Utilisation non médicale des médicaments d’ordonnance chez les adolescents utilisant des drogues au Québec

Abstract : OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence and factors associated with nonmedical use of prescription medication (NMUPM) among adolescents who use drugs (ages 12 to 17 years) in Quebec. METHOD: Secondary data analyses were carried out with data from a 6-month study, namely, the 2010-2011 Quebec Health Survey of High School Students-a large-scale survey that sought to gain a better understanding of the health and well-being of young Quebecers in high school. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to study NMUPM among adolescents who use drugs, according to sociodemographic characteristics, peer characteristics, health indicators (anxiety, depression, or attention-deficit disorder [ADD] with or without hyperactivity), self-competency, family environment, and substance use (alcohol and drug use) factors. RESULTS: Among adolescents who had used drugs in the previous 12 months, 5.4% (95% CI 4.9% to 6.0%) reported NMUPM. Based on multivariate analyses, having an ADD (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.47; 95% CI 1.13 to 1.91), anxiety disorder (AOR 2.14; 95% CI 1.57 to 2.92), low self-esteem (AOR 1.62; 95% CI 1.26 to 2.08), low self-control (AOR 1.95; 95% CI 1.55 to 2.45), low parental supervision (AOR 1.43; 95% CI 1.11 to 1.83), regular alcohol use (AOR 1.72; 95% CI 1.36 to 2.16), and polysubstance use (AOR 4.09; 95% CI 3.06 to 5.48) were associated with increased odds of reporting NMUPM. CONCLUSIONS: The observed prevalence of NMUPM was lower than expected. However, the associations noted with certain mental health disorders and regular or heavy use of other psychoactive substances are troubling. Clinical implications are discussed.OBJECTIF: Déterminer la prévalence de l’utilisation non médicale des médicaments d’ordonnance (UNMMO) et les facteurs qui y sont associés chez les adolescents (de 12 à 17 ans) qui utilisent des drogues au Québec. MÉTHODE: Des analyses de données secondaires ont été exécutées avec les données d’une étude de 6 mois, l’Enquête québécoise sur la santé des jeunes du secondaire 2010-2011, une enquête de grande envergure visant à obtenir une meilleure compréhension de la santé et du bien-être des jeunes québécois du secondaire. Des analyses de régression logistique bivariée et multivariée ont été menées pour étudier l’UNMMO chez les adolescents qui utilisent des drogues, selon les facteurs des caractéristiques sociodémographiques, des caractéristiques des pairs, des indicateurs de la santé (anxiété, dépression, ou trouble de déficit de l’attention [TDA] avec ou sans hyperactivité), de l’autoefficacité, de l’environnement familial, et de l’utilisation de substances (utilisation d’alcool et de drogues). RÉSULTATS: Parmi les adolescents qui avaient utilisé des drogues dans les 12 mois précédents, 5,4 % (IC à 95 % 4,9 % à 6,0 %) déclaraient une UNMMO. Selon les analyses multivariées, un TDA (ratio de cotes ajusté [RCC] 1,47; IC à 95 % 1,13 à 1,91), un trouble anxieux (RCC 2,14; IC à 95 % 1,57 à 2,92), une faible estime de soi (RCC 1,62; IC à 95 % 1,26 à 2,08), un faible autocontrôle (RCC 1,95; IC à 95 % 1,55 à 2,45), une faible supervision parentale (RCC 1,43; IC à 95 % 1,11 à 1,83), une utilisation d’alcool régulière (RCC 1,72; IC à 95 % 1,36 à 2,16), et une utilisation de polysubstances (RCC 4,09; IC à 95 % 3,06 à 5,48) étaient associés à des probabilités accrues de déclarer une UNMMO. CONCLUSIONS: La prévalence observée de l’UNMMO était plus faible que prévu. Cependant, les associations notées entre certains troubles de santé mentale et l’utilisation régulière ou intensive d’autres substances psychoactives sont inquiétantes. Les implications cliniques sont discutées

"I love having benzos after my coke shot": The use of psychotropic medication among cocaine users in downtown Montreal

