Creation of a gridded time series of hydrological variables for Canada

There is a lack of measured, long-term, reliable, and well-distributed hydrological variables in Canada. These hydrological variables include, but are not limited to: temperature, precipitation, ground runoff, evapotranspiration, soil moisture, and snow water equivalent. The objective of this thesis was to establish the best possible distributed estimates of these hydrological variables for Canada over the period of 1961-2000. The first step was to interpolate measured temperature and precipitation across the country. These interpolated values were then used to calculate the other hydrological variables using the Waterloo Flood Forecasting Model (WATFLOOD). The Waterloo Mapping technique (WATMAP) was developed to use topographic and land cover databases to automatically and systematically derive the information needed to create the drainage database. WATFLOOD was calibrated with the Dynamically Dimensioned Search (DDS) algorithm using the difference between the measured and simulated streamflow as the objective function. After a final calibration of 100 separate DDS runs, distributed time series for the hydrological variables were created. A simple assessment was made for the predictive uncertainty in the simulated streamflow results based on the results of the final calibration. As well, the implications of various climate change scenarios were examined in the context of how they would change the hydrological variables. The major recommendations for future study included: finding other gridded datasets that could be used to verify the ones that were created in this study and examining further the magnitudes of the different kinds of predictive uncertainty (data, model, and parameter). The results of this thesis fit in well with the goals of the study on Predictions in Ungauged Basins. This thesis was organized along the principle of “design the process, not the product”. As such, although a set of final products are presented at the end, the most important part of the thesis was the process that achieved these products. Thus it is not assumed that every technique designed in this thesis will be applicable to every other researcher, but it hoped that most researchers in the field will be able to use at least some parts of the techniques developed here

Great Lakes Runoff Intercomparison Project Phase 3: Lake Erie (GRIP-E)

Hydrologic model intercomparison studies help to evaluate the agility of models to simulate variables such as streamflow, evaporation, and soil moisture. This study is the third in a sequence of the Great Lakes Runoff Intercomparison Projects. The densely populated Lake Erie watershed studied here is an important international lake that has experienced recent flooding and shoreline erosion alongside excessive nutrient loads that have contributed to lake eutrophication. Understanding the sources and pathways of flows is critical to solve the complex issues facing this watershed. Seventeen hydrologic and land-surface models of different complexity are set up over this domain using the same meteorological forcings, and their simulated streamflows at 46 calibration and seven independent validation stations are compared. Results show that: (1) the good performance of Machine Learning models during calibration decreases significantly in validation due to the limited amount of training data; (2) models calibrated at individual stations perform equally well in validation; and (3) most distributed models calibrated over the entire domain have problems in simulating urban areas but outperform the other models in validation

Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries

Abstract Background Healthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres. Methods This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was co-prioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low–middle-income countries. Results In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified, which had low uptake in practice according to 3042 professionals globally. In phase 2, a shortlist of 15 intervention domains was generated. In phase 3, interventions were deemed acceptable for more than 90 per cent of patients except for reducing general anaesthesia (84 per cent) and re-sterilization of ‘single-use’ consumables (86 per cent). In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for high-income countries were: introducing recycling; reducing use of anaesthetic gases; and appropriate clinical waste processing. In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for low–middle-income countries were: introducing reusable surgical devices; reducing use of consumables; and reducing the use of general anaesthesia. Conclusion This is a step toward environmentally sustainable operating environments with actionable interventions applicable to both high– and low–middle–income countries