30 research outputs found
Managing pain and inflammation associated with musculoskeletal disease: time for a change?
Acute inflammation is a necessary part of successful healing after musculoskeletal insult. Disruption or prolongation of this process can lead to suboptimal outcomesCitation1. Blocking pro-inflammation pathways by means of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is routinely used to manage pain and inflammationCitation2. Such treatment continues to be advocated by authors in this journalCitation3. While often symptomatically beneficial and of potential value in breaking the pain cycle and helping clinicians clarify the relative importance of inflammation in a patientâs symptoms, their use may encourage harmful pain-masking, interfere with tissue healing (homeostasis), promote chronicity and predispose to re-injuryCitation4â6. Furthermore, potentially serious side effects of NSAIDs are well establishedCitation7. There is currently much interest in the potential of moving from treatments which inhibit inflammation to those promoting resolution, a new area of scientific research termed âresolution pharmacologyâCitation8. For patients who have suffered injury or are experiencing acute or acute on chronic osteoarthritis symptoms is there currently enough evidence to justify a shift in therapeutic approach towards pro-resolution strategies?Peer Reviewe
ICON 2019: International Scientific Tendinopathy Symposium Consensus: Clinical Terminology
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.Background Persistent tendon pain that impairs function has inconsistent medical terms that can influence choice of treatment.1 When a person is told they have tendinopathy by clinician A or tendinitis by clinician B, they might feel confused or be alarmed at receiving what they might perceive as two different diagnoses. This may lead to loss of confidence in their health professional and likely adds to uncertainty if they were to search for information about their condition. Clear and uniform terminology also assists inter-professional communication. Inconsistency in terminology for painful tendon disorders is a problem at numerous anatomical sites. Historically, the term âtendinitisâ was first used to describe tendon pain, thickening and impaired function (online supplementary figure S1). The term âtendinosisâ has also been used in a small number of publications, some of which were very influential.2 3 Subsequently, âtendinopathyâ emerged as the most common term for persistent tendon pain.4 5 To our knowledge, experts (clinicians and researchers) or patients have never engaged in a formal process to discuss the terminology we use. We believe that health professionals have not yet agreed on the appropriate terminology for painful tendon conditions.Peer reviewedFinal Accepted Versio
ICON 2019âInternational Scientific Tendinopathy Symposium Consensus: There are nine core health-related domains for tendinopathy (CORE DOMAINS): Delphi study of healthcare professionals and patients
Background: The absence of any agreed-upon tendon health-related domains hampers advances in clinical tendinopathy research. This void means that researchers report a very wide range of outcome measures inconsistently. As a result, substantial synthesis/meta-analysis of tendon research findings is almost futile despite researchers publishing busily. We aimed to determine options for, and then define, core health-related domains for tendinopathy.
Methods: We conducted a Delphi study of healthcare professionals (HCP) and patients in a three-stage process. In stage 1, we extracted candidate domains from clinical trial reports and developed an online survey. Survey items took the form: âThe âcandidate domainâ is important enough to be included as a core health-related domain of tendinopathyâ; response options were: agree, disagree, or unsure. In stage 2, we administered the online survey and reported the findings. Stage 3 consisted of discussions of the findings of the survey at the ICON (International Scientific Tendinopathy Symposium Consensus) meeting. We set 70% participant agreement as the level required for a domain to be considered âcoreâ; similarly, 70% agreement was required for a domain to be relegated to ânot coreâ (see Results next).
Results: Twenty-eight HCP (92% of whom had >10 years of tendinopathy experience, 71% consulted >10 cases per month) and 32 patients completed the online survey. Fifteen HCP and two patients attended the consensus meeting. Of an original set of 24 candidate domains, the ICON group deemed nine domains to be core. These were: (1) patient rating of condition, (2) participation in life activities (day to day, work, sport), (3) pain on activity/loading, (4) function, (5) psychological factors, (6) physical function capacity, (7) disability, (8) quality of life and (9) pain over a specified time. Two of these (2, 6) were an amalgamation of five candidate domains. We agreed that seven other candidate domains were not core domains: range of motion, pain on clinician applied test, clinical examination, palpation, drop out, sensory modality pain and pain without other specification. We were undecided on the other five candidate domains of physical activity, structure, medication use, adverse effects and economic impact.
Conclusion: Nine core domains for tendon research should guide reporting of outcomes in clinical trials. Further research should determine the best outcome measures for each specific tendinopathy (ie, core outcome sets)
10â Recommended core outcome domains for tendinopathy derived from a delphi of patients and health care professionals: the groningen ISTS2018 consensus
n/
GWAS on longitudinal growth traits reveals different genetic factors influencing infant, child, and adult BMI
Early childhood growth patterns are associated with adult health, yet the genetic factors and the developmental stages involved are not fully understood. Here, we combine genome-wide association studies with modeling of longitudinal growth traits to study the genetics of infant and child growth, followed by functional, pathway, genetic correlation, risk score, and colocalization analyses to determine how developmental timings, molecular pathways, and genetic determinants of these traits overlap with those of adult health. We found a robust overlap between the genetics of child and adult body mass index (BMI), with variants associated with adult BMI acting as early as 4 to 6 years old. However, we demonstrated a completely distinct genetic makeup for peak BMI during infancy, influenced by variation at the LEPR/LEPROT locus. These findings suggest that different genetic factors control infant and child BMI. In light of the obesity epidemic, these findings are important to inform the timing and targets of prevention strategies
IL-1ÎČ promotes ADAMTS enzyme-mediated aggrecan degradation through NF-ÎșB in human intervertebral disc
Exercise and menstrual function
Up to four fifths of women who exercise vigorously may have some form of menstrual dysfunctio