BAREFOOT-, SHOD, PLATE AND INSOLE PRESSURE MEASUREMENT COMPARISONS DURING 4-4.5 m/s RUNNING IN RELATIONSHIPS TO LOWER LIMBS MOVEMENTS

In order to know the different between insole and ground pressure measurements, or which information is given by a pressure platform and which by an pressure insole system, We compare them for some specific parameters against the relationship of lower limbs movement. The methods we used are collected plantar pressure data from 30 males (in different conditions we controlled). A six-degrees of freedom, midfoot and forefoot segments along with motion of the tibia. Kinematic data (Qualisis, Sweden) was collected simultaneously with high speed pressure plate (footscan RSSCAN International, Belgium) data. At last we found Highly good correlation were found in the barefoot (heel and total foot, Figure 5) and shod data for the pressure plate (footscan). And the two different pressure measurement systems produce different results for the TIR. Et

Functional Outcome After Successful Internal Fixation Versus Salvage Arthroplasty of Patients With a Femoral Neck Fracture

Objectives: To determine patient independency, health-related and disease-specific quality of life (QOL), gait pattern, and muscle strength in patients after salvage arthroplasty for failed internal fixation of a femoral neck fracture. Design: Secondary cohort study to a randomized controlled trial. Setting: Multicenter trial in the Netherlands, including 14 academic and nonacademic hospitals. Patients: Patients after salvage arthroplasty for failed internal fixation of a femoral neck fracture were studied. A comparison was made with patients who healed uneventfully after internal fixation. Intervention: None (observatory study). Main Outcome Measurements: Patient characteristics, SF-12, and Western Ontario McMaster osteoarthritis index scores were collected. Gait parameters were measured using plantar pressure measurement. Maximum isometric forces of the hip muscles were measured using a handheld dynamome

Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke

Background  Aphasia is an acquired language impairment following brain damage that affects some or all language modalities: expression and understanding of speech, reading, and writing. Approximately one third of people who have a stroke experience aphasia.  Objectives  To assess the effects of speech and language therapy (SLT) for aphasia following stroke.  Search methods  We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched 9 September 2015), CENTRAL (2015, Issue 5) and other Cochrane Library Databases (CDSR, DARE, HTA, to 22 September 2015), MEDLINE (1946 to September 2015), EMBASE (1980 to September 2015), CINAHL (1982 to September 2015), AMED (1985 to September 2015), LLBA (1973 to September 2015), and SpeechBITE (2008 to September 2015). We also searched major trials registers for ongoing trials including ClinicalTrials.gov (to 21 September 2015), the Stroke Trials Registry (to 21 September 2015), Current Controlled Trials (to 22 September 2015), and WHO ICTRP (to 22 September 2015). In an effort to identify further published, unpublished, and ongoing trials we also handsearched theInternational Journal of Language and Communication Disorders(1969 to 2005) and reference lists of relevant articles, and we contacted academic institutions and other researchers. There were no language restrictions.  Selection criteria  Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing SLT (a formal intervention that aims to improve language and communication abilities, activity and participation) versus no SLT; social support or stimulation (an intervention that provides social support and communication stimulation but does not include targeted therapeutic interventions); or another SLT intervention (differing in duration, intensity, frequency, intervention methodology or theoretical approach).  Data collection and analysis  We independently extracted the data and assessed the quality of included trials. We sought missing data from investigators.  Main results  We included 57 RCTs (74 randomised comparisons) involving 3002 participants in this review (some appearing in more than one comparison). Twenty-seven randomised comparisons (1620 participants) assessed SLT versus no SLT; SLT resulted in clinically and statistically significant benefits to patients' functional communication (standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.28, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.06 to 0.49, P = 0.01), reading, writing, and expressive language, but (based on smaller numbers) benefits were not evident at follow-up. Nine randomised comparisons (447 participants) assessed SLT with social support and stimulation; meta-analyses found no evidence of a difference in functional communication, but more participants withdrew from social support interventions than SLT. Thirty-eight randomised comparisons (1242 participants) assessed two approaches to SLT. Functional communication was significantly better in people with aphasia that received therapy at a high intensity, high dose, or over a long duration compared to those that received therapy at a lower intensity, lower dose, or over a shorter period of time. The benefits of a high intensity or a high dose of SLT were confounded by a significantly higher dropout rate in these intervention groups. Generally, trials randomised small numbers of participants across a range of characteristics (age, time since stroke, and severity profiles), interventions, and outcomes.  Authors' conclusions  Our review provides evidence of the effectiveness of SLT for people with aphasia following stroke in terms of improved functional communication, reading, writing, and expressive language compared with no therapy. There is some indication that therapy at high intensity, high dose or over a longer period may be beneficial. HIgh-intensity and high dose interventions may not be acceptable to all

Constraint-induced Aphasia Therapy versus Intensive Semantic Treatment in Fluent Aphasia

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of two intensive therapy methods: Constraint- 4 Induced Aphasia Therapy (CIAT) and semantic therapy (BOX). Method: Nine patients with chronic fluent aphasia participated in a therapy programme 6 to establish behavioral treatment outcomes. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups (CIAT or BOX). Results: Intensive therapy significantly improved verbal communication. However, BOX 9 treatment showed a more pronounced improvement on two communication measures, namely on a standardized assessment for verbal communication, the Amsterdam Nijmegen Everyday Language Test (Blomert, Koster, & Kean, 1995) and on a subjective rating scale, the Communicative Effectiveness Index (Lomas et al., 1989). All 13 participants significantly improved on one (or more) subtests of the Aachen Aphasia Test (Graetz et al., 1992), an impairment-focused assessment. There was a treatment-specific effect. Therapy with BOX had a significant effect on language comprehension and on semantics, while of CIAT affected language production and phonology. Conclusion: The findings indicate that in patients with fluent aphasia (1) intensive treatment has a significant effect on language and verbal communication, (2) intensive therapy results in selective treatment effects and (3) an intensive semantic treatment shows a more striking mean improvement on verbal communication in comparison to communication-based CIAT-treatment

Smart living biomaterials : development of a mycelium-bacteria cocultivation platform to engineer material functionalities

During the last decade, there was a drastic transition towards a more circular and sustainable bio-economy. Nevertheless, evolving and innovative technology keeps raising expectations for developing all kinds of smart materials. This project addresses a development gap in biological materials to keep up with this trend and aims to exploit nature’s strategies that have been developing and optimising for millions of years to cope and interact with its environment, yielding a smart biological material. To this end, special interest grew in mycelium materials because of their robustness, versatility and rapid growth. The major advances in bacterial synthetic biology engineering will be exploited to use bacterial strains as a chassis for sensor-containing genetic circuits that render advanced functionalities to the mycelium material through cocultivation of both partners. This creates an opportunity to meet the expectations of both the biobased economy and innovative technology by creating an engineered living material (ELM), consisting of only biological compounds and being able to interact with its environment. Synthetic biology will be implemented to introduce bioswitches in the bacterial hosts that are activated by environmental cues of light, temperature or chemical compounds and render an advanced functionality to the material, either by direct activity (metabolite production) or indirect effects (influencing growth or morphology of the mycelium material). Various engineered living material (ELM) products will be developed, composed of a synthetic cocultivation consortium of a filamentous fungus and a bacterial strain, ranging from consumer goods to applications in the environmental or construction sector