy, however, current regional case finding tools are difficult to benchmark and evaluate; Data availability and homogeneity are the biggest challenges when evaluating the performance of the programmes

GPs’ perspectives on the management of patients with multimorbidity: Systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research

Objective: To synthesise the existing published literature on the perceptions of general practitioners (GPs) or their equivalent on the clinical management of multimorbidity and determine targets for future research that aims to improve clinical care in multimorbidity. Design: Systematic review and metaethnographic synthesis of primary studies that used qualitative methods to explore GPs’ experiences of clinical management of multimorbidity or multiple chronic diseases. Data sources: EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Academic Search Complete, SocIndex, Social Science Full Text and digital theses/online libraries (database inception to September 2012) to identify literature using qualitative methods (focus groups or interviews). Review methods: The 7-step metaethnographic approach described by Noblit and Hare, which involves cross-interpretation between studies while preserving the context of the primary data. Results: Of 1805 articles identified, 37 were reviewed in detail and 10 were included, using a total of 275 GPs in 7 different countries. Four areas of difficulty specific to the management of multimorbidity emerged from these papers: disorganisation and fragmentation of healthcare; the inadequacy of guidelines and evidence-based medicine; challenges in delivering patient-centred care; and barriers to shared decision-making. A ‘line of argument’ was drawn which described GPs’ sense of isolation in decision-making for multimorbid patients. Conclusions: This systematic review shows that the problem areas for GPs in the management of multimorbidity may be classified into four domains. There will be no ‘one size fits all’ intervention for multimorbidity but these domains may be useful targets to guide the development of interventions that will assist and improve the provision of care to multimorbid patients

A Systems Medicine approach to multimorbidity. Towards personalised care for patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

[eng] BACKGROUND: Multimorbidity (i.e. the presence of more than one chronic disease in the same patient) and comorbidity (i.e. the presence of more than one chronic disease in the presence of an index disease) are main sources of dysfunction in chronic patients and avoidable costs in conventional health systems worldwide. By affecting a majority of elderly population worldwide, multimorbidity prompts the need for revisiting the single disease approach followed by contemporary clinical practice and elaborate strategies that target shared mechanisms of associated diseases with the potential of preventing, decelerating or even halting multimorbid disease progression. However, our current understanding on disease interactions is rather limited, and although many disorders have been associated based on their shared molecular traits and their observed co-occurrence in different populations, no comprehensive approach has been outlined to translate this knowledge into clinical practice. The advent of novel measurement technologies (e.g. omics) and recent initiatives on digital health (e.g. registries, electronic health records) are facilitating access to an enormous amount of patient-related information from whole populations to molecular levels. State-of-the art computational models and machine learning tools demonstrate high potential for health prediction and together with systems biology are shaping the practicalities of systems medicine. Given the extremely long and expensive bench to clinics cycles of the biomedical sector, systems medicine promises a fast track approach where scientific evidence support clinical care, while simultaneously collected insights from daily clinical practice promote new scientific discoveries and optimize healthcare. The PhD thesis aims to explore multimorbidity from a systems medicine perspective on the concrete and practical use case of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). COPD constitutes an ideal use case due to several factors, including: i) its high impact on healthcare and its ever-increasing burden; ii) its heterogeneous disease manifestations, and progress, often involving extra-pulmonary effects, including highly prevalent comorbidities (e.g. type 2 diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disorders, anxiety-depression and lung cancer); and, iii) its well