48 research outputs found

    CIGB-300, a synthetic peptide-based drug that targets the CK2 phosphoaceptor domain. Translational and clinical research

    Get PDF
    CK2 represents an oncology target scientifically validated. However, clinical research with inhibitors of the CK2-mediated phosphorylation event is still insufficient to recognize it as a clinically validated target. CIGB-300, an investigational peptide-based drug that targets the phosphoaceptor site, binds to a CK2 substrate array in vitro but mainly to B23/nucleophosmin in vivo. The CIGB-300 proapoptotic effect is preceded by its nucleolar localization, inhibition of the CK2-mediated phosphorylation on B23/nucleophosmin and nucleolar disassembly. Importantly, CIGB-300 shifted a protein array linked to apoptosis, ribosome biogenesis, cell proliferation, glycolisis, and cell motility in proteomic studies which helped to understand its mechanism of action. In the clinical ground, CIGB-300 has proved to be safe and well tolerated in a First-in-Human trial in women with cervical malignancies who also experienced signs of clinical benefit. In a second Phase 1 clinical trial in women with cervical cancer stage IB2/II, the MTD and DLT have been also identified in the clinical setting. Interestingly, in cervical tumors the B23/nucleophosmin protein levels were significantly reduced after CIGB-300 treatment at the nucleus compartment. In addition, expanded use of CIGB-300 in case studies has evidenced antitumor activity when administered as compassional option. Collectively, our data outline important clues on translational and clinical research from this novel peptide-based drug reinforcing its perspectives to treat cancer and paving the way to validate CK2 as a promising target in oncology.Fil: Perea, Silvio E.. Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology; CubaFil: Baladron, Idania. Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology; CubaFil: Garcia, Yanelda. Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology; CubaFil: Perera, Yasser. Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology; CubaFil: Lopez, Adlin. Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology; CubaFil: Soriano, Jorge L.. Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology; Cuba. General Hospital ‘‘Hermanos Ameijeiras’; CubaFil: Batista, Noyde. Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology; Cuba. General Hospital ‘‘Hermanos Ameijeiras’; CubaFil: Palau, Aley. Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology; Cuba. General Hospital ‘‘Hermanos Ameijeiras’; CubaFil: HernĂĄndez, Ignacio. Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology; CubaFil: Farina, HernĂĄn Gabriel. Universidad Nacional de Quilmes; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones CientĂ­ficas y TĂ©cnicas; ArgentinaFil: Garcia, Idrian. Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology; CubaFil: Gonzalez, Lidia. Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology; CubaFil: Gil, Jeovanis. Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology; CubaFil: Rodriguez, Arielis. Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology; CubaFil: Solares, Margarita. Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology; CubaFil: Santana, Agueda. Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology; CubaFil: Cruz, Marisol. Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology; CubaFil: Lopez, Matilde. Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology; CubaFil: Valenzuela, Carmen. Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology; CubaFil: Reyes, Osvaldo. Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology; CubaFil: LĂłpez Saura, Pedro A.. Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology; CubaFil: GonzĂĄlez, Carlos A.. Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology; CubaFil: Diaz, Alina. Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology; CubaFil: Castellanos, Lila. Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology; CubaFil: Sanchez, Aniel. Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology; CubaFil: Betancourt, Lazaro. Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology; CubaFil: Besada, Vladimir. Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology; CubaFil: GonzĂĄlez, Luis J.. Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology; CubaFil: Garay, Hilda. Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology; CubaFil: GĂłmez, Roberto. Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology; CubaFil: Gomez, Daniel Eduardo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones CientĂ­ficas y TĂ©cnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Quilmes; ArgentinaFil: Alonso, Daniel Fernando. Universidad Nacional de Quilmes; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones CientĂ­ficas y TĂ©cnicas; ArgentinaFil: Perrin, Phillipe. No especifĂ­ca;Fil: Renualt, Jean Yves. No especifĂ­ca;Fil: Sigman, Hugo. No especifĂ­ca;Fil: Herrera, Luis. Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology; CubaFil: Acevedo, Boris. Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology; Cub

