Train-scheduling optimization model for railway networks with multiplatform stations

This paper focuses on optimizing the schedule of trains on railway networks composed of busy complex stations. A mathematical formulation of this problem is provided as a Mixed Integer Linear Program (MILP). However, the creation of an optimal new timetable is an NP-hard problem; therefore, the MILP can be solved for easy cases, computation time being impractical for more complex examples. In these cases, a heuristic approach is provided that makes use of genetic algorithms to find a good solution jointly with heuristic techniques to generate an initial population. The algorithm was applied to a number of problem instances producing feasible, though not optimal, solutions in several seconds on a laptop, and compared to other proposals. Some improvements are suggested to obtain better results and further improve computation time. Rail transport is recognized as a sustainable and energy-efficient means of transport. Moreover, each freight train can take a large number of trucks off the roads, making them safer. Studies in this field can help to make railways more attractive to travelers by reducing operative cost, and increasing the number of services and their punctuality. To improve the transit system and service, it is necessary to build optimal train scheduling. There is an interest from the industry in automating the scheduling process. Fast computerized train scheduling, moreover, can be used to explore the effects of alternative draft timetables, operating policies, station layouts, and random delays or failures.Postprint (published version

Operations Research Modeling of Cyclic Train Timetabling, Cyclic Train Platforming, and Bus Routing Problems