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Cocaine abuse is a major public health issue due to its role in the HIV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) epidemics in North America. A significant area of concern among people who use cocaine (PWUC), injected or smoked, is their frequent misuse of prescription drugs, particularly psychotropic medication (PM), such as tranquilizers, sedatives, stimulants, and antipsychotics. This paper aims to describe and understand practices of PM use among PWUC in downtown Montreal. METHOD: Ethnographic methods including participant observation and semi-structured interviews were used in an iterative manner. RESULTS: Two thirds of the 50 participants were male. They ranged in age from 20 to 60 and most were homeless. A significant proportion of them reported polydrug use patterns that included frequent concomitant opioid use (heroin and/or prescription opioids (PO)). Benzodiazepine-based tranquilizers and the atypical antipsychotic quetiapine were the most frequently used PM. Routes of PM administration were oral, nasal and, to a lesser degree, intravenous. Five main PM use practices were identified: 1) "downers" from cocaine high (benzodiazepines and quetiapine); 2) enhancers of heroin/PO effects (benzodiazepines); 3) reducers or suppressors of heroin/PO withdrawal symptoms (benzodiazepines); 4) enablers of a different type of "trip" (benzodiazepines); and 5) treatment for mental and physical problems (benzodiazepines and quetiapine). CONCLUSION: PM use practices showed several complementary functions that PM fulfill in a context of polydrug use. The soothing and stimulating effects of PM reinforce the patterns of drug use among participants, posing various risks including overdose, HIV/HCV transmission, PM dependence and accidents. The results highlight the need for clinicians to assess clients' substance use patterns when prescribing PM and to question PWUC about PM use. The findings also underline certain unmet service needs in relation to overdose, HIV/HCV and mental health prevention/treatment among cocaine users

Persistence of low drug treatment coverage for injection drug users in large US metropolitan areas

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Objectives</p> <p>Injection drug users (IDUs) are at high risk for HIV, hepatitis, overdose and other harms. Greater drug treatment availability has been shown to reduce these harms among IDUs. Yet, little is known about changes in drug treatment availability for IDUs in the U.S. This paper investigates change in drug treatment coverage for IDUs in 90 metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) during 1993-2002.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We define <it>treatment coverage </it>as the percent of IDUs who are in treatment. The number of IDUs in drug treatment is calculated from treatment entry data and treatment census data acquired from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Service Administration, divided by our estimated number of IDUs in each MSA.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Treatment coverage was low in 1993 (mean 6.7%; median 6.0%) and only increased to a mean of 8.3% and median of 8.0% coverage in 2002.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Although some MSAs experienced increases in treatment coverage over time, overall levels of coverage were low. The persistence of low drug treatment coverage for IDUs represents a failure by the U.S. health care system to prevent avoidable harms and unnecessary deaths in this population. Policy makers should expand drug treatment for IDUs to reduce blood-borne infections and community harms associated with untreated injection drug use.</p

Genetic and environmental risk factors in the non-medical use of over-the-counter or prescribed analgesics, and their relationship to major classes of licit and illicit substance use and misuse in a population-based sample of young adult twins

Background and Aims: The non-medical use of over-the-counter or prescribed analgesics (NMUA) is a significant public health problem. Little is known about the genetic and environmental etiology of NMUA and how these risks relate to other classes of substance use and misuse. Our aims were to estimate the heritability NMUA and sources of genetic and environmental covariance with cannabis and nicotine use, cannabis and alcohol use disorders and nicotine dependence in Australian twins. Design: Biometrical genetic analyses or twin methods using structural equation univariate and multivariate modeling. Setting: Australia. Participants: A total of 2007 young adult twins [66% female; μ\ua0=\ua025.9, standard deviation (SD)\ua0=\ua03.6, range\ua0=\ua018–38] from the Brisbane Longitudinal Twin Study retrospectively assessed between 2009 and 2016. Measurements: Self-reported NMUA (non-opioid or opioid-based), life-time nicotine, cannabis and opioid use, DSM-V cannabis and alcohol use disorders and the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence. Findings: Life-time NMUA was reported by 19.4% of the sample. Univariate heritability explained 46% [95% confidence interval (CI)\ua0=\ua00.29–0.57] of the risks in NMUA. Multivariate analyses revealed that NMUA is moderately associated genetically with cannabis (r\ua0=\ua00.41) and nicotine (r\ua0=\ua00.45) use and nicotine dependence (r\ua0=\ua00.34). In contrast, the genetic correlations with cannabis (r\ua0=\ua00.15) and alcohol (r\ua0=\ua00.07) use disorders are weak. Conclusions: In young male and female adults in Australia, the non-medical use of over-the-counter or prescribed analgesics appears to have moderate heritability. NMUA is moderately associated with cannabis and nicotine use and nicotine dependence. Its genetic etiology is largely distinct from that of cannabis and alcohol use disorders

“Hitting the wall”: Lived experiences of mental health crises

Background : As Norway moves toward the provision of home-based crisis response, knowledge is needed about understandings of mental health crisis and effective ways of addressing crises within the home. Objective : To elicit and learn from service users&#x2019; experiences about the subjective meanings of crisis and what kind of help will be most effective in resolving mental health crises. Theoretical : A phenomenological-hermeneutic cooperative inquiry method was used to elicit and analyse focus group responses from mental health service users who had experienced crises. Results : Findings clustered into three themes: (1) Crisis as multifaceted and varied experiences; (2) losing the skills and structure of everyday life; and (3) complexities involved in family support. Conclusion : Several aspects of crises require an expansion of the biomedical model of acute intervention to include consideration of the personal and familial meaning of the crisis, attention to the home context, and activities of daily living that are disrupted by the crisis, and ways for the person and the family to share in and learn from resolution of the crisis