described systemic effects that are suggested associations with comorbidities in terms of underlying mechanisms. HYPOTHESIS: The central hypothesis of the PhD thesis builds on the emerging biological evidence that clustering of comorbid conditions, a phenomenon seen in complex chronic patients, could be due to shared abnormalities in relevant biological pathways (i.e. bioenergetics, inflammation and tissue remodelling). It is assumed that a systems understanding of the patient conditions may help to uncover the molecular mechanisms and lead to the design of preventive and targeted therapeutic strategies aiming at modulating patient prognosis. The PhD thesis focuses on non-pulmonary phenomena of COPD; that is, systemic effects and comorbidities, often observed in patients with COPD as a paradigm of complex chronic disease. OBJECTIVES: The general objective of the PhD thesis is threefold: i) to investigate molecular disturbances at body systems level that may lead to a better understanding of characteristic systemic effects and comorbidities of patients with COPD; ii) to analyse population level patterns of COPD comorbidities and investigate their role in the health risk of patients with COPD; and, iii) to explore technological strategies and tools that facilitate the transfer of the collected knowledge on comorbidity into clinical practice. MAIN FINDINGS: Firstly, the PhD thesis introduced a novel knowledge management tool for targeted molecular analysis of underlying disease mechanisms of skeletal muscle dysfunction in patients with COPD. Second, a network analysis approach was outlined to further study this systemic effect, as well as the causes of abnormal adaptation of COPD muscle to exercise training. Furthermore, this work together with three other studies also aimed to reveal the general underlying causes of comorbidity clustering in COPD, using different modelling approaches. Overarching outcome of these studies indicates abnormalities in the complex co-regulation of core biological pathways (i.e. bioenergetics, inflammation, oxidative stress and tissue remodelling) both on muscle and body systems level (blood, lung), which paves the way for the development of novel pharmacological and non-pharmacological preventive interventions on non- pulmonary phenomena in patients with COPD. Furthermore, results indicated strong relation of muscle related dysregulations to aerobic capacity, in opposed to pulmonary severity of COPD. These findings have far reaching potential in COPD care, starting from defining the need for better characterization of exercise performance in the clinic practice and the promotion of physical activity from early stages of the disease. This PhD thesis also generated outcomes with respect to the risk of multimorbidity in patients with COPD using a population health approach. The thesis validated that patients with COPD are in increased risk to co-occur with other diseases compared to non-COPD patients, regardless of the population and healthcare system specificities of different regions (i.e. Catalonia, US). These findings indicated the potential role of multimorbidity as a risk factor for COPD, that was evaluated in the PhD thesis by constructing health risk assessment models to predict unexpected medical events in patients with COPD. The promising performance of the models and the prominent role of multimorbidity in these models presented a powerful argument for its role in clinical staging of the disease and their potential in clinical decision support. CONCLUSIONS: The PhD thesis achieved main points of the general objectives, namely: i) to perform a systems analysis of patients with COPD by investigating molecular disturbances at body systems level leading to a better understanding of characteristic systemic effects and comorbidities of patient with COPD; ii) to analyse population level patterns of COPD comorbidities and investigate their role in the health risk of patients with COPD; and iii) to explore technological strategies and tools that facilitate the transfer of the collected knowledge on comorbidity into clinical practice. Accordingly, the following conclusions arise: 1. Non-pulmonary manifestations in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) have a major negative impact on: highly relevant clinical events, use of healthcare resources and prognosis. Accordingly, the following indications were made: a. Actionable insights on non-pulmonary phenomena should be included in the clinical staging of these patients in an operational manner. b. Management of patients with COPD should be revisited to incorporate an integrative approach to non-pulmonary phenomena. c. Innovative cost-effective interventions, and pharmacological and non- pharmacological treatments targeting prevention of non-pulmonary manifestations in patients with COPD should be developed, and properly assessed. 