10 research outputs found
Setting Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in Mechanically Ventilated Patients Undergoing Surgery
Alveolar recruitment manoeuvre results in improved pulmonary function in obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery: a randomised trial
Body Habitus and Dynamic Surgical Conditions Independently Impair Pulmonary Mechanics during Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Surgery
Lung Atelectasis Promotes Immune and Barrier Dysfunction as Revealed by Transcriptome Sequencing in Female Sheep
The Protective Effects of Butorphanol on Pulmonary Function of Patients with Obesity Undergoing Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: a Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
Multimodal non-invasive monitoring to apply an open lung approach strategy in morbidly obese patients during bariatric surgery
To evaluate the use of non-invasive variables for monitoring an open-lung approach (OLA) strategy in bariatric surgery. Twelve morbidly obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery received a baseline protective ventilation with 8 cmH2O of positive-end expiratory pressure (PEEP). Then, the OLA strategy was applied consisting in lung recruitment followed by a decremental PEEP trial, from 20 to 8 cmH2O, in steps of 2 cmH2O to find the lung’s closing pressure. Baseline ventilation was then resumed setting open lung PEEP (OL-PEEP) at 2 cmH2O above this pressure. The multimodal non-invasive variables used for monitoring OLA consisted in pulse oximetry (SpO2), respiratory compliance (Crs), end-expiratory lung volume measured by a capnodynamic method (EELVCO2), and esophageal manometry. OL-PEEP was detected at 15.9 ± 1.7 cmH2O corresponding to a positive end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure (PL,ee) of 0.9 ± 1.1 cmH2O. ROC analysis showed that SpO2 was more accurate (AUC 0.92, IC95% 0.87–0.97) than Crs (AUC 0.76, IC95% 0.87–0.97) and EELVCO2 (AUC 0.73, IC95% 0.64–0.82) to detect the lung’s closing pressure according to the change of PL,ee from positive to negative values. Compared to baseline ventilation with 8 cmH2O of PEEP, OLA increased EELVCO2 (1309 ± 517 vs. 2177 ± 679 mL) and decreased driving pressure (18.3 ± 2.2 vs. 10.1 ± 1.7 cmH2O), estimated shunt (17.7 ± 3.4 vs. 4.2 ± 1.4%), lung strain (0.39 ± 0.07 vs. 0.22 ± 0.06) and lung elastance (28.4 ± 5.8 vs. 15.3 ± 4.3 cmH2O/L), respectively; all p < 0.0001. The OLA strategy can be monitored using noninvasive variables during bariatric surgery. This strategy decreased lung strain, elastance and driving pressure compared with standard protective ventilatory settings.Fil: Tusman, Gerardo. FundaciĂłn Medica de Mar del Plata. Hospital Privado de Comunidad; ArgentinaFil: Acosta, Cecilia Maria. FundaciĂłn Medica de Mar del Plata. Hospital Privado de Comunidad; ArgentinaFil: Ochoa, Marcos RaĂşl. FundaciĂłn Medica de Mar del Plata. Hospital Privado de Comunidad; ArgentinaFil: Böhm, Stephan H.. Universität Rostock; AlemaniaFil: Gogniat, Emiliano. Sociedad Argentina de Cuidados Intensivos; ArgentinaFil: Martinez Arca, Jorge. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de IngenierĂa. Departamento de IngenierĂa ElĂ©ctrica. Laboratorio de BioingenierĂa; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones CientĂficas y TĂ©cnicas. Centro CientĂfico TecnolĂłgico Conicet - Mar del Plata; ArgentinaFil: Scandurra, Adriana Gabriela. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de IngenierĂa. Departamento de IngenierĂa ElĂ©ctrica. Laboratorio de BioingenierĂa; ArgentinaFil: Madorno, MatĂas. Instituto TecnolĂłgico de Buenos Aires; ArgentinaFil: Ferrando, Carlos. Hospital ClĂnico Barcelona; EspañaFil: Suarez Sipmann, Fernando. Universidad Autonoma de Madrid. Hospital Universitario de la Princesa; España. Centro de InvestigaciĂłn BiomĂ©dica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias; España. Uppsala Universitet; Sueci