INTOXICAÇÃO MEDICAMENTOSA EM CRIANÇAS NO ESTADO DE GOIÁS: UMA ANÁLISE RETROSPECTIVA

As intoxicações infantis por medicamentos são muito comuns no Brasil e representam um problema de saúde pública. Estudar as causas destas intoxicações pode ajudar a identificar informações relevantes para o estabelecimento de medidas preventivas que possam contribuir na redução destes eventos toxicológicos. Desta forma, o objetivo deste estudo foi descrever o perfil das intoxicações infantis registradas no Centro de Informação Toxicológica de Goiás (CIT-GO), Brasil, no período de 2009 a 2011. Dos 1.286 registros de intoxicações por medicamentos no CIT-GO, mais da metade ocorreu em crianças do sexo feminino (52,6%) e com idade de 1 a 4 anos (67,41%). As intoxicações por via oral foram as mais comuns (77,44%), predominando a causa acidental (65,4%) e ocorreram principalmente nas residências (74,88%). Entre os medicamentos, os psicotrópicos foram os principais responsáveis pelas intoxicações (23,20%), sendo os benzodiazepínicos os mais utilizados (12,5%), seguidos dos analgésicos (7,2%) e dos antibióticos (6,6%). Os dados indicam que a falta de orientação, de armazenamento em local seguro e o uso voluntário indevido de medicamentos pela população são importantes fatores que contribuem para a ocorrência das intoxicações infantis no estado de Goiás

Photography-based taxonomy is inadequate, unnecessary, and potentially harmful for biological sciences

The question whether taxonomic descriptions naming new animal species without type specimen(s) deposited in collections should be accepted for publication by scientific journals and allowed by the Code has already been discussed in Zootaxa (Dubois & Nemésio 2007; Donegan 2008, 2009; Nemésio 2009a–b; Dubois 2009; Gentile & Snell 2009; Minelli 2009; Cianferoni & Bartolozzi 2016; Amorim et al. 2016). This question was again raised in a letter supported by 35 signatories published in the journal Nature (Pape et al. 2016) on 15 September 2016. On 25 September 2016, the following rebuttal (strictly limited to 300 words as per the editorial rules of Nature) was submitted to Nature, which on 18 October 2016 refused to publish it. As we think this problem is a very important one for zoological taxonomy, this text is published here exactly as submitted to Nature, followed by the list of the 493 taxonomists and collection-based researchers who signed it in the short time span from 20 September to 6 October 2016

Contribuição diferencial do hipocampo ventral e do complexo amidalóide na modulação de respostas defensivas inatas e condicionadas de camundongos

Quando os animais são confrontados com estímulos ambientais ameaçadores como a exposição ao predador ou estímulos como altura, iluminação e estímulos nociceptivos, exibem reações de defesa coordenadas e específicas. Nas últimas décadas, observa-se um crescente interesse pela utilização de estímulos naturalísticos para o estudo das bases neurais de emoções como o medo e ansiedade. Nesse contexto, o teste de exposição ao rato (RET), um novo modelo etológico de interação presa-predador, utilizando camundongos (presa) e ratos (predador), foi desenvolvido para avaliar a expressão de diferentes comportamentos defensivos na presa. Entretanto, poucos estudos foram conduzidos com esse modelo no intuito de investigar as bases neurais das respostas defensivas de camundongos expostos ao rato. Adicionalmente, evidências da literatura destacam que o hipocampo ventral (HV) e o complexo amidalóide (CA) parecem contribuir diferencialmente na modulação de respostas defensivas frente a estímulos proximais (predador) ou potenciais. Assim, o presente estudo foi conduzido para investigar o papel do HV e do CA nas respostas defensivas de camundongos exibidas diante do predador (rato) e do contexto associado ao predador. Para tal, o presente estudo foi dividido em quatro etapas. Na primeira delas, investigamos se o estresse da exposição ao predador no RET altera a secreção de corticosterona em camundongos e determinamos a magnitude e a duração desta secreção. Na segunda etapa, avaliamos o papel do HV e do CA, através da injeção local do agonista de receptores GABAA muscimol (0,1 μg/0,1 μl), na mediação de respostas comportamentais defensivas de camundongos expostos ao RET (situação proximal) e comparamos com aquelas apresentadas durante a exposição ao labirinto em cruz elevado (LCE - situação potencial). Subsequentemente, investigamos se camundongos expostos...When animals are confronted with environmental threatening situations such as exposure to a predator as well as to height, high illumination and nociceptive stimuli they exhibit defensive behaviors. Over the past decades there has been a growing interest by the neuroscientists in the use of naturalistic stimuli to the study of the neural systems of the emotions such as fear and anxiety. In this context, the Rat Exposure Test (RET) which is a new ethological model of prey-predator interaction using mice (prey) and rats (predator) was developed in order to evaluate the expression of different defensive behaviors in the prey. However few studies using this model have been carried out with the objective of investigating the neural systems of the defensive behaviors in mice exposed to rats. In addition, evidence in literature has shown that the ventral hippocampus (VH) and the amygdaloid complex (AC) contribute differentially in the modulation of defensive behaviors during exposure to either potential or immediate stimuli (predator). Thus, the present study was aimed at investigating the role of VH and AC in the modulation of defensive behaviors of mice when exposed to predators (rats) as well as the predatory context. The experiment comprised four parts: (i) to investigate both whether stress regarding the exposure to the predator alters the corticosterone secretion in mice and to determine the magnitude and the duration of this secretion; (ii) the role of VH and AC was evaluated through local microinjection of the GABAA receptor agonist muscimol (0,1 μg/0,1 μl) in the modulation of defensive behavioral responses of mice exposed to RET (proximal aversive situation). The responses then were compared to those presented during to the exposure to the elevated plus-maze (EPM - potential aversive situation); (iii) to investigate whether mice exposed to natural predator (rat) in RET exhibit... (Complete abstract click electronic access below)Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq

Ketoconazole- and fluconazole-induced embryotoxicity and skeletal anomalies in wistar rats: a comparative study

Ketoconazole and fluconazole are two broad-spectrum azole antifungals used for the treatment of superficial and systemic mycoses. Embryotoxicity and teratogenicity have been reported in some studies when those drugs are administered at high doses to pregnant rats. The aim of this study was to present a comparative study of embryotoxic effects as well as the skeletal anomalies in fetuses of Wistar rats which received ketoconazole and fluconazole at teratogenic doses on gestational days (GD) 6 through 15 (organogenesis period). On gestational day (GD) 21, the dams were euthanized and examined for standard parameters of reproductive outcome. Fetuses were stained with alizarin red and the bones of the head, trunk, forelimb and hindlimb were examined for detection of skeletal anomalies. The frequency of skeletal anomalies in the ketoconazole-treated group was significant when compared to the fluconazole and the control group

Increased corticosterone levels in mice subjected to the rat exposure test

In recent years, there has been a notable interest in studying prey-predator relationships to develop rodent-based models for the neurobehavioral aspects of stress and emotion. However, despite the growing use of transgenic mice and results showing important differences in the behavioral responses of rats and mice, little research has been conducted regarding the responses of mice to predators. The rat exposure test (RET), a recently developed and behaviorally validated prey-predator (mouse-rat)-based model, has proven to be a useful tool in evaluating the defensive responses of mice facing rats. To further validate the RET, we investigated the endocrine and behavioral responses of mice exposed to this apparatus. We first constructed a plasma corticosterone secretion curve in mice exposed to a rat or to an empty cage (control). Rat-exposed mice showed a pronounced rise in corticosterone levels that peaked 15 min from the beginning of the predator exposure. The corticosterone levels and behavioral responses of mice exposed to a rat or to a toy in the RET apparatus were then measured. We observed high plasma corticosterone levels along with clear avoidance behaviors represented by decreases in tunnel and surface area exploration and increases in risk assessment behaviors and freezing. This strongly suggests that the test elicits a repertoire of behavioral responses compatible with an aversion state and indicates that it is a promising model for the evaluation of prey-predator interactions. However, more physiological, neurochemical, and pharmacological studies are needed to further validate the test. (c) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq

Ventrolateral periaqueductal gray lesion attenuates nociception but does not change anxiety-like indices or fear-induced antinociception in mice

