Set optimization - a rather short introduction

Recent developments in set optimization are surveyed and extended including various set relations as well as fundamental constructions of a convex analysis for set- and vector-valued functions, and duality for set optimization problems. Extensive sections with bibliographical comments summarize the state of the art. Applications to vector optimization and financial risk measures are discussed along with algorithmic approaches to set optimization problems

Properly optimal elements in vector optimization with variable ordering structures

In this paper, proper optimality concepts in vector optimization with variable ordering structures are introduced for the first time and characterization results via scalarizations are given. New type of scalarizing functionals are presented and their properties are discussed. The scalarization approach suggested in the paper does not require convexity and boundedness conditions

Characterization of proper optimal elements with variable ordering structures

In vector optimization with a variable ordering structure the partial ordering defined by a convex cone is replaced by a whole family of convex cones, one associated with each element of the space. As these vector optimization problems are not only of interest in applications but also mathematical challenging, in recent publications it was started to develop a comprehensive theory. In doing that also notions of proper efficiency where generalized to variable ordering structures. In this paper we study the relations between several types of proper optimality notions, among others based on local and global approximations of the considered sets. We give scalarization results based on new functionals defined by elements from the dual cones which allow characterizations also in the nonconvex case

Sublinear scalarizations for proper and approximate proper efficient points in nonconvex vector optimization

We show that under a separation property, a Q-minimal point in a normed space is the minimum of a given sublinear function. This fact provides sufficient conditions, via scalarization, for nine types of proper efficient points; establishing a characterization in the particular case of Benson proper efficient points. We also obtain necessary and sufficient conditions in terms of scalarization for approximate Benson and Henig proper efficient points. The separation property we handle is a variation of another known property and our scalarization results do not require convexity or boundedness assumptions.Open Access funding provided thanks to the CRUE-CSIC agreement with Springer Nature. Fernando García-Castaño and Miguel Ángel Melguizo-Padial acknowledge the financial support from the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (MCIN/AEI) under grant PID2021-122126NB-C32, co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) under the slogan “A way of making Europe”

Domination and Decomposition in Multiobjective Programming

During the last few decades, multiobjective programming has received much attention for both its numerous theoretical advances as well as its continued success in modeling and solving real-life decision problems in business and engineering. In extension of the traditionally adopted concept of Pareto optimality, this research investigates the more general notion of domination and establishes various theoretical results that lead to new optimization methods and support decision making. After a preparatory discussion of some preliminaries and a review of the relevant literature, several new findings are presented that characterize the nondominated set of a general vector optimization problem for which the underlying domination structure is defined in terms of different cones. Using concepts from linear algebra and convex analysis, a well known result relating nondominated points for polyhedral cones with Pareto solutions is generalized to nonpolyhedral cones that are induced by positively homogeneous functions, and to translated polyhedral cones that are used to describe a notion of approximate nondominance. Pareto-oriented scalarization methods are modified and several new solution approaches are proposed for these two classes of cones. In addition, necessary and sufficient conditions for nondominance with respect to a variable domination cone are developed, and some more specific results for the case of Bishop-Phelps cones are derived. Based on the above findings, a decomposition framework is proposed for the solution of multi-scenario and large-scale multiobjective programs and analyzed in terms of the efficiency relationships between the original and the decomposed subproblems. Using the concept of approximate nondominance, an interactive decision making procedure is formulated to coordinate tradeoffs between these subproblems and applied to selected problems from portfolio optimization and engineering design. Some introductory remarks and concluding comments together with ideas and research directions for possible future work complete this dissertation

Nonconvex and mixed integer multiobjective optimization with an application to decision uncertainty

Multiobjective optimization problems commonly arise in different fields like economics or engineering. In general, when dealing with several conflicting objective functions, there is an infinite number of optimal solutions which cannot usually be determined analytically. This thesis presents new branch-and-bound-based approaches for computing the globally optimal solutions of multiobjective optimization problems of various types. New algorithms are proposed for smooth multiobjective nonconvex optimization problems with convex constraints as well as for multiobjective mixed integer convex optimization problems. Both algorithms guarantee a certain accuracy of the computed solutions, and belong to the first deterministic algorithms within their class of optimization problems. Additionally, a new approach to compute a covering of the optimal solution set of multiobjective optimization problems with decision uncertainty is presented. The three new algorithms are tested numerically. The results are evaluated in this thesis as well. The branch-and-bound based algorithms deal with box partitions and use selection rules, discarding tests and termination criteria. The discarding tests are the most important aspect, as they give criteria whether a box can be discarded as it does not contain any optimal solution. We present discarding tests which combine techniques from global single objective optimization with outer approximation techniques from multiobjective convex optimization and with the concept of local upper bounds from multiobjective combinatorial optimization. The new discarding tests aim to find appropriate lower bounds of subsets of the image set in order to compare them with known upper bounds numerically.Multikriterielle Optimierungprobleme sind in diversen Anwendungsgebieten wie beispielsweise in den Wirtschafts- oder Ingenieurwissenschaften zu finden. Da hierbei mehrere konkurrierende Zielfunktionen auftreten, ist die Lösungsmenge eines derartigen Optimierungsproblems im Allgemeinen unendlich groß und kann meist nicht in analytischer Form berechnet werden. In dieser Dissertation werden neue Branch-and-Bound basierte Algorithmen zur Lösung verschiedener Klassen von multikriteriellen Optimierungsproblemen entwickelt und vorgestellt. Der Branch-and-Bound Ansatz ist eine typische Methode der globalen Optimierung. Einer der neuen Algorithmen löst glatte multikriterielle nichtkonvexe Optimierungsprobleme mit konvexen Nebenbedingungen, während ein zweiter zur Lösung multikriterieller gemischt-ganzzahliger konvexer Optimierungsprobleme dient. Beide Algorithmen garantieren eine gewisse Genauigkeit der berechneten Lösungen und gehören damit zu den ersten deterministischen Algorithmen ihrer Art. Zusätzlich wird ein Algorithmus zur Berechnung einer Überdeckung der Lösungsmenge multikriterieller Optimierungsprobleme mit Entscheidungsunsicherheit vorgestellt. Alle drei Algorithmen wurden numerisch getestet. Die Ergebnisse werden ebenfalls in dieser Arbeit ausgewertet. Die neuen Algorithmen arbeiten alle mit Boxunterteilungen und nutzen Auswahlregeln, sowie Verwerfungs- und Terminierungskriterien. Dabei spielen gute Verwerfungskriterien eine zentrale Rolle. Diese entscheiden, ob eine Box verworfen werden kann, da diese sicher keine Optimallösung enthält. Die neuen Verwerfungskriterien nutzen Methoden aus der globalen skalarwertigen Optimierung, Approximationstechniken aus der multikriteriellen konvexen Optimierung sowie ein Konzept aus der kombinatorischen Optimierung. Dabei werden stets untere Schranken der Bildmengen konstruiert, die mit bisher berechneten oberen Schranken numerisch verglichen werden können

Nonlinear Cone Separation Theorems in Real Topological Linear Spaces

The separation of two sets (or more specific of two cones) plays an important role in different fields of mathematics such as variational analysis, convex analysis, convex geometry, optimization. In the paper, we derive some new results for the separation of two not necessarily convex cones by a (convex) cone / conical surface in real (topological) linear spaces. We follow basically the separation approach by Kasimbeyli (2010, SIAM J. Optim. 20) based on augmented dual cones and normlinear separation functions. Classical separation theorems for convex sets will be the key tool for proving our main nonlinear cone separation theorems. Also in the setting of a real reflexive Banach space, we are able to extend the cone separation result derived by Kasimbeyli