2. Abnormal co-regulation of core biological pathways (i.e. bioenergetics, inflammation, tissue remodelling and oxidative stress), both in skeletal muscle and at body systems level, are common characteristics of patients with COPD, which potentially play a major role in comorbidity clustering. 3. Consistent relationships between cardiovascular health, skeletal muscle dysfunction and clinical outcomes in patients with COPD was identified, which makes it a priority to characterize patient exercise performance and physical activity in the clinic, and to adopt early cardiopulmonary rehabilitation strategies to modulate prognosis and prevent comorbidity clustering in these patients. 4. Multimorbidity is a strong predictor of unplanned medical events in patients with COPD and shows high potential to be used for personalized health risk prediction and service workflow selection. 5. Personalized health risk prediction was identified as a high potential tool for the integration and transfer of scientific evidence on multimorbidity to daily clinical practice. Limiting factors of its present applicability were explored and implementation strategies based on cloud computing solutions were proposed.[cat] INTRODUCCIÓ: Tant la multimorbiditat (la presència de més d'una malaltia crònica en el mateix pacient), com la comorbiditat (la presència de més d'una malaltia crònica quan hi ha una malaltia de referència) són una font important de disfuncions en l’atenció sanitària dels pacients crònics i generen importants despeses evitables en sistemes de salut arreu del món. La multimorbiditat/comorbiditat afecta la majoria de població de més de 65 anys. El seu gran impacte sanitari i social fa necessària la revisió d’aspectes essencials de la pràctica mèdica convencional, molt enfocada al tractament de cada malaltia de forma aïllada. En aquest sentit, cal elaborar estratègies que considerin els mecanismes biològics comuns entre patologies, per tal de prevenir, retardar o fins i tot aturar la progressió del fenomen. Malauradament, el poc coneixement dels mecanismes biològics que modulen les interaccions entre malalties és un factor limitant important. Hi ha estudis sobre els mecanismes moleculars comuns entre malalties i s’han realitzat anàlisis poblacionals de la multimorbiditat, però no existeix encara una aproximació holística per tal de traduir aquest coneixement a la pràctica clínica. L’aparició de noves tecnologies òmiques, així com iniciatives recents en l’àmbit de la salut digital, han facilitat l'accés a una quantitat enorme d'informació dels pacients, tant a nivell poblacional com a nivell molecular. A més, les eines computacionals i d'aprenentatge automàtic existents estan demostrant un gran potencial predictiu que, conjuntament amb les metodologies de la biologia de sistemes, estan conformant els aspectes pràctics del desplegament de la medicina de sistemes. De forma progressiva, aquesta última esdevé una via efectiva per accelerar el rol de l’evidència científica com a suport a la atenció clínica. De forma recíproca, la digitalització sistemàtica de la pràctica clínica diària, permet la generació de noves descobertes científiques i la optimització de l’assistència sanitària. Aquesta tesis doctoral pretén explorar la multimorbiditat des d’una perspectiva de medicina de sistemes, considerant com a cas d'ús concret i pràctic la malaltia pulmonar obstructiva crònica (MPOC). La MPOC constitueix un cas d'ús ideal a causa de diversos factors: i) el seu alt impacte a nivell sanitari; ii) la heterogeneïtat en quant a manifestacions i progrés, sovint amb efectes extra-pulmonars, incloent de forma freqüent comorbiditats com la diabetis mellitus tipus 2, trastorns cardiovasculars, l'ansietat-depressió i el càncer de pulmó; i, iii) els efectes sistèmics de la malaltia pulmonar, que podrien presentar mecanismes biològics comuns a algunes comorbiditats. HIPÒTESIS: La hipòtesi central d’aquesta tesis doctoral considera que la multimorbiditat podria explicar-se per alteracions en les xarxes de regulació de mecanismes biològics rellevants com la bioenergètica, inflamació i remodelació de teixits. En aquest sentit, l’anàlisi holística del problema podria millorar la comprensió dels mecanismes moleculars que modulen les associacions entre malalties i, per tant, facilitar el disseny d'estratègies terapèutiques preventives i dirigides a modular el pronòstic dels pacients. Aquesta tesis doctoral estudia els fenòmens extra-pulmonars de la