Passing from a gas to an electric water heater system: adaptive PID versus Smith predictive control

“Copyright © [2007] IEEE. Reprinted from 11th International Conference on Intelligent Engineering Systems , 2007. ISBN:1-4244-1147-5 This material is posted here with permission of the IEEE. Internal or personal use of this material is permitted. However, permission to reprint/republish this material for advertising or promotional purposes or for creating new collective works for resale or redistribution must be obtained from the IEEE by writing to [email protected]. By choosing to view this document, you agree to all provisions of the copyright laws protecting it.”This paper presents the control results of an electric water heater system using two approaches: adaptable proportional integral derivative and Smith predictive control based in the physical internal model control structure. The electric water heater was modelled with two variable blocks connected in series: a first order system and a time delay. In fact, the gain, the time constant and the time delay of the system change linearly with the water that flows in the permutation chamber. The physical model of the electric water heater system was retched based in energy dynamic equations and validated with open loop data of the system in a similar way that was made in a previews study about modelling and controlling a gas water heater. The two different control algorithms explored are the adaptive proportional integral derivative (APID) and the Smith predictive control (SPC) based in the internal physical model control algorithm. The first approach has some problems dealing with the time constant and the time delay variations of the system. This solution can control the overshoot for all different water flows but the time constant of the close loop systems changes with the water flow. The APID does not deal well with water flow variations. The second approach is more adequate to control this kind of systems (first order system followed by a time delay that changes in time). The SPC loop is indicated for control time delay systems and with the à priori knowledge of the physical model we can achieve a very good control result. Finally, these two algorithms are applied in controlling the system and the results are compared using the mean square error criterion

Robust Predictive Extended State Observer for a Class of Nonlinear Systems with Time-Varying Input Delay

