Violaciones graves a derechos humanos, reparación simbólica y medidas de satisfacción: una revisión

Serious violations of human rights (VGDH), and acts of sociopolitical violence, are devastating to those who suffer them, and profoundly impact the fabric and dynamics of social relations. It is for this reason that the Comprehensive Reparation of Injury (RID) is an extremely relevant and transcendent process, since it seeks to restore the rights and transform the living conditions of victims of violent events and violations of human rights, so that they restore the Realization of his life project; Within this process, symbolic reparation and measures of satisfaction, conform as the most sensitive and transcendent, since it allows establishing the bridge from the dignity (Guilis, s / a) moral and psychological damage. The processes of symbolic repair have individual and collective impact, so from their design they must establish participatory dialogues between them. The present realizes a first theoretical revision on these and its importance for the attention and psychosocial accompaniment of victims.Las violaciones graves de derechos humanos (VGDH), y los actos de violencia sociopolítica, resultan devastadores para las personas que los sufren, e impactan profundamente el tejido y la dinámica de relaciones sociales. Es por ello, que la reparación integral del daño (RID), es un proceso sumamente relevante y trascendente, ya que pretenden restituir los derechos y transformar las condiciones de vida de las víctimas de eventos violentos y violaciones a derechos humanos, para que restablezcan la realización de su proyecto de vida; dentro de este proceso, la reparación simbólica y las medidas de satisfacción, se conforman como las de mayor sensibilidad y trascendencia, ya que permite establecer el puente a partir de la dignidad (Guilis, s/a) el daño moral y el psicológico. Los procesos de reparación simbólica tienen impacto individual y colectivo, por lo que desde su diseño deben establecer dialécticas dialógicas participativas entre estos. El presente realiza una primera revisión teórica sobre estos y su trascendencia para la atención y acompañamiento psicosocial de víctimas

PERSPECTIVA PSICOSOCIAL DE LOS DERECHOS HUMANOS

Hoy en día es imprescindible abordar el problema de los derechos desde una perspectiva holística que integre la posición que el individuo ocupa en la sociedad y el impacto de los hechos sociales sobre su persona. Esta perspectiva va por lo tanto más allá del enfoque clásico de las violaciones a los derechos civiles y políticos de los ciudadanos sino, también incluye sus derechos económicos, sociales y culturales. Cualquier enfoque de tipo holístico debe entender al ser humano en su ambiente, social, cultural, natural y en función a todas las estructuras existentes, por más sutiles que sean o invisibles que parezcan. Precisamente este libro permite apreciar la dimensión amplia y compleja del ser en sociedad y las interacciones que de ambas partes se generan y las ramificaciones que producen. No es un ejercicio fácil y los editores de este volumen han logrado un salto cuántico al poder congregar en un solo espacio miradas que en otras circunstancias podrían haber sido opuestas y hasta contrarias a nuestra comprensión de problemas que, en efecto, tienen raíces comunes. El libro está dividido en 5 secciones, El espíritu de los tiempos actuales y los Derechos Humanos, Construcción ciudadana y ejercicio de los Derechos Humanos, Violaciones a Derechos Humanos, victimizaciones y su atención, Ejercicio de los Derechos Humanos y situaciones disruptivas y Defensa y defensores de Derechos Humanos.Manuel Gutiérrez Romero Jessica Ruiz Magañ

Violaciones graves a derechos humanos, reparación simbólica y medidas de satisfacción: una revisión

Serious violations of human rights (VGDH), and acts of sociopolitical violence, are devastating to those who suffer them, and profoundly impact the fabric and dynamics of social relations. It is for this reason that the Comprehensive Reparation of Injury (RID) is an extremely relevant and transcendent process, since it seeks to restore the rights and transform the living conditions of victims of violent events and violations of human rights, so that they restore the Realization of his life project; Within this process, symbolic reparation and measures of satisfaction, conform as the most sensitive and transcendent, since it allows establishing the bridge from the dignity (Guilis, s / a) moral and psychological damage. The processes of symbolic repair have individual and collective impact, so from their design they must establish participatory dialogues between them. The present realizes a first theoretical revision on these and its importance for the attention and psychosocial accompaniment of victims.Las violaciones graves de derechos humanos (VGDH), y los actos de violencia sociopolítica, resultan devastadores para las personas que los sufren, e impactan profundamente el tejido y la dinámica de relaciones sociales. Es por ello, que la reparación integral del daño (RID), es un proceso sumamente relevante y trascendente, ya que pretenden restituir los derechos y transformar las condiciones de vida de las víctimas de eventos violentos y violaciones a derechos humanos, para que restablezcan la realización de su proyecto de vida; dentro de este proceso, la reparación simbólica y las medidas de satisfacción, se conforman como las de mayor sensibilidad y trascendencia, ya que permite establecer el puente a partir de la dignidad (Guilis, s/a) el daño moral y el psicológico. Los procesos de reparación simbólica tienen impacto individual y colectivo, por lo que desde su diseño deben establecer dialécticas dialógicas participativas entre estos. El presente realiza una primera revisión teórica sobre estos y su trascendencia para la atención y acompañamiento psicosocial de víctimas

