BRCC36A is epistatic to BRCA1 in DNA crosslink repair and homologous recombination in Arabidopsis thaliana

BRCA1 is a well-known tumor suppressor protein in mammals, involved in multiple cellular processes such as DNA repair, chromosome segregation and chromatin remodeling. Interestingly, homologs of BRCA1 and several of its complex partners are also found in plants. As the respective mutants are viable, in contrast to mammalian mutants, detailed analyses of their biological role is possible. Here we demonstrate that the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana harbors two homologs of the mammalian BRCA1 interaction partner BRCC36, AtBRCC36A and AtBRCC36B. Mutants of both genes as well as the double mutants are fully fertile and show no defects in development. We were able to show that mutation of one of the homologs, AtBRCC36A, leads to a severe defect in intra- and interchromosomal homologous recombination (HR). A HR defect is also apparent in Atbrca1 mutants. As the Atbrcc36a/Atbrca1 double mutant behaves like the single mutants of AtBRCA1 and AtBRCC36A both proteins seem to be involved in a common pathway in the regulation of HR. AtBRCC36 is also epistatic to AtBRCA1 in DNA crosslink repair. Upon genotoxic stress, AtBRCC36A is transferred into the nucleus

BRCC36A is epistatic to BRCA1 in DNA crosslink repair and homologous recombination in Arabidopsis thaliana

BRCA1 is a well-known tumor suppressor protein in mammals, involved in multiple cellular processes such as DNA repair, chromosome segregation and chromatin remodeling. Interestingly, homologs of BRCA1 and several of its complex partners are also found in plants. As the respective mutants are viable, in contrast to mammalian mutants, detailed analyses of their biological role is possible. Here we demonstrate that the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana harbors two homologs of the mammalian BRCA1 interaction partner BRCC36, AtBRCC36A and AtBRCC36B. Mutants of both genes as well as the double mutants are fully fertile and show no defects in development. We were able to show that mutation of one of the homologs, AtBRCC36A, leads to a severe defect in intra- and interchromosomal homologous recombination (HR). A HR defect is also apparent in Atbrca1 mutants. As the Atbrcc36a/Atbrca1 double mutant behaves like the single mutants of AtBRCA1 and AtBRCC36A both proteins seem to be involved in a common pathway in the regulation of HR. AtBRCC36 is also epistatic to AtBRCA1 in DNA crosslink repair. Upon genotoxic stress, AtBRCC36A is transferred into the nucleus

Homologs of Breast Cancer Genes in Plants

Since the initial discovery of genes involved in hereditary breast cancer in humans, a vast wealth of information has been published. Breast cancer proteins were shown to work as tumor suppressors primarily through their involvement in DNA-damage repair. Surprisingly, homologs of these genes can be found in plant genomes, as well. Here, we want to give an overview of the identification and characterization of the biological roles of these proteins, in plants. In addition to the conservation of their function in DNA repair, new plant-specific characteristics have been revealed. BRCA1 is required for the efficient repair of double strand breaks (DSB) by homologous recombination in somatic cells of the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Bioinformatic analysis indicates that, whereas most homologs of key components of the different mammalian BRCA1 complexes are present in plant genomes, homologs of most factors involved in the recruitment of BRCA1 to the DSB cannot be identified. Thus, it is not clear at the moment whether differences exist between plants and animals at this important step. The most conserved region of BRCA1 and BARD1 homologs in plants is a PHD domain which is absent in mammals and which, in AtBARD1, might be involved in the transcriptional regulation of plant development. The presence of a plant-specific domain prompted us to reevaluate the current model for the evolution of BRCA1 homologs and to suggest a new hypothesis, in which we postulate that plant BRCA1 and BARD1 have one common predecessor that gained a PHD domain before duplication. Furthermore, work in Arabidopsis demonstrates that – as in animals – BRCA2 homologs are important for meiotic DNA recombination. Surprisingly, recent research has revealed that AtBRCA2 also has an important role in systemic acquired resistance. In Arabidopsis, BRCA2 is involved in the transcriptional regulation of pathogenesis-related (PR) genes via its interaction with the strand exchange protein RAD51

Arabidopsis RETINOBLASTOMA RELATED directly regulates DNA damage responses through functions beyond cell cycle control

The rapidly proliferating cells in plant meristems must be protected from genome damage. Here, we show that the regulatory role of the Arabidopsis RETINOBLASTOMA RELATED (RBR) in cell proliferation can be separated from a novel function in safeguarding genome integrity. Upon DNA damage, RBR and its binding partner E2FA are recruited to heterochromatic γH2AX-labelled DNA damage foci in an ATM- and ATR-dependent manner. These γH2AX-labelled DNA lesions are more dispersedly occupied by the conserved repair protein, AtBRCA1, which can also co-localise with RBR foci. RBR and AtBRCA1 physically interact in vitro and in planta. Genetic interaction between the RBR-silenced amiRBR and Atbrca1 mutants suggests that RBR and AtBRCA1 may function together in maintaining genome integrity. Together with E2FA, RBR is directly involved in the transcriptional DNA damage response as well as in the cell death pathway that is independent of SOG1, the plant functional analogue of p53. Thus, plant homologs and analogues of major mammalian tumour suppressor proteins form a regulatory network that coordinates cell proliferation with cell and genome integrity