[EN] This paper deals with asymptotic stabilisation of a class of nonlinear input-delayed systems via dynamic output feedback in the presence of disturbances. The proposed strategy has the structure of an observer-based control law, in which the observer estimates and predicts both the plant state and the external disturbance. A nominal delay value is assumed to be known and stability conditions in terms of linear matrix inequalities are derived for fast-varying delay uncertainties. Asymptotic stability is achieved if the disturbance or the time delay is constant. The controller design problem is also addressed and a numerical example with an unstable system is provided to illustrate the usefulness of the proposed strategy.This work was partially supported by: Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, Spain (TIN2017-86520-C3-1-R); Universitat Politècnica de València (FPI-UPV 2014 PhD Grant); and Israel Science Foundation (Grant No. 1128/14).Sanz Diaz, R.; García Gil, PJ.; Fridman, E.; Albertos Pérez, P. (2020). Robust Predictive Extended State Observer for a Class of Nonlinear Systems with Time-Varying Input Delay. International Journal of Control. 93(2):217-225. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207179.2018.1562204S217225932Ahmed-Ali, T., Cherrier, E., & Lamnabhi-Lagarrigue, F. (2012). Cascade High Gain Predictors for a Class of Nonlinear Systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 57(1), 221-226. doi:10.1109/tac.2011.2161795Artstein, Z. (1982). Linear systems with delayed controls: A reduction. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 27(4), 869-879. doi:10.1109/tac.1982.1103023Basturk, H. I. (2017). Cancellation of unmatched biased sinusoidal disturbances for unknown LTI systems in the presence of state delay. Automatica, 76, 169-176. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2016.10.006Basturk, H. I., & Krstic, M. (2015). Adaptive sinusoidal disturbance cancellation for unknown LTI systems despite input delay. Automatica, 58, 131-138. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2015.05.013Bekiaris-Liberis, N., & Krstic, M. (2011). Compensation of Time-Varying Input and State Delays for Nonlinear Systems. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 134(1). doi:10.1115/1.4005278Besançon, G., Georges, D. & Benayache, Z. (2007). Asymptotic state prediction for continuous-time systems with delayed input and application to control. 2007 European control conference (ECC) (pp. 1786–1791).Engelborghs, K., Dambrine, M., & Roose, D. (2001). Limitations of a class of stabilization methods for delay systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 46(2), 336-339. doi:10.1109/9.905705Fridman, E. (2001). New Lyapunov–Krasovskii functionals for stability of linear retarded and neutral type systems. Systems & Control Letters, 43(4), 309-319. doi:10.1016/s0167-6911(01)00114-1Fridman, E. (2014). Introduction to Time-Delay Systems. Systems & Control: Foundations & Applications. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-09393-2Fridman, E. (2014). Tutorial on Lyapunov-based methods for time-delay systems. European Journal of Control, 20(6), 271-283. doi:10.1016/j.ejcon.2014.10.001Furtat, I., Fridman, E., & Fradkov, A. (2018). Disturbance Compensation With Finite Spectrum Assignment for Plants With Input Delay. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 63(1), 298-305. doi:10.1109/tac.2017.2732279Germani, A., Manes, C., & Pepe, P. (2002). A new approach to state observation of nonlinear systems with delayed output. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 47(1), 96-101. doi:10.1109/9.981726Guo, L., & Chen, W.-H. (2005). Disturbance attenuation and rejection for systems with nonlinearity via DOBC approach. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 15(3), 109-125. doi:10.1002/rnc.978Karafyllis, I., & Krstic, M. (2017). Predictor Feedback for Delay Systems: Implementations and Approximations. Systems & Control: Foundations & Applications. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-42378-4Krstic, M. (2008). Lyapunov tools for predictor feedbacks for delay systems: Inverse optimality and robustness to delay mismatch. Automatica, 44(11), 2930-2935. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2008.04.010Léchappé, V., Moulay, E., Plestan, F., Glumineau, A., & Chriette, A. (2015). New predictive scheme for the control of LTI systems with input delay and unknown disturbances. Automatica, 52, 179-184. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2014.11.003Léchappé, V., Moulay, E. & Plestan, F. (2016). Dynamic observation-prediction for LTI systems with a time-varying delay in the input. 2016 IEEE 55th conference on decision and control (CDC) (pp. 2302–2307).Manitius, A., & Olbrot, A. (1979). Finite spectrum assignment problem for systems with delays. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 24(4), 541-552. doi:10.1109/tac.1979.1102124Mazenc, F. & Malisoff, M. (2016). New prediction approach for stabilizing time-varying systems under time-varying input delay. 2016 IEEE 55th conference on decision and control (CDC) (pp. 3178–3182).Mondie, S., & Michiels, W. (2003). Finite spectrum assignment of unstable time-delay systems with a safe implementation. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 48(12), 2207-2212. doi:10.1109/tac.2003.820147Najafi, M., Hosseinnia, S., Sheikholeslam, F., & Karimadini, M. (2013). Closed-loop control of dead time systems via sequential sub-predictors. International Journal of Control, 86(4), 599-609. doi:10.1080/00207179.2012.751627Najafi, M., Sheikholeslam, F., Hosseinnia, S., & Wang, Q.-G. (2014). Robust H ∞ control of single input-delay systems based on sequential sub-predictors. IET Control Theory & Applications, 8(13), 1175-1184. doi:10.1049/iet-cta.2012.1004Sanz, R., Garcia, P., & Albertos, P. (2016). Enhanced disturbance rejection for a predictor-based control of LTI systems with input delay. Automatica, 72, 205-208. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2016.05.019Sanz, R., García, P., & Albertos, P. (2018). A generalized smith predictor for unstable time-delay SISO systems. ISA Transactions, 72, 197-204. doi:10.1016/j.isatra.2017.09.020Sanz, R., García, P., Fridman, E. & Albertos, P. (2017). A predictive extended state observer for a class of nonlinear systems with input delay subject to external disturbances. 2017 IEEE 56th annual conference on decision and control (CDC) (pp. 4345–4350).Sanz, R., Garcia, P., Fridman, E., & Albertos, P. (2018). Rejection of mismatched disturbances for systems with input delay via a predictive extended state observer. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 28(6), 2457-2467. doi:10.1002/rnc.4027Shustin, E., & Fridman, E. (2007). On delay-derivative-dependent stability of systems with fast-varying delays. Automatica, 43(9), 1649-1655. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2007.02.009Suplin, V., Fridman, E., & Shaked, U. (2007). Sampled-data H∞ control and filtering: Nonuniform uncertain sampling. Automatica, 43(6), 1072-1083. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2006.11.024Yao, J., Jiao, Z., & Ma, D. (2014). RISE-Based Precision Motion Control of DC Motors With Continuous Friction Compensation. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 61(12), 7067-7075. doi:10.1109/tie.2014.2321344Zhong, Q.-C. (2004). On Distributed Delay in Linear Control Laws—Part I: Discrete-Delay Implementations. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 49(11), 2074-2080. doi:10.1109/tac.2004.83753