MPOC; és a dir, efectes sistèmics (disfunció del múscul esquelètic) i comorbiditats, com a paradigma de malalties cròniques complexes. OBJECTIUS: L'objectiu general d’aquesta tesis doctoral és triple: i) l’anàlisi holístic de pacients amb MPOC amb focus en la disfunció muscular i les comorbiditats; ii) avaluar el paper de les comorbiditats en el risc de salut dels pacients amb MPOC, tant a nivell poblacional com individual; i, iii) explorar estratègies tecnològiques i eines de salut digital que facilitin la transferència de coneixement a la pràctica clínica diària. RESULTATS: El primer manuscrit de la tesi descriu una nova eina de gestió del coneixement per l’anàlisi molecular dels mecanismes de disfunció del múscul esquelètic en pacients amb MPOC. També dins el primer objectiu de la tesi, s’efectua un anàlisi de xarxes orientat a la identificació de mòduls biològics explicatius de la disfunció muscular i de l’adaptació anòmala d’aquests malalts a l’entrenament físic, tal com es descriu en el segon manuscrit. Els tres articles següents exploren, des de diferents perspectives, l’impacte i mecanismes de les comorbiditats en els pacients amb MPOC. Els principals resultats d'aquests estudis indiquen una complexa i anormal regulació de vies biològiques principals, com es el cas de la bioenergètica, inflamació, estrès oxidatiu i remodelació de teixits, tant a nivell del múscul com a nivell sistèmic (sang, pulmó). Aquests resultats obren noves vies per a intervencions preventives, tant farmacològiques com no farmacològiques, sobre els fenòmens no pulmonars que presenten els pacients amb MPOC. Els resultats indiquen una associació de les alteracions musculars amb la capacitat aeròbica, i no pas amb la gravetat de la malaltia pulmonar. Aquestes troballes tenen un gran potencial en la millora de la gestió dels pacients amb MPOC, començant per la necessitat d’una millor caracterització de la capacitat aeròbica en la pràctica clínica i la promoció d'activitat física des de les primeres etapes de la malaltia. La tesi també ha generat resultats d’interès en relació amb el risc de multimorbiditat en pacients amb MPOC, mitjançant un enfocament de salut poblacional. Els resultats evidencien que els pacients amb MPOC presenten un risc mes elevat de comorbiditat que els pacients sense MPOC, independentment de les especificitats de la població i del sistema sanitari de les àrees analitzades (Catalunya, EUA). La tesi també demostra el paper de la multimorbiditat com a factor modulador del risc clínic dels pacients amb MPOC. Aquests resultats indiquen l’interès de l’ús de la multimobiditat en l’estadiatge dels pacients amb MPOC i en l’elaboració d’eines de suport al procés de decisió clínica. CONCLUSIONS: Aquesta tesi doctoral ha assolit els objectius generals plantejats i proposa les següents conclusions: 1. Les manifestacions no pulmonars en els pacients amb malaltia pulmonar obstructiva crònica (MPOC) tenen un impacte negatiu respecte a esdeveniments de gran rellevància clínica, ús de recursos sanitaris i pronòstic. En conseqüència, es fan les següents recomanacions: a. Els fenòmens no pulmonars de la MPOC s’haurien d’incloure de manera operativa en l’estadiatge d'aquests pacients. b. S’hauria de redefinir la gestió clínica dels pacients amb MPOC tot incorporant un enfocament holístic dels fenòmens no pulmonars. c. S’haurien de desenvolupar i avaluar correctament noves intervencions, farmacològiques i no farmacològiques, per a la prevenció de les manifestacions no pulmonars en pacients amb MPOC. 2. Les alteracions de la regulació de vies biològiques rellevants com la bioenergètica, inflamació, estrès oxidatiu i la remodelació de teixits a nivell del múscul esquelètic, i també a nivell sistèmic, s’observa en els pacients amb MPOC i pot tenir un paper important en les co-morbiditats. 3. Les relacions entre alteracions cardiovasculars, disfunció del múscul esquelètic i altres aspectes clínics dels pacients amb MPOC, indiquen la necessitat de caracteritzar la capacitat aeròbica i els nivells d'activitat física en la pràctica clínica, així com la implementació d’estratègies de rehabilitació cardiopulmonar en les primeres etapes de la malaltia, per tal de modular la prognosis dels malalts i prevenir l’aparició de comorbiditats. 4. La multimorbiditat és un bon predictor d’esdeveniments clínics rellevants en pacients amb MPOC i mostra un gran potencial per a personalitzar l’estimació de risc i la selecció de serveis. 5. La predicció de risc de forma personalitzada s’ha identificat com una eina amb molt potencial per a la gestió de la multimorbiditat en la pràctica clínica diària. S’han explorat els factors limitants de la seva aplicabilitat i s’han proposat estratègies d'implementació d’eines predictives adients, basades en solucions de computació en el núvol.