Etude des acteurs et des interactions entre les voies de recombinaison chez Arabidopsis thaliana

The repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) by recombination is essential for the maintenance of genome integrity of all living organisms. However, recombination must be finely regulated as it can generate mutations or chromosomal rearrangements, sometimes extremely deleterious to the cell. DSB can be repaired by two classes of recombination mechanism: non-homologous recombination (or DNA End Joining) or homologous recombination (implicating DNA sequence homology between the recombining molecules). In somatic cells, the two main pathways of homologous recombination (HR) are RAD51-dependent Synthesis Dependent Strand Annealing (SDSA) and RAD51-independent Single Strand Annealing (SSA). Our results have demonstrated an unexpected role of XRCC2, RAD51B and RAD51D - three RAD51 paralogues – in the SSA pathway. We confirmed that the function of XRCC2 in SSA does not depend upon RAD51, thus demonstrating that some RAD51 paralogues have acquired RAD51 recombinase-independent functions. The different severities of individual mutant phenotypes and epistasis analyses carried out on the double and triple mutants suggest individual functions of these proteins in SSA recombination. We propose that they facilitate hybridization of the two complementary sequences located on both sides of the break, although this remains to be confirmed by in vitro experiments. Study of the roles of XPF-ERCC1 - a complex involved in the cleavage of non-homologous DNA ends during HR - revealed an inhibitory role of this complex on the SDSA pathway. This is dependent on its endonuclease activity and is probably due to the cleavage of long 3' ends performing the homologous DNA duplex invasion, the initial step of the SDSA pathway. Our analyses also confirmed that the role of the complex depends on the length of the nonhomologous ends, as seen in mammals and yeasts. Although XPF-ERCC1 is essential for the cleavage of long nonhomologous DNA ends, it is not required for the elimination of short ends during HR.La réparation des cassures double brin (CDB) de l'ADN par recombinaison est essentielle au maintien de l'intégrité du génome de tous les être vivants. Ce processus doit cependant être finement régulé puisque la recombinaison peut générer des mutations ou des réarrangements chromosomiques, parfois extrêmement délétères pour la cellule. Les CDB peuvent être réparées par deux mécanismes : la recombinaison non homologue (ou jonction des extrémités d'ADN) ou la recombinaison homologue (impliquant une homologie de séquence entre les molécules recombinantes). Dans les cellules somatiques, les deux voies principales de recombinaison homologue (RH) sont la voie Synthesis Dependent Strand Annealing (SDSA) dépendante de la recombinase RAD51 et la voie Single Strand Annealing (SSA) indépendante de RAD51. Nos résultats ont d'abord mis en évidence un rôle inattendu de XRCC2, RAD51B et RAD51D - trois paralogues de RAD51 - dans la voie SSA. Nous avons confirmé que la fonction de la protéine XRCC2 dans la voie SSA ne dépend pas de RAD51, ce qui démontre que certains paralogues de RAD51 ont acquis des fonctions indépendantes de la recombinase. La différence de sévérité des phénotypes des mutants individuels ainsi que les analyses d'épistasie menées sur le double et le triple mutant suggèrent des fonctions individuelles de ces protéines au cours du SSA. Nous proposons qu'elles facilitent l'étape d'hybridation des deux séquences complémentaires situées de part et d'autre de la cassure, bien que ceci reste à confirmer par des études in vitro. L'étude des fonctions de l'hétérodimère XPF-ERCC1 - un complexe impliqué dans le clivage des extrémités d'ADN non homologues au cours des voies de RH - a révélé un rôle inhibiteur de ce complexe sur la voie SDSA. Cette action est dépendante de son activité endonucléasique et serait liée au clivage des longues extrémités 3' sortantes réalisant l'invasion d'un duplex d'ADN homologue, l'étape initiale de la voie SDSA. Notre étude a de plus confirmé que le rôle du complexe dépend de la longueur des extrémités non homologues chez Arabidopsis, comme chez les mammifères et la levure. Bien que le complexe XPF-ERCC1 soit essentiel au clivage des longues extrémités d'ADN non homologue, il n'est pas requis à l'élimination des courtes extrémités au cours de la RH

DNA repair and gene targeting in plant end-joining mutants

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) can be repaired by homologous recombination (HR) or by non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). The latter mechanism is the major route for DSB repair in the somatic cells of higher eukaryotes, including plants. If we could manipulate the balance of the DSB repair pathways towards HR on purpose, it would be possible to improve gene targeting (GT). I studied Arabidopsis mutants, which were deficient in genes involved in classical NHEJ (C-NHEJ) and back-up NHEJ (B-NHEJ). Like in mammals, B-NHEJ by proteins including AtParp facilitates micro-homology mediated end joining (MMEJ), which leads to deletions. Double mutants with mutations in both C-NHEJ and B-NHEJ still showed end joining, indicating that a third NHEJ pathway for DSBs repair must exist in plants. Though the frequency of T-DNA integration was decreased in most NHEJ mutants, unfortunately the frequency of gene targeting was not improved.UBL - phd migration 201