Rejection of mismatched disturbances for systems with input delay via a predictive extended state observer

[EN] The problem of output stabilization and disturbance rejection for input-delayed systems is tackled in this work. First, a suitable transformation is introduced to translate mismatched disturbances into an equivalent input disturbance. Then, an extended state observer is combined with a predictive observer structure to obtain a future estimation of both the state and the disturbance. A disturbance model is assumed to be known but attenuation of unmodeled components is also considered. The stabilization is proved via Lyapunov-Krasovskii functionals, leading to sufficient conditions in terms of linear matrix inequalities for the closed-loop analysis and parameter tuning. The proposed strategy is illustrated through a numerical example.PROMETEOII/2013/004; Conselleria d'Educacio; Generalitat Valenciana, Grant/Award Number: TIN2014-56158-C4-4-P-AR; Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad, Grant/Award Number: FPI-UPV 2014; Universitat Politecnica de ValenciaSanz Diaz, R.; García Gil, PJ.; Fridman, E.; Albertos Pérez, P. (2018). Rejection of mismatched disturbances for systems with input delay via a predictive extended state observer. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control. 28(6):2457-2467. https://doi.org/10.1002/rnc.4027S24572467286Stability and Stabilization of Systems with Time Delay. (2011). IEEE Control Systems, 31(1), 38-65. doi:10.1109/mcs.2010.939135Fridman, E. (2014). Introduction to Time-Delay Systems. Systems & Control: Foundations & Applications. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-09393-2Watanabe, K., & Ito, M. (1981). A process-model control for linear systems with delay. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 26(6), 1261-1269. doi:10.1109/tac.1981.1102802Astrom, K. J., Hang, C. C., & Lim, B. C. (1994). A new Smith predictor for controlling a process with an integrator and long dead-time. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 39(2), 343-345. doi:10.1109/9.272329Matausek, M. R., & Micic, A. D. (1996). A modified Smith predictor for controlling a process with an integrator and long dead-time. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 41(8), 1199-1203. doi:10.1109/9.533684García, P., & Albertos, P. (2008). A new dead-time compensator to control stable and integrating processes with long dead-time. Automatica, 44(4), 1062-1071. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2007.08.022Normey-Rico, J. E., & Camacho, E. F. (2009). Unified approach for robust dead-time compensator design. Journal of Process Control, 19(1), 38-47. doi:10.1016/j.jprocont.2008.02.003Manitius, A., & Olbrot, A. (1979). Finite spectrum assignment problem for systems with delays. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 24(4), 541-552. doi:10.1109/tac.1979.1102124Artstein, Z. (1982). Linear systems with delayed controls: A reduction. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 27(4), 869-879. doi:10.1109/tac.1982.1103023Krstic, M. (2008). Lyapunov tools for predictor feedbacks for delay systems: Inverse optimality and robustness to delay mismatch. Automatica, 44(11), 2930-2935. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2008.04.010Léchappé, V., Moulay, E., Plestan, F., Glumineau, A., & Chriette, A. (2015). New predictive scheme for the control of LTI systems with input delay and unknown disturbances. Automatica, 52, 179-184. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2014.11.003Sanz, R., Garcia, P., & Albertos, P. (2016). Enhanced disturbance rejection for a predictor-based control of LTI systems with input delay. Automatica, 72, 205-208. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2016.05.019Basturk, H. I., & Krstic, M. (2015). Adaptive sinusoidal disturbance cancellation for unknown LTI systems despite input delay. Automatica, 58, 131-138. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2015.05.013Basturk, H. I. (2017). Cancellation of unmatched biased sinusoidal disturbances for unknown LTI systems in the presence of state delay. Automatica, 76, 169-176. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2016.10.006Sanz, R., Garcia, P., Albertos, P., & Zhong, Q.-C. (2016). Robust controller design for input-delayed systems using predictive feedback and an uncertainty estimator. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 27(10), 1826-1840. doi:10.1002/rnc.3639Mondie, S., & Michiels, W. (2003). Finite spectrum assignment of unstable time-delay systems with a safe implementation. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 48(12), 2207-2212. doi:10.1109/tac.2003.820147Zhong, Q.-C. (2004). On Distributed Delay in Linear Control Laws—Part I: Discrete-Delay Implementations. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 49(11), 2074-2080. doi:10.1109/tac.2004.837531Zhou, B., Lin, Z., & Duan, G.-R. (2012). Truncated predictor feedback for linear systems with long time-varying input delays. Automatica, 48(10), 2387-2399. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2012.06.032Zhou, B., Li, Z.-Y., & Lin, Z. (2013). On higher-order truncated predictor feedback for linear systems with input delay. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 24(17), 2609-2627. doi:10.1002/rnc.3012Besançon G Georges D Benayache Z Asymptotic state prediction for continuous-time systems with delayed input and application to control IEEE 2007 Kos, GreeceNajafi, M., Hosseinnia, S., Sheikholeslam, F., & Karimadini, M. (2013). Closed-loop control of dead time systems via sequential sub-predictors. International Journal of Control, 86(4), 599-609. doi:10.1080/00207179.2012.751627Léchappé V Moulay E Plestan F Dynamic observation-prediction for LTI systems with a time-varying delay in the input IEEE 2016 Las Vegas, NVCacace, F., Conte, F., Germani, A., & Pepe, P. (2016). Stabilization of strict-feedback nonlinear systems with input delay using closed-loop predictors. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 26(16), 3524-3540. doi:10.1002/rnc.3517Mazenc, F., & Malisoff, M. (2017). Stabilization of Nonlinear Time-Varying Systems Through a New Prediction Based Approach. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 62(6), 2908-2915. doi:10.1109/tac.2016.2600500Guo, L., & Chen, W.-H. (2005). Disturbance attenuation and rejection for systems with nonlinearity via DOBC approach. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 15(3), 109-125. doi:10.1002/rnc.978Fridman, E. (2003). Output regulation of nonlinear systems with delay. Systems & Control Letters, 50(2), 81-93. doi:10.1016/s0167-6911(03)00131-2Isidori, A., & Byrnes, C. I. (1990). Output regulation of nonlinear systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 35(2), 131-140. doi:10.1109/9.45168Ding, Z. (2003). Global stabilization and disturbance suppression of a class of nonlinear systems with uncertain internal model. Automatica, 39(3), 471-479. doi:10.1016/s0005-1098(02)00251-0Chen, W.-H., Yang, J., Guo, L., & Li, S. (2016). Disturbance-Observer-Based Control and Related Methods—An Overview. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 63(2), 1083-1095. doi:10.1109/tie.2015.2478397Fridman, E., & Shaked, U. (2002). An improved stabilization method for linear time-delay systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 47(11), 1931-1937. doi:10.1109/tac.2002.804462Fridman, E., & Orlov, Y. (2009). Exponential stability of linear distributed parameter systems with time-varying delays. Automatica, 45(1), 194-201. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2008.06.00

Adaptive PD Control using Deep Reinforcement Learning for Local-Remote Teleoperation with Stochastic Time Delays

Local-remote systems allow robots to execute complex tasks in hazardous environments such as space and nuclear power stations. However, establishing accurate positional mapping between local and remote devices can be difficult due to time delays that can compromise system performance and stability. Enhancing the synchronicity and stability of local-remote systems is vital for enabling robots to interact with environments at greater distances and under highly challenging network conditions, including time delays. We introduce an adaptive control method employing reinforcement learning to tackle the time-delayed control problem. By adjusting controller parameters in real-time, this adaptive controller compensates for stochastic delays and improves synchronicity between local and remote robotic manipulators. To improve the adaptive PD controller's performance, we devise a model-based reinforcement learning approach that effectively incorporates multi-step delays into the learning framework. Utilizing this proposed technique, the local-remote system's performance is stabilized for stochastic communication time-delays of up to 290ms. Our results demonstrate that the suggested model-based reinforcement learning method surpasses the Soft-Actor Critic and augmented state Soft-Actor Critic techniques. Access the code at: https://github.com/CAV-Research-Lab/Predictive-Model-Delay-CorrectionComment: 7 pages + 1 references, 4 figure

Adaptive Quality of Service Control in Distributed Real-Time Embedded Systems

An increasing number of distributed real-time embedded systems face the critical challenge of providing Quality of Service (QoS) guarantees in open and unpredictable environments. For example, such systems often need to enforce CPU utilization bounds on multiple processors in order to avoid overload and meet end-to-end dead-lines, even when task execution times deviate significantly from their estimated values or change dynamically at run-time. This dissertation presents an adaptive QoS control framework which includes a set of control design methodologies to provide robust QoS assurance for systems at different scales. To demonstrate its effectiveness, we have applied the framework to the end-to-end CPU utilization control problem for a common class of distributed real-time embedded systems with end-to-end tasks. We formulate the utilization control problem as a constrained multi-input-multi-output control model. We then present a centralized control algorithm for small or medium size systems, and a decentralized control algorithm for large-scale systems. Both algorithms are designed systematically based on model predictive control theory to dynamically enforce desired utilizations. We also introduce novel task allocation algorithms to ensure that the system is controllable and feasible for utilization control. Furthermore, we integrate our control algorithms with fault-tolerance mechanisms as an effective way to develop robust middleware systems, which maintain both system reliability and real-time performance even when the system is in face of malicious external resource contentions and permanent processor failures. Both control analysis and extensive experiments demonstrate that our control algorithms and middleware systems can achieve robust utilization guarantees. The control framework has also been successfully applied to other distributed real-time applications such as end-to-end delay control in real-time image transmission. Our results show that adaptive QoS control middleware is a step towards self-managing, self-healing and self-tuning distributed computing platform

Robust controller design for input-delayed systems using predictive feedback and an uncertainty estimator

