49 research outputs found

    Dosimetry tools and techniques for IMRT

    Full text link
    Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/98734/1/MPH001313.pd

    De trieste bevrijding van Westbroek

    No full text
    Laatste reactie van de bezetter waarbij veel onschuldige inwoners van Achttienhoven en Westbroek om het leven kwame

    Café science for kids.

    No full text

    Café science for kids

    No full text

    HLA-DQ Typing Kits in Diagnosis and Screening for Celiac Disease

    No full text
    Aim: Celiac disease (CD) is strongly associated with HLA-DQ2.2, HLA-DQ2.5, and HLA-DQ8. Up to 99.7% of all CD patients are positive for either one or two of these genetic markers, demonstrating a high negative predictive value. This has led to the development of diagnostic kits that, instead of providing a full HLA-DQ typing, detect only these three HLA-DQ types. Our aim was to compare three different kits for their performance, utilization, and costs. Because 0.4-3.6% of all CD patients test positive for HLA-DQ7 and negative for the aforementioned types, information provided by the kits regarding DQ7 alpha and beta chains was evaluated as well. Materials and Methods: Fifty DNA samples previously typed with the SSCP method were analyzed using three commercial kits. Results and Discussion: All kits report hetero- or homozygosity for HLA-DQ2.5. The XeliGen kit directly detects HLA-DQ7, but is relatively expensive. The MLPA kit is the least expensive in terms of reagents and may indirectly detect HLA-DQ7. The CeliaSCAN kit is easy to use and provides indirect information about HLA-DQ7.5. Conclusion: All kits correctly identify the CD risk genes. The resources of the laboratory and the intended use should determine the preference for any of the HLA-DQ typing kits herein described
    corecore