    Physicochemical and biological characterization of 1E10 Anti-Idiotype vaccine

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>1E10 monoclonal antibody is a murine anti-idiotypic antibody that mimics N-glycolyl-GM3 gangliosides. This antibody has been tested as an anti-idiotypic cancer vaccine, adjuvated in Al(OH)<sub>3</sub>, in several clinical trials for melanoma, breast, and lung cancer. During early clinical development this mAb was obtained <it>in vivo </it>from mice ascites fluid. Currently, the production process of 1E10 is being transferred from the <it>in vivo </it>to a bioreactor-based method.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Here, we present a comprehensive molecular and immunological characterization of 1E10 produced by the two different production processes in order to determine the impact of the manufacturing process in vaccine performance. We observed differences in glycosylation pattern, charge heterogeneity and structural stability between <it>in vivo</it>-produced 1E10 and bioreactor-obtained 1E10. Interestingly, these modifications had no significant impact on the immune responses elicited in two different animal models.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Changes in 1E10 primary structure like glycosylation; asparagine deamidation and oxidation affected 1E10 structural stability but did not affect the immune response elicited in mice and chickens when compared to 1E10 produced in mice.</p

    Albiglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease (Harmony Outcomes): a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial

    Get PDF
    Background: Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists differ in chemical structure, duration of action, and in their effects on clinical outcomes. The cardiovascular effects of once-weekly albiglutide in type 2 diabetes are unknown. We aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of albiglutide in preventing cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Methods: We did a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial in 610 sites across 28 countries. We randomly assigned patients aged 40 years and older with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease (at a 1:1 ratio) to groups that either received a subcutaneous injection of albiglutide (30–50 mg, based on glycaemic response and tolerability) or of a matched volume of placebo once a week, in addition to their standard care. Investigators used an interactive voice or web response system to obtain treatment assignment, and patients and all study investigators were masked to their treatment allocation. We hypothesised that albiglutide would be non-inferior to placebo for the primary outcome of the first occurrence of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke, which was assessed in the intention-to-treat population. If non-inferiority was confirmed by an upper limit of the 95% CI for a hazard ratio of less than 1·30, closed testing for superiority was prespecified. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02465515. Findings: Patients were screened between July 1, 2015, and Nov 24, 2016. 10 793 patients were screened and 9463 participants were enrolled and randomly assigned to groups: 4731 patients were assigned to receive albiglutide and 4732 patients to receive placebo. On Nov 8, 2017, it was determined that 611 primary endpoints and a median follow-up of at least 1·5 years had accrued, and participants returned for a final visit and discontinuation from study treatment; the last patient visit was on March 12, 2018. These 9463 patients, the intention-to-treat population, were evaluated for a median duration of 1·6 years and were assessed for the primary outcome. The primary composite outcome occurred in 338 (7%) of 4731 patients at an incidence rate of 4·6 events per 100 person-years in the albiglutide group and in 428 (9%) of 4732 patients at an incidence rate of 5·9 events per 100 person-years in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·78, 95% CI 0·68–0·90), which indicated that albiglutide was superior to placebo (p&lt;0·0001 for non-inferiority; p=0·0006 for superiority). The incidence of acute pancreatitis (ten patients in the albiglutide group and seven patients in the placebo group), pancreatic cancer (six patients in the albiglutide group and five patients in the placebo group), medullary thyroid carcinoma (zero patients in both groups), and other serious adverse events did not differ between the two groups. There were three (&lt;1%) deaths in the placebo group that were assessed by investigators, who were masked to study drug assignment, to be treatment-related and two (&lt;1%) deaths in the albiglutide group. Interpretation: In patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease, albiglutide was superior to placebo with respect to major adverse cardiovascular events. Evidence-based glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists should therefore be considered as part of a comprehensive strategy to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes. Funding: GlaxoSmithKline

    Design and baseline characteristics of the finerenone in reducing cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in diabetic kidney disease trial

    Get PDF
    Background: Among people with diabetes, those with kidney disease have exceptionally high rates of cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality and progression of their underlying kidney disease. Finerenone is a novel, nonsteroidal, selective mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist that has shown to reduce albuminuria in type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) while revealing only a low risk of hyperkalemia. However, the effect of finerenone on CV and renal outcomes has not yet been investigated in long-term trials. Patients and Methods: The Finerenone in Reducing CV Mortality and Morbidity in Diabetic Kidney Disease (FIGARO-DKD) trial aims to assess the efficacy and safety of finerenone compared to placebo at reducing clinically important CV and renal outcomes in T2D patients with CKD. FIGARO-DKD is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, event-driven trial running in 47 countries with an expected duration of approximately 6 years. FIGARO-DKD randomized 7,437 patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate >= 25 mL/min/1.73 m(2) and albuminuria (urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio >= 30 to <= 5,000 mg/g). The study has at least 90% power to detect a 20% reduction in the risk of the primary outcome (overall two-sided significance level alpha = 0.05), the composite of time to first occurrence of CV death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or hospitalization for heart failure. Conclusions: FIGARO-DKD will determine whether an optimally treated cohort of T2D patients with CKD at high risk of CV and renal events will experience cardiorenal benefits with the addition of finerenone to their treatment regimen. Trial Registration: EudraCT number: 2015-000950-39; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02545049

