A survey of IEEE 802.15.4 effective system parameters for wireless body sensor networks

This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Moravejosharieh, Amirhossein, Lloret, Jaime. (2016). A survey of IEEE 802.15.4 effective system parameters for wireless body sensor networks.International Journal of Communication Systems, 29, 7, 1269-1292. DOI: 10.1002/dac.3098, which has been published in final form at http://doi.org/10.1002/dac.3098. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving[EN] Wireless body sensor networks are offered to meet the requirements of a diverse set of applications such as health-related and well-being applications. For instance, they are deployed to measure, fetch and collect human body vital signs. Such information could be further used for diagnosis and monitoring of medical conditions. IEEE 802.15.4 is arguably considered as a well-designed standard protocol to address the need for low-rate, low-power and low-cost wireless body sensor networks. Apart from the vast deployment of this technology, there are still some challenges and issues related to the performance of the medium access control (MAC) protocol of this standard that are required to be addressed. This paper comprises two main parts. In the first part, the survey has provided a thorough assessment of IEEE 802.15.4 MAC protocol performance where its functionality is evaluated considering a range of effective system parameters, that is, some of the MAC and application parameters and the impact of mutual interference. The second part of this paper is about conducting a simulation study to determine the influence of varying values of the system parameters on IEEE 802.15.4 performance gains. More specifically, we explore the dependability level of IEEE 802.5.4 performance gains on a candidate set of system parameters. Finally, this paper highlights the tangible needs to conduct more investigations on particular aspect(s) of IEEE 802.15.4 MAC protocol. Copyright (c) 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Moravejosharieh, A.; Lloret, J. (2016). A survey of IEEE 802.15.4 effective system parameters for wireless body sensor networks. International Journal of Communication Systems. 29(7):1269-1292. https://doi.org/10.1002/dac.3098S12691292297Alrajeh, N. A., Lloret, J., & Canovas, A. (2014). A Framework for Obesity Control Using a Wireless Body Sensor Network. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 10(7), 534760. doi:10.1155/2014/534760Lopes I Silva B Rodrigues J Lloret J Proenca M A mobile health monitoring solution for weight control International Conference on Wireless Communications and Signal Processing (WCSP) Nanjing / China 2011 1 5Singh, N., Singh, A. K., & Singh, V. K. (2015). Design and performance of wearable ultrawide band textile antenna for medical applications. Microwave and Optical Technology Letters, 57(7), 1553-1557. doi:10.1002/mop.29131Lan, K., Chou, C.-M., Wang, T., & Li, M.-W. (2012). Using body sensor networks for motion detection: a cluster-based approach for green radio. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, 25(2), 199-216. doi:10.1002/ett.2559Lloret, J., Garcia, M., Catala, A., & Rodrigues, J. J. P. C. (2016). A group-based wireless body sensors network using energy harvesting for soccer team monitoring. International Journal of Sensor Networks, 21(4), 208. doi:10.1504/ijsnet.2016.079172Garcia M Catala A Lloret J Rodrigues J A wireless sensor network for soccer team monitoring International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems and Workshops (DCOSS) Barcelona / Spain 2011 1 6Penders J Gyselinckx B Vullers R De Nil M Nimmala V van de Molengraft J Yazicioglu F Torfs T Leonov V Merken P Van Hoof C Human++: from technology to emerging health monitoring concepts 5th International Summer School and Symposium ISSS-MDBS on Medical Devices and Biosensors Hong Kong 2008 94 98Penders J Van de Molengraft J. Brown L Grundlehner B Gyselinckx B Van Hoof C Potential and challenges of body area networks for personal health Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC Minneapolis, U.S. 2009 6569 6572Ullah, S., Higgins, H., Braem, B., Latre, B., Blondia, C., Moerman, I., … Kwak, K. S. (2010). A Comprehensive Survey of Wireless Body Area Networks. Journal of Medical Systems, 36(3), 1065-1094. doi:10.1007/s10916-010-9571-3Cao, H., Leung, V., Chow, C., & Chan, H. (2009). Enabling technologies for wireless body area networks: A survey and outlook. IEEE Communications Magazine, 47(12), 84-93. doi:10.1109/mcom.2009.5350373Hall, P. S., Yang Hao, Nechayev, Y. I., Alomainy, A., Constantinou, C. C., Parini, C., … Bozzetti, M. (2007). Antennas and propagation for on-body communication systems. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, 49(3), 41-58. doi:10.1109/map.2007.4293935Mamaghanian, H., Khaled, N., Atienza, D., & Vandergheynst, P. (2011). Compressed Sensing for Real-Time Energy-Efficient ECG Compression on Wireless Body Sensor Nodes. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 58(9), 2456-2466. doi:10.1109/tbme.2011.2156795LAN-MAN Standards Committee the IEEE Computer Society IEEE standard for local and metropolitan area networks - part 15.4: low rate wireless personal area networks (LR-WPANs) 2011Petrova M Riihijarvi J Mahonen P Labella S Performance study of IEEE 802.15.4 using measurements and simulations IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC) Las Vegas, U.S. 2006 487 492Vaithiyanathan, J., Raju, R. K., & Sadayan, G. (2011). Performance Evaluation of IEEE 802.15.4 Using Association Process and Channel Measurement. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 409-417. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-22555-0_42Yazdi E Moravejosharieh A Willig A Pawlikowski K Coupling power and frequency adaptation for interference mitigation in IEEE 802.15.4-based mobile body sensor networks: part II 2014 Australasian Telecommunication Networks and Applications Conference (ATNAC) Melbourne, Australia 2014 105 110Pelegris P Banitsas K Investigating the efficiency of IEEE 802.15.4 for medical monitoring applications 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC Boston, U.S. 2011 8215 8218Ranjit, J. S., & Shin, S. (2013). A Modified IEEE 802.15.4 Superframe Structure for Guaranteed Emergency Handling in Wireless Body Area Network. Network Protocols and Algorithms, 5(2), 1. doi:10.5296/npa.v5i2.3375Jianliang Zheng, & Lee, M. J. (2004). Will IEEE 802.15.4 make ubiquitous networking a reality?: a discussion on a potential low power, low bit rate standard. IEEE Communications Magazine, 42(6), 140-146. doi:10.1109/mcom.2004.1304251Toscano E Lo Bello L Cross-channel interference in IEEE 802.15.4 networks IEEE International Workshop on Factory Communication Systems, 2008. WFCS 2008 Dresden, Germany 2008 139 148Bashir F Baek WS Sthapit P Pandey D young Pyun J Coordinator assisted passive discovery for mobile end devices in IEEE 802.15.4 2013 IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (CCNC) Las Vegas, U.S. 2013 601 604Tabatabaei Yazdi E Willig A Pawlikowski K Shortening orphan time in IEEE 802.15.4: what can be gained 2013 19th IEEE International Conference on Networks (ICON) Singapore 2013 1 6Park, T. R., Kim, T. H., Choi, J. Y., Choi, S., & Kwon, W. H. (2005). Throughput and energy consumption analysis of IEEE 802.15.4 slotted CSMA∕CA. Electronics Letters, 41(18), 1017. doi:10.1049/el:20051662Bianchi, G. (2000). Performance analysis of the IEEE 802.11 distributed coordination function. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 18(3), 535-547. doi:10.1109/49.840210IEEE Computer Society LAN MAN Standards Committee Wireless LAN medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specifications 1997Pollin, S., Ergen, M., Ergen, S. C., Bougard, B., Der Perre, L. V., Moerman, I., … Catthoor, F. (2008). Performance Analysis of Slotted Carrier Sense IEEE 802.15.4 Medium Access Layer. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 7(9), 3359-3371. doi:10.1109/twc.2008.060057Xinhua Ling, Yu Cheng, Mark, J. W., & Xuemin Shen. (2008). A Renewal Theory Based Analytical Model for the Contention Access Period of IEEE 802.15.4 MAC. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 7(6), 2340-2349. doi:10.1109/twc.2008.070048Lee, C. Y., Cho, H. I., Hwang, G. U., Doh, Y., & Park, N. (2011). Performance modeling and analysis of IEEE 802.15.4 slotted CSMA/CA protocol with ACK mode. AEU - International Journal of Electronics and Communications, 65(2), 123-131. doi:10.1016/j.aeue.2010.02.007Wang, F., Zhao, Y., & Li, D. (2011). Analysis of CSMA/CA in IEEE 802.15.4. IET Communications, 5(15), 2187-2195. doi:10.1049/iet-com.2010.1007Zhu, J., Tao, Z., & Lv, C. (2011). Performance Evaluation of IEEE 802.15.4 CSMA/CA Scheme Adopting a Modified LIB Model. Wireless Personal Communications, 65(1), 25-51. doi:10.1007/s11277-011-0226-6Shu F Sakurai T Analysis of an energy conserving CSMA-CA GLOBECOM Washington DC, U.S. 2007 2536 2540Shu, F., & Sakurai, T. (2011). A new analytical model for the IEEE 802.15.4 CSMA-CA protocol. Computer Networks, 55(11), 2576-2591. doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2011.04.017Cano-Garcia, J. M., & Casilari, E. (2011). An empirical evaluation of the consumption of 802.15.4/ZigBee sensor motes in noisy environments. 