Public transportation or mass transit involves the movement of large numbers of people between a given numbers of locations. The services provided by this system can be classified into three groups: (i) short haul: a low-speed service within small areas with high population; (ii) city transit: transporting people within a city; and (iii) long haul: a service with long trips, few stops, and high speed (Khisty and Lall, 2003). It can be also classified based on local and express services. The public transportation planning includes five consecutive steps: (i) the network design and route design; (ii) the setting frequencies or line plan; (iii) the timetabling; (iv) the vehicle scheduling; and (v) the crew scheduling and rostering (Guihaire and Hao, 2008; Schöbel, 2012). The first part of this dissertation considers three problems in passenger railway transportation. It has been observed that the demand for rail travel has grown rapidly over the last decades and it is expected that the growth continues in the future. High quality railway services are needed to accommodate increasing numbers of passengers and goods. This is one of the key factors for economic growth. The high costs of railway infrastructure ask for an increased utilization of the existing infrastructure. Attractive railway services can only be offered with more reliable rolling stock and a more reliable infrastructure. However, to keep a high quality standard of operations, smarter methods of timetable construction are indispensable, since existing methods have major shortcomings. The first part of this dissertation, comprising Chapters 1-6, aims at developing a cyclic (or periodic) timetable for a passenger railway system. Three different scenarios are considered and three mixed integer linear programs, combined with heuristics for calculating upper and lower bounds on the optimal value for each scenario, will be developed. The reason of considering a periodic timetable is that it is easy to remember for passengers. The main inputs are the line plan and travel time between and minimum dwell time at each station. The output of each model is an optimal periodic timetable. We try to optimize the quality of service for the railway system by minimizing the length of cycle by which trains are dispatched from their origin. Hence, we consider the cycle length as the primary objective function. Since minimizing travel time is a key factor in measuring service quality, another criterion--total dwell time of the trains--is considered and added to the objective function. The first problem, presented in Chapter 3, has already been published in a scholarly journal (Heydar et al., 2013). This chapter is an extension of the work of Bergmann (1975) and is the simplest part of this research. In this problem, we consider a single-track unidirectional railway line between two major stations with a number of stations in between. Two train types--express and local--are dispatched from the first station in an alternate fashion. The express train stops at no intermediate station, while the local train should make a stop at every intermediate station for a minimum amount of dwell time. A mixed integer linear program is developed in order to minimize the length of the dispatching cycle and minimize the total dwell time of the local train at all stations combined. Constraints include a minimum dwell time for the local train at each station, a maximum total dwell time for the local train, and headway considerations on the main line an in stations. Hundreds of randomly generated problem instances with up to 70 stations are considered and solved to optimality in a reasonable amount of time. Instances of this problem typically have multiple optimal solutions, so we develop a procedure for finding all optimal solutions of this problem. In the second problem, presented in Chapter 4, we present the literature\u27s first mixed integer linear programming model of a cyclic, combined train timetabling and platforming problem which is an extension of the model presented in Chapter 3 and Heydar et al. (2013). The work on this problem has been submitted to a leading transportation journal (Petering et al., 2012). From another perspective, this work can be seen as investigating the capacity of a single track, unidirectional rail line that adheres to a cyclic timetable. In this problem, a set of intermediate stations lies between an origin and destination with one or more parallel sidings at each station. A total of T train types--each with a given starting and finishing point and a set of known intermediate station stops--are dispatched from their respective starting points in cyclic fashion, with one train of each type dispatched per cycle. A mixed integer linear program is developed in order to schedule the train arrivals and departures at the stations and assign trains to tracks (platforms) in the stations so as to minimize the length of the dispatching cycle and/or minimize the total stopping (dwell) time of all train types at all stations combined. Constraints include a minimum dwell time for each train type in each of the stations in which it stops, a maximum total dwell time for each train type, and headway considerations on the main line and on the tracks in the stations. This problem belongs to the class of NP-hard problems. Hundreds of randomly generated and real-world problem instances with 4-35 intermediate stations and 2-11 train types are considered and solved to optimality in a reasonable amount of time using IBM ILOG CPLEX. Chapter 5 expands upon the work in Chapter 4. Here, we present a mixed integer linear program for cyclic train timetabling and routing on a single track, bi-directional rail line. There are T train types and one train of each type is dispatched per cycle. The decisions include the sequencing of the train types on the main line and the assignment of train types to station platforms. Two conflicting objectives--(1) minimizing cycle length (primary objective) and (2) minimizing total train journey time (secondary objective)--are combined into a single weighted sum objective to generate Pareto optimal solutions. Constraints include a minimum stopping time for each train type in each station, a maximum allowed journey time for each train type, and a minimum headway on the main line and on platforms in stations. The MILP considers five aspects of the railway system: (1) bi-directional train travel between stations, (2) trains moving at different speeds on the main line, (3) trains having the option to stop at stations even if they are not required to, (4) more than one siding or platform at a station, and (5) any number of train types. In order to solve large scale instances, various heuristics and exact methods are employed for computing secondary parameters and for finding lower and upper bounds on the primary objective. These heuristics and exact methods are combined with the math model to allow CPLEX 12.4 to find optimal solutions to large problem instances in a reasonable amount of time. The results show that it is sometimes necessary for (1) a train type to stop at a station where stopping is not required or (2) a train type to travel slower than its normal speed in order to minimize timetable cycle time. In the second part of this dissertation, comprising Chapters 7-9, we study a transit-based evacuation problem which is an extension of bus routing problem. This work has been already submitted to a leading transportation journal (Heydar et al., 2014). This paper presents a mathematical model to plan emergencies in a highly populated urban zone where a certain numbers of pedestrians depend on transit for evacuation. The proposed model features a two-level operational framework. The first level operation guides evacuees through urban streets and crosswalks (referred to as the pedestrian network ) to designated pick-up points (e.g., bus stops), and the second level operation properly dispatches and routes a fleet of buses at different depots to those pick-up points and transports evacuees to their destinations or safe places. In this level, the buses are routed through the so-called vehicular network. An integrated mixed integer linear program that can effectively take into account the interactions between the aforementioned two networks is formulated to find the maximal evacuation efficiency in the two networks. Since the large instances of the proposed model are mathematically difficult to solve to optimality, a two-stage heuristic is developed to solve larger instances of the model. Over one hundred numerical examples and runs solved by the heuristic illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed solution method in handling large-scale real-world instances

Computer-based decision support for railway traffic scheduling and dispatching: A review of models and algorithms