[spa] INTRODUCCIÓN: Tanto la multimorbilidad (la presencia de más de una enfermedad crónica en un mismo paciente) como la comorbilidad (la presencia de más de una enfermedad crónica en presencia de una enfermedad de referencia) son una fuente importante de disfunciones en la atención sanitaria de los pacientes crónicos y generan importantes costes evitables en los sistemas de salud de todo el mundo. La multimorbilidad/comorbilidad afecta a la mayoría de la población de más de 65 años. Debido a su gran impacto sanitario y social, resulta necesaria la revisión de aspectos esenciales de la práctica médica convencional, muy enfocada en el tratamiento de cada enfermedad de forma aislada. En este sentido, es necesario elaborar estrategias que consideren mecanismos biológicos comunes entre patologías, con el fin de prevenir, retrasar o incluso detener la progresión del fenómeno. Desgraciadamente, el escaso conocimiento de los mecanismos biológicos que modulan las interacciones entre enfermedades es un factor limitante importante. Existen estudios sobre los mecanismos moleculares comunes entre enfermedades y se han realizados análisis poblaciones de la multimorbilidad, pero no existe aún una aproximación holística que permita traducir este conocimiento a la práctica clínica. La aparición de nuevas tecnologías ómicas, así como recientes iniciativas en el ámbito de la salud digital, han facilitado el acceso a una cantidad enorme de información sobre los pacientes, tanto a nivel poblacional como a nivel molecular. Además, las herramientas computacionales y de aprendizaje automático existentes demuestran un gran potencial predictivo que, conjuntamente con las metodologías de biología de sistemas, están conformando los aspectos prácticos de la medicina de sistemas. De manera progresiva esta última se está convirtiendo en una vía efectiva para acelerar el papel de la evidencia científica como soporte a la atención clínica. De forma recíproca, la digitalización sistemática de la práctica clínica diaria permite la generación de nuevos descubrimientos científicos y la optimización de la asistencia sanitaria. Esta tesis doctoral pretende explorar la multimorbilidad desde una perspectiva de medicina de sistemas, considerando como caso de uso concreto y práctico la enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica (EPOC). La EPOC constituye un caso de uso ideal debido a diversos factores: i) su alto impacto a nivel sanitario; ii) la heterogeneidad en cuanto a manifestaciones y progreso, a menudo con efectos extra pulmonares, incluyendo de forma frecuente comorbilidades como la diabetes mellitus tipo 2, trastornos cardiovasculares, la ansiedad-depresión y el cáncer de pulmón; y, iii) los efectos sistémicos de la enfermedad pulmonar, que podrían presentar mecanismos biológicos comunes a algunas comorbilidades. HIPÓTESIS: La hipótesis central de esta tesis doctoral considera que la multimorbilidad podría explicarse por alteraciones en las redes de regulación de mecanismos biológicos relevantes como la bioenergética, inflamación y remodelación de tejidos. En este sentido, el análisis holístico del problema podría mejorar la comprensión de los mecanismos moleculares que modulan las asociaciones entre enfermedades y, por tanto, facilitar el diseño de estrategias terapéuticas preventivas y dirigidas a modular el pronóstico de los pacientes. Esta tesis doctoral estudia los fenómenos extra pulmonares de la EPOC; es decir, efectos sistémicos (disfunción del músculo esquelético) y comorbilidades, como paradigma de enfermedades crónicas complejas. OBJETIVOS: El objetivo general de esta tesis doctoral es triple: i) el análisis holístico de pacientes con EPOC focalizando en la disfunción muscular y la comorbilidades; ii) evaluar el papel de las comorbilidades en el riesgo de salud de los pacientes con EPOC, tanto a nivel poblacional como individual; y, iii) explorar estrategias tecnológicas y herramientas de salud digital que faciliten la transferencia de conocimiento a la práctica clínica diaria. RESULTADOS: El primer manuscrito de la tesis describe una nueva herramienta de gestión del conocimiento para el análisis molecular de los mecanismos de disfunción del músculo esquelético en pacientes con EPOC. Incluido en el primer objetivo de la tesis, se efectúa un análisis de redes orientado a la identificación de módulos biológicos que explican la disfunción muscular y la adaptación anómala de estos pacientes al entrenamiento físico, tal y cómo se describe en el segundo manuscrito. Los tres artículos siguientes exploran, desde perspectivas diferentes, el impacto y mecanismos de las comorbilidades en los pacientes con EPOC. Los principales resultados de estos estudios indican una compleja y anormal regulación de vías biológicas principales, como es el caso de la bioenergética, inflamación, estrés oxidativo y remodelación de tejidos, tanto a nivel del músculo como a nivel sistémico (sangre, pulmón). Estos resultados abren nuevas vías para intervenciones preventivas, tanto farmacológicas como no farmacológicas, sobre los fenómenos no pulmonares que presentan los pacientes con E

