PowerPack: Energy Profiling and Analysis of High-Performance Systems and Applications

Energy efficiency is a major concern in modern high-performance computing system design. In the past few years, there has been mounting evidence that power usage limits system scale and computing density, and thus, ultimately system performance. However, despite the impact of power and energy on the computer systems community, few studies provide insight to where and how power is consumed on high-performance systems and applications. In previous work, we designed a framework called PowerPack that was the first tool to isolate the power consumption of devices including disks, memory, NICs, and processors in a high-performance cluster and correlate these measurements to application functions. In this work, we extend our framework to support systems with multicore, multiprocessor-based nodes, and then provide in-depth analyses of the energy consumption of parallel applications on clusters of these systems. These analyses include the impacts of chip multiprocessing on power and energy efficiency, and its interaction with application executions. In addition, we use PowerPack to study the power dynamics and energy efficiencies of dynamic voltage and frequency scaling (DVFS) techniques on clusters. Our experiments reveal conclusively how intelligent DVFS scheduling can enhance system energy efficiency while maintaining performance

GDP : using dataflow properties to accurately estimate interference-free performance at runtime

Multi-core memory systems commonly share resources between processors. Resource sharing improves utilization at the cost of increased inter-application interference which may lead to priority inversion, missed deadlines and unpredictable interactive performance. A key component to effectively manage multi-core resources is performance accounting which aims to accurately estimate interference-free application performance. Previously proposed accounting systems are either invasive or transparent. Invasive accounting systems can be accurate, but slow down latency-sensitive processes. Transparent accounting systems do not affect performance, but tend to provide less accurate performance estimates. We propose a novel class of performance accounting systems that achieve both performance-transparency and superior accuracy. We call the approach dataflow accounting, and the key idea is to track dynamic dataflow properties and use these to estimate interference-free performance. Our main contribution is Graph-based Dynamic Performance (GDP) accounting. GDP dynamically builds a dataflow graph of load requests and periods where the processor commits instructions. This graph concisely represents the relationship between memory loads and forward progress in program execution. More specifically, GDP estimates interference-free stall cycles by multiplying the critical path length of the dataflow graph with the estimated interference-free memory latency. GDP is very accurate with mean IPC estimation errors of 3.4% and 9.8% for our 4- and 8-core processors, respectively. When GDP is used in a cache partitioning policy, we observe average system throughput improvements of 11.9% and 20.8% compared to partitioning using the state-of-the-art Application Slowdown Model

Sensible energy accounting with abstract metering for multicore systems

Chip multicore processors (CMPs) are the preferred processing platform across different domains such as data centers, real-time systems, and mobile devices. In all those domains, energy is arguably the most expensive resource in a computing system. Accurately quantifying energy usage in a multicore environment presents a challenge as well as an opportunity for optimization. Standard metering approaches are not capable of delivering consistent results with shared resources, since the same task with the same inputs may have different energy consumption based on the mix of co-running tasks. However, it is reasonable for data-center operators to charge on the basis of estimated energy usage rather than time since energy is more correlated with their actual cost. This article introduces the concept of Sensible Energy Accounting (SEA). For a task running in a multicore system, SEA accurately estimates the energy the task would have consumed running in isolation with a given fraction of the CMP shared resources. We explain the potential benefits of SEA in different domains and describe two hardware techniques to implement it for a shared last-level cache and on-core resources in SMT processors. Moreover, with SEA, an energy-aware scheduler can find a highly efficient on-chip resource assignment, reducing by up to 39% the total processor energy for a 4-core system.Peer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft

Per-task energy metering and accounting in the multicore era

Chip multi-core processors (CMPs) are the preferred processing platform across different domains such as data centers, real-time systems and mobile devices. In all those domains, energy is arguably the most expensive resource in a computing system, in particular, with fastest growth. Therefore, measuring the energy usage draws vast attention. Current studies mostly focus on obtaining finer-granularity energy measurement, such as measuring power in smaller time intervals, distributing energy to hardware components or software components. Such studies focus on scenarios where system energy is measured under the assumption that only one program is running in the system. So far, there is no hardware-level mechanism proposed to distribute the system energy to multiple running programs in a resource sharing multi-core system in an exact way. For the first time, we have formalized the need for per-task energy measurement in multicore by establishing a two-fold concept: Per-Task Energy Metering (PTEM) and Sensible Energy Accounting (SEA). In the scenario where many tasks running in parallel in a multicore system: For each task, the target of PTEM is to provide estimate of the actual energy consumption at runtime based on its resource usage during execution; and SEA aims at providing estimates on the energy it would have consumed when running in isolation with a particular fraction of system's resources. Accurately determining the energy consumed by each task in a system will become of prominent importance in future multi-core based systems as it offers several benefits including (i) Selection of appropriate co-runners, (ii) improved energy-aware task scheduling and (iii) energy-aware billing in data centers. We have shown how these two concepts can be applied to the main components of a computing system: the processor and the memory system. At first, we have applied PTEM to the processor by means of tracking the activities and occupancy of all the resources in a per-task basis. Secondly, we have applied PTEM to the memory system by means of tracking the activities and the state switches of memory banks. Then, we have applied SEA to the processor by predicting the activities and execution time for each task when they run with an fraction of chip resources alone. And last, we apply SEA to the memory system, by means of predicting activities, execution time and the time invoking memory system for each task. As for all these works, by trading-off the hardware cost with the estimation accuracy, we have obtained the implementable and affordable cost mechanisms with high accuracy. We have also shown how these techniques can be applied in different scenarios, such as, to detect significant energy usage variations for any particular task and to develop more energy efficient scheduling policy for the multi-core system. These works in this thesis have been published into IEEE/ACM journals and conferences proceedings that can be found in the publication chapter of this thesis.Los "Chip Multi-core Processors" (CMPs) son la plataforma de procesado preferida en diferentes dominios, tales como los centros de datos, sistemas de tiempo real y dispositivos móviles. En todos estos dominios, la energía puede ser el recurso más caro en el sistema de computación, concretamente, lo rápido que está creciendo. Por lo tanto, como medir el consumo energético está ganando mucha atención. Los estudios actuales se centran mayormente en cómo obtener medidas muy detalladas (finer granularity). Por ejemplo, tomar medidas de potencia en pequeños intervalos de tiempo, usando medidores de energía hardware o software. Estos estudios se centran en escenarios donde el consumo del sistema se mide bajo la suposición de que solo un programa se está ejecutando en el sistema. Aun no hay ninguna propuesta de un mecanismo a nivel de hardware para medir el consumo entre múltiples programas ejecutándose a la vez en un sistema multi-core con recursos compartidos. Por primera vez, hemos formalizado la necesidad de medir el consumo energético por-tarea en un multi-core estableciendo un concepto dual: Per-Taks Energy Metering (PTEM) y Sensible Energy Accounting (SEA). En un escenario donde varias tareas se ejecutan en paralelo en un sistema multi-core, por cada tarea, el objetivo de PTEM es estimar el consumo real energético durante tiempo de ejecución basándose en los recursos usados durante la ejecución, y SEA trata de proveer una estimación del consumo que tendría en solitario con solo una fracción concreta de los recursos del sistema. Determinar el consumo energético con precisión para cada tarea en un sistema tomara gran importancia en el futuro de los sistemas basados en multi-cores, ya que ofrecen varias ventajas tales como: (i) determinar los co-runners apropiados, (ii) mejorar la planificación de tareas teniendo en cuenta su consumo y (iii) facturación de los servicios de los data centers basada en el consumo. Hemos mostrado como estos dos conceptos pueden aplicarse a los principales componentes de un sistema de computación: el procesador y el sistema de memoria. Para empezar, hemos aplicado PTEM al procesador para registrar la actividad y la ocupación de todos los recursos por cada tarea. Luego, hemos aplicado SEA al procesador prediciendo la actividad y tiempo de ejecución por tarea cuando se ejecutan con solo una parte de los recursos del chip. Por último, hemos aplicado SEA al sistema de memoria para predecir la activada, el tiempo ejecución y cuando el sistema de memoria es invocado por cada tarea. Con todo ello, hemos alcanzado un compromiso entre el coste del hardware y la precisión en las estimaciones para obtener mecanismos implementables con un coste aceptable y una alta precisión. Durante nuestros estudios mostramos como esas técnicas pueden ser aplicadas a diferente escenarios, tales como: detectar variaciones significativas en el consumo energético por una tarea en concreto o como desarrollar políticas de planificación energéticamente más eficientes para sistemas multi-core. Los trabajos que hemos publicado durante el desarrollo de esta tesis en los IEEE/ACM journals y en varias conferencias pueden encontrarse en el capítulo de "publicaciones" de este documentoPostprint (published version