2011 International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control. doi:10.1109/icnsc.2011.5874886Baz, M., Mitchell, P. D., & Pearce, D. A. J. (2013). Versatile Analytical Model for Delay and Energy Evaluation in WPANs: A Case Study for IEEE 802.15.4 CSMA-CA. Wireless Personal Communications, 75(1), 415-445. doi:10.1007/s11277-013-1370-yLiu Q Czylwik A A priority-based adaptive service differentiation scheme for IEEE 802.15.4 sensor networks Proceedings of European Wireless 2014; 20th European Wireless Conference Barcelona, Spain 2014 1 6Golmie, N., Cypher, D., & Rebala, O. (s. f.). Performance evaluation of low rate WPANs for medical applications. IEEE MILCOM 2004. Military Communications Conference, 2004. doi:10.1109/milcom.2004.1494952Misic, J., Misic, V. B., & Shafi, S. (s. f.). Performance of IEEE 802.15.4 beacon enabled PAN with uplink transmissions in non-saturation mode - access delay for finite buffers. First International Conference on Broadband Networks. doi:10.1109/broadnets.2004.61Mišić, J., Shafi, S., & Mišić, V. B. (2005). The impact of MAC parameters on the performance of 802.15.4 PAN. Ad Hoc Networks, 3(5), 509-528. doi:10.1016/j.adhoc.2004.08.002Anastasi, G., Conti, M., & Di Francesco, M. (2011). A Comprehensive Analysis of the MAC Unreliability Problem in IEEE 802.15.4 Wireless Sensor Networks. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 7(1), 52-65. doi:10.1109/tii.2010.2085440Lee, B.-H., Al Rasyid, M. U. H., & Wu, H.-K. (2012). Analysis of superframe adjustment and beacon transmission for IEEE 802.15.4 cluster tree networks. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2012(1). doi:10.1186/1687-1499-2012-219Zimmerling, M., Ferrari, F., Mottola, L., Voigt, T., & Thiele, L. (2012). pTunes. Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks - IPSN ’12. doi:10.1145/2185677.2185730Rohm, D., Goyal, M., Hosseini, H., Divjak, A., & Bashir, Y. (2009). Configuring Beaconless IEEE 802.15.4 Networks Under Different Traffic Loads. 2009 International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications. doi:10.1109/aina.2009.84Jin-Shyan Lee. (2006). Performance evaluation of IEEE 802.15.4 for low-rate wireless personal area networks. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 52(3), 742-749. doi:10.1109/tce.2006.1706465De Paz Alberola, R., & Pesch, D. (2012). Duty cycle learning algorithm (DCLA) for IEEE 802.15.4 beacon-enabled wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 10(4), 664-679. doi:10.1016/j.adhoc.2011.06.006Barbieri, A., Chiti, F., & Fantacci, R. (2006). WSN17-2: Proposal of an Adaptive MAC Protocol for Efficient IEEE 802.15.4 Low Power Communications. IEEE Globecom 2006. doi:10.1109/glocom.2006.989Jeon, J., Lee, J. W., Ha, J. Y., & Kwon, W. H. (2007). DCA: Duty-Cycle Adaptation Algorithm for IEEE 802.15.4 Beacon-Enabled Networks. 2007 IEEE 65th Vehicular Technology Conference - VTC2007-Spring. doi:10.1109/vetecs.2007.35Kang, M., Chong, J., Hyun, H., Kim, S., Jung, B., & Sung, D. (2007). Adaptive Interference-Aware Multi-Channel Clustering Algorithm in a ZigBee Network in the Presence of WLAN Interference. 2007 2nd International Symposium on Wireless Pervasive Computing. doi:10.1109/iswpc.2007.342601Yi, P., Iwayemi, A., & Zhou, C. (2011). Developing ZigBee Deployment Guideline Under WiFi Interference for Smart Grid Applications. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2(1), 110-120. doi:10.1109/tsg.2010.2091655Tang, L., Wang, K.-C., Huang, Y., & Gu, F. (2007). Channel Characterization and Link Quality Assessment of IEEE 802.15.4-Compliant Radio for Factory Environments. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 3(2), 99-110. doi:10.1109/tii.2007.898414Sha M Xing G Zhou G Liu S Wang X C-MAC: model-driven concurrent medium access control for wireless sensor networks IEEE INFOCOM 2009 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 2009 1845 1853 10.1109/INFCOM.2009.5062105Peizhong Yi, Iwayemi, A., & Chi Zhou. (2010). Frequency agility in a ZigBee network for smart grid application. 2010 Innovative Smart Grid Technologies (ISGT). doi:10.1109/isgt.2010.5434747Torabi N Wong W Leung VCM A robust coexistence scheme for IEEE 802.15.4 wireless personal area networks IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (CCNC) Las Vegas, U.S. 2011 1031 1035 10.1109/CCNC.2011.5766322IEEE standard for local and metropolitan area networks - part 15.6: wireless body area networks IEEE Std 802.15.6-2012 2012 1 271 10.1109/IEEESTD.2012.6161600Kim, S., Kim, S., Kim, J.-W., & Eom, D.-S. (2012). Flexible beacon scheduling scheme for interference mitigation in body sensor networks. 2012 9th Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks (SECON). doi:10.1109/secon.2012.6275772Bradai N Fourati LC Kamoun L Performance analysis of medium access control protocol for wireless body area networks 27th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops (WAINA) Barcelona, Spain 2013 916 921Moravejosharieh A Yazdi ET Study of resource utilization in IEEE 802.15.4 wireless body sensor network, part I: the need for enhancement IEEE 16th International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering (CSE) Sydney, Australia 2013 1226 1231Moravejosharieh A Yazdi ET Willig A Study of resource utilization in IEEE 802.15.4 wireless body sensor network, part II: greedy channel utilization 19th IEEE International Conference on Networks (ICON) Singapore 2013 1 6Moravejosharieh A Yazdi E Willig A Pawlikowski K Adaptive channel utilisation in IEEE 802.15.4 wireless body sensor networks: continuous hopping approach Australasian Telecommunication Networks and Applications Conference (ATNAC) Melbourne, Australia 2014 93 98 10.1109/ATNAC.2014.7020880Moravejosharieh, A. H. (2015). Frequency-Adaptive Approach In IEEE 802.15.4 Wireless Body Sensor Networks: Continuous-Assessment or Periodic-Assessment? International Journal of Information, Communication Technology and Applications, 1(1), 19. doi:10.17972/ajicta2015113Moravejosharieh A Yazdi E Pawlikowski K Sirisena H Adaptive channel utilisation in IEEE 802.15.4 wireless body sensor networks: adaptive phase-shifting approach International Telecommunication Networks and Applications Conference (ITNAC) Sydney, Australia 2015 93 98Bian, K., Park, J.-M., & Gao, B. (2014). Channel Assignment for Multi-hop Cognitive Radio Networks. Cognitive Radio Networks, 101-116. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-07329-3_6Bian, K., Park, J.-M., & Gao, B. (2014). Coexistence-Aware Spectrum Sharing for Homogeneous Cognitive Radio Networks. Cognitive Radio Networks, 61-75. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-07329-3_4Wu C Yan H Huo H A multi-channel MAC protocol design based on IEEE 802.15.4 standard in industry 2012 10th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN) Beijing, China 2012 1206 1211 10.1109/INDIN.2012.6300916Incel, O. D. (2011). A survey on multi-channel communication in wireless sensor networks. Computer Networks, 55(13), 3081-3099. doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2011.05.020Kim Y Shin H Cha H Y-MAC: an energy-efficient multi-channel MAC protocol for dense wireless sensor networks Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks IPSN '08 St. Louis MO, U.S. 2008 53 63Demirkol, I., Ersoy, C., & Alagoz, F. (2006). MAC protocols for wireless sensor networks: a survey. IEEE Communications Magazine, 44(4), 115-121. doi:10.1109/mcom.2006.1632658Wykret T Correia L Macedo D Giacomin J Andrade L Evaluation and avoidance of interference in WSN: a multi-radio node prototype using dynamic spectrum allocation IFIP Wireless Days (WD) Valencia, Spain 2013 1 3 10.1109/WD.2013.6686533Doyle L Sutton P Nolan K Lotze J Ozgul B Rondeau T Fahmy S Lahlou H DaSilva L Experiences from the IRIS testbed in dynamic spectrum access and cognitive radio experimentation IEEE Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Singapore 2010 1 8 10.1109/DYSPAN.2010.5457835Ansari, J., Zhang, X., & Mahonen, P. (2010). Multi-radio medium access control protocol for wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Sensor Networks, 8(1), 47. doi:10.1504/ijsnet.2010.034066Liu Z Wu W A dynamic multi-radio multi-channel MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks 2nd International Conference on Communication Software and Networks (ICCSN) Singapore 2010 105 109Xu, W., Trappe, W., & Zhang, Y. (2008). Defending wireless sensor networks from radio interference through channel adaptation. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks, 4(4), 1-34. doi:10.1145/1387663.1387664Kim Y Shin H Cha H Y-MAC: an energy-efficient multi-channel MAC protocol for dense wireless sensor networks Proceedings of the 7th IEEE Computer Society International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks IPSN '08 Washington, DC, USA 2008 53 63Tae Hyun Kim, Jae Yeol Ha, & Sunghyun Choi. (2009). Improving Spectral and Temporal Efficiency of Collocated IEEE 802.15.4 LR-WPANs. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 8(12), 1596-1609. doi:10.1109/tmc.2009.85Chowdhury, K. R., Nandiraju, N., Chanda, P., Agrawal, D. P., & Zeng, Q.-A. (2009). Channel allocation and medium access control for wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 7(2), 307-321. doi:10.1016/j.adhoc.2008.03.004Deylami, M., & Jovanov, E. (2012). A distributed and collaborative scheme for mitigating coexistence in IEEE 802.15.4 based WBANs. Proceedings of the 50th Annual Southeast Regional Conference on - ACM-SE ’12. doi:10.1145/2184512.2184514Deylami, M. N., & Jovanov, E. (2014). A Distributed Scheme to Manage The Dynamic Coexistence of IEEE 802.15.4-Based Health-Monitoring WBANs. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 18(1), 327-334. doi:10.1109/jbhi.2013.2278217Deylami M Jovanov E An implementation of a distributed scheme for managing the dynamic coexistence of wireless body area networks Southeastcon, 2013 Proceedings of IEEE Jacksonville, U.S. 2013 1 6 10.1109/SECON.2013.6567446Cavallari, R., Martelli, F., Rosini, R., Buratti, C., & Verdone, R. (2014). A Survey on Wireless Body Area Networks: Technologies and Design Challenges. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 16(3), 1635-1657. doi:10.1109/surv.2014.012214.00007Chen, M., Gonzalez, S., Vasilakos, A., Cao, H., & Leung, V. C. M. (2010). Body Area Networks: A Survey. Mobile Networks and Applications, 16(2), 171-193. doi:10.1007/s11036-010-0260-8Movassaghi, S., Abolhasan, M., Lipman, J., Smith, D., & Jamalipour, A. (2014). Wireless Body Area Networks: A Survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 16(3), 1658-1686. doi:10.1109/surv.2013.121313.00064Patel, M., & Wang, J. (2010). Applications, challenges, and prospective in emerging body area networking technologies. IEEE Wireless Communications, 17(1), 80-88. doi:10.1109/mwc.2010.5416354ULLAH, S., KHAN, P., ULLAH, N., SALEEM, S., HIGGINS, H., & Sup KWAK, K. (2009). A Review of Wireless Body Area Networks for Medical Applications. International Journal of Communications, Network and System Sciences, 02(08), 797-803. doi:10.4236/ijcns.2009.28093Boulis, A., Smith, D., Miniutti, D., Libman, L., & Tselishchev, Y. (2012). Challenges in body area networks for healthcare: the MAC. IEEE Communications Magazine, 50(5), 100-106. doi:10.1109/mcom.2012.6194389Pantelopoulos A Bourbakis N A survey on wearable biosensor systems for health monitoring 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Vancouver, Canada 2008 4887 4890 10.1109/IEMBS.2008.4650309Takei, K., Honda, W., Harada, S., Arie, T., & Akita, S. (2014). Toward Flexible and Wearable Human-Interactive Health-Monitoring Devices. Advanced Healthcare Materials, 4(4), 487-500. doi:10.1002/adhm.201400546Caldeira, J. M. L. P., Rodrigues, J. J. P. C., & Lorenz, P. (2013). Intra-Mobility Support Solutions for Healthcare Wireless Sensor Networks–Handover Issues. IEEE Sensors Journal, 13(11), 4339-4348. doi:10.1109/jsen.2013.2267729Carrano, R. C., Passos, D., Magalhaes, L. C. S., & Albuquerque, C. V. N. (2014). Survey and Taxonomy of Duty Cycling Mechanisms in Wireless Sensor Networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 16(1), 181-194. doi:10.1109/surv.2013.052213.00116Sudevalayam, S., & Kulkarni, P. (2011). Energy Harvesting Sensor Nodes: Survey and Implications. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 13(3), 443-461. doi:10.1109/surv.2011.060710.00094Khanafer, M., Guennoun, M., & Mouftah, H. T. (2014). A Survey of Beacon-Enabled IEEE 802.15.4 MAC Protocols in Wireless Sensor Networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 16(2), 856-876. doi:10.1