The exposure of rodents to an open elevated plus-maze (oEPM: four open arms raised from the floor) elicits naloxone-insensitive antinociception. Midazolam infusion into the dorsal portion of the periaque-ductal gray (dPAG), a structure of the descending inhibitory system of pain, failed to alter oEPM-induced antinociception. Chemical lesion of dorsomedial and dorsolateral PAG attenuated defensive behavior in the standard EPM (sEPM), an animal model of anxiety, but failed to change oEPM-induced antinociception. The present study investigated the effects of bilateral lesion, with the injection of NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartic acid), of the ventrolateral column of PAG (vIPAG) (i) on nociceptive response induced by 2.5% formalin injected into the right hind paw (nociception test) in mice exposed to the enclosed EPM (eEPM: four enclosed arms - a non-aversive situation) or to the oEPM and (ii) on anxiety indices in mice exposed to the sEPM without prior formalin injection. Results showed that oEPM-induced antinociception was not altered by lesion of vIPAG. Nevertheless, the lesion reduced the nociceptive response in mice exposed to the eEPM and increased general locomotor activity during the eEPM and oEPM exposure. Furthermore, vIPAG lesion did not alter anxiety-like indices in mice exposed to the sEPM. The results suggest that vIPAG does not play a role in oEPM-induced antinociception or in defensive reactions assessed in the sEPM. Moreover, vIPAG inactivation induces pain inhibition in mice not exposed to an aversive situation and seems to increase general activity. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq

Corticosterone does not change open elevated plus maze-induced antinociception in mice

It has been demonstrated that the exposure of rodents to the standard elevated plus-maze (sEPM: 2 open and 2 enclosed arms) elicits defensive behavioral reactions and antinociception and also activates the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. We have recently reported that EPM-induced antinociception is particularly observed when rats and mice are exposed to a totally open EPM (oEPM: 4 open arms). Given that the oEPM seems to be a more aversive situation than the sEPM, we hypothesized that oEPM exposure would induce higher plasma levels of corticosterone than sEPM exposure in mice. In this study, we investigated the influence of exposure to eEPM (enclosed EPM: 4 enclosed arms), sEPM or oEPM on plasma corticosterone levels in mice, with or without prior nociceptive stimulation (2.5% formalin injection into the right hind paw). We also tested whether the nociceptive response in the formalin test and oEPM-induced antinociception are altered by adrenalectomy. Results showed that oEPM-exposed mice spent less time licking the injected paw than sEPM- and eEPM-exposed animals. All three types of EPM exposure increased plasma corticosterone when compared to the basal group, but sEPM- and oEPM-exposed mice showed higher corticosterone levels than eEPM-exposed mice. Prior nociceptive stimulation (formalin injection) did not enhance the plasma corticosterone response induced by the three types of EPM exposure. Indeed, formalin injection appeared to provoke a ceiling effect on plasma corticosterone concentration. Furthermore, neither the nociceptive response in the formalin test nor oEPM-induced antinociception was changed by adrenalectomy. Present results suggest that oEPM antinociception does not depend on corticosterone release in mice. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved

Ethopharmacological evaluation of the rat exposure test: A prey-predator interaction test

The rat exposure test (RET) is a prey (mouse)-predator (rat) situation that activates brain defensive areas and elicits hormonal and defensive behavior in the mouse. Here, we investigated possible correlations between the spatiotemporal [time spent in protected (home chamber and tunnel) and unprotected (surface) compartments and frequency of entries into the three compartments] and ethological [e.g., duration of protected and unprotected stretched-attend postures (SAP), duration of contact with the rat's compartment] measures (Experiment 1). Secondly, we investigated the effects of systemic treatment with pro- or anti-aversive drugs on the behavior that emerged from the factor analysis (Experiment 2). The effects of chronic (21 days) imipramine and fluoxetine on defensive behavior were also investigated (Experiment 3). Exp. 1 revealed that the time in the protected compartment, protected SAP and rat contacts loaded on factor 1 (defensive behavior), while the total entries and unprotected SAP loaded on factor 2 (locomotor activity). Exp. 2 showed that alprazolam (but not diazepam) selectively changed the defensive factor. Caffeine produced a mild proaversive-like effect, whereas yohimbine only decreased locomotor activity (total entries). Fluoxetine (but not imipramine) produced a weak proaversive-like effect. 5-HT1A/5-HT2 receptor ligands did not change any behavioral measure. In Exp. 3, chronic fluoxetine (but not imipramine) attenuated the defensive behavior factor without changing locomotion. Given that the defensive factor was sensitive to drugs known to attenuate (alprazolam and chronic fluoxetine) and induce (caffeine) panic attack, we suggest the RET as a useful test to assess the effects of panicolytic and panicogenic drugs. © 2012 Elsevier B.V