Per-task energy accounting in computing systems

We present for the first time the concept of per-task energy accounting (PTEA) and relate it to per-task energy metering (PTEM). We show the benefits of supporting both in future computing systems. Using the shared last-level cache (LLC) as an example: (1) We illustrate the complexities in providing PTEM and PTEA; (2) we present an idealized PTEM model and an accurate and low-cost implementation of it; and (3) we introduce a hardware mechanism to provide accurate PTEA in the cache.Postprint (published version

Performance comparison of cache coherence protocol on multi-core architecture

Number of cores in multi-core processors is steadily increased to make it faster and more reliable. Increasing the number of cores comes with a numerous issues that need to be addressed. In this dissertation we looked at the cache coherence issue, its importance and solution. Cache coherence is important as two or more cores sharing the same data must maintain the recent updated value to avoid reading of stale value. We have made an extensive study of existing cache coherence methods, such as Snoopy coherence technique and Directory coherence technique. Snoopy coherence technique is studied with the help of MOESI coherence protocol and Directory coherence technique is observed with the help of MI, MESI TWO LEVEL, MESI THREE LEVEL, MOESI, and MOESI TOKEN coherence protocol. We have used GEM5 simulator and Splash-2 benchmark to compare their performance. For simulation a precompiled program called MemTest, Ruby random tester, and Splash-2 suite is used. It is observed that the performance is improved as we move from MI, MESI TWO LEVEL, MESI THREE LEVEL, MOESI, and MOESI TOKEN in Directory coherence technique and for Snoopy coherence we observed the performance through varying parameters like, cache size, block size and associativity. It is also observed that that adding L3 level cache the performance of MESI Three Level is improved over MESI Two Level

CPU accounting in multi-threaded processors

In recent years, multi-threaded processors have become more and more popular in industry in order to increase the system aggregated performance and per-application performance, overcoming the limitations imposed by the limited instruction-level parallelism, and by power and thermal constraints. Multi-threaded processors are widely used in servers, desktop computers, lap-tops, and mobile devices. However, multi-threaded processors introduce complexities when accounting CPU (computation) capacity (CPU accounting), since the CPU capacity accounted to an application not only depends upon the time that the application is scheduled onto a CPU, but also on the amount of hardware resources it receives during that period. And given that in a multi-threaded processor hardware resources are dynamically shared between applications, the CPU capacity accounted to an application in a multi-threaded processor depends upon the workload in which it executes. This is inconvenient because the CPU accounting of the same application with the same input data set may be accounted significantly different depending upon the workload in which it executes. Deploying systems with accurate CPU accounting mechanisms is necessary to increase fairness among running applications. Moreover, it will allow users to be fairly charged on a shared data center, facilitating server consolidation in future systems. This Thesis analyses the concepts of CPU capacity and CPU accounting for multi-threaded processors. In this study, we demonstrate that current CPU accounting mechanisms are not as accurate as they should be in multi-threaded processors. For this reason, we present two novel CPU accounting mechanisms that improve the accuracy in measuring the CPU capacity for multi-threaded processors with low hardware overhead. We focus our attention on several current multi-threaded processors, including chip multiprocessors and simultaneous multithreading processors. Finally, we analyse the impact of shared resources in multi-threaded processors in operating system CPU scheduler and we propose several schedulers that improve the knowledge of shared hardware resources at the software level

DReAM: An approach to estimate per-Task DRAM energy in multicore systems

Accurate per-task energy estimation in multicore systems would allow performing per-task energy-aware task scheduling and energy-aware billing in data centers, among other applications. Per-task energy estimation is challenged by the interaction between tasks in shared resources, which impacts tasks’ energy consumption in uncontrolled ways. Some accurate mechanisms have been devised recently to estimate per-task energy consumed on-chip in multicores, but there is a lack of such mechanisms for DRAM memories. This article makes the case for accurate per-task DRAM energy metering in multicores, which opens new paths to energy/performance optimizations. In particular, the contributions of this article are (i) an ideal per-task energy metering model for DRAM memories; (ii) DReAM, an accurate yet low cost implementation of the ideal model (less than 5% accuracy error when 16 tasks share memory); and (iii) a comparison with standard methods (even distribution and access-count based) proving that DReAM is much more accurate than these other methods.Peer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft