Sustainable development path research on urban transportation based on synergistic and cost-effective analysis: A case of Guangzhou

Urban transportation plays an important role in slowing down global warming and controlling environmental pollution. To explore the sustainable development paths of Guangzhou transportation, the synergies and cost-effectiveness of emission mitigations on CO2 and air pollutants are quantitatively evaluated under different control measures in this paper. The radar chart analysis method, marginal abatement cost curves, and emission mitigation effect normalization are used to identify and evaluate the synergies and cost-effectiveness. The results show that the control measures to adjust transport modes and regulate private cars can achieve significant synergies and cost-effectiveness of emission mitigations on CO2 and air pollutants, and should be implemented as a high priority. In contrast, the control measures to promote the application of electricity, hydrogen energy, and bio-fuel have effective synergies, but with high costs, and should be implemented as a lower priority. Moreover, the control measures to popularize Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) have good cost-effectiveness, but with poor synergies due to the emission increments of HC and CO. Unless HC and CO emissions can be effectively reduced through the installation of terminal removal devices for air pollutants, the implementation of the control measures related to LNG will remain a low priority

In Search of Radical Democracy: The Ideological Character of Current Political Advocacies for Culture Change in Planning

This paper argues that current attempts to situate the crisis in planning in demoralised or old planning cultures are playing a key role in strengthening the ideological commitment of planning to an advanced liberal social order. In order to provide planners with the means to understand some of the ideological mechanisms at work in such processes, the 2007 Danish structural reform and the parallel advocacy for culture change in planning are analysed. Drawing on post-Marxist theories of Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe, the analysis draws attention to the need for reflection on whether the current ideological commitment of planning is that which best serves a democratic society