Improving sensor network robustness with multi-channel convergecast

Intenerg

A critical analysis of research potential, challenges and future directives in industrial wireless sensor networks

In recent years, Industrial Wireless Sensor Networks (IWSNs) have emerged as an important research theme with applications spanning a wide range of industries including automation, monitoring, process control, feedback systems and automotive. Wide scope of IWSNs applications ranging from small production units, large oil and gas industries to nuclear fission control, enables a fast-paced research in this field. Though IWSNs offer advantages of low cost, flexibility, scalability, self-healing, easy deployment and reformation, yet they pose certain limitations on available potential and introduce challenges on multiple fronts due to their susceptibility to highly complex and uncertain industrial environments. In this paper a detailed discussion on design objectives, challenges and solutions, for IWSNs, are presented. A careful evaluation of industrial systems, deadlines and possible hazards in industrial atmosphere are discussed. The paper also presents a thorough review of the existing standards and industrial protocols and gives a critical evaluation of potential of these standards and protocols along with a detailed discussion on available hardware platforms, specific industrial energy harvesting techniques and their capabilities. The paper lists main service providers for IWSNs solutions and gives insight of future trends and research gaps in the field of IWSNs

Portability, compatibility and reuse of MAC protocols across different IoT radio platforms

To cope with the diversity of Internet of Things (loT) requirements, a large number of Medium Access Control (MAC) protocols have been proposed in scientific literature, many of which are designed for specific application domains. However, for most of these MAC protocols, no multi-platform software implementation is available. In fact, the path from conceptual MAC protocol proposed in theoretical papers, towards an actual working implementation is rife with pitfalls. (i) A first problem is the timing bugs, frequently encountered in MAC implementations. (ii) Furthermore, once implemented, many MAC protocols are strongly optimized for specific hardware, thereby limiting the potential of software reuse or modifications. (iii) Finally, in real-life conditions, the performance of the MAC protocol varies strongly depending on the actual underlying radio chip. As a result, the same MAC protocol implementation acts differently per platform, resulting in unpredictable/asymmetrical behavior when multiple platforms are combined in the same network. This paper describes in detail the challenges related to multi-platform MAC development, and experimentally quantifies how the above issues impact the MAC protocol performance when running MAC protocols on multiple radio chips. Finally, an overall methodology is proposed to avoid the previously mentioned cross-platform compatibility issues. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved

PluralisMAC: a generic multi-MAC framework for heterogeneous, multiservice wireless networks, applied to smart containers

Developing energy-efficient MAC protocols for lightweight wireless systems has been a challenging task for decades because of the specific requirements of various applications and the varying environments in which wireless systems are deployed. Many MAC protocols for wireless networks have been proposed, often custom-made for a specific application. It is clear that one MAC does not fit all the requirements. So, how should a MAC layer deal with an application that has several modes (each with different requirements) or with the deployment of another application during the lifetime of the system? Especially in a mobile wireless system, like Smart Monitoring of Containers, we cannot know in advance the application state (empty container versus stuffed container). Dynamic switching between different energy-efficient MAC strategies is needed. Our architecture, called PluralisMAC, contains a generic multi-MAC framework and a generic neighbour monitoring and filtering framework. To validate the real-world feasibility of our architecture, we have implemented it in TinyOS and have done experiments on the TMote Sky nodes in the w-iLab.t testbed. Experimental results show that dynamic switching between MAC strategies is possible with minimal receive chain overhead, while meeting the various application requirements (reliability and low-energy consumption)