[EN] This paper deals with the problem of stabilizing a class of input-delayed systems with (possibly) nonlinear uncertainties by using explicit delay compensation. It is well known that plain predictive schemes lack robustness with respect to uncertain model parameters. In this work, an uncertainty estimator is derived for input-delay systems and combined with a modified state predictor, which uses current available information of the estimated uncertainties. Furthermore, based on Lyapunov-Krasovskii functionals, a computable criterion to check robust stability of the closed-loop is developed and cast into a minimization problem constrained to an LMI. Additionally, for a given input delay, an iterative-LMI algorithm is proposed to design stabilizing tuning parameters. The main results are illustrated and validated using a numerical example with a second-order dynamic system.This work was partially supported by projects PROMETEOII/2013/004, Conselleria d Educació, Generalitat Valenciana, and TIN2014-56158-C4-4-P-AR, Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, Spain.Sanz Diaz, R.; García Gil, PJ.; Albertos Pérez, P.; Zhong, Q. (2017). Robust controller design for input-delayed systems using predictive feedback and an uncertainty estimator. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control. 27(10):1826-1840. https://doi.org/10.1002/rnc.3639S182618402710Stability and Stabilization of Systems with Time Delay. (2011). IEEE Control Systems, 31(1), 38-65. doi:10.1109/mcs.2010.939135Normey-Rico, J. E., Bordons, C., & Camacho, E. F. (1997). Improving the robustness of dead-time compensating PI controllers. Control Engineering Practice, 5(6), 801-810. doi:10.1016/s0967-0661(97)00064-6Michiels, W., & Niculescu, S.-I. (2003). On the delay sensitivity of Smith Predictors. International Journal of Systems Science, 34(8-9), 543-551. doi:10.1080/00207720310001609057Normey-Rico, J. E., & Camacho, E. F. (2008). Dead-time compensators: A survey. Control Engineering Practice, 16(4), 407-428. doi:10.1016/j.conengprac.2007.05.006Guzmán, J. L., García, P., Hägglund, T., Dormido, S., Albertos, P., & Berenguel, M. (2008). Interactive tool for analysis of time-delay systems with dead-time compensators. Control Engineering Practice, 16(7), 824-835. doi:10.1016/j.conengprac.2007.09.002Manitius, A., & Olbrot, A. (1979). Finite spectrum assignment problem for systems with delays. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 24(4), 541-552. doi:10.1109/tac.1979.1102124Artstein, Z. (1982). Linear systems with delayed controls: A reduction. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 27(4), 869-879. doi:10.1109/tac.1982.1103023Moon, Y. S., Park, P., & Kwon, W. H. (2001). Robust stabilization of uncertain input-delayed systems using reduction method. Automatica, 37(2), 307-312. doi:10.1016/s0005-1098(00)00145-xYue, D. (2004). Robust stabilization of uncertain systems with unknown input delay. Automatica, 40(2), 331-336. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2003.10.005Yue, D., & Han, Q.-L. (2005). Delayed feedback control of uncertain systems with time-varying input delay. Automatica, 41(2), 233-240. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2004.09.006Lozano, R., Castillo, P., Garcia, P., & Dzul, A. (2004). Robust prediction-based control for unstable delay systems: Application to the yaw control of a mini-helicopter. Automatica, 40(4), 603-612. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2003.10.007Gonzalez, A., Garcia, P., Albertos, P., Castillo, P., & Lozano, R. (2012). Robustness of a discrete-time predictor-based controller for time-varying measurement delay. Control Engineering Practice, 20(2), 102-110. doi:10.1016/j.conengprac.2011.09.001Karafyllis, I., & Krstic, M. (2013). Robust predictor feedback for discrete-time systems with input delays. International Journal of Control, 86(9), 1652-1663. doi:10.1080/00207179.2013.792005Krstic, M. (2010). Input Delay Compensation for Forward Complete and Strict-Feedforward Nonlinear Systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 55(2), 287-303. doi:10.1109/tac.2009.2034923Bekiaris-Liberis, N., & Krstic, M. (2011). Compensation of Time-Varying Input and State Delays for Nonlinear Systems. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 134(1). doi:10.1115/1.4005278Karafyllis, I., Malisoff, M., Mazenc, F., & Pepe, P. (Eds.). (2016). Recent Results on Nonlinear Delay Control Systems. Advances in Delays and Dynamics. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-18072-4Cacace, F., Conte, F., Germani, A., & Pepe, P. (2016). Stabilization of strict-feedback nonlinear systems with input delay using closed-loop predictors. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 26(16), 3524-3540. doi:10.1002/rnc.3517Fridman, E., & Shaked, U. (2002). An improved stabilization method for linear time-delay systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 47(11), 1931-1937. doi:10.1109/tac.2002.804462Fridman, E., & Shaked, U. (2002). A descriptor system approach to H/sub ∞/ control of linear time-delay systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 47(2), 253-270. doi:10.1109/9.983353Chen, W.-H., & Zheng, W. X. (2006). On improved robust stabilization of uncertain systems with unknown input delay. Automatica, 42(6), 1067-1072. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2006.02.015Krstic, M. (2008). Lyapunov tools for predictor feedbacks for delay systems: Inverse optimality and robustness to delay mismatch. Automatica, 44(11), 2930-2935. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2008.04.010Léchappé, V., Moulay, E., Plestan, F., Glumineau, A., & Chriette, A. (2015). New predictive scheme for the control of LTI systems with input delay and unknown disturbances. Automatica, 52, 179-184. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2014.11.003Roh, Y.-H., & Oh, J.-H. (1999). Robust stabilization of uncertain input-delay systems by sliding mode control with delay compensation. Automatica, 35(11), 1861-1865. doi:10.1016/s0005-1098(99)00106-5Bresch-Pietri, D., & Krstic, M. (2009). Adaptive trajectory tracking despite unknown input delay and plant parameters. Automatica, 45(9), 2074-2081. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2009.04.027Kamalapurkar, R., Fischer, N., Obuz, S., & Dixon, W. E. (2016). Time-Varying Input and State Delay Compensation for Uncertain Nonlinear Systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 61(3), 834-839. doi:10.1109/tac.2015.2451472Chen, W.-H., Ohnishi, K., & Guo, L. (2015). Advances in Disturbance/Uncertainty Estimation and Attenuation [Guest editors’ introduction]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 62(9), 5758-5762. doi:10.1109/tie.2015.2453347Chen, W.-H., Yang, J., Guo, L., & Li, S. (2016). Disturbance-Observer-Based Control and Related Methods—An Overview. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 63(2), 1083-1095. doi:10.1109/tie.2015.2478397Sariyildiz E Ohnishi K Design constraints of disturbance observer in the presence of time delay 2013 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics (ICM) Vicenza, Italy 2013 69 74Wang, Q.-G., Hang, C. C., & Yang, X.-P. (2001). Single-loop controller design via IMC principles. Automatica, 37(12), 2041-2048. doi:10.1016/s0005-1098(01)00170-4Zheng, Q., & Gao, Z. (2014). Predictive active disturbance rejection control for processes with time delay. ISA Transactions, 53(4), 873-881. doi:10.1016/j.isatra.2013.09.021Chen, M., & Chen, W.-H. (2010). Disturbance-observer-based robust control for time delay uncertain systems. International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, 8(2), 445-453. doi:10.1007/s12555-010-0233-5Guo, L., & Chen, W.-H. (2005). Disturbance attenuation and rejection for systems with nonlinearity via DOBC approach. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 15(3), 109-125. doi:10.1002/rnc.978Zhong, Q.-C., & Rees, D. (2004). Control of Uncertain LTI Systems Based on an Uncertainty and Disturbance Estimator. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 126(4), 905-910. doi:10.1115/1.1850529Yong He, Min Wu, & Jin-Hua She. (2005). Improved bounded-real-lemma representation and H/sub /spl infin// control of systems with polytopic uncertainties. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs, 52(7), 380-383. doi:10.1109/tcsii.2005.850418CAO, Y.-Y., LAM, J., & SUN, Y.-X. (1998). Static Output Feedback Stabilization: An ILMI Approach. Automatica, 34(12), 1641-1645. doi:10.1016/s0005-1098(98)80021-6Marler, R. T., & Arora, J. S. (2009). The weighted sum method for multi-objective optimization: new insights. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 41(6), 853-862. doi:10.1007/s00158-009-0460-7Fridman, E. (2014). Introduction to Time-Delay Systems. Systems & Control: Foundations & Applications. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-09393-2Solomon, O., & Fridman, E. (2013). New stability conditions for systems with distributed delays. Automatica, 49(11), 3467-3475. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2013.08.025Huaizhong Li, & Minyue Fu. (1997). A linear matrix inequality approach to robust H/sub ∞/ filtering. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 45(9), 2338-2350. doi:10.1109/78.622956Šiljak, D. D., & Stipanovic, D. M. (2000). Robust stabilization of nonlinear systems: The LMI approach. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 6(5), 461-493. doi:10.1155/s1024123x0000143