This paper provides an overview of the research in railway scheduling and dispatching. A distinction is made between tactical scheduling, operational scheduling and re-scheduling. Tactical scheduling refers to master scheduling, whereas operational scheduling concerns scheduling at a later stage. Re-scheduling focuses on the re-planning of an existing timetable when deviations from it have occurred. 48 approaches published between 1973 and 2005 have been reviewed according to a framework that classifies them with respect to problem type, solution mechanism, and type of evaluation. 26 of the approaches support the representation of a railway network rather than a railway line, but the majority has been experimentally evaluated for traffic on a line. 94 % of the approaches have been subject to some kind of experimental evaluation, while approximately 4 % have been implemented. The solutions proposed vary from myopic, priority-based algorithms, to traditional operations research techniques and the application of agent technology.This paper provides an overview of the research in railway scheduling and dispatching. A distinction is made between tactical scheduling, operational scheduling and re-scheduling. Tactical scheduling refers to master scheduling, whereas operational scheduling concerns scheduling at a later stage. Re-scheduling focuses on the re-planning of an existing timetable when deviations from it have occurred. 48 approaches published between 1973 and 2005 have been reviewed according to a framework that classifies them with respect to problem type, solution mechanism, and type of evaluation. 26 of the approaches support the representation of a railway network rather than a railway line, but the majority has been experimentally evaluated for traffic on a line. 94 % of the approaches have been subject to some kind of experimental evaluation, while approximately 4 % have been implemented. The solutions proposed vary from myopic, priority-based algorithms, to traditional operations research techniques and the application of agent technology

Optimization in railway timetabling for regional and intercity trains in Zealand: A case of study of DSB

The Train Timetabling Problem is one of the main tactical problems in the railway planning process. Depending on the size of the network, the problem can be hard to solve directly and alternative methods should be studied. In this thesis, the Train Timetabling Problem is formulated using a graph formu-lation that takes advantage of the symmetric timetabling strategy and assumed fixed running times between station. The problem is formulated for the morning rush hour period of the Regional and InterCity train network of Zealand. The solution method implemented is based on a Large Neighborhood Search model that iteratively applies a dive-and-cut-and-price procedure. An LP relax version of the problem is solved using Column Generation considering only a subset of columns and constraints. Each column corresponds to the train paths of a line that are found by shortest paths in the graphs. Then, violated constraints are added by separation and an heuristic process is applied to help finding integer solutions. Last, the passengers are routed on the network based on the found timetable and the passenger travel time calculated. The process is repeated taking into account the best transfers from the solution found. A parameter tuning is conducted to find the best algorithm setting. Then, the model is solved for different scenarios where the robustness and quality of the solution is analyzed. The model shows good performance in most of the scenarios being able to find good quality solutions relatively fast. The way the best transfers are considered between timetable solutions does not add significant value in terms of solution quality but could be useful from a planning perspective. In addition, most of the real-life conflicts are taken into account in the model but not all of them. As a result, the model can still be improved in order to provide completely conflict-free timetables. In general, the model appears to be useful for the timetabling planning process of DSB. It allows to test different network requirements and preferences easily. The model not only generates a timetable but also estimates the passenger travel time and the occupancy of the trains quite accurately. Also, any modification in the line plan can easily be included without affecting the core model.Outgoin

Dispatching and Rescheduling Tasks and Their Interactions with Travel Demand and the Energy Domain: Models and Algorithms

Abstract The paper aims to provide an overview of the key factors to consider when performing reliable modelling of rail services. Given our underlying belief that to build a robust simulation environment a rail service cannot be considered an isolated system, also the connected systems, which influence and, in turn, are influenced by such services, must be properly modelled. For this purpose, an extensive overview of the rail simulation and optimisation models proposed in the literature is first provided. Rail simulation models are classified according to the level of detail implemented (microscopic, mesoscopic and macroscopic), the variables involved (deterministic and stochastic) and the processing techniques adopted (synchronous and asynchronous). By contrast, within rail optimisation models, both planning (timetabling) and management (rescheduling) phases are discussed. The main issues concerning the interaction of rail services with travel demand flows and the energy domain are also described. Finally, in an attempt to provide a comprehensive framework an overview of the main metaheuristic resolution techniques used in the planning and management phases is shown