    Omecamtiv mecarbil in chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, GALACTIC‐HF: baseline characteristics and comparison with contemporary clinical trials

    Get PDF
    Aims: The safety and efficacy of the novel selective cardiac myosin activator, omecamtiv mecarbil, in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is tested in the Global Approach to Lowering Adverse Cardiac outcomes Through Improving Contractility in Heart Failure (GALACTIC‐HF) trial. Here we describe the baseline characteristics of participants in GALACTIC‐HF and how these compare with other contemporary trials. Methods and Results: Adults with established HFrEF, New York Heart Association functional class (NYHA) ≄ II, EF ≀35%, elevated natriuretic peptides and either current hospitalization for HF or history of hospitalization/ emergency department visit for HF within a year were randomized to either placebo or omecamtiv mecarbil (pharmacokinetic‐guided dosing: 25, 37.5 or 50 mg bid). 8256 patients [male (79%), non‐white (22%), mean age 65 years] were enrolled with a mean EF 27%, ischemic etiology in 54%, NYHA II 53% and III/IV 47%, and median NT‐proBNP 1971 pg/mL. HF therapies at baseline were among the most effectively employed in contemporary HF trials. GALACTIC‐HF randomized patients representative of recent HF registries and trials with substantial numbers of patients also having characteristics understudied in previous trials including more from North America (n = 1386), enrolled as inpatients (n = 2084), systolic blood pressure &lt; 100 mmHg (n = 1127), estimated glomerular filtration rate &lt; 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 (n = 528), and treated with sacubitril‐valsartan at baseline (n = 1594). Conclusions: GALACTIC‐HF enrolled a well‐treated, high‐risk population from both inpatient and outpatient settings, which will provide a definitive evaluation of the efficacy and safety of this novel therapy, as well as informing its potential future implementation

    REPORTE CORTO / SHORT REPORT - A PROGRAM TO AID THE INTERPRETATION OF THE MS/MS SPECTRA OF PEPTIDES

    No full text
    The combination of Collision Activated Decomposition (CAD) and linked-scan measurement has demonstrated its utility for sequencing unknown and chemically modified peptides. Various computer algorithms has been described in order to aid the peptide sequencing but few of them behave well for peptides with molecular weight over 1 000. Our algorithm based on the graphos theory was modified on to obtain faster and reliable results of the "N" sequences with the best scores. To compare it we used a computer with lower performances than the previous papers. The program needed less than 1 minute to analyze very complicated spectrum it can also differentiate two isobaric amino acid such as Leu and Ile when the side chain fragmentation were observed in the spectrum

    ARTICULO DE REVISION / REVIEW ARTICLE - METODOS ESPECTROMETRICOS DE MASAS PARA EL ESTUDIO DE PROTEINAS

    No full text
    The development of new ionization methods has allowed the establishment of mass spectrometry as analytical tool for the characterization of biomolecules, becoming an essential technique for the detection of modified amino acids in natural and recombinant proteins. Besides, this technique constitute a promising alternative for peptide and protein sequencing. Here, we describe the development of this technique in the last 20 years and the most advanced equipments nowadays used for protein studies. RESUMEN El desarrollo de nuevos metodos de ionizacion ha permitido a la espectrometria de masas establecerse como tecnica de analisis de biomoleculas. Actualmente constituye una tecnica insustituible para la deteccion de aminoacidos modificados en proteinas naturales y recombinantes y una alternativa prometedora para la secuenciacion de peptidos y proteinas. En este trabajo se describe el desarrollo de esta tecnica en los ultimos 20 anos y la instrumentacion mas empleada actualmente para el estudio de proteinas. Desde la decada del 50, la espectrometria de masas (EM) era ya una reconocida herramienta en la elucidacion de estructuras de compuestos organicos(1), caracterizada por una alta exactitud en las mediciones y una alta sensibilidad. Sin embargo, hasta la decada del 80 la contribucion de esta tecnica a la elucidacion de la estructura primaria de las proteinas fue limitada(2, 3), pues aun para peptidos pequenos se requiere de una extensa derivacion (para conferirles volatilidad) y de sucesivos pasos de extraccion o purificacion del derivado. Estas razones, hicieron impracticable esta tecnica como via para la secuenciacion de proteinas de forma rutinaria. En los ultimos anos se han logrado dos avances importantes que permiten la aplicacion progresiva de la espectrometria de masas a las biomoleculas y en particular a las proteinas. En primer lugar, el diseno de novedosos metodos de ionizacion y en segundo lugar, la introduccion de mejoras tecnologicas en los analizadores ya existentes