Common security issues and challenges in wireless sensor networks and IEEE 802.11 wireless mesh networks

Both Wireless Mesh Network (WMN) and Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) are multi-hop wireless networks. WMN is an emerging community based integrated broadband wireless network which ensures high bandwidth ubiquitous internet provision to users, while, WSN is application specific and ensures large scale real-time data processing in complex environment. Both these wireless networks have some common vulnerable features which may increase the chances of different sorts of security attacks. Wireless sensor nodes have computation, memory and power limitations, which do not allow for implementation of complex security mechanism. In this paper, we discuss the common limitations and vulnerable features of WMN and WSN, along with the associated security threats and possible countermeasures. We also propose security mechanisms keeping in view the architecture and limitations of both. This article will serve as a baseline guide for the new researchers who are concern with the security aspects of WMN and WSN

Wireless industrial monitoring and control networks: the journey so far and the road ahead

While traditional wired communication technologies have played a crucial role in industrial monitoring and control networks over the past few decades, they are increasingly proving to be inadequate to meet the highly dynamic and stringent demands of today’s industrial applications, primarily due to the very rigid nature of wired infrastructures. Wireless technology, however, through its increased pervasiveness, has the potential to revolutionize the industry, not only by mitigating the problems faced by wired solutions, but also by introducing a completely new class of applications. While present day wireless technologies made some preliminary inroads in the monitoring domain, they still have severe limitations especially when real-time, reliable distributed control operations are concerned. This article provides the reader with an overview of existing wireless technologies commonly used in the monitoring and control industry. It highlights the pros and cons of each technology and assesses the degree to which each technology is able to meet the stringent demands of industrial monitoring and control networks. Additionally, it summarizes mechanisms proposed by academia, especially serving critical applications by addressing the real-time and reliability requirements of industrial process automation. The article also describes certain key research problems from the physical layer communication for sensor networks and the wireless networking perspective that have yet to be addressed to allow the successful use of wireless technologies in industrial monitoring and control networks

Adaptive Duty Cycling MAC Protocols Using Closed-Loop Control for Wireless Sensor Networks

The fundamental design goal of wireless sensor MAC protocols is to minimize unnecessary power consumption of the sensor nodes, because of its stringent resource constraints and ultra-power limitation. In existing MAC protocols in wireless sensor networks (WSNs), duty cycling, in which each node periodically cycles between the active and sleep states, has been introduced to reduce unnecessary energy consumption. Existing MAC schemes, however, use a fixed duty cycling regardless of multi-hop communication and traffic fluctuations. On the other hand, there is a tradeoff between energy efficiency and delay caused by duty cycling mechanism in multi-hop communication and existing MAC approaches only tend to improve energy efficiency with sacrificing data delivery delay. In this paper, we propose two different MAC schemes (ADS-MAC and ELA-MAC) using closed-loop control in order to achieve both energy savings and minimal delay in wireless sensor networks. The two proposed MAC schemes, which are synchronous and asynchronous approaches, respectively, utilize an adaptive timer and a successive preload frame with closed-loop control for adaptive duty cycling. As a result, the analysis and the simulation results show that our schemes outperform existing schemes in terms of energy efficiency and delivery delay

Wireless model-based predictive networked control system over cooperative wireless network

Owing to their distributed architecture, networked control systems (NCSs) are proven to be feasible in scenarios where a spatially distributed feedback control system is required. Traditionally, such NCSs operate over real-time wired networks. Recently, in order to achieve the utmost flexibility, scalability, ease of deployment, and maintainability, wireless networks such as IEEE 802.11 wireless local area networks (LANs) are being preferred over dedicated wired networks. However, conventional NCSs with event-triggered controllers and actuators cannot operate over such general purpose wireless networks since the stability of the system is compromised due to unbounded delays and unpredictable packet losses that are typical in the wireless medium. Approaching the wireless networked control problem from two perspectives, this work introduces a practical wireless NCS and an implementation of a cooperative medium access control protocol that work jointly to achieve decent control under severe impairments, such as unbounded delay, bursts of packet loss and ambient wireless traffic. The proposed system is evaluated on a dedicated test platform under numerous scenarios and significant performance gains are observed, making cooperative communications a strong candidate for improving the reliability of industrial wireless networks