Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries

Abstract Background Healthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres. Methods This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was co-prioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low–middle-income countries. Results In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified, which had low uptake in practice according to 3042 professionals globally. In phase 2, a shortlist of 15 intervention domains was generated. In phase 3, interventions were deemed acceptable for more than 90 per cent of patients except for reducing general anaesthesia (84 per cent) and re-sterilization of ‘single-use’ consumables (86 per cent). In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for high-income countries were: introducing recycling; reducing use of anaesthetic gases; and appropriate clinical waste processing. In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for low–middle-income countries were: introducing reusable surgical devices; reducing use of consumables; and reducing the use of general anaesthesia. Conclusion This is a step toward environmentally sustainable operating environments with actionable interventions applicable to both high– and low–middle–income countries

Neurobiology of Delusions, Memory, and Insight in Alzheimer Disease

ObjectiveDelusional thoughts are common among patients with Alzheimer disease (AD) and may be conceptually linked to memory deficits (cannot recall accurate information, which leads to inaccurate beliefs) and poor insight (unable to appreciate the illogic of beliefs). This study's goals were to examine the clinical associations among delusions, memory deficits, and poor insight; explore neurobiologic correlates for these symptoms; and identify shared mechanisms.MethodsIn a cross-sectional analysis, 88 outpatients with AD (mean Mini-Mental State Exam score: 19.3) were studied. Delusional thoughts were assessed with the Neuropsychiatric Inventory, level of inaccurate insight was assessed with the Neurobehavioral Rating Scale, and memory was assessed with the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale memory subscale. (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography was used to measure regional cortical metabolism. Relationships between clinical ratings and regional cortical metabolic activity (voxel-based) were assessed using SPM2.ResultsPatients with delusions had lower Dementia Rating Scale memory subscale scores. Neurobehavioral Rating Scale inaccurate insight scores were no different in those with and without delusions. Cortical metabolic activity was lower in the right lateral frontal cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, and bilateral temporal cortex in patients with delusions. Low cortical metabolic activity in the right lateral, inferior, and medial temporal cortex was associated with poorer memory. This region partially overlapped the region of hypometabolism associated with delusions. In contrast, low cortical metabolic activity in bilateral medial frontal cortex was associated with poor insight.ConclusionDelusions in AD are associated with dysfunction in specific frontal and temporal cortical regions. Delusions are partially clinically and neurobiologically linked to memory deficits but not to poor insight