Education of clinical reasoning in patients with multimorbidity: a scoping review and perspectives for technology-enhanced learning

Multimorbidity is defined as the co-existence of two or more chronic diseases in a patient, and it is increasing in prevalence. This condition poses new problems for clinical reasoning. Few studies inquire regarding the construct of reasoning in multimorbidity and the teaching/learning methods. The objectives of this scoping review were searching for a definition of the construct of clinical reasoning in multimorbidity and the related learning methods, and special ways in which information technology can help. We searched PubMed, Scopus, ERIC and CORE databases. After an iterative process of selection and thematic analysis, we selected 30 articles, that were thematized in three classes: the multimorbid patient as a teacher (8 articles), defining a framework of competence (11 articles), representing multimorbidity and related clinical reasoning (11 articles). In this last theme were also grouped studies using technology to enhance learning. The construct of clinical reasoning in multimorbidity expands over three domains: clinical (including managing uncertainty, anticipating, and detecting evolutions and conflicting guidelines, and setting priorities); relational (concerning communicating uncertainty and developing a feasible, shared plan of care with the patient; organizational) (managing the wide system of resources needed to take care of a multimorbid patient). The preferred teaching methods are based on the encounter with real or expert patients, technology enhanced case-based learning and graphical representations of clinical cases. Perspectives of research should be addressed to permit the learner to experience a patient's life-long experience by moving forward and back over time while exploring interactions among diseases and social determinants with respect to possibly conflicting treatments. Perspectives on rich, technology-enhanced simulations should be researched

GPs’ perspectives on the management of patients with multimorbidity: systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research

Objective To synthesise the existing published literature on the perceptions of general practitioners (GPs) or their equivalent on the clinical management of multimorbidity and determine targets for future research that aims to improve clinical care in multimorbidity. Design Systematic review and metaethnographic synthesis of primary studies that used qualitative methods to explore GPs’ experiences of clinical management of multimorbidity or multiple chronic diseases. Data sources EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Academic Search Complete, SocIndex, Social Science Full Text and digital theses/online libraries (database inception to September 2012) to identify literature using qualitative methods (focus groups or interviews). Review methods The 7-step metaethnographic approach described by Noblit and Hare, which involves cross-interpretation between studies while preserving the context of the primary data. Results Of 1805 articles identified, 37 were reviewed in detail and 10 were included, using a total of 275 GPs in 7 different countries. Four areas of difficulty specific to the management of multimorbidity emerged from these papers: disorganisation and fragmentation of healthcare; the inadequacy of guidelines and evidence-based medicine; challenges in delivering patient-centred care; and barriers to shared decision-making. A ‘line of argument’ was drawn which described GPs’ sense of isolation in decision-making for multimorbid patients. Conclusions This systematic review shows that the problem areas for GPs in the management of multimorbidity may be classified into four domains. There will be no ‘one size fits all’ intervention for multimorbidity but these domains may be useful targets to guide the development of interventions that will assist and improve the provision of care to multimorbid patients

Conflict resolution in clinical treatments