Pictavia Aurea

Este volumen, titulado Pictavia aurea, reúne 131 estudios que constituyen una granada muestra de los debates y las presentaciones en torno a la cultura hispánica del Siglo de Oro que entre los días 11 y 15 de julio de 2011 se dieron en la ciudad de Poitiers (Francia) en el marco del IX congreso de la Asociación Internacional “Siglo de Oro”. Auspiciada por la Universidad de Poitiers, a través del Centro de Estudios de la Literatura española de Entre Siglos (siglos xvii-xviii) (CELES XVII-XVIII) y el laboratorio «Formes et Représentations en Linguistique et Littérature» (FoReLL), la convocatoria reunió en la ciudad francesa a 276 participantes y a un centenar de asistentes en la novena edición del Congreso de la Asociación, que celebró entonces la efeméride del 450o aniversario del nacimiento de Luis de Góngora.A Isaías Lerner, maestro de la filología hispánic

Health-status outcomes with invasive or conservative care in coronary disease

BACKGROUND In the ISCHEMIA trial, an invasive strategy with angiographic assessment and revascularization did not reduce clinical events among patients with stable ischemic heart disease and moderate or severe ischemia. A secondary objective of the trial was to assess angina-related health status among these patients. METHODS We assessed angina-related symptoms, function, and quality of life with the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) at randomization, at months 1.5, 3, and 6, and every 6 months thereafter in participants who had been randomly assigned to an invasive treatment strategy (2295 participants) or a conservative strategy (2322). Mixed-effects cumulative probability models within a Bayesian framework were used to estimate differences between the treatment groups. The primary outcome of this health-status analysis was the SAQ summary score (scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health status). All analyses were performed in the overall population and according to baseline angina frequency. RESULTS At baseline, 35% of patients reported having no angina in the previous month. SAQ summary scores increased in both treatment groups, with increases at 3, 12, and 36 months that were 4.1 points (95% credible interval, 3.2 to 5.0), 4.2 points (95% credible interval, 3.3 to 5.1), and 2.9 points (95% credible interval, 2.2 to 3.7) higher with the invasive strategy than with the conservative strategy. Differences were larger among participants who had more frequent angina at baseline (8.5 vs. 0.1 points at 3 months and 5.3 vs. 1.2 points at 36 months among participants with daily or weekly angina as compared with no angina). CONCLUSIONS In the overall trial population with moderate or severe ischemia, which included 35% of participants without angina at baseline, patients randomly assigned to the invasive strategy had greater improvement in angina-related health status than those assigned to the conservative strategy. The modest mean differences favoring the invasive strategy in the overall group reflected minimal differences among asymptomatic patients and larger differences among patients who had had angina at baseline

Initial invasive or conservative strategy for stable coronary disease

BACKGROUND Among patients with stable coronary disease and moderate or severe ischemia, whether clinical outcomes are better in those who receive an invasive intervention plus medical therapy than in those who receive medical therapy alone is uncertain. METHODS We randomly assigned 5179 patients with moderate or severe ischemia to an initial invasive strategy (angiography and revascularization when feasible) and medical therapy or to an initial conservative strategy of medical therapy alone and angiography if medical therapy failed. The primary outcome was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, or hospitalization for unstable angina, heart failure, or resuscitated cardiac arrest. A key secondary outcome was death from cardiovascular causes or myocardial infarction. RESULTS Over a median of 3.2 years, 318 primary outcome events occurred in the invasive-strategy group and 352 occurred in the conservative-strategy group. At 6 months, the cumulative event rate was 5.3% in the invasive-strategy group and 3.4% in the conservative-strategy group (difference, 1.9 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8 to 3.0); at 5 years, the cumulative event rate was 16.4% and 18.2%, respectively (difference, 121.8 percentage points; 95% CI, 124.7 to 1.0). Results were similar with respect to the key secondary outcome. The incidence of the primary outcome was sensitive to the definition of myocardial infarction; a secondary analysis yielded more procedural myocardial infarctions of uncertain clinical importance. There were 145 deaths in the invasive-strategy group and 144 deaths in the conservative-strategy group (hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.32). CONCLUSIONS Among patients with stable coronary disease and moderate or severe ischemia, we did not find evidence that an initial invasive strategy, as compared with an initial conservative strategy, reduced the risk of ischemic cardiovascular events or death from any cause over a median of 3.2 years. The trial findings were sensitive to the definition of myocardial infarction that was used