    Linear polymerization of a synthetic peptide of the V3 region from HIV-1 JY1 isolate using acetamidomethyl-protected thiol groups of cysteine residues

    No full text
    A method to carry out the linear polymerization of a synthetic peptide using acetamidomethyl (Acm)-protected thiol groups of cysteine residues, was developed. This polymer showed to be useful in the improvement of peptide immunogenicity. To achieve the polymerization, two Cys(Acm) residues were incorporated at both ends of the peptide. The model peptide contains B and T cell epitopes placed in tandem. The B cell epitope comprises 15 amino acids of the V3 region from HIV-1 JY1 isolate, and the helper T cell epitope belongs to the region 830-844 of the tetanus toxoid. The polymerization reaction consisted in an instant process of deprotection and oxidation of thiol groups at a high monomer concentration. This reaction proceeded quickly with about 80% of conversion. The monomer and the polymers were analyzed by gel filtration chromatography, reverse phase-high performance liquid chromatography, sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and mass spectrometry. The sera obtained from mice immunized with the monomer and the polymer variants were assayed against a conjugated BSA-JY1 peptide in an indirect ELISA. The highest titer values corresponded to the polymer variant (p &lt; 0.01). This result emphasizes that this strategy can be used to increase the immunogenicity of synthetic peptides in vaccines or therapeutics

    Mass spectrometric and kinetics characterization of modified species of Growth Hormone Releasing Hexapeptide generated under thermal stress in different pH and buffers

    No full text
    Growth Hormone Releasing Peptide-6 (GHRP-6) is a promising molecule (H-His1-D-Trp- Ala-Trp-D-Phe-Lys6-NH2) for the treatment of several diseases. Studies on the degradation pathways of this molecule under stressed conditions are needed to develop appropriate formulations. Degradation products (DPs) of GHRP-6, generated by heating in the dark at 60 °C with pH ranging from 3.0 to 8.0 and in presence of common buffers, were isolated by RP-HPLC and characterized by ESI-MS/MS. C-terminal deamidation of GHRP-6 was generated preferentially at pH 3.0 and 8.0. Hydrolysis and head-to-tail cyclization were favored at pH ranging from 6.0 to 7.0 in phosphate containing buffers. A DP with +12 Da molecular mass was presumably originated by the reaction with formaldehyde derived from some of the additives and/or elastomeric closures. Certain DPs derived from the acylation reaction of the tri- and di-carboxylic buffering species were favored at pH 3.0–6.0 and indicate that buffer components, including those “Generally Recognized as Safe”, may potentially introduce chemical modifications and product heterogeneity. Nano LC–MS/MS analysis revealed GHRP-6 was also detected as a low-abundance species with Trp oxidized to 5-hydroxy, kynurenine, and N-formylkynurenine. The kinetics for the formation of the major degradation products was also studied by RP-HPLC.Fil: Santana, HĂ©ctor. Center For Genetic Engineering And Biotechnology Havana; CubaFil: Espinosa, Luis Ariel. Center For Genetic Engineering And Biotechnology Havana; CubaFil: SĂĄnchez, Aniel. Center For Genetic Engineering And Biotechnology Havana; CubaFil: Bolaño Alvarez, Alain. Center For Genetic Engineering And Biotechnology Havana; Cuba. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones CientĂ­ficas y TĂ©cnicas. Centro CientĂ­fico TecnolĂłgico Conicet - CĂłrdoba. Centro de Investigaciones en QuĂ­mica BiolĂłgica de CĂłrdoba. Universidad Nacional de CĂłrdoba. Facultad de Ciencias QuĂ­micas. Centro de Investigaciones en QuĂ­mica BiolĂłgica de CĂłrdoba; ArgentinaFil: Besada, Vladimir. Center For Genetic Engineering And Biotechnology Havana; CubaFil: GonzĂĄlez, Luis Javier. Center For Genetic Engineering And Biotechnology Havana; Cub
    corecore