Identification of prognosis-related gene features in low-grade glioma based on ssGSEA

Low-grade gliomas (LGG) are commonly seen in clinical practice, and the prognosis is often poor. Therefore, the determination of immune-related risk scores and immune-related targets for predicting prognoses in patients with LGG is crucial. A single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) was performed on 22 immune gene sets to calculate immune-based prognostic scores. The prognostic value of the 22 immune cells for predicting overall survival (OS) was assessed using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and univariate and multivariate Cox analyses. Subsequently, we constructed a validated effector T-cell risk score (TCRS) to identify the immune subtypes and inflammatory immune features of LGG patients. We divided an LGG patient into a high-risk–score group and a low-risk–score group based on the optimal cutoff value. Kaplan–Meier survival curve showed that patients in the low-risk–score group had higher OS. We then identified the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between the high-risk–score group and low-risk-score group and obtained 799 upregulated genes and 348 downregulated genes. The analysis of the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) and Gene Ontology (GO) show that DEGs were mainly concentrated in immune-related processes. In order to further explore the immune-related genes related to prognosis, we constructed a protein–protein interaction (PPI) network using Cytoscape and then identified the 50 most crucial genes. Subsequently, nine DEGs were found to be significantly associated with OS based on univariate and multivariate Cox analyses. It was further confirmed that CD2, SPN, IL18, PTPRC, GZMA, and TLR7 were independent prognostic factors for LGG through batch survival analysis and a nomogram prediction model. In addition, we used an RT-qPCR assay to validate the bioinformatics results. The results showed that CD2, SPN, IL18, PTPRC, GZMA, and TLR7 were highly expressed in LGG. Our study can provide a reference value for the prediction of prognosis in LGG patients and may help in the clinical development of effective therapeutic agents

The evolving SARS-CoV-2 epidemic in Africa: Insights from rapidly expanding genomic surveillance

INTRODUCTION Investment in Africa over the past year with regard to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) sequencing has led to a massive increase in the number of sequences, which, to date, exceeds 100,000 sequences generated to track the pandemic on the continent. These sequences have profoundly affected how public health officials in Africa have navigated the COVID-19 pandemic. RATIONALE We demonstrate how the first 100,000 SARS-CoV-2 sequences from Africa have helped monitor the epidemic on the continent, how genomic surveillance expanded over the course of the pandemic, and how we adapted our sequencing methods to deal with an evolving virus. Finally, we also examine how viral lineages have spread across the continent in a phylogeographic framework to gain insights into the underlying temporal and spatial transmission dynamics for several variants of concern (VOCs). RESULTS Our results indicate that the number of countries in Africa that can sequence the virus within their own borders is growing and that this is coupled with a shorter turnaround time from the time of sampling to sequence submission. Ongoing evolution necessitated the continual updating of primer sets, and, as a result, eight primer sets were designed in tandem with viral evolution and used to ensure effective sequencing of the virus. The pandemic unfolded through multiple waves of infection that were each driven by distinct genetic lineages, with B.1-like ancestral strains associated with the first pandemic wave of infections in 2020. Successive waves on the continent were fueled by different VOCs, with Alpha and Beta cocirculating in distinct spatial patterns during the second wave and Delta and Omicron affecting the whole continent during the third and fourth waves, respectively. Phylogeographic reconstruction points toward distinct differences in viral importation and exportation patterns associated with the Alpha, Beta, Delta, and Omicron variants and subvariants, when considering both Africa versus the rest of the world and viral dissemination within the continent. Our epidemiological and phylogenetic inferences therefore underscore the heterogeneous nature of the pandemic on the continent and highlight key insights and challenges, for instance, recognizing the limitations of low testing proportions. We also highlight the early warning capacity that genomic surveillance in Africa has had for the rest of the world with the detection of new lineages and variants, the most recent being the characterization of various Omicron subvariants. CONCLUSION Sustained investment for diagnostics and genomic surveillance in Africa is needed as the virus continues to evolve. This is important not only to help combat SARS-CoV-2 on the continent but also because it can be used as a platform to help address the many emerging and reemerging infectious disease threats in Africa. In particular, capacity building for local sequencing within countries or within the continent should be prioritized because this is generally associated with shorter turnaround times, providing the most benefit to local public health authorities tasked with pandemic response and mitigation and allowing for the fastest reaction to localized outbreaks. These investments are crucial for pandemic preparedness and response and will serve the health of the continent well into the 21st century