A New Model-Free Method Combined with Neural Networks for MIMO Systems

In this brief, a model-free adaptive predictive control (MFAPC) is proposed. It outperforms the current model-free adaptive control (MFAC) for not only solving the time delay problem in multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) systems but also relaxing the current rigorous assumptions for sake of a wider applicable range. The most attractive merit of the proposed controller is that the controller design, performance analysis and applications are easy for engineers to realize. Furthermore, the problem of how to choose the matrix {\lambda} is finished by analyzing the function of the closed-loop poles rather than the previous contraction mapping method. Additionally, in view of the nonlinear modeling capability and adaptability of neural networks (NNs), we combine these two classes of algorithms together. The feasibility and several interesting results of the proposed method are shown in simulations

A Fully Probabilistic Design for Tracking Control for Stochastic Systems with Input Delay

This paper studies model reference adaptive control (MRAC) for a class of stochastic discrete time control systems with time delays in the control input. In particular, a unified fully probabilistic control framework is established to develop the solution to the MRAC, where the controller is the minimiser of the Kullback-Leibler Divergence (KLD) between the actual and desired joint probability density functions of the tracking error and the controller. The developed framework is quite general, where all the components within this framework, including the controller and system tracking error, are modelled using probabilistic models. The general solution for arbitrary probabilistic models of the framework components is first obtained and then demonstrated on a class of linear Gaussian systems with time delay in the main control input, thus obtaining the desired results. The contribution of this paper is twofold. First, we develop a fully probabilistic design framework for MRAC, referred to as MRFPD, for stochastic dynamical systems. Second, we establish a systematic pedagogic procedure that is based on deriving explicit forms for the required predictive distributions for obtaining the causal form of the randomised controller when input delays are present