Dissertação de mestrado integrado em Engenharia InformáticaCurrently, in the health area, there is a need for systems that provide support for the decision of health professionals through specific recommendations for each patient based on Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) for automatic interpretation. CPGs are documents that have enormous importance in the daily life of health professionals, playing a key role in reducing variations in medical practice, improving the quality of health care, and reducing health care costs. These documents reflect knowledge about how best to diagnose and treat diseases in the form of a list of clinical recommendations. However, there may be conflicts and interactions in the application of these clinical recommendations, that which in their maximum exponent may impair the patient’s clinical condition. These conflicts are transported to decision support systems, creating the need to develop computational methods to solve these same conflicts. In the case of multimorbid patients, this resolution of conflicts can be very problematic because these patients suffer from several pathologies at the same time, and that the use of a drug for one particular pathology may have a detrimental effect on the application of another drug in another pathology. Therefore, the objective of this dissertation topic is the determination of conflicts and interactions between drugs and the determination of these same alternatives.Atualmente na área da saúde, existe uma necessidade de existirem sistemas que forneçam apoio à decisão dos profissionais de saúde através de recomendações específicas para cada paciente com base em protocolos clínicos para interpretação automática. Os protocolos clínicos são documentos que têm enorme importância no dia-a-dia dos profissionais de saúde, desempenhando um papel fundamental na redução das variações na prática médica, na melhoria da qualidade dos cuidados de saúde e na redução dos custos de saúde. Estes documentos reflectem o conhecimento sobre a melhor forma de diagnosticar e tratar doenças na forma de uma lista de recomendações clínicas. Contudo, podem existir conflitos e interações na aplicação destas recomendações clínicas, que no seu expoente máximo poderão levar a um agravamento do estado clínico do paciente, nomeadamente no caso da aplicação de diferentes fármacos. Estes conflitos são transportados para os sistemas de apoio à decisão, criando a necessidade de desenvolver métodos computacionais de resolução destes mesmos conflitos. No caso dos pacientes multimórbidos esta resolução de conflitos pode ser bastante problemática devido ao facto destes pacientes sofrerem de várias patologias ao mesmo tempo, e que a utilização de um fármaco para uma determinada patologia possa vir a ter um efeito nocivo na aplicação de outro fármaco noutra patologia. Sendo assim, o objetivo deste tema de dissertação é a determinação dos conflitos e interações entre fármacos e a determinação dessas mesmas alternativas

A qualitative interpretation of challenges associated with helping patients with multiple chronic diseases identify their goals

Background Patients with multiple chronic diseases are usually treated according to disease-specific guidelines, with outcome measurements focusing mostly on biomedical indicators (e.g. blood sugar levels or lung function). However, for multimorbidity, a goal-oriented approach focusing on the goals defined by the individual patient, may be more suitable. Despite the clear theoretical and conceptual advantages of including patient-defined goals in clinical decision-making for multimorbidity, it is not clear how patients define their goals and which aspects play a role in the process of defining them. Objective To explore goal-setting in patients with multimorbidity. Design Qualitative analysis of interviews with 19 patients diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and comorbidities. Results Patients do not naturally present their goals. Their goals are difficult to elicit, even when different interviewing techniques are used. Four underlying hypotheses which may explain this finding were identified from the interviews: (1) patients cannot identify with the concept of goal-setting; (2) goal-setting is reduced due to acceptation; (3) actual stressors predominate over personal goal-setting; and (4) patients may consider personal goals as selfish. Conclusions Our findings advocate for specific attention to provider skills and strategies that help patients identify their personal goals. The hypotheses on why patients may struggle with defining goals may be useful to prompt patients in this process and support the development of